[1]
Adam Watson 1990. Systems of States. Review of International Studies. 16, 2 (1990), 99–109.
[2]
Ahluwalia, D.P.S. 2001. Politics and post-colonial theory: African inflections. Routledge.
[3]
Ahsan I. Butt 2013. Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America’s War-Prone Decade, 1932-41. International Organization. 67, 3 (2013), 575–607.
[4]
Alan James 1989. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 15, 3 (1989), 215–229.
[5]
Alexander Wendt 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 2 (1992), 391–425.
[6]
Alker, H.R. and Biersteker, T.J. 1984. The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire. International Studies Quarterly. 28, 2 (Jun. 1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600692.
[7]
Andreas Osiander 1998. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly. 42, 3 (1998), 409–432.
[8]
Andrew Linklater 2005. Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process. Review of International Studies. 31, 1 (2005), 141–154.
[9]
Angell, N. 1933. The great illusion. Heinemann.
[10]
Anghie, A. 2007. Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Anghie, A. 2007. Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson 1991. The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 16, 1 (1991), 67–106.
[13]
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson 1991. The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 16, 1 (1991), 67–106.
[14]
Arrighi, G. 1994. The long twentieth century: money, power and the origins of our times. Verso.
[15]
Ashley, Richard K 1AD. Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies. International studies quarterly. 34, 3 (1AD).
[16]
Ashworth, L.M. 2002. Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? a Revisionist History. International Relations. 16, 1 (Apr. 2002), 33–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016001004.
[17]
Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R.O. 1985. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 38, 01 (Oct. 1985), 226–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.
[18]
Axelrod, R.M. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
[19]
Baldwin, D.A. 1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press.
[20]
Baldwin, D.A. 1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press.
[21]
Baldwin, D.A. 1978. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. American Political Science Review. 72, 03 (Sep. 1978), 1165–1168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1955253.
[22]
Barry Buzan From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS.
[23]
Baylis, J. et al. eds. 2014. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Baylis, J. et al. eds. 2014. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[25]
Baylis, J. et al. eds. 2014. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[26]
BELLAMY, A.J. 2008. The responsibilities of victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War. Review of International Studies. 34, 04 (Oct. 2008). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050800819X.
[27]
Benner, E.L. 1988. Marx and Engels on Nationalism and National Identity: A Reappraisal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 17, 1 (Mar. 1988), 1–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170010601.
[28]
Booth, K. et al. 2001. How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Booth, K. et al. 2001. How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge University Press.
[30]
BOOTH, K. 1995. Human wrongs and international relations. International Affairs. 71, 1 (Jan. 1995), 103–126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2624012.
[31]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[32]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[33]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[34]
BOOTH, KEN 1AD. Introduction: How Might We Live? Global Ethics in a New Century. Review of international studies. 26, (1AD).
[35]
Boucher, D. 1998. Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford University Press.
[36]
Brown, C. 1992. International relations theory: new normative approaches. Columbia University Press.
[37]
Brown, C. 2002. Sovereignty, rights and justice: international political theory today. Polity.
[38]
BROWN, C. 1997. Theories of International Justice. British Journal of Political Science. 27, 2 (Apr. 1997), 273–297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123497000148.
[39]
Brown, C. 1994. ‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 23, 2 (Jun. 1994), 213–236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230020901.
[40]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[41]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[42]
Buhari-Gulmez, D. 2010. Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach1. International Political Sociology. 4, 3 (Sep. 2010), 253–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00104.x.
[43]
Bull, H. et al. 1990. Hugo Grotius and international relations. Clarendon Press.
[44]
Bull, H. 1984. Intervention in world politics. Clarendon.
[45]
Bull, H. 2012. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[46]
Bull, H. 2012. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan. 51–73.
[47]
Bull, H. and Watson, A. 1984. The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.
[48]
Bull, H. and Watson, A. 1984. The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.
[49]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[50]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[51]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[52]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[53]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[54]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[55]
Burchill, S. et al. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[56]
Buzan, B. and Little, R. 2000. International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Cabrera, L. 2010. World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges. European Journal of International Relations. 16, 3 (Sep. 2010), 511–530. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346888.
[58]
Caney, Simon 1AD. International distributive justice. Political studies. 49, 5 (1AD).
[59]
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave.
[60]
Casper Sylvest 2005. Continuity and Change in British Liberal Internationalism, c. 1900-1930. Review of International Studies. 31, 2 (2005), 263–283.
