1
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
2
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
3
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy. 2011. http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
4
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
5
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy. 2011. http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
6
Jordan D. Understanding modern warfare. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
7
Fearon JD. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization 1995;49:379–414.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/2706903?pq-origsite=summon
8
Dan Reiter. Exploring the Bargaining Model of War. Perspectives on Politics 2003;1:27–43.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3687811?pq-origsite=summon
9
Ramsay KW. Information, Uncertainty, and War. Annual Review of Political Science 2017;20:505–27.
10
Hegre H. Gravitating toward War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:566–89. doi:10.1177/0022002708316738
11
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
12
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
13
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
14
Biddle S, Long S. Democracy and Military Effectiveness. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2004;48:525–46. doi:10.1177/0022002704266118
15
Wirtz JJ. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle . By Stephen Biddle. (Princeton University Press, 2004.). The Journal of Politics 2006;68:469–70. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00420_5.x
16
Downes, Alexander B. How smart and tough are democracies? International security 22AD;33.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+smart+and+tough+are+democracies%3F&rft.jtitle=International+Security&rft.au=Downes%2C+Alexander+B&rft.date=2009-03-22&rft.pub=MIT+Press+Journals&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=9&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=200818826&paramdict=en-UK
17
Talmadge C. The Puzzle of Personalist Performance: Iraqi Battlefield Effectiveness in the Iran-Iraq War. Security Studies 2013;22:180–221. doi:10.1080/09636412.2013.786911
18
Cederman L-E. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review 2001;95:15–31.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3117626?pq-origsite=summon
19
Choi S-W. Re-Evaluating Capitalist and Democratic Peace Models1. International Studies Quarterly 2011;55:759–69. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00674.x
20
Gartzke E. The Capitalist Peace. American Journal of Political Science 2007;51:166–91.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4122913?pq-origsite=summon
21
Reiter D, Stam AC. Democracy, War Initiation, and Victory. American Political Science Review 1998;92:377–89. doi:10.2307/2585670
22
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
23
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
24
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
25
Fatton LP. The impotence of conventional arms control: why do international regimes fail when they are most needed? Contemporary Security Policy 2016;37:200–22. doi:10.1080/13523260.2016.1187952
26
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
27
Beardsley K, Asal V. Winning with the Bomb. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009;53:278–301. doi:10.1177/0022002708330386
28
Gartzke E, Jo D-J. Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009;53:209–33. doi:10.1177/0022002708330289
29
Horowitz M. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009;53:234–57. doi:10.1177/0022002708330388
30
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
31
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
32
Chang W, Tetlock PE. Rethinking the training of intelligence analysts. Intelligence and National Security 2016;31:903–20. doi:10.1080/02684527.2016.1147164
33
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
34
Odom WE. Intelligence Analysis. Intelligence and National Security 2008;23:316–32. doi:10.1080/02684520802121216
35
Yarhi-Milo K. In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries. International security 2013;38:7–51.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In+the+Eye+of+the+Beholder%3A+How+Leaders+and+Intelligence+Communities+Assess+the+Intentions+of+Adversaries&rft.jtitle=International+Security&rft.au=Keren+Yarhi-Milo&rft.date=2013&rft.pub=The+MIT+Press&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=51&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=international_security_v038_38_1_yarhi_milo_In_the_Eye_of_the_Beholder_How_Leaders_and_Intelligence_Communities_Assess_the_Intentions_of_Adversaries&paramdict=en-UK
36
Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers 2004;56:563–95.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3488799?pq-origsite=summon
37
Fearon JD, Laitin DD. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. The American Political Science Review 2003;97:75–90.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3118222?pq-origsite=summon
38
CEDERMAN L-E, WEIDMANN NB, SKREDE GLEDITSCH K. Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison. The American Political Science Review 2011;105:478–95.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/41480853?pq-origsite=summon
39
Buhaug H, Gleditsch KS. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:215–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00499.x
40
Gleditsch KS. Transnational Dimensions of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 2007;44:293–309. doi:10.1177/0022343307076637
41
Gleditsch KS, Salehyan I, Schultz K. Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2008;52:479–506. doi:10.1177/0022002707313305
42
Andrew H. Kydd and Barbara F. Walter. The Strategies of Terrorism. International Security 2006;31:49–80.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137539?pq-origsite=summon
43
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy. 2011. http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
44
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
45
Abrahms M. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security 2006;31:42–78.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137516?pq-origsite=summon
46
Thomas J. Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science 2014;58:804–18. doi:10.1111/ajps.12113
47
Robert A. Pape. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review 2003;97:343–61.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3117613?pq-origsite=summon
