1.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
2.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
4.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
5.
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
6.
Jordan D. Understanding modern warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
7.
Fearon JD. Rationalist Explanations for War. International Organization [Internet]. 1995;49(3):379–414. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/2706903?pq-origsite=summon
8.
Dan Reiter. Exploring the Bargaining Model of War. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2003;1(1):27–43. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3687811?pq-origsite=summon
9.
Ramsay KW. Information, Uncertainty, and War. Annual Review of Political Science. 2017 May 11;20(1):505–27.
10.
Hegre H. Gravitating toward War. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2008 Aug;52(4):566–89.
11.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
12.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
13.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
14.
Biddle S, Long S. Democracy and Military Effectiveness. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2004 Aug;48(4):525–46.
15.
Wirtz JJ. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle . By Stephen Biddle. (Princeton University Press, 2004.). The Journal of Politics. 2006 May;68(2):469–70.
16.
Downes, Alexander B. How smart and tough are democracies? International security [Internet]. 22AD;33(4). Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+smart+and+tough+are+democracies%3F&rft.jtitle=International+Security&rft.au=Downes%2C+Alexander+B&rft.date=2009-03-22&rft.pub=MIT+Press+Journals&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=9&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=200818826&paramdict=en-UK
17.
Talmadge C. The Puzzle of Personalist Performance: Iraqi Battlefield Effectiveness in the Iran-Iraq War. Security Studies. 2013 Apr;22(2):180–221.
18.
Cederman LE. Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2001;95(1):15–31. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3117626?pq-origsite=summon
19.
Choi SW. Re-Evaluating Capitalist and Democratic Peace Models1. International Studies Quarterly. 2011 Sep;55(3):759–69.
20.
Gartzke E. The Capitalist Peace. American Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2007;51(1):166–91. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4122913?pq-origsite=summon
21.
Reiter D, Stam AC. Democracy, War Initiation, and Victory. American Political Science Review. 1998 Jun;92(02):377–89.
22.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
23.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
24.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
25.
Fatton LP. The impotence of conventional arms control: why do international regimes fail when they are most needed? Contemporary Security Policy. 2016 May 3;37(2):200–22.
26.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
27.
Beardsley K, Asal V. Winning with the Bomb. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2009 Apr;53(2):278–301.
28.
Gartzke E, Jo DJ. Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2009 Apr;53(2):209–33.
29.
Horowitz M. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2009 Apr;53(2):234–57.
30.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
31.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
32.
Chang W, Tetlock PE. Rethinking the training of intelligence analysts. Intelligence and National Security. 2016 Sep 18;31(6):903–20.
33.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
34.
Odom WE. Intelligence Analysis. Intelligence and National Security. 2008 Jun;23(3):316–32.
35.
Yarhi-Milo K. In the Eye of the Beholder: How Leaders and Intelligence Communities Assess the Intentions of Adversaries. International security [Internet]. 2013;38(1):7–51. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In+the+Eye+of+the+Beholder%3A+How+Leaders+and+Intelligence+Communities+Assess+the+Intentions+of+Adversaries&rft.jtitle=International+Security&rft.au=Keren+Yarhi-Milo&rft.date=2013&rft.pub=The+MIT+Press&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=51&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=international_security_v038_38_1_yarhi_milo_In_the_Eye_of_the_Beholder_How_Leaders_and_Intelligence_Communities_Assess_the_Intentions_of_Adversaries&paramdict=en-UK
36.
Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers [Internet]. 2004;56(4):563–95. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3488799?pq-origsite=summon
37.
Fearon JD, Laitin DD. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2003;97(1):75–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3118222?pq-origsite=summon
38.
CEDERMAN LE, WEIDMANN NB, SKREDE GLEDITSCH K. Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2011;105(3):478–95. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/41480853?pq-origsite=summon
39.
Buhaug H, Gleditsch KS. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly. 2008 Jun;52(2):215–33.
40.
Gleditsch KS. Transnational Dimensions of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research. 2007 May;44(3):293–309.
41.
Gleditsch KS, Salehyan I, Schultz K. Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2008 Aug;52(4):479–506.
42.
Andrew H. Kydd and Barbara F. Walter. The Strategies of Terrorism. International Security [Internet]. 2006;31(1):49–80. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137539?pq-origsite=summon
43.
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
44.
Baylis J, Wirtz JJ, Gray CS, editors. Strategy in the contemporary world: an introduction to strategic studies. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
45.
Abrahms M. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security [Internet]. 2006;31(2):42–78. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137516?pq-origsite=summon
46.
Thomas J. Rewarding Bad Behavior: How Governments Respond to Terrorism in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science. 2014 Oct;58(4):804–18.
47.
Robert A. Pape. The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2003;97(3):343–61. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3117613?pq-origsite=summon
48.
Byman DL. Friends like These: Counterinsurgency and the War on Terrorism. International Security [Internet]. 2006;31(2):79–115. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137517?pq-origsite=summon
49.
Lyall J. Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2009 Jun;53(3):331–62.
50.