[61]
Chase-Dunn, C. 1981. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly. 25, 1 (Mar. 1981). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209.
[62]
Chase-Dunn, C. and Inoue, H. 2012. Accelerating democratic global state formation. Cooperation and Conflict. 47, 2 (Jun. 2012), 157–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712443168.
[63]
Clark, I. 1997. Globalization and fragmentation: international relations in the twentieth century. Oxford University Press.
[64]
Clark, Ian 1989. The hierarchy of states. Cambridge University Press.
[65]
Commission on Global Governance 1995. Our global neighbourhood: the report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford University Press.
[66]
Copeland, D.C. 2001. The origins of major war. Cornell University Press.
[67]
Cox, R.W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 10, 2 (Jun. 1981), 126–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501.
[68]
Cox, R.W. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 10, 2 (Jun. 1981), 126–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501.
[69]
D. J. Markwell 1986. Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies. 12, 4 (1986), 279–292.
[70]
Darby, P. 2000. At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. Cassell.
[71]
Darby, P. 2004. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, 1 (Jan. 2004), 1–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.
[72]
David A. Lake 2007. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security. 32, 1 (2007), 47–79.
[73]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[74]
Deutsch, K.W. and Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience. Princeton University Press.
[75]
Deutsch, K.W. and Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience. Princeton University Press.
[76]
Devetak, R. 1995. The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 24, 1 (Mar. 1995), 27–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240010401.
[77]
Donnelly, J. 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[78]
Donnelly, J. 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[79]
Donnelly, J. 2009. Rethinking political structures: from ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond. International Theory. 1, 01 (Mar. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000037.
[80]
Donnelly, J. 2006. Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations. 12, 2 (Jun. 2006), 139–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106064505.
[81]
Dueck, C. 2005. Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America’s Peculiar Path to World Power. Security Studies. 14, 2 (Apr. 2005), 195–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410500232891.
[82]
Duffield, M.R. 2007. Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Polity.
[83]
Dunne, T. et al. 2013. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press.
[84]
Dunne, T. and Wheeler, N.J. 1999. Human rights in global politics. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Edward Keene Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.
[86]
Edward Keene Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.
[87]
Ernst B. Haas 1970. The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing. International Organization. 24, 4 (1970), 607–646.
[88]
Evans, M. 2009. Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of. Ethics & International Affairs. 23, 2 (Jun. 2009), 147–164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00204.x.
[89]
Falk, R.A. 1995. On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Polity Press.
[90]
Falk, R.A. 1995. On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Polity Press.
[91]
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 2001. Taking stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 4, 1 (Jun. 2001), 391–416. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.
[92]
Forbes, I. and Hoffman, M. 1993. Political theory, international relations, and the ethics of intervention. Macmillan.
[93]
Frank, A.G. 1966. The development of underdevelopment.
[94]
Friedrich Kratochwil and John Gerard Ruggie 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization. 40, 4 (1986), 753–775.
[95]
Fukuyama, F.F. 1989. The End of History. National Interest. 18, (1989).
[96]
G. John Ikenberry 2009. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 1 (2009), 71–87.
[97]
Gallie, W.B. 1978. Philosophers of peace and war: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy. Cambridge University Press.
[98]
George Modelski 1978. The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 20, 2 (1978), 214–235.
[99]
Geyer, M. and Bright, C. 1995. World History in a Global Age. The American Historical Review. 100, 4 (Oct. 1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2168200.
[100]
Gilbert, M. 2005. Encyclopedia of international relations and global politics. Routledge.
[101]
Gill, S. 1995. Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 24, 3 (Dec. 1995), 399–423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240030801.
[102]
Gill, S. 1993. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
[103]
Glanville, L. 2013. The Myth of "Traditional” Sovereignty. International Studies Quarterly. 57, 1 (Mar. 2013), 79–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12004.
[104]
Gleditsch, N.P. 2008. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly. 52, 4 (Dec. 2008), 691–712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x.
[105]
Gleditsch, N.P. 2008. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly. 52, 4 (Dec. 2008), 691–712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x.
[106]
Gleditsch, N.P. 2008. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly. 52, 4 (Dec. 2008), 691–712. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x.
[107]
Goodin, R.E. 1990. International ethics and the environmental crisis.
[108]
Goodrich, L.M. 1954. Political Community at the International Level. (Doubleday Short Studies in Political Science.). The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 295, 1 (Sep. 1954), 147–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/000271625429500118.
[109]
Griffiths, M. 2007. International relations theory for the 21st century: an introduction. Routledge.
[110]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. UBC Press.
[111]
Hameiri, S. 2010. Regulating statehood: state building and the transformation of the global order. Palgrave Macmillan.
[112]
Harrison, G. 2004. The World Bank and Africa: the construction of governance states. Routledge.
[113]
Held, D. and McGrew, A.G. 2007. Globalization theory: approaches and controversies. Polity Press.
[114]
Helen Milner 1991. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies. 17, 1 (1991), 67–85.
[115]
Herz, J.H. 1950. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics. 2, 02 (Jan. 1950), 157–180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187.
[116]
Hobson, J.M. and Sharman, J.C. 2005. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations. 11, 1 (Mar. 2005), 63–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137.
[117]
Hoffman, M. 1987. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 16, 2 (Jun. 1987), 231–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160022801.
[118]
Hoffmann, S. 1977. An American social science: international relations.
[119]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.
[120]
Holzgrefe, J.L. and Keohane, R.O. 2003. Humanitarian intervention: ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge University Press.
[121]
Hopf, T. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, 1 (Summer 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.
[122]
Hovden, E. and Keene, E. 2002. The globalization of liberalism. Palgrave in association with Millennium Journal of International Studies.
[123]
Howard, M. 2008. War and the liberal conscience. Hurst.
[124]
Hurrell, A. 2007. On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford University Press.
[125]
Ikenberry, G.J. 2006. Liberal order and imperial ambition: essays on American power and world politics. Polity Press.
[126]
J. Ann Tickner 1997. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 4 (1997), 611–632.
[127]
Jackson, R.H. 1990. Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 19, 2 (Jun. 1990), 261–272. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190020901.
[128]
Jackson, R.H. 1990. Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.
[129]
Jackson, R.H. and S2rensen, G. 2013. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[130]
Jackson, R.H. and S2rensen, G. 2016. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press. 3–29.
[131]
Jackson, R.H. and S2rensen, G. 2016. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press.
[132]
Jahn, B. 1998. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 27, 3 (Sep. 1998), 613–641. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030201.
[133]
Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik 1999. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security. 24, 2 (1999), 5–55.
[134]
Jens Bartelson 1995. A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
[135]
John Gerard Ruggie 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization. 36, 2 (1982), 379–415.
[136]
John Gerard Ruggie 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization. 47, 1 (1993), 139–174.
[137]
Joseph M. Grieco 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 42, 3 (1988), 485–507.
[138]
Joseph M. Grieco 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 42, 3 (1988), 485–507.
[139]
Justin Rosenberg 1990. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies. 16, 4 (1990), 285–303.
[140]
Kant, I. 1795. Perpetual peace.
[141]
Kathryn Sikkink 1993. Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization. 47, 3 (1993), 411–441.
[142]
Katzenstein, P.J. and Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on International Peace & Security 1996. The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
[143]
Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
[144]
Kegley, C.W. 1993. The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities: ISA Presidential Address March 27, 1993 Acapulco, Mexico. International Studies Quarterly. 37, 2 (Jun. 1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2600765.
[145]
Keohane, R.O. 1989. Closing the fairness practice gap.
[146]
Keohane, R.O. 1986. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[147]
Keohane, R.O. 2012. Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations. 26, 2 (Jun. 2012), 125–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117812438451.
[148]
Koskenniemi, M. 2002. The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge University Press.
[149]
Koskenniemi, M. 2002. The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge University Press.
[150]
Krasner, S.D. 1999. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. 3–42.
[151]
Lawson, S. 2002. The new agenda in international relations: from polarization to globalization in world politics. Blackwell Publishers.
[152]
Linklater, A. 2000. International relations: critical concepts in political science. Routledge.
[153]
Linklater, A. 1981. Men and citizens in international relations.
[154]
Linklater, A. 1982. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics.
[155]
Linklater, A. 1982. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics.
[156]
Linklater, A. 1992. The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 21, 1 (Mar. 1992), 77–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210010601.
[157]
Linklater, A. 1998. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. University of South Carolina Press.
[158]
Linklater, A. 1998. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. University of South Carolina Press.
[159]
Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. 2006. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
[160]
Lobell, S.E. et al. 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
[161]
Lobell, S.E. et al. 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
[162]
Lobell, S.E. et al. 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
[163]
Long, D. and Wilson, P. 1995. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Clarendon Press.