48
Byman DL. Friends like These: Counterinsurgency and the War on Terrorism. International Security 2006;31:79–115.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137517?pq-origsite=summon
49
Lyall J. Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009;53:331–62. doi:10.1177/0022002708330881
50
Lyall J. Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars. International organization 2009;63:67–106.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rage+Against+the+Machines%3A+Explaining+Outcomes+in+Counterinsurgency+Wars&rft.jtitle=INTERNATIONAL+ORGANIZATION&rft.au=Lyall%2C+J&rft.au=Wilson%2C+I&rft.date=2009&rft.pub=CAMBRIDGE+UNIV+PRESS&rft.issn=0020-8183&rft.eissn=1531-5088&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS0020918309090031&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000262693900003&paramdict=en-UK
51
Tarrow S. Inside Insurgencies: Politics and Violence in an Age of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics 2007;5:587–600.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/20446506?pq-origsite=summon
52
Beardsley KC, Quinn DM, Biswas B, et al. Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2006;50:58–86. doi:10.1177/0022002705282862
53
Beardsley K. Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems. American Journal of Political Science 2008;52:723–40. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00339.x
54
Gartner SS, Bercovitch J. Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-Lived Conflict Settlements. International Studies Quarterly 2006;50:819–40.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4092781?pq-origsite=summon
55
Greig JM. Stepping into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate? American Journal of Political Science 2005;49. doi:10.2307/3647675
56
Beardsley K. Peacekeeping and the Contagion of Armed Conflict. The Journal of Politics 2011;73:1051–64. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000764
57
Fortna VP. Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after Civil War. International Studies Quarterly 2004;48:269–92.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3693574?pq-origsite=summon
58
Hultman L, Kathman J, Shannon M. United Nations Peacekeeping and Civilian Protection in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science 2013;:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/ajps.12036
59
Monica Duffy Toft. Ending Civil Wars : A Case for Rebel Victory? International Security 2010;34:7–36.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/40784560?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60
Bove V, Ruggeri A. Kinds of Blue: Diversity in UN Peacekeeping Missions and Civilian Protection. British Journal of Political Science 2016;46:681–700. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000034
61
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
62
Buhaug H. Climate not to blame for African civil wars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107:16477–82.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/20779692?pq-origsite=summon
63
Koubi V, Bernauer T, Kalbhenn A, et al. Climate variability, economic growth, and civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research 2012;49:113–27. doi:10.1177/0022343311427173
64
Adamson FB. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security 2006;31:165–99.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137542?pq-origsite=summon
65
Bove V, Böhmelt T. Does Immigration Induce Terrorism? The Journal of Politics 2016;78:572–88. doi:10.1086/684679
66
Moore WH, Shellman SM. Whither Will They Go? A Global Study of Refugees’ Destinations, 1965–1995. International Studies Quarterly 2007;51:811–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00478.x
67
Salehyan I, Gleditsch KS. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization 2006;60:335–66.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3877896?pq-origsite=summon
68
de Nevers R. NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era. International Security 2007;31:34–66.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137565?pq-origsite=summon
69
European Union 2016. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
70
Olsen GR. The EU and Military Conflict Management in Africa: For the Good of Africa or Europe? International Peacekeeping 2009;16:245–60. doi:10.1080/13533310802685828
71
Haftel YZ, Hofmann SC. Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research 2017;54:484–98. doi:10.1177/0022343316675908
72
Hofmann SC. Overlapping Institutions in the Realm of International Security: The Case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics 2009;7:45–52.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/40407213?pq-origsite=summon
73
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy. 2011. http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
74
Böhmelt T, Pilster U. The Impact of Institutional Coup-Proofing on Coup Attempts and Coup Outcomes. International Interactions 2015;41:158–82. doi:10.1080/03050629.2014.906411
75
Pilster U, Böhmelt T. Coup-Proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99. Conflict Management and Peace Science 2011;28:331–50. doi:10.1177/0738894211413062
76
Powell J. Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2012;56:1017–40.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/23414730?pq-origsite=summon
77
Quinlivan JT. Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East. International Security 1999;24:131–65.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/2539255?pq-origsite=summon
78
Barter SJ. State Proxy or Security Dilemma? Understanding Anti-Rebel Militias in Civil War. Asian Security 2013;9:75–92. doi:10.1080/14799855.2013.795546
79
Carey SC, Colaresi MP, Mitchell NJ. Governments, Informal Links to Militias, and Accountability. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2015;59:850–76. doi:10.1177/0022002715576747
80
Petersohn U. Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs), Military Effectiveness, and Conflict Severity in Weak States, 1990–2007. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2017;61:1046–72. doi:10.1177/0022002715600758
81
Singer PW. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security. International Security 2002;26:186–220.http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3092094?pq-origsite=summon
82
Kaldor M. The politics of new wars. In: New and old wars. Cambridge: : Polity 2012.
