1.
Alcock, J.: Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach (10th Edition). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass (2013).
2.
Alcock, J., Rubenstein, D.R.: Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
3.
Rubenstein, D., Alcock, J.: Animal Behavior (11th Edition - EBOOK). (2018).
4.
Alcock, J.: Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach (9th Edition). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass (2009).
5.
Martin, P.R., Bateson, P.P.G.: Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
6.
Daly, M., Wilson, M.: Sex, Evolution, and Behavior. Wadsworth Publishing Company, a Division of Wadsworth, Inc, Belmont, California (1983).
7.
Houck, L.D., Drickamer, L.C., Animal Behavior Society: Foundations of animal behavior: classic papers with commentaries. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).
8.
Daly, M.: On function, cause, and being Jerry Hogan’s student. Behavioural Processes. 117, 70–73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.002.
9.
Brennan, P.: Sexual Selection. Nature Education Knowledge. 3,.
10.
Andersson, M., Iwasa, Y.: Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 11, 53–58 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)81042-1.
11.
Janicke, T., Ha derer, I.K., Lajeunesse, M.J., Anthes, N.: Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances. 2, e1500983–e1500983 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500983.
12.
Jones, A.G., Ratterman, N.L.: Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106, 10001–10008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106.
13.
Pound, N., Daly, M., Wilson, M.: There’s no contest: Human sex differences are sexually selected. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999032X.
14.
Pound, N., Price, M.E.: Human Sex Differences: Distributions Overlap but the Tails Sometimes Tell a Tale. Psychological Inquiry. 24, 224–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2013.817297.
15.
Daly, M., Wilson, M.: Sex, evolution, and behavior. In: Sex, evolution, and behavior. pp. 77–111. Wadsworth Publishing Company, a Division of Wadsworth, Inc, Belmont, California (1983).
16.
Miller, C.W.: Sexual selection: Male-male competition. In: The Princeton Guide to Evolution. pp. 641–646 (2013).
17.
Andersson, M., Simmons, L.W.: Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 21, 296–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015.
18.
Jones, A.G., Ratterman, N.L.: Mate choice and sexual selection: What have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106, 10001–10008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106.
19.
Peyton M. West: The Lion’s Mane: Neither a token of royalty nor a shield for fighting, the mane is a signal of quality to mates and rivals, but one that comes with consequences. American Scientist. 93, 226–235 (2005).
20.
Candolin, U., Wong, B.: Mate Choice. In: Fish Behaviour. pp. 337–376. Science Publishers (2008).
21.
Gerald S. Wilkinson and Paul R. Reillo: Female Choice Response to Artificial Selection on an Exaggerated Male Trait in a Stalk-Eyed Fly. Proceedings: Biological Sciences. 255, 1–6 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0001.
22.
Wigby, S., Chapman, T.: Sperm competition. Current Biology. 14, R100–R103 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.013.
23.
Birkhead, T.R., Pizzari, T.: Evolution of sex: Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics. 3, 262–273 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg774.
24.
Shackelford, T.K., Pound, N., Goetz, A.T.: Psychological and Physiological Adaptations to Sperm Competition in Humans. Review of General Psychology. 9, 228–248 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.228.
25.
Birkhead, T.R.: How stupid not to have thought of that: post-copulatory sexual selection. Journal of Zoology. 281, 78–93 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00701.x.
26.
Edward, D.A., Stockley, P., Hosken, D.J.: Sexual Conflict and Sperm Competition. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 7, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a017707.
27.
Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G., Parker, G.A.: Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 17, 313–320 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02533-8.
28.
DelBARCO-TRILLO, J.: Adjustment of sperm allocation under high risk of sperm competition across taxa: a meta-analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 24, 1706–1714 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02293.x.
29.
Bellis, M.A., Baker, R.R., Gage, M.J.G.: Variation in Rat Ejaculates Consistent with the Kamikaze-Sperm Hypothesis. Journal of Mammalogy. 71, 479–480 (1990).
30.
Pound, N., Gage, M.J.G.: Prudent sperm allocation in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus: a mammalian model of adaptive ejaculate adjustment. Animal Behaviour. 68, 819–823 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.004.
31.
Pound, N.: Effects of morphine on electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in two congeneric rodent species differing in sperm competition intensity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 266, 1755–1758 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0842.
32.
Perry, G., Pianka, E.R.: Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 12, 360–364 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01097-5.