[164]
MacMillan, J. and Linklater, A. 1995. Boundaries in question: new directions in international relations. Pinter Publishers.
[165]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 15, 1 (Summer 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.
[166]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 15, 1 (Summer 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.
[167]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton.
[168]
Michael Mann 1997. Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State? Review of International Political Economy. 4, 3 (1997), 472–496.
[169]
Michael W. Doyle 1983. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 12, 3 (1983), 205–235.
[170]
Miller, J.D.B. 1986. Norman Angell and the futility of war: peace and the public mind. Macmillan.
[171]
Miller, J.D.B. and Vincent, R.J. 1990. Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Clarendon Press.
[172]
Mitrany, D. 1948. The Functional Approach to World Organization. International Affairs. 24, 3 (Jul. 1948), 350–363. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3018652.
[173]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1952. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 46, 04 (Dec. 1952), 961–988. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.
[174]
Morgenthau, H.J. et al. 2006. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[175]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1970. Truth and power: essays of a decade, 1960-70. Pall Mall P.
[176]
Nandy, A. 1988. The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford University Press.
[177]
Nardin, T. and Mapel, D. 1992. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge University Press.
[178]
Navari, C. 1989. The great illusion revisited: the international theory of Norman Angell.
[179]
NICHOLAS KITCHEN 2010. Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies. 36, 1 (2010), 117–143.
[180]
Nicholson, M. 2002. International relations: a concise introduction. Palgrave.
[181]
Nicholson, M. 2002. International relations: a concise introduction. International relations: a concise introduction. Palgrave. 114–127.
[182]
Nye, J.S. 1988. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 40, 02 (Jan. 1988), 235–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.
[183]
Oran R. Young 1982. Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization. 36, 2 (1982), 277–297.
[184]
Oye, K.A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics. 38, 01 (Oct. 1985), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010349.
[185]
Peter Gellman 1988. Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism. Review of International Studies. 14, 4 (1988), 247–266.
[186]
Peter Singer 1972. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1, 3 (1972), 229–243.
[187]
Peter Stirk 2005. John H. Herz: Realism and the Fragility of the International Order. Review of International Studies. 31, 2 (2005), 285–306.
[188]
Peter Wilson 1998. The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies. 24, (1998), 1–15.
[189]
Pevehouse, Jon 1AD. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. Perspectives on politics. 1, 3 (1AD), 651–652.
[190]
Pogge, T. 2007. Global justice. Blackwell Publishing.
[191]
Pogge, T. 2007. Global justice. Blackwell Publishing.
[192]
Polanyi, K. 1975. The great transformation. Octagon Books.
[193]
Porter, B. and University College of Wales 1972. The Aberystwyth papers: international politics, 1919-1969. Oxford University Press (for the University College of Wales).
[194]
PRICE, R. and REUS - SMIT, C. 1998. Dangerous Liaisons? European Journal of International Relations. 4, 3 (Sep. 1998), 259–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004003001.
[195]
Rachman, Gideon 18AD. Clash of civilisations prediction revisited. The Australian financial review. (18AD).
[196]
Rawls, J. and Rawls, J. 1999. The law of peoples: with, ‘The idea of public reason revisited’. Harvard University Press.
[197]
ReusSmit, Christian 1AD. Imagining society: constructivism and the English School. British journal of politics & international relations. 4, 3 (1AD), 487–509.
[198]
Review by: Gideon Rose 1998. Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy: The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security by Michael E. Brown. World Politics. 51, 1 (1998), 144–172.
[199]
Richard K. Ashley 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38, 2 (1984), 225–286.
[200]
Richard Little 2003. The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language? Review of International Studies. 29, 3 (2003), 443–460.
[201]
Richardson, J.L. 2001. Contending liberalisms in world politics: ideology and power. L. Rienner.
[202]
Robert O. Keohane 1998. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 42, 1 (1998), 193–197.
[203]
Robinson, W.I. 1996. Promoting polyarchy: globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.
[204]
Ronen Palan 2000. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 26, 4 (2000), 575–598.
[205]
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
[206]
Rosecrance, R. 1987. Long cycle theory and international relations. International Organization. 41, 02 (Mar. 1987). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478.
[207]
Rosecrance, R. 1986. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. Basic Books.
[208]
Rosenberg, J. 1994. The International Imagination: IR theory and "classic social analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 23, 1 (1994).
