1
Carsten J. After kinship. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=47760&src=0
2
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
3
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
4
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
5
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
6
Clifford J. Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world. In: Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 1992. 172–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=803f5b2a-6469-e811-80cd-005056af4099
7
Lambek M, Strathern AJ. Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. In: Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. 53–79.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a95014e-a34a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
8
Comaroff JL, Comaroff J. On personhood: an anthropological perspective from Africa. Social identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 2001;7:267–83. doi:10.1080/13504630120065310
9
Valentine DE. Fluid signs: being a person the Tamil way. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984.
10
Lambek M, Strathern AJ. Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
11
Leenhardt M, Gulati BM. Do Kamo: person and myth in the Melanesian world. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1979.
12
Strathern M. The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1988. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=837207
13
Vilaca A. Dividuality in Amazonia: God, the Devil, and the constitution of personhood in Wari’ Christianity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:243–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01678.x
14
Godelier M, Strathern M. Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia. In: Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. 159–73.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ad1b5c5e-6369-e811-80cd-005056af4099
15
Wikan U. Managing turbulent hearts: a Balinese formula for living. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1990.
16
Young MW. Magicians of manumanua: living myth in Kalauna. In: Magicians of manumanua: living myth in Kalauna. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1983. 9–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=000baae0-b82a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
17
Sahlins M. What kinship is (part one). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:2–19.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011568?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
18
Sahlins M. What kinship is (part two). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:227–42.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011369?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
19
Rumsey A. Agency, Personhood and the ‘I’ of Discourse in the Pacific and Beyond. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2000;6:101–15.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2660767?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
20
Kuper A. We need to talk about kinship. Anthropology of this Century Published Online First: 2018.http://aotcpress.com/articles/talk-kinship/
21
Carsten J. What kinship does – and how. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:245–51. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.013
22
BLOCH M. What kind of "is” is Sahlins’ "is”? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:253–7. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.014
23
Brightman R. Hierarchy and conflict in mutual being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:259–70. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.015
24
Shryock A. It’s this, not that. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:271–9. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.016
25
Feuchtwang S. What is kinship? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:281–4. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.017
26
Edwards J. Donor siblings. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:285–92. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.018
27
Fausto C. The kinship I and the kinship other. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:293–7. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.019
28
Kapila K. . . . In South Asia. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:299–304. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.020
29
Hamberger K. The order of intersubjectivity. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:305–7. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.021
30
Robbins J. On kinship and comparsion, intersubjectivity and mutuality of being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:309–16. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.022
31
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
32
Ouroussoff A. Illusions of Rationality: False Premisses of the Liberal Tradition. Man 1993;28. doi:10.2307/2803414
33
Rose N. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. In: Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. London: : Free Asociation 1999. 217–32.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=25baa017-6669-e811-80cd-005056af4099
34
Rose N. Inventing our selves: psychology, power, and personhood. In: Inventing our selves: psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996. 1–21.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e3e65be9-5d30-e911-80cd-005056af4099
35
Spiro ME. Is the Western conception of the self ‘peculiar’ within the context of the world cultures? Ethos 1993;21:107–53.http://www.jstor.org/stable/640371?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. In: After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992. 47–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9b2c6073-3d30-e911-80cd-005056af4099
37
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
38
Bialecki J, Daswani G. What is an individual? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:271–94. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.013
39
Chua L. Horizontal and vertical relations. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:339–59. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.016
40
Mosko MS. Unbecoming individuals. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:361–93. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.017
41
Lambek M. The continuous and discontinuous person: two dimensions of ethical life. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2013;19:837–58. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12073
42
Benedict R. Anthropology and the abnormal. Journal of General Psychology. 1934;10:59–82.https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/texts/201/Benedict,%20Anthropology.pdf
43
Heller, Thomas C., Brooke-Rose, Christine. Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought. In: Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought. Stanford, CA.: : Stanford University Press 1986. 222–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4160b4d4-a44a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
44
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000.
45
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. In: Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000. 229–54.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb846ae2-9c2f-e911-80cd-005056af4099
46
Dupre J. Normal people. Social Research;65:221–48.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=sih&AN=823543&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
47
Hacking I. The taming of chance. In: The taming of chance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. 160–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1a399255-6269-e811-80cd-005056af4099
48
Jenkins R, Angrosino MV. Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability. In: Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. 1–24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=221787bf-062e-e911-80cd-005056af4099
49
Overing J, Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth. Reason and morality. London: : Tavistock Publications 1985. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=6738&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
50
Hacking I. Kinds of people, moving targets. 2006.https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pba151p285.pdf
51
Street A. Seen by the state: bureaucracy, visibility and governmentality in a Papua New Guinean hospital. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 2012;23:1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00164.x
52
Hacking I. How we have been learning to talk about autism: a role for stories. Metaphilosophy 2009;40:499–516. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x
53
Grinker RR, Cho K. Border Children: Interpreting Autism Spectrum Disorder in South Korea. Ethos 2013;41:46–74. doi:10.1111/etho.12002
54
Hacking I. The social construction of what? In: The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999. 125–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c6d6a8d1-e264-e811-80cd-005056af4099
55
Hacking I. Mad travellers: reflections on the reality of transient mental illnesses. London: : Free Association Books 1999.
