[1]
A. Linklater, International relations: critical concepts in political science, vol. Critical concepts in political science. London: Routledge, 2000.
[2]
I. Kant, Perpetual peace. 1795 [Online]. Available: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm
[3]
E. H. Carr and M. Cox, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations, [2nd ed.]. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
[4]
H. Bull, The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
[5]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland, 2010.
[6]
A. Linklater, Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. London: Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics, 1982.
[7]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, International relations theories: discipline and diversity, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[8]
K. Booth and S. Smith, International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995.
[9]
C. Brown and K. Ainley, Understanding international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[10]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[11]
J. Der Derian, International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995.
[12]
R. H. Jackson and G. S2rensen, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[13]
J. MacMillan and A. Linklater, Boundaries in question: new directions in international relations. London: Pinter Publishers, 1995.
[14]
M. Nicholson, International relations: a concise introduction, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
[15]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[16]
J. Steans, L. Pettiford, T. Diez, and J. Steans, Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes, 2nd ed. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
[17]
J. A. Sterling-Folker, Making sense of international relations theory, Second edition. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, 2013.
[18]
C. Weber, International relations theory: a critical introduction, Fourth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=544463&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[19]
‘Review of international studies’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=Review+of+International+Studies
[20]
‘European journal of international relations’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=European+Journal+of+International+Relations
[21]
‘International organisations research journal’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+organisation
[22]
‘International theory’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+theory
[23]
‘International studies quarterly’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_centric_title_equals&criteria=International%20studies%20quarterly&language=en-gb&titleType=JOURNALS
[24]
‘Ethics and international affairs’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Ethics+and+International+Affairs
[25]
‘Alternatives: global, local, political’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Alternatives%3A+global%2C+local%2C+political+
[26]
‘International security’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+security
[27]
‘Millennium’ [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Millennium
[28]
K. BOOTH, ‘Human wrongs and international relations’, International Affairs, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 103–126, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.2307/2624012. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624012?pq-origsite=summon
[29]
R. H. Jackson and G. S2rensen, ‘Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches’, in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, Sixth edition., Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 3–29 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=75f0b456-97a2-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[30]
R. H. Jackson, ‘Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 261–272, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1177/03058298900190020901.
[31]
H. J. Morgenthau, Truth and power: essays of a decade, 1960-70. London: Pall Mall P, 1970.
[32]
B. Porter and University College of Wales, The Aberystwyth papers: international politics, 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press (for the University College of Wales), 1972.
[33]
S. Hoffmann, An American social science: international relations. 1977.
[34]
H. R. Alker and T. J. Biersteker, ‘The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2, Jun. 1984, doi: 10.2307/2600692.
[35]
Ashley, Richard K, ‘Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies’, International studies quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies&rft.jtitle=International Studies Quarterly&rft.au=Ashley, Richard K&rft.au=Walker, R.B.J&rft.date=1990-09-01&rft.pub=Wiley Subscription Services, Inc&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=9675559&paramdict=en-UK
[36]
J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611–632, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[37]
R. W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–155, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1177/03058298810100020501.
[38]
D. Boucher, Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[39]
C. Brown, Sovereignty, rights and justice: international political theory today. Oxford: Polity, 2002.
[40]
BOOTH, KEN, ‘Introduction: How Might We Live? Global Ethics in a New Century’, Review of international studies, vol. 26, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097709?pq-origsite=summon
[41]
M. Hollis and S. Smith, Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
[42]
M. Wight, G. Wight, B. E. Porter, H. Bull, and Royal Institute of International Affairs, International theory: the three traditions. London: Continuum for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2002.