[209]
Ruggie, J.G. 1983. Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. World Politics. 35, 02 (Jan. 1983), 261–285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010273.
[210]
Schmidt, B.C. 2002. Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism. International Relations. 16, 1 (Apr. 2002), 9–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016001003.
[211]
Scholte, J.A. 1997. Global capitalism and the state. International Affairs. 73, 3 (Jul. 1997), 427–452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2624266.
[212]
Schweller, R.L. 1994. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security. 19, 1 (Summer 1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149.
[213]
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui 1996. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans. University of Minnesota Press.
[214]
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination. University of Minnesota Press.
[215]
Sklair, L. and Sklair, L. 2002. Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford University Press.
[216]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[217]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[218]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[219]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[220]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[221]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[222]
Steans, J. 1998. Gender and international relations: an introduction. Polity Press.
[223]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson Prentice Hall.
[224]
Sterling-Folker, J.A. 2013. Making sense of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
[225]
Sterling-Folker, J.A. 2013. Making sense of international relations theory. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
[226]
Suganami, H. 1983. The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations. International Relations. 7, 5 (Apr. 1983), 2363–2381. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788300700508.
[227]
Tickner, J.A. 2001. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. Columbia University Press.
[228]
Tickner, J.A. 1988. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 17, 3 (Dec. 1988), 429–440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
[229]
Tickner, J.A. 1988. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 17, 3 (Dec. 1988), 429–440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
[230]
Tickner, J.A. 2005. What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly. 49, 1 (Mar. 2005), 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x.
[231]
TILLY, C 1992. Futures of European states. Social research. 59, 4 (1992), 705–717.
[232]
Vasquez, J.A. 1997. The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review. 91, 04 (Dec. 1997), 899–912. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2952172.
[233]
Vasquez, J.A. and Elman, C. 2003. Realism and the balancing of power: a new debate. Prentice Hall.
[234]
Vincent, R.J. Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press.
[235]
Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
[236]
Wallerstein, I.M. 2003. The decline of American power: the U.S. in a chaotic world. New Press.
[237]
Wallerstein, I.M. 2001. The Essential Wallerstein. New Press.
[238]
Wallerstein, I.M. 2011. The modern world-system: 2: Mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600-1750. University of California Press.
[239]
Wallerstein, I.M. 2011. The modern world-system: 3: Second era of great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730-1840s. University of California Press.
[240]
Wallerstein, I.M. 2004. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Duke University Press.
[241]
Walt, S.M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
[242]
Walters, F.P. 1956. Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. International Affairs. 32, 4 (Oct. 1956), 481–481. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2606306.
[243]
Waltz, Kenneth N 1AD. The emerging structure of international politics. International security. 18, 2 (1AD).
[244]
Waltz, K.N. 2001. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
[245]
Waltz, K.N. 1993. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security. 18, 2 (Autumn 1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2539097.
[246]
Waltz, K.N. 2010. Theory of international politics. Waveland.
[247]
Waltz, K.N. 2010. Theory of international politics. Waveland.
[248]
Waltz, K.N. 2010. Theory of international politics. Waveland.
[249]
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. Basic Books.
[250]
WATSON, ADAM 1AD. Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies. Review of international studies. 13, 2 (1AD).
[251]
Weber, C. 2014. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[252]
Wendt, A. 2003. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations. 9, 4 (Dec. 2003), 491–542. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/135406610394001.
[253]
Wheeler, N.J. 2000. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press.
[254]
Wheeler, N.J. 2000. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press.
[255]
Whitworth, S. 2004. Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: a gendered analysis. Lynne Rienner Pub.
[256]
Wight, M. et al. 2002. International theory: the three traditions. Continuum for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[257]
William I. Robinson and Jerry Harris 2000. Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science & Society. 64, 1 (2000), 11–54.
[258]
WILLIAMS, D. 2013. Development, intervention, and international order. Review of International Studies. 39, 05 (Dec. 2013), 1213–1231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000260.
[259]
Wolfers, A. 1951. The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference. World Politics. 4, 01 (Oct. 1951), 39–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2008900.
[260]
Alternatives: global, local, political.
[261]
Diplomatic Investigations. Harvard University Press.
[262]
Ethics and international affairs.
[263]
European journal of international relations.
[264]
Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method. Millennium. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701?journalCode=mila.
[265]
International organisations research journal.
[266]
International security.
[267]
International studies quarterly.
[268]
International theory.
[270]
Review of international studies.
[271]
The End of History? - Francis Fukuyama.