56
Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ. Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. In: Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995. 351–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=995d09bd-de2d-e911-80cd-005056af4099
57
Kertzer DI, Arel D. Census and identity: the politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
58
Martin E. Bipolar expeditions: mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2007.
59
Martin E. Flexible survivors. Cultural Values 2000;4:512–7. doi:10.1080/14797580009367214
60
Street A. Biomedicine in an unstable place: infrastructure and personhood in a Papua New Guinean hospital. Durham: : Duke University Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1790881
61
Lock MM, Young A, Cambrosio A. Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry. In: Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cdfbb5e6-6b69-e811-80cd-005056af4099
62
Lindenbaum S, Lock MM. Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everday life. London: : University of California Press 1993.
63
Antze P, Lambek M. Tense past: cultural essays in trauma and memory. New York: : Routledge 1996.
64
Breslau J. Cultures of trauma: Anthropological views of posttraumatic stress disorder in international health - Introduction. Culture, medicine and psychiatry 1AD;28:113–26.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/B%3AMEDI.0000034421.07612.c8
65
Fassin D, Rechtman R. The empire of trauma: an inquiry into the condition of victimhood. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2009.
66
Hacking I. Rewriting the soul: multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1995. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=617285
67
Kirmayer LJ. Psychotherapy and the Cultural Concept of the Person. Transcultural Psychiatry 2007;44:232–57. doi:10.1177/1363461506070794
68
Kleinman A. Writing at the margin: discourse between anthropology and medicine. In: Writing at the margin: discourse between anthropology and medicine. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1995. 173–89.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9d551751-822b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
69
Krause I-B. Personhood, culture and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 1995;17:363–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x
70
Summerfield D. A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas. Social Science & Medicine 1999;48:1449–62. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00450-X
71
Young A. The harmony of illusions: inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1995. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=617290
72
Broch-Due V, Bertelsen BE, editors. Violent reverberations: global modalities of trauma. Cham, Switzerland: : Palgrave Macmillan 2016.
73
Krause I-B. Personhood, culture and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 1995;17:363–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x
74
Lindenbaum S, Lock MM. Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everday life. In: Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everday life. London: : University of California Press 1993. 330–63.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7bfb3b7b-982b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
75
Lock MM, Nguyen V-K. An anthropology of biomedicine. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=254770&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
76
Lock MM. Encounters with aging: mythologies of menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1993.
77
Margaret Lock. New Japanese Mythologies: Faltering Discipline and the Ailing Housewife. American Ethnologist 1988;15:43–61. doi:10.1525/ae.1988.15.1.02a00040
78
Martin E. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. In: The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, Mass: : Beacon Press 2001. 166–78.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4c19aa6e-6569-e811-80cd-005056af4099
79
Zeserson JM. Chi no michi as metaphor: Conversations with Japanese women about menopause. Anthropology & Medicine 2001;8:177–99. doi:10.1080/13648470120101363
80
Erol M. Tales of the Second Spring: Menopause in Turkey Through the Narratives of Menopausal Women and Gynecologists. Medical Anthropology 2009;28:368–96. doi:10.1080/01459740903303969
81
Rabinow P. Essays on the anthropology of reason. In: Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1996. 91–111.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=99186035-f463-e811-80cd-005056af4099
82
Franklin S, McKinnon S. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2001. 384–409.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2d501e99-fa63-e811-80cd-005056af4099
83
Finkler K. The Kin in the Gene. Current Anthropology 2001;42:235–63. doi:10.1086/320004
84
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature--culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory 2003;3:65–85. doi:10.1177/1463499603003001752
85
Ian Hacking. Genetics, Biosocial Groups & the Future of Identity. Daedalus 2006;135:81–95. doi:10.1162/daed.2006.135.4.81
86
Hoyer K. Conflicting Notions of Personhood in Genetic Research. Anthropology Today 2002;18:9–13. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.00129
87
Pálsson G. Genomic Anthropology: Coming In from the Cold? Current Anthropology 2008;49:545–68. doi:10.1086/529545
88
Gâisli Pâalsson. Anthropology and the new genetics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
89
Strathern M. Kinship, law and the unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. In: Kinship, law and the unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press 2005. 15–32.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2620a277-c62a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
90
Strathern M. Kinship, law and the unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
91
Pálsson G. Decode Me! Current Anthropology 2012;53:S185–95. doi:10.1086/662291
