Bibliography for PP5563 - Evolution of International Relations BETA

Adam Watson. (1990). Systems of States. Review of International Studies, 16(2), 99–109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Ahluwalia, D. P. S. (2001). Politics and post-colonial theory: African inflections. Routledge.

Ahsan I. Butt. (2013). Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America’s War-Prone Decade, 1932-41. International Organization, 67(3), 575–607. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282077?pq-origsite=summon

Alan James. (1989). The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 15(3), 215–229. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alexander Wendt. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Alker, H. R., & Biersteker, T. J. (1984). The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire. International Studies Quarterly, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600692

Alternatives: global, local, political. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Alternatives%3A+global%2C+local%2C+political+

Andreas Osiander. (1998). Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 409–432. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Andrew Linklater. (2005). Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 141–154. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072076?pq-origsite=summon

Angell, N. (1933). The great illusion (Cheap ed). Heinemann.

Anghie, A. (2007a). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law: Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge University Press.

Anghie, A. (2007b). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law: Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge University Press.

Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson. (1991a). The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 16(1), 67–106. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson. (1991b). The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 16(1), 67–106. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon

Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: money, power and the origins of our times. Verso.

Ashley, Richard K. (1 C.E.). Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies&rft.jtitle=International Studies Quarterly&rft.au=Ashley, Richard K&rft.au=Walker, R.B.J&rft.date=1990-09-01&rft.pub=Wiley Subscription Services, Inc&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=9675559&paramdict=en-UK

Ashworth, L. M. (2002). Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? a Revisionist History. International Relations, 16(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016001004

Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(01), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357

Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.

Baldwin, D. A. (1978). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. American Political Science Review, 72(03), 1165–1168. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955253

Baldwin, D. A. (1993a). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Baldwin, D. A. (1993b). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Barry Buzan. (n.d.). From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS. https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=0521541212

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2014a). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (6th edition). Oxford University Press.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2014b). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (6th edition). Oxford University Press.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2014c). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (6th edition). Oxford University Press.

BELLAMY, A. J. (2008). The responsibilities of victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War. Review of International Studies, 34(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050800819X

Benner, E. L. (1988). Marx and Engels on Nationalism and National Identity: A Reappraisal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170010601

BOOTH, K. (1995). Human wrongs and international relations. International Affairs, 71(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2624012

Booth, K., Cox, M., & Dunne, T. (2001a). How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge University Press.

Booth, K., Cox, M., & Dunne, T. (2001b). How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge University Press.

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995a). International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995b). International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995c). International relations theory today. Polity Press.

BOOTH, KEN. (1 C.E.). Introduction: How Might We Live? Global Ethics in a New Century. Review of International Studies, 26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097709?pq-origsite=summon

Boucher, D. (1998). Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford University Press.

Brown, C. (1992). International relations theory: new normative approaches. Columbia University Press.

Brown, C. (1994). ‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230020901

BROWN, C. (1997). Theories of International Justice. British Journal of Political Science, 27(2), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123497000148

Brown, C. (2002). Sovereignty, rights and justice: international political theory today. Polity.

Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009a). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009b). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Buhari-Gulmez, D. (2010). Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach1. International Political Sociology, 4(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00104.x

Bull, H. (1984). Intervention in world politics. Clarendon.

Bull, H. (2012a). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.

Bull, H. (2012b). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. In The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics (4th ed, pp. 51–73). Palgrave Macmillan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2bcd36d9-059e-e711-80cb-005056af4099

Bull, H., Kingsbury, B., & Roberts, A. (1990). Hugo Grotius and international relations. Clarendon Press.

Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984a). The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.

Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984b). The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013a). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013b). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013c). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013d). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013e). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013f). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., & Devetak, R. (2013g). Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2000). International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford University Press.

Cabrera, L. (2010). World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346888

Caney, Simon. (1 C.E.). International distributive justice. Political Studies, 49(5). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International distributive justice&rft.jtitle=Political Studies&rft.au=Simon Caney&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing Ltd&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=974&rft.externalDocID=98490332&paramdict=en-UK

Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2001). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations ([2nd ed.]). Palgrave.

Casper Sylvest. (2005). Continuity and Change in British Liberal Internationalism, c. 1900-1930. Review of International Studies, 31(2), 263–283. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072096?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Chase-Dunn, C. (1981). Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209

Chase-Dunn, C., & Inoue, H. (2012). Accelerating democratic global state formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712443168

Clark, I. (1997). Globalization and fragmentation: international relations in the twentieth century. Oxford University Press.

Clark, Ian. (1989). The hierarchy of states. Cambridge University Press.

Commission on Global Governance. (1995). Our global neighbourhood: the report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford University Press.

Copeland, D. C. (2001). The origins of major war: Vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press.

Cox, R. W. (1981a). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501

Cox, R. W. (1981b). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501

D. J. Markwell. (1986). Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies, 12(4), 279–292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Darby, P. (2000). At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. Cassell.

Darby, P. (2004). Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101

David A. Lake. (2007). Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security, 32(1), 47–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30129801?pq-origsite=summon

Der Derian, J. (1995). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.

Deutsch, K. W. & Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions. (1957a). Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience: Vol. Publication of the Center for Research on World Political Institutions, Princeton University. Princeton University Press.

Deutsch, K. W. & Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions. (1957b). Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience: Vol. Publication of the Center for Research on World Political Institutions, Princeton University. Princeton University Press.

Devetak, R. (1995). The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240010401

Diplomatic Investigations. (n.d.). Harvard University Press.

Donnelly, J. (2000a). Realism and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity

Donnelly, J. (2000b). Realism and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity

Donnelly, J. (2006). Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and                International Society. European Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106064505

Donnelly, J. (2009). Rethinking political structures: from ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond. International Theory, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000037

Dueck, C. (2005). Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America’s Peculiar Path to World Power. Security Studies, 14(2), 195–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410500232891

Duffield, M. R. (2007). Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1179717

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International relations theories: discipline and diversity (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., & Wheeler, N. J. (1999). Human rights in global politics. Cambridge University Press.

Edward Keene. (n.d.-a). Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.

Edward Keene. (n.d.-b). Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.

Ernst B. Haas. (1970). The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing. International Organization, 24(4), 607–646. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706149?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Ethics and international affairs. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Ethics+and+International+Affairs

European journal of international relations. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=European+Journal+of+International+Relations

Evans, M. (2009). Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of. Ethics & International Affairs, 23(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00204.x

Falk, R. A. (1995a). On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Polity Press.

Falk, R. A. (1995b). On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Polity Press.

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391

Forbes, I., & Hoffman, M. (1993). Political theory, international relations, and the ethics of intervention: Vol. Southampton studies in international policy. Macmillan.

Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment.

Friedrich Kratochwil and John Gerard Ruggie. (1986). International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization, 40(4), 753–775. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706828?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Fukuyama, F. F. (1989). The End of History. National Interest, 18. https://ps321.community.uaf.edu/files/2012/10/Fukuyama-End-of-history-article.pdf

G. John Ikenberry. (2009). Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 71–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Gallie, W. B. (1978). Philosophers of peace and war: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy: Vol. Wiles lectures. Cambridge University Press.

George Modelski. (1978). The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20(2), 214–235. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178047?pq-origsite=summon

Geyer, M., & Bright, C. (1995). World History in a Global Age. The American Historical Review, 100(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2168200

Gilbert, M. (2005). Encyclopedia of international relations and global politics. Routledge.

Gill, S. (1993). Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(3), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240030801

Glanville, L. (2013). The Myth of "Traditional” Sovereignty. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12004

Gleditsch, N. P. (2008a). The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x

Gleditsch, N. P. (2008b). The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x

Gleditsch, N. P. (2008c). The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 691–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x

Goodin, R. E. (1990). International ethics and the environmental crisis.

Goodrich, L. M. (1954). Political Community at the International Level. (Doubleday Short Studies in Political Science.). The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 295(1), 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625429500118

Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method. (n.d.). Millennium. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701?journalCode=mila

Griffiths, M. (2007). International relations theory for the 21st century: an introduction. Routledge.

Halliday, F. (1994). Rethinking international relations. UBC Press.

Hameiri, S. (2010). Regulating statehood: state building and the transformation of the global order: Vol. Critical studies of the Asia-Pacific series. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=299706&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity

Harrison, G. (2004). The World Bank and Africa: the construction of governance states. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=7716&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity

Held, D., & McGrew, A. G. (2007). Globalization theory: approaches and controversies: Vol. Global transformations. Polity Press.

Helen Milner. (1991). The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies, 17(1), 67–85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097244?pq-origsite=summon

Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 2(02), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187

Hobson, J. M., & Sharman, J. C. (2005). The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics                of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations, 11(1), 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137

Hoffman, M. (1987). Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022801

Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American social science: international relations.

Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.

Holzgrefe, J. L., & Keohane, R. O. (2003). Humanitarian intervention: ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge University Press.

Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267

Hovden, E., & Keene, E. (2002). The globalization of liberalism. Palgrave in association with Millennium Journal of International Studies.

Howard, M. (2008). War and the liberal conscience ([New ed.]). Hurst.

Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052512

Ikenberry, G. J. (2006). Liberal order and imperial ambition: essays on American power and world politics. Polity Press.

International organisations research journal. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+organisation

International security. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+security

International studies quarterly. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_centric_title_equals&criteria=International%20studies%20quarterly&language=en-gb&titleType=JOURNALS

International theory. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+theory

J. Ann Tickner. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Jackson, R. H. (1990a). Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Jackson, R. H. (1990b). Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190020901

Jackson, R. H., & S²rensen, G. (2013). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (5th ed). Oxford University Press.

Jackson, R. H., & S²rensen, G. (2016a). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. In Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (Sixth edition, pp. 3–29). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=75f0b456-97a2-e711-80cb-005056af4099

Jackson, R. H., & S²rensen, G. (2016b). Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.

Jahn, B. (1998). One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27(3), 613–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030201

Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik. (1999). Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security, 24(2), 5–55. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Jens Bartelson. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.

John Gerard Ruggie. (1982). International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706527?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

John Gerard Ruggie. (1993). Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization, 47(1), 139–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706885?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Joseph M. Grieco. (1988a). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Joseph M. Grieco. (1988b). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Justin Rosenberg. (1990). What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies, 16(4), 285–303. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual peace. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm

Kathryn Sikkink. (1993). Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization, 47(3), 411–441. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706982?pq-origsite=summon

Katzenstein, P. J. & Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on International Peace & Security. (1996). The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.

Kegley, C. W. (1993). The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities: ISA Presidential Address March 27, 1993 Acapulco, Mexico. International Studies Quarterly, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600765

Keohane, R. O. (1986). Neorealism and its critics: Vol. The Political economy of international change. Columbia University Press.

Keohane, R. O. (1989). Closing the fairness practice gap.

Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451

Koskenniemi, M. (2002a). The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge University Press.

Koskenniemi, M. (2002b). The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge University Press.

Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. In Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy (pp. 3–42). Princeton University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8e62b4ed-f39d-e711-80cb-005056af4099

Lawson, S. (2002). The new agenda in international relations: from polarization to globalization in world politics. Blackwell Publishers.

Linklater, A. (1981). Men and citizens in international relations.

Linklater, A. (1982a). Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics.

Linklater, A. (1982b). Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics.

Linklater, A. (1992). The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210010601

Linklater, A. (1998a). The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era: Vol. Studies in international relations. University of South Carolina Press.

Linklater, A. (1998b). The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era: Vol. Studies in international relations. University of South Carolina Press.

Linklater, A. (2000). International relations: critical concepts in political science: Vol. Critical concepts in political science. Routledge.

Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009a). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869

Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009b). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869

Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009c). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869

Long, D., & Wilson, P. (1995). Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Clarendon Press.

MacMillan, J., & Linklater, A. (1995). Boundaries in question: new directions in international relations. Pinter Publishers.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990a). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981

Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990b). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton.

Michael Mann. (1997). Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State? Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), 472–496. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177235?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Michael W. Doyle. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–235. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Millennium. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Millennium

Miller, J. D. B. (1986). Norman Angell and the futility of war: peace and the public mind. Macmillan.

Miller, J. D. B., & Vincent, R. J. (1990). Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Clarendon Press.

Mitrany, D. (1948). The Functional Approach to World Organization. International Affairs, 24(3), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/3018652

Morgenthau, H. J. (1952). Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review, 46(04), 961–988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108

Morgenthau, H. J. (1970). Truth and power: essays of a decade, 1960-70. Pall Mall P.

Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (2006). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Nandy, A. (1988). The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.

Nardin, T., & Mapel, D. (1992). Traditions of international ethics: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Navari, C. (1989). The great illusion revisited: the international theory of Norman Angell.

NICHOLAS KITCHEN. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 117–143. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588107?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Nicholson, M. (2002a). International relations: a concise introduction (2nd ed). Palgrave.

Nicholson, M. (2002b). International relations: a concise introduction. In International relations: a concise introduction (2nd ed., pp. 114–127). Palgrave. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ddbb1ec-f3a1-e711-80cb-005056af4099

Nye, J. S. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(02), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363

Oran R. Young. (1982). Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 277–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706523?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Oye, K. A. (1985). Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics, 38(01), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010349

Peter Gellman. (1988). Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism. Review of International Studies, 14(4), 247–266. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097151?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Peter Singer. (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265052?pq-origsite=summon

Peter Stirk. (2005). John H. Herz: Realism and the Fragility of the International Order. Review of International Studies, 31(2), 285–306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072097?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Peter Wilson. (1998). The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies, 24, 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Pevehouse, Jon. (1 C.E.). Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. Perspectives on Politics, 1(3), 651–652. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. By Bruce Russett and John Oneal. New York: Norton, 2001. 393p. $22.70 paper&rft.jtitle=Perspectives on Politics&rft.au=Pevehouse, Jon&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.pub=Cambridge University Press&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=652&rft.externalDocID=S1537592703230437&paramdict=en-UK

Pogge, T. (2007a). Global justice: Vol. Metaphilosophy series in philosophy ([New ed.]). Blackwell Publishing.

Pogge, T. (2007b). Global justice: Vol. Metaphilosophy series in philosophy ([New ed.]). Blackwell Publishing.

Polanyi, K. (1975). The great transformation. Octagon Books.

Porter, B. & University College of Wales. (1972). The Aberystwyth papers: international politics, 1919-1969. Oxford University Press (for the University College of Wales).

PRICE, R., & REUS - SMIT, C. (1998). Dangerous Liaisons? European Journal of International Relations, 4(3), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001

Rachman, Gideon. (18 C.E.). Clash of civilisations prediction revisited. The Australian Financial Review. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clash of civilisations prediction revisited&rft.jtitle=The Australian Financial Review&rft.au=Gideon Rachman&rft.date=2015-11-18&rft.pub=Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited&rft.issn=0404-2018&rft.eissn=0404-2018&rft.externalDocID=3868070261&paramdict=en-UK

Rawls, J., & Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples: with, ‘The idea of public reason revisited’. Harvard University Press.

ReusSmit, Christian. (1 C.E.). Imagining society: constructivism and the English School. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 4(3), 487–509. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imagining society: constructivism and the English School&rft.jtitle=British Journal of Politics and International Relations&rft.au=ReusSmit, Christian&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing&rft.issn=1369-1481&rft.eissn=1467-856X&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00091&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=n/a&paramdict=en-UK

Review by:                          Gideon Rose. (1998). Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy: The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security by Michael E. Brown. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Review of international studies. (n.d.). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=Review+of+International+Studies

Richard K. Ashley. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?pq-origsite=summon

Richard Little. (2003). The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language? Review of International Studies, 29(3), 443–460. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097865?pq-origsite=summon

Richardson, J. L. (2001). Contending liberalisms in world politics: ideology and power. L. Rienner.

Robert O. Keohane. (1998). Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 193–197. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600824?pq-origsite=summon

Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.

Ronen Palan. (2000). A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 26(4), 575–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.

Rosecrance, R. (1986). The rise of the trading state: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. Basic Books.

Rosecrance, R. (1987). Long cycle theory and international relations. International Organization, 41(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478

Rosenberg, J. (1994). The International Imagination: IR theory and "classic social analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23(1). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298940230010601

Ruggie, J. G. (1983). Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. World Politics, 35(02), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010273

Schmidt, B. C. (2002). Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism. International Relations, 16(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016001003

Scholte, J. A. (1997). Global capitalism and the state. International Affairs, 73(3), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2624266

Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149

Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui. (1996a). Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans. University of Minnesota Press.

Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui. (1996b). Sovereigns, Quasi sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination. University of Minnesota Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/32421

Sklair, L., & Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996a). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996b). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996c). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996d). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996e). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996f). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Steans, J. (1998). Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity Press.

Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Sterling-Folker, J. A. (2013a). Making sense of international relations theory (Second edition). Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.

Sterling-Folker, J. A. (2013b). Making sense of international relations theory (Second edition). Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.

Suganami, H. (1983). The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations. International Relations, 7(5), 2363–2381. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788300700508

The End of History? - Francis Fukuyama. (n.d.). http://www.wesjones.com/eoh.htm

Tickner, J. A. (1988a). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801

Tickner, J. A. (1988b). Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801

Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.

Tickner, J. A. (2005). What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly, 49(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x

TILLY, C. (1992). Futures of European states. Social Research, 59(4), 705–717. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FUTURES OF EUROPEAN STATES&rft.jtitle=SOCIAL RESEARCH&rft.au=TILLY, C&rft.date=1992&rft.pub=NEW SCH SOC RES&rft.issn=0037-783X&rft.eissn=1944-768X&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=717&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=A1992LA68300003&paramdict=en-UK

Vasquez, J. A. (1997). The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review, 91(04), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952172

Vasquez, J. A., & Elman, C. (2003). Realism and the balancing of power: a new debate: Vol. Prentice Hall studies in international relations. Prentice Hall.

Vincent, R. J. (n.d.). Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press.

Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2001). The Essential Wallerstein. New Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2003). The decline of American power: the U.S. in a chaotic world. New Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2004). World-systems analysis: an introduction. Duke University Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2011a). The modern world-system: 2: Mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600-1750: Vol. Modern world-system. University of California Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2011b). The modern world-system: 3: Second era of great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730-1840s: Vol. Studies in social discontinuity. University of California Press.

Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances: Vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press.

Walters, F. P. (1956). Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. International Affairs, 32(4), 481–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2606306

Waltz, K. N. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097

Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.

Waltz, K. N. (2010a). Theory of international politics. Waveland.

Waltz, K. N. (2010b). Theory of international politics. Waveland.

Waltz, K. N. (2010c). Theory of international politics. Waveland.

Waltz, Kenneth N. (1 C.E.). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The emerging structure of international politics&rft.jtitle=International Security&rft.au=Waltz, Kenneth N&rft.date=1993-10-01&rft.pub=MIT Press Journals&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=44&rft.externalDocID=6183986&paramdict=en-UK

Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Basic Books.

WATSON, ADAM. (1 C.E.). Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies. Review of International Studies, 13(2). http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies&rft.jtitle=Review of International Studies&rft.au=WATSON, ADAM&rft.date=1987-04-01&rft.pub=Butterworths&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&paramdict=en-UK

Weber, C. (2014). International relations theory: a critical introduction (Fourth edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=544463&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity

Wendt, A. (2003). Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), 491–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/135406610394001

Wheeler, N. J. (2000a). Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740

Wheeler, N. J. (2000b). Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740

Whitworth, S. (2004). Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: a gendered analysis: Vol. Critical security studies. Lynne Rienner Pub.

Wight, M., Wight, G., Porter, B. E., Bull, H., & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (2002). International theory: the three traditions. Continuum for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

William I. Robinson and Jerry Harris. (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science & Society, 64(1), 11–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40403824?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

WILLIAMS, D. (2013). Development, intervention, and international order. Review of International Studies, 39(05), 1213–1231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000260

Wolfers, A. (1951). The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference. World Politics, 4(01), 39–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008900