1
Carsten J. After kinship. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=47760&src=0
2
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
3
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985. http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
4
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985. http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
5
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985. http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
6
Clifford J. Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world. In: Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 1992. 172–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4018550c-c764-e811-80cd-005056af4099
7
Lambek M, Strathern AJ. Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. In: Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. 53–79.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a95014e-a34a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
8
Comaroff JL, Comaroff J. On personhood: an anthropological perspective from Africa. Social ientities 2001;7:267–83. doi:10.1080/13504630120065310
9
Valentine DE. Fluid signs: being a person the Tamil way. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984.
10
Lambek M, Strathern AJ. Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
11
Leenhardt M, Gulati BM. Do Kamo: person and myth in the Melanesian world. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1979.
12
Strathern M. The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1988. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=837207
13
Vilaca A. Dividuality in Amazonia: God, the Devil, and the constitution of personhood in Wari’ Christianity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:243–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01678.x
14
Godelier M, Strathern M. Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia. In: Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. 159–73.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5207346b-0064-e811-80cd-005056af4099
15
Wikan U. Managing turbulent hearts: a Balinese formula for living. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1990.
16
Young M. Magicians of Manumanua.
17
Marshall Sahlins. What kinship is (part one). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011568?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
18
Marshall Sahlins. What kinship is (part two). The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011369?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
19
Alan Rumsey. Agency, Personhood and the ‘I’ of Discourse in the Pacific and Beyond. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2000;6.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2660767?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
20
Kuper A. We need to talk about kinship. Anthropology of this Century Published Online First: 2018.http://aotcpress.com/articles/talk-kinship/
21
Carsten J. What kinship does – and how. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:245–51.https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau3.2.013
22
Bloch M. What kind of ‘is’ is Sahlins’ ‘is’? Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:253–7.https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau3.2.014
23
Brightman R. Hierarchy and conflict in mutual being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:259–70. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.015
24
Shryock A. It’s this, not that. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:271–9. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.016
25
Feuchtwang S. What is kinship? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:281–4. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.017
26
Edwards J. Donor siblings. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:285–92. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.018
27
Fausto C. The kinship I and the kinship other. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:293–7. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.019
28
Kapila K. . . . In South Asia. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:299–304. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.020
29
Hamberger K. The order of intersubjectivity. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:305–7. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.021
30
Robbins J. On kinship and comparsion, intersubjectivity and mutuality of being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:309–16. doi:10.14318/hau3.2.022
31
Carrithers M, Collins S, Lukes S. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985. http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
32
Ouroussoff A. Illusions of Rationality: False Premisses of the Liberal Tradition. Man 1993;28. doi:10.2307/2803414
33
Rose N. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. In: Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. London: : Free Asociation 1999. 217–32.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=67271e22-d067-e811-80cd-005056af4099
34
Rose N. Inventing our selves: psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
35
Spiro ME. Is the Western conception of the self ‘peculiar’ within the context of the world cultures? Ethos 1993;21:107–53.http://www.jstor.org/stable/640371?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
36
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
37
Bialecki J, Daswani G. What is an individual? HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:271–94. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.013
38
Chua L. Horizontal and vertical relations. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:339–59. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.016
39
Mosko MS. Unbecoming individuals. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2015;5:361–93. doi:10.14318/hau5.1.017
40
Lambek M. The continuous and discontinuous person: two dimensions of ethical life. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2013;19:837–58. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12073
41
Benedict R. Anthropology and the abnormal. Journal of General Psychology. 1934;10:59–82.https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/texts/201/Benedict,%20Anthropology.pdf
42
Heller, Thomas C., Brooke-Rose, Christine. Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought. In: Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought. Stanford, CA.: : Stanford University Press 1986. 222–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4160b4d4-a44a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
43
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2000.
44
Dupre J. Normal people. Social Research;65:221–48.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=sih&AN=823543&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
45
Hacking I. The taming of chance. In: The taming of chance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. 160–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9e013967-f263-e811-80cd-005056af4099
46
Jenkins R, Angrosino MV. Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability. In: Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. 1–24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e856b86f-4663-e811-80cd-005056af4099
47
Overing J, Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth. Reason and morality. London: : Tavistock Publications 1985. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=6738&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
48
Hacking I. Kinds of people, moving targets. 2006.https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pba151p285.pdf
49
Street A. Seen by the state: bureaucracy, visibility and governmentality in a Papua New Guinean hospital. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 2012;23:1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00164.x
50
Hacking I. How we have been learning to talk about autism: a role for stories. Metaphilosophy 2009;40:499–516. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x
51
Grinker RR, Cho K. Border Children: Interpreting Autism Spectrum Disorder in South Korea. Ethos 2013;41:46–74. doi:10.1111/etho.12002
52
Hacking I. The social construction of what? In: The social construction of what? Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999. 125–62.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=17fdbdf1-6869-e811-80cd-005056af4099
53
Hacking I. Mad travellers: reflections on the reality of transient mental illnesses. London: : Free Association Books 1999.
