1.
Virgo G. The principles of equity & trusts. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Seventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Davies PS, Virgo G. Equity & trusts: text, cases, and materials. Second edition. Burn EH, editor. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
4.
Pettit PH. Equity and the law of trusts [Internet]. 12th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=557723&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
5.
Haley MA, McMurtry L. Equity and trusts. Fourth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2014.
6.
Hudson A. Equity and trusts. 9th edition. New York: Routledge; 2017.
7.
Wilson S, Todd P, Wilson S. Todd & Wilson’s textbook on trusts & equity. 12th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.
8.
Pearce RA, Stevens J, Barr W. The law of trusts and equitable obligations: Robert Pearce, John Stevens, Warren Barr. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
9.
Swadling W. The Quistclose trust: critical essays [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2004. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=80856&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
10.
Scott-Hunt S, Lim H. Feminist perspectives on equity and trusts [Internet]. London: Cavendish; 2001. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=16703&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
11.
Jaffey P. Private law and property claims. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2007.
12.
Gardner S. An introduction to the law of trusts. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
13.
Hayton DJ. The law of trusts. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2003.
14.
Sharon K. Dobbins. Equity: The Court of Conscience or the King’s Command, the Dialogues of St. German and Hobbes Compared. Journal of Law and Religion [Internet]. 1991;9(1):113–149. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/1051110?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
15.
Mike Macnair. Equity and Conscience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 2007;27(4):659–681. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/20185349?pq-origsite=summon
16.
Dunn A. Equity is dead. Long live equity! The modern law review [Internet]. Vol. 62(No. 1):140–150. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097080
17.
Pawlowski M. Unconscionability as a unifying concept in equity. Denning law journal [Internet]. 2001;16(1):79–96. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unconscionability+as+a+Unifying+Concept+in+Equity&rft.jtitle=Denning+Law+Journal&rft.au=Pawlowski%2C+Mark&rft.date=2001&rft.pub=University+of+Buckingham+Press&rft.issn=0269-1922&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=96&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=n%2Fa&paramdict=en-US
18.
Burrows A. We do this at common law but that in equity. Oxford journal of legal studies [Internet]. Volume 22(Issue 1):1–16. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600632
19.
Hayton DJ. Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2001;117(Jan):96–108. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=104
20.
Oakley AJ, International Conference on Trust Law. Trends in contemporary trust law [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=635df98c-a14a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
21.
Mason A. The place of equity and equitable remedies in the contemporary common law world. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1994;110(Apr):238–259. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=ICD027BC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=110
22.
Gretton GL. Trusts without equity. International and comparative law quarterly [Internet]. 2000;Vol. 49(No. 3):599–620. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/761397
23.
Thornton R. Ethical investments: a case of disjointed thinking. The Cambridge law journal [Internet]. Volume 67(Issue 02):396–422. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730800038X
24.
Langbein JH. The contractarian basis of the law of trusts. The Yale law journal [Internet]. Vol. 105(No. 3):625–675. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/797196
25.
Otto, Dianne. A Barren Future? Equity’s Conscience and Women’s Inequality. Melbourne University Law Review [Internet]. University of Melbourne Law School; 1992 Dec 1;18(4). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mulr18&size=2&collection=journals&id=836
26.
Parkinson P. Reconceptualising the express trust. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2002 Dec;61(03). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197302001769
27.
Emery C. Most hallowed principle - certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment, The. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1982;98. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9c60b223-a14a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
28.
Baughen S. ‘Equality is equity’; or is it? Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 2000;(Jan/Feb):58–61. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA7493220E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=33
29.
Hayton DJ. Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2001;117(Jan):96–108. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
30.
Halliwell M. Perfecting imperfect gifts and trusts: have we reached the end of the Chancellor’s foot? Conveyancer & Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2003;(May/Jun):192–202. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA73953A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=9
31.
Hayton D. Uncertainty of subject-matter of trusts. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1994;110(Jul):335–340. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=46
32.
Klinck DR. McPhail v. Doulton and certainty of objects: a ‘semantic’ criticism. Ottawa law review [Internet]. 1988 Mar 22;20(2):377–402. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=McPhail+v.+Doulton+and+certainty+of+objects%3A+a+%22semantic%22+criticism&rft.jtitle=Ottawa+Law+Review&rft.au=Klinck%2C+Dennis+R&rft.date=1988-03-22&rft.pub=Faculty+of+the+Common+Law+Section%2C+University+of+Ottawa&rft.issn=0048-2331&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=7289712&paramdict=en-US
33.
McCormick W. How difficult is it to gift a share? Shah v Shah [2010] EWCA Civ 1408. Trusts & Trustees [Internet]. 2011 June 1;17(5):438–440. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttr080
34.
Gardner S. Fiduciary powers in toytown. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1991;107(Apr):214–220. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=ICD1E8F40E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=22
35.
Richardson G. Lehman brothers: traditional trusts principles and 21st century international bank failures. Trusts & Trustees [Internet]. 2011 Apr 1;17(3):226–232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttr020
36.
Giacomet, Fausto. Capital Markets Law Journal. (2). Available from: http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/docview/1619565749?pq-origsite=summon
37.
Administrative Unworkability - A Reassessment of an Abiding Problem. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1 AD; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA7909B60E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
38.
Hughes-Davies. Redefining the Quistclose Trust. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer; 2015; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA25B8AC0B5D411E4AC54BF9A229C706A&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
39.
Dervan H. Trusts’ law reform: do we need a statutory straitjacket? Trusts & Trustees [Internet]. 2014 Sept 1;20(7):673–691. Available from: http://tandt.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/7/673.full.pdf+html
40.
Hopkins J. Continuing Uncertainty as to Certainty of Objects of Trust Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 1973 Apr;32(01). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300090164
41.
Certainty of subject matter: a defence of Hunter v. Moss. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1 AD; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA764A961E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
42.
Austin, R. P. Discretionary Trusts: Conceptual Uncertainty and Practical Sense. 1980;9. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discretionary+trusts%3A+conceptual+uncertainty+and+practical+sense&rft.jtitle=Sydney+Law+Review&rft.au=Austin%2C+R.P&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.pub=Sydney+Law+School&rft.issn=0082-0512&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=1472881&paramdict=en-UK
43.
F. Spearing. Discretionary Trusts & Power: Distinction without a difference. Trent Law Journal; 1983;7. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/trntlj7&size=2&collection=journals&id=115
44.
McKay L. Re Baden and the third class of uncertainty [Internet]. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=afd95904-e970-e611-80c6-005056af4099
45.
Debunking the myth of secret trusts? Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1 AD; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I78ED3BD0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
46.
Oosterhoff, Albert H. Secret and Half-Secret Trusts. Law Journal Library [Internet]. 2006;26. Available from: https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/espjrl26&div=18&start_page=173&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=6&men_tab=srchresults
47.
Burgess, Robert. Juridical Nature of Secret Trusts, The. Law Journal Library [Internet]. 1972;23. Available from: https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nilq23&div=33&start_page=263&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=7&men_tab=srchresults
48.
J. Levine and R. Holton. Enforcement of Secret and Semi-Secret Trusts. Probate Law Journal; 1983;5. Available from: https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/problj5&div=5&start_page=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=9&men_tab=srchresults
49.
Siu, Ho. Keeping Secrets: A Critical Analysis of the Justifications for the Doctrine of Secret Trusts. Law Journal Library [Internet]. 2015;3. Available from: https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/neastlr3&div=17&start_page=75&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=10&men_tab=srchresults
50.
Instruments of Fraud, Testamentary Dispositions, and the Doctrine of Secret Trusts. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1999;115. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I78ED62E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
51.
G. Allan. Secret is out there: searching for the legal justification for the doctrine of secret trusts through analysis of the case law. Common Law World Review; 2011;40. Available from: https://heinonline-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/comlwr40&div=22&start_page=311&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=13&men_tab=srchresults
52.
Private purpose trusts - a reform proposal. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1 AD; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I04BE36F075FE11DCBE5DC90C8219B168&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
53.
Gardner S. New angles on unincorporated associations. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1992;(Jan/Feb):41–52. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA7841840E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=69
54.
Smart PStJ. Holding property for non-charitable purposes: mandates, conditions and estoppels. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1987;(Nov-Dec):415–522. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA7BF7390E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=63
55.
Matthews P. A problem in the construction of gifts to unincorporated associations. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1995;(Jul/Aug):302–308. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA76AC3E0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=79
56.
Gardner S. A detail in the construction of gifts to unincorporated associations. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1998;(Jan/Feb):8–12. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA7558E30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=90
57.
Panesar S. Surplus funds and unincorporated associations. Trusts & Trustees [Internet]. 2008;14(10):698–707. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttn100
58.
Stauch M, Watt G. Is there liability for imprudent trustee investment? Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1998;(Sep/Oct):352–361. Available from: http://brunel.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search?bookMark=ePnHCXMwNZ0xD8IgEIUZHNTGn9CEuDc5CxQ6ORiN7t2bo1xNFwft4r_3jtadMJHv3jvuwV4dUGazX3POcKVNJqHElQG2KyIZm6HZKfv4aFE5pNnR51HQr2alpie20_ldR51zB0R6ym9OSLvsXKjudu0u92r9K6B62rauItaBJFWJwUD0mBy6EUeKgQtuw2VvYFlvXWLHwQbe100AQ2PERIOHU0JTqOOy7R_I_dqzZ23M7hFaudEsVLksEnj3cgLmNw490995D635AYVJSeQ
59.
Paul S. Davies. Section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925: Deus Ex Machina? Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. Conveyancer & Property Lawyer; 2015; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I424A9C706E1611E5ADEBEC044153D0B4&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
60.
Trustees’ personal liability and the role of liability insurance. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1 AD; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA76A0090E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
61.
Nobles RL. Charities and ethical investment. Conveyancer & property lawyer [Internet]. 1992;(Mar/Apr):115–118. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=IA781CE50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=51
62.
Rahmatian, Andreas. The continued relevance of the ‘poor relations’ and the ‘poor employees’ cases under the Charities Act 2006. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. (UK); 2009 Jan 1;(1). Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IEABDDFB0FA5111DDAFC3E136547FBB8B&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.brunel.ac.uk%2Fentity
63.
Synge M. The ‘new’ public benefit requirement: making sense of charity law? [Internet]. Oxford, OX: Hart Publishing; 2015. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=813499&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
64.
Mart Synge. Charitable status: not a negligible matter. Law Quarterly Review; 2016;132. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I4C93D8F0EB1011E5A168CCCE55E37A72&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity