[1]
J. Carsten, After kinship, vol. New departures in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=47760&src=0
[2]
M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[3]
M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
[4]
M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
[5]
M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
[6]
J. Clifford, ‘Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world’, in Person and myth: Maurice Leenhardt in the Melanesian world, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992, pp. 172–188 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4018550c-c764-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[7]
M. Lambek and A. J. Strathern, ‘Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia’, in Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 53–79 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a95014e-a34a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[8]
J. L. Comaroff and J. Comaroff, ‘On personhood: an anthropological perspective from Africa’, Social ientities, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–283, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1080/13504630120065310. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504630120065310
[9]
D. E. Valentine, Fluid signs: being a person the Tamil way. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
[10]
M. Lambek and A. J. Strathern, Bodies and persons: comparative perspectives from Africa and Melanesia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[11]
M. Leenhardt and B. M. Gulati, Do Kamo: person and myth in the Melanesian world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.
[12]
M. Strathern, The gender of the gift: problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia, vol. Studies in Melanesian anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=837207
[13]
A. Vilaca, ‘Dividuality in Amazonia: God, the Devil, and the constitution of personhood in Wari’ Christianity’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 243–262, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01678.x.
[14]
M. Godelier and M. Strathern, ‘Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia’, in Big men and great men: personifications of power in Melanesia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 159–173 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5207346b-0064-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[15]
U. Wikan, Managing turbulent hearts: a Balinese formula for living. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
[16]
M. Young, Magicians of Manumanua. .
[17]
Marshall Sahlins, ‘What kinship is (part one)’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 1, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011568?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[18]
Marshall Sahlins, ‘What kinship is (part two)’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 2, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011369?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[19]
Alan Rumsey, ‘Agency, Personhood and the “I” of Discourse in the Pacific and Beyond’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 6, no. 1, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2660767?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[20]
A. Kuper, ‘We need to talk about kinship’, Anthropology of this Century, no. 23, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://aotcpress.com/articles/talk-kinship/
[21]
J. Carsten, ‘What kinship does – and how’, Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 245–251, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau3.2.013
[22]
M. Bloch, ‘What kind of “is” is Sahlins’ “is”?’, Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 253–257, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau3.2.014
[23]
R. Brightman, ‘Hierarchy and conflict in mutual being’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 259–270, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.015.
[24]
A. Shryock, ‘It’s this, not that’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 271–279, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.016.
[25]
S. Feuchtwang, ‘What is kinship?’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 281–284, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.017.
[26]
J. Edwards, ‘Donor siblings’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 285–292, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.018.
[27]
C. Fausto, ‘The kinship I and the kinship other’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 293–297, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.019.
[28]
K. Kapila, . . . ‘In South Asia’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 299–304, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.020.
[29]
K. Hamberger, ‘The order of intersubjectivity’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 305–307, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.021.
[30]
J. Robbins, ‘On kinship and comparsion, intersubjectivity and mutuality of being’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 309–316, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.2.022.
[31]
M. Carrithers, S. Collins, and S. Lukes, The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://14.139.206.50:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1592/1/Carrithers%26Collins%26Lukas%20-%20The%20category%20of%20the%20person,%20Anthropology,%20philosophy,%20history.pdf
[32]
A. Ouroussoff, ‘Illusions of Rationality: False Premisses of the Liberal Tradition’, Man, vol. 28, no. 2, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.2307/2803414.
[33]
N. Rose, ‘Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self’, in Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self, 2nd ed., London: Free Asociation, 1999, pp. 217–232 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=67271e22-d067-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[34]
N. Rose, Inventing our selves: psychology, power, and personhood, vol. Cambridge studies in the history of psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[35]
M. E. Spiro, ‘Is the Western conception of the self “peculiar” within the context of the world cultures?’, Ethos, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 107–153, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/640371?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[36]
M. Strathern, After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[37]
J. Bialecki and G. Daswani, ‘What is an individual?’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 271–294, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.14318/hau5.1.013.
[38]
L. Chua, ‘Horizontal and vertical relations’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 339–359, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.14318/hau5.1.016.
[39]
M. S. Mosko, ‘Unbecoming individuals’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 361–393, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.14318/hau5.1.017.
[40]
M. Lambek, ‘The continuous and discontinuous person: two dimensions of ethical life’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 837–858, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12073.
[41]
R. Benedict, ‘Anthropology and the abnormal’, Journal of General Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 59–82, 1934 [Online]. Available: https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/texts/201/Benedict,%20Anthropology.pdf
[42]
Heller, Thomas C. and Brooke-Rose, Christine, ‘Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought’, in Reconstructing individualism: autonomy, individuality, and the self in Western thought, Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press, 1986, pp. 222–236 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4160b4d4-a44a-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[43]
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
[44]
J. Dupre, ‘Normal people.’, Social Research, vol. 65, pp. 221–248 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=sih&AN=823543&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
[45]
I. Hacking, ‘The taming of chance’, in The taming of chance, vol. Ideas in context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 160–169 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9e013967-f263-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[46]
R. Jenkins and M. V. Angrosino, ‘Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability’, in Questions of competence: culture, classification and intellectual disability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–24 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e856b86f-4663-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[47]
J. Overing and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth, Reason and morality, vol. ASA monographs. London: Tavistock Publications, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=6738&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[48]
I. Hacking, ‘Kinds of people, moving targets’. British Academy, London, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pba151p285.pdf
[49]
A. Street, ‘Seen by the state: bureaucracy, visibility and governmentality in a Papua New Guinean hospital’, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00164.x. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1757-6547.2012.00164.x/abstract;jsessionid=E21DECD5B2AE760E754CCE2B574B23D1.f02t01?systemMessage=Please+be+advised+that+we+experienced+an+unexpected+issue+that+occurred+on+Saturday+and+Sunday+January+20th+and+21st+that+caused+the+site+to+be+down+for+an+extended+period+of+time+and+affected+the+ability+of+users+to+access+content+on+Wiley+Online+Library.+This+issue+has+now+been+fully+resolved.++We+apologize+for+any+inconvenience+this+may+have+caused+and+are+working+to+ensure+that+we+can+alert+you+immediately+of+any+unplanned+periods+of+downtime+or+disruption+in+the+future.
[50]
I. Hacking, ‘How we have been learning to talk about autism: a role for stories’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 40, no. 3–4, pp. 499–516, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01607.x.
[51]
R. R. Grinker and K. Cho, ‘Border Children: Interpreting Autism Spectrum Disorder in South Korea’, Ethos, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 46–74, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/etho.12002.
[52]
I. Hacking, ‘The social construction of what?’, in The social construction of what?, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 125–162 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=17fdbdf1-6869-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[53]
I. Hacking, Mad travellers: reflections on the reality of transient mental illnesses. London: Free Association Books, 1999.
[54]
D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A. J. Premack, Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate, vol. Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
[55]
D. I. Kertzer and D. Arel, Census and identity: the politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census, vol. New perspectives on anthropological and social demography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[56]
E. Martin, Bipolar expeditions: mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007.
[57]
E. Martin, ‘Flexible survivors’, Cultural Values, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 512–517, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1080/14797580009367214. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14797580009367214
[58]
A. Street, Biomedicine in an unstable place: infrastructure and personhood in a Papua New Guinean hospital, vol. Experimental futures : technological lives, scientific arts, anthropological voices. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1790881
[59]
M. M. Lock, A. Young, and A. Cambrosio, ‘Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry’, in Living and working with the new medical technologies: intersections of inquiry, vol. Cambridge studies in medical anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b070b5f7-8469-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[60]
S. Lindenbaum and M. M. Lock, Knowledge, power, and practice: the anthropolgy of medicine and everday life, vol. Comparative studies of health systems and medical care. London: University of California Press, 1993.
[61]
P. Antze and M. Lambek, Tense past: cultural essays in trauma and memory. New York: Routledge, 1996.
[62]
‘Cultures of trauma: Anthropological views of posttraumatic stress disorder in international health - Introduction’, Culture, medicine and psychiatry, vol. 28, pp. 113–126, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultures+of+trauma%3A+Anthropological+views+of+posttraumatic+stress+disorder+in+international+health+-+Introduction&rft.jtitle=CULTURE+MEDICINE+AND+PSYCHIATRY&rft.au=Breslau%2C+J&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.pub=SPRINGER&rft.issn=0165-005X&rft.eissn=1573-076X&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=126&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=000222566500001&paramdict=en-UK
[63]
D. Fassin and R. Rechtman, The empire of trauma: an inquiry into the condition of victimhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
[64]
I. Hacking, Rewriting the soul: multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=275223&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[65]
L. J. Kirmayer, ‘Psychotherapy and the Cultural Concept of the Person’, Transcultural Psychiatry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 232–257, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1363461506070794. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1363461506070794
[66]
A. Kleinman, Writing at the margin: discourse between anthropology and medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
[67]
I.-B. Krause, ‘Personhood, culture and family therapy’, Journal of Family Therapy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 363–382, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x/full
[68]
D. Summerfield, ‘A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1449–1462, May 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00450-X. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795369800450X?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&ccp=y
[69]
A. Young, The harmony of illusions: inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=293518&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[70]
V. Broch-Due and B. E. Bertelsen, Eds., Violent reverberations: global modalities of trauma. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
[71]
I.-B. Krause, ‘Personhood, culture and family therapy’, Journal of Family Therapy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 363–382, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.1995.tb00026.x.
[72]
S. Lindenbaum and M. Lock, Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. .
[73]
M. M. Lock and V.-K. Nguyen, An anthropology of biomedicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=254770&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[74]
M. M. Lock, Encounters with aging: mythologies of menopause in Japan and North America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
[75]
Margaret Lock, ‘New Japanese Mythologies: Faltering Discipline and the Ailing Housewife’, American Ethnologist, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–61, 1988, doi: 10.1525/ae.1988.15.1.02a00040. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/645485?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[76]
E. Martin, ‘The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction’, in The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction, Rev ed., Boston, Mass: Beacon Press, 2001, pp. 166–178 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6024df1f-9f65-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[77]
J. M. Zeserson, ‘Chi no michi as metaphor: Conversations with Japanese women about menopause’, Anthropology & Medicine, vol. 8, no. 2–3, pp. 177–199, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1080/13648470120101363. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13648470120101363
[78]
M. Erol, ‘Tales of the Second Spring: Menopause in Turkey Through the Narratives of Menopausal Women and Gynecologists’, Medical Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 368–396, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/01459740903303969.
[79]
P. Rabinow, ‘Essays on the anthropology of reason’, in Essays on the anthropology of reason, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 91–111 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bd2fcf9e-6769-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[80]
S. Franklin and S. McKinnon, ‘Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies’, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001, pp. 384–409 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e55d5404-6769-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[81]
K. Finkler, ‘The Kin in the Gene’, Current Anthropology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 235–263, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1086/320004.
[82]
S. Franklin, ‘Re-thinking nature--culture: Anthropology and the new genetics’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–85, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1177/1463499603003001752. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1463499603003001752
[83]
Ian Hacking, ‘Genetics, Biosocial Groups & the Future of Identity’, Daedalus, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 81–95, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20028075?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[84]
K. Hoyer, ‘Conflicting Notions of Personhood in Genetic Research’, Anthropology Today, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 9–13, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.00129. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694985?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[85]
‘Genomic Anthropology’, Current anthropology, vol. 49, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic+Anthropology&rft.jtitle=Current+Anthropology&rft.au=G%C3%ADsli+P%C3%A1lsson&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.pub=University+of+Chicago%2C+acting+through+its+Press&rft.issn=0011-3204&rft.eissn=1537-5382&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.externalDocID=1582513981&paramdict=en-UK
[86]
Gâisli Pâalsson, Anthropology and the new genetics, vol. New departures in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[87]
M. Strathern, Kinship, law and the unexpected: relatives are always a surprise. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[88]
G. Pálsson, ‘Decode Me!’, Current Anthropology, vol. 53, no. S5, pp. S185–S195, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1086/662291.