54
Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ. Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995.
55
Kertzer DI, Arel D. Census and identity: the politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
56
Martin E. Bipolar expeditions: mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2007.
57
Martin E. Flexible survivors. Cultural Values 2000;4:512–7. doi:10.1080/14797580009367214
58
Street A. Biomedicine in an unstable place: infrastructure and personhood in a Papua New Guinean hospital. Durham: : Duke University Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1790881
59
Lock MM, Young A, Cambrosio A. Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry. In: Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b070b5f7-8469-e811-80cd-005056af4099
60
Lindenbaum S, Lock MM. Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everday life. London: : University of California Press 1993.
61
Antze P, Lambek M. Tense past: cultural essays in trauma and memory. New York: : Routledge 1996.
62
Cultures of trauma: Anthropological views of posttraumatic stress disorder in international health - Introduction. Culture, medicine and psychiatry 1AD;28:113–26.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultures+of+trauma%3A+Anthropological+views+of+posttraumatic+stress+disorder+in+international+health+-+Introduction&rft.jtitle=CULTURE+MEDICINE+AND+PSYCHIATRY&rft.au=Breslau%2C+J&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.pub=SPRINGER&rft.issn=0165-005X&rft.eissn=1573-076X&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=126&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000222566500001&paramdict=en-UK
63
Fassin D, Rechtman R. The empire of trauma: an inquiry into the condition of victimhood. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2009.
64
Hacking I. Rewriting the soul: multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1995. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=275223&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
65
Kirmayer LJ. Psychotherapy and the Cultural Concept of the Person. Transcultural Psychiatry 2007;44:232–57. doi:10.1177/1363461506070794
66
Kleinman A. Writing at the margin: discourse between anthropology and medicine. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1995.
67
Krause I-B. Personhood, culture and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 1995;17:363–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x
68
Summerfield D. A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas. Social Science & Medicine 1999;48:1449–62. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00450-X
69
Young A. The harmony of illusions: inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1995. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=293518&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
70
Broch-Due V, Bertelsen BE, editors. Violent reverberations: global modalities of trauma. Cham, Switzerland: : Palgrave Macmillan 2016.
71
Krause I-B. Personhood, culture and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 1995;17:363–82. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x
72
Lindenbaum S, Lock M. Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life.
73
Lock MM, Nguyen V-K. An anthropology of biomedicine. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=254770&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
74
Lock MM. Encounters with aging: mythologies of menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1993.
75
Margaret Lock. New Japanese Mythologies: Faltering Discipline and the Ailing Housewife. American Ethnologist 1988;15:43–61. doi:10.1525/ae.1988.15.1.02a00040
76
Martin E. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. In: The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, Mass: : Beacon Press 2001. 166–78.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6024df1f-9f65-e811-80cd-005056af4099
77
Zeserson JM. Chi no michi as metaphor: Conversations with Japanese women about menopause. Anthropology & Medicine 2001;8:177–99. doi:10.1080/13648470120101363
78
Erol M. Tales of the Second Spring: Menopause in Turkey Through the Narratives of Menopausal Women and Gynecologists. Medical Anthropology 2009;28:368–96. doi:10.1080/01459740903303969
79
Rabinow P. Essays on the anthropology of reason. In: Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1996. 91–111.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bd2fcf9e-6769-e811-80cd-005056af4099
80
Franklin S, McKinnon S. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, NC: : Duke University Press 2001. 384–409.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e55d5404-6769-e811-80cd-005056af4099
81
Finkler K. The Kin in the Gene. Current Anthropology 2001;42:235–63. doi:10.1086/320004
82
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature--culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory 2003;3:65–85. doi:10.1177/1463499603003001752
83
Ian Hacking. Genetics, Biosocial Groups & the Future of Identity. Daedalus 2006;135:81–95.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20028075?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
84
Hoyer K. Conflicting Notions of Personhood in Genetic Research. Anthropology Today 2002;18:9–13. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.00129
85
Genomic Anthropology. Current anthropology 1AD;49.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic+Anthropology&rft.jtitle=Current+Anthropology&rft.au=G%C3%ADsli+P%C3%A1lsson&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.pub=University+of+Chicago%2C+acting+through+its+Press&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.externalDocID=1582513981&paramdict=en-UK
86
Gâisli Pâalsson. Anthropology and the new genetics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
87
Strathern M. Kinship, law and the unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press 2005.
88
Pálsson G. Decode Me! Current Anthropology 2012;53:S185–95. doi:10.1086/662291