Lyall J. Rage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars. International organization [Internet]. 2009;63(1):67–106. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rage+Against+the+Machines%3A+Explaining+Outcomes+in+Counterinsurgency+Wars&rft.jtitle=INTERNATIONAL+ORGANIZATION&rft.au=Lyall%2C+J&rft.au=Wilson%2C+I&rft.date=2009&rft.pub=CAMBRIDGE+UNIV+PRESS&rft.issn=0020-8183&rft.eissn=1531-5088&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS0020918309090031&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000262693900003&paramdict=en-UK
51.
Tarrow S. Inside Insurgencies: Politics and Violence in an Age of Civil War. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2007;5(3):587–600. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/20446506?pq-origsite=summon
52.
Beardsley KC, Quinn DM, Biswas B, Wilkenfeld J. Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2006 Feb;50(1):58–86.
53.
Beardsley K. Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems. American Journal of Political Science. 2008 Oct;52(4):723–40.
54.
Gartner SS, Bercovitch J. Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: The Contribution of Mediation to Short-Lived Conflict Settlements. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;50(4):819–40. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4092781?pq-origsite=summon
55.
Greig JM. Stepping into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate? American Journal of Political Science. 2005 Apr;49(2).
56.
Beardsley K. Peacekeeping and the Contagion of Armed Conflict. The Journal of Politics. 2011 Oct;73(4):1051–64.
57.
Fortna VP. Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace after Civil War. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 2004;48(2):269–92. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3693574?pq-origsite=summon
58.
Hultman L, Kathman J, Shannon M. United Nations Peacekeeping and Civilian Protection in Civil War. American Journal of Political Science. 2013 May;n/a-n/a.
59.
Monica Duffy Toft. Ending Civil Wars : A Case for Rebel Victory? International Security [Internet]. 2010;34(4):7–36. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/40784560?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Bove V, Ruggeri A. Kinds of Blue: Diversity in UN Peacekeeping Missions and Civilian Protection. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2016 Jul;46(03):681–700. Available from: https://www-cambridge-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/54C5B7FB27C145335952A52592221DCD/S0007123415000034a.pdf/kinds_of_blue_diversity_in_un_peacekeeping_missions_and_civilian_protection.pdf
61.
Collins A, editor. Contemporary security studies. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2016.
62.
Buhaug H. Climate not to blame for African civil wars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America [Internet]. 2010;107(38):16477–82. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/20779692?pq-origsite=summon
63.
Koubi V, Bernauer T, Kalbhenn A, Spilker G. Climate variability, economic growth, and civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research. 2012 Jan;49(1):113–27.
64.
Adamson FB. Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security [Internet]. 2006;31(1):165–99. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137542?pq-origsite=summon
65.
Bove V, Böhmelt T. Does Immigration Induce Terrorism? The Journal of Politics. 2016 Apr;78(2):572–88.
66.
Moore WH, Shellman SM. Whither Will They Go? A Global Study of Refugees’ Destinations, 1965–1995. International Studies Quarterly. 2007 Dec;51(4):811–34.
67.
Salehyan I, Gleditsch KS. Refugees and the Spread of Civil War. International Organization [Internet]. 2006;60(2):335–66. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3877896?pq-origsite=summon
68.
de Nevers R. NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era. International Security [Internet]. 2007;31(4):34–66. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4137565?pq-origsite=summon
69.
European Union 2016 [Internet]. Available from: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
70.
Olsen GR. The EU and Military Conflict Management in Africa: For the Good of Africa or Europe? International Peacekeeping. 2009 Apr;16(2):245–60.
71.
Haftel YZ, Hofmann SC. Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research. 2017 Jul;54(4):484–98.
72.
Hofmann SC. Overlapping Institutions in the Realm of International Security: The Case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2009;7(1):45–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/40407213?pq-origsite=summon
73.
Snyder CA. Contemporary Security and Strategy [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://staff.unila.ac.id/iwansulistyo/files/2016/08/Snyder-Contemporary-Security-Strategy.pdf
74.
Böhmelt T, Pilster U. The Impact of Institutional Coup-Proofing on Coup Attempts and Coup Outcomes. International Interactions. 2015 Jan;41(1):158–82.
75.
Pilster U, Böhmelt T. Coup-Proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99. Conflict Management and Peace Science. 2011 Sep;28(4):331–50.
76.
Powell J. Determinants of the Attempting and Outcome of Coups d’état. The Journal of Conflict Resolution [Internet]. 2012;56(6):1017–40. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/23414730?pq-origsite=summon
77.
Quinlivan JT. Coup-Proofing: Its Practice and Consequences in the Middle East. International Security [Internet]. 1999;24(2):131–65. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/2539255?pq-origsite=summon
78.
Barter SJ. State Proxy or Security Dilemma? Understanding Anti-Rebel Militias in Civil War. Asian Security. 2013 May;9(2):75–92.
79.
Carey SC, Colaresi MP, Mitchell NJ. Governments, Informal Links to Militias, and Accountability. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2015 Aug;59(5):850–76.
80.
Petersohn U. Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs), Military Effectiveness, and Conflict Severity in Weak States, 1990–2007. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2017 May;61(5):1046–72.
81.
Singer PW. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry and Its Ramifications for International Security. International Security [Internet]. 2002;26(3):186–220. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/3092094?pq-origsite=summon
82.
Kaldor M. The politics of new wars. In: New and old wars. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2012.