[43]
N. P. Gleditsch, ‘The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 691–712, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x. [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Liberal+Moment+Fifteen+Years+On1&rft.jtitle=International+Studies+Quarterly&rft.au=Gleditsch%2C+Nils+Petter&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2478.2008.00522.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1468_2478_2008_00522_x&paramdict=en-UK
[44]
D. Long and P. Wilson, Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
[45]
Andreas Osiander, ‘Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 409–432, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[46]
J. H. Herz, ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 157–180, Jan. 1950, doi: 10.2307/2009187. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009187?pq-origsite=summon
[47]
H. J. Morgenthau, ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’, American Political Science Review, vol. 46, no. 04, pp. 961–988, Dec. 1952, doi: 10.2307/1952108. [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Another+%E2%80%93great+debate%E2%80%9D%3A+The+national+interest+of+the+United+States&rft.jtitle=American+Political+Science+Review&rft.au=Morgenthau%2C+Hans+J&rft.date=1952&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=961&rft.epage=988&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307%2F1952108&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=401678067&paramdict=en-UK
[48]
A. Wolfers, ‘The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference’, World Politics, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 39–63, Oct. 1951, doi: 10.2307/2008900. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2008900?pq-origsite=summon
[49]
J. G. Ruggie, ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, World Politics, vol. 35, no. 02, pp. 261–285, Jan. 1983, doi: 10.2307/2010273. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010273?pq-origsite=summon
[50]
Peter Wilson, ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, pp. 1–15, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[51]
F. F. Fukuyama, ‘The End of History’, National Interest, vol. 18, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://ps321.community.uaf.edu/files/2012/10/Fukuyama-End-of-history-article.pdf
[52]
C. W. Kegley, ‘The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities: ISA Presidential Address March 27, 1993 Acapulco, Mexico’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.2307/2600765. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600765?pq-origsite=summon
[53]
C. Brown and K. Ainley, Understanding international relations, 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[54]
L. M. Ashworth, ‘Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? a Revisionist History’, International Relations, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–51, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0047117802016001004.
[55]
F. P. Walters, ‘Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization’, International Affairs, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 481–481, Oct. 1956, doi: 10.2307/2606306. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2606306?pq-origsite=summon
[56]
Peter Gellman, ‘Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism’, Review of International Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 247–266, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097151?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[57]
M. Howard, War and the liberal conscience, [New ed.]. London: Hurst, 2008.
[58]
M. Gilbert, Encyclopedia of international relations and global politics. London: Routledge, 2005.
[59]
D. J. Markwell, ‘Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On’, Review of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 279–292, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
J. D. B. Miller, Norman Angell and the futility of war: peace and the public mind. London: Macmillan, 1986.
[61]
C. Navari, The great illusion revisited: the international theory of Norman Angell. 1989.
[62]
B. C. Schmidt, ‘Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism’, International Relations, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 9–31, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0047117802016001003.
[63]
Peter Stirk, ‘John H. Herz: Realism and the Fragility of the International Order’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 285–306, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072097?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[64]
Casper Sylvest, ‘Continuity and Change in British Liberal Internationalism, c. 1900-1930’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 263–283, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072096?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[65]
N. Angell, The great illusion, Cheap ed. London: Heinemann, 1933.
[66]
Waltz, Kenneth N, ‘The emerging structure of international politics’, International security, vol. 18, no. 2, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The emerging structure of international politics&rft.jtitle=International Security&rft.au=Waltz, Kenneth N&rft.date=1993-10-01&rft.pub=MIT Press Journals&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=44&rft.externalDocID=6183986&paramdict=en-UK
[67]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, Summer 1990, doi: 10.2307/2538981.
[68]
Rachman, Gideon, ‘Clash of civilisations prediction revisited’, The Australian financial review, 18AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clash of civilisations prediction revisited&rft.jtitle=The Australian Financial Review&rft.au=Gideon Rachman&rft.date=2015-11-18&rft.pub=Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited&rft.issn=0404-2018&rft.eissn=0404-2018&rft.externalDocID=3868070261&paramdict=en-UK
[69]
N. P. Gleditsch, ‘The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 691–712, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x. [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Liberal+Moment+Fifteen+Years+On1&rft.jtitle=International+Studies+Quarterly&rft.au=Gleditsch%2C+Nils+Petter&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2478.2008.00522.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1468_2478_2008_00522_x&paramdict=en-UK
[70]
G. John Ikenberry, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[71]
‘The End of History? - Francis Fukuyama’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wesjones.com/eoh.htm
[72]
William I. Robinson and Jerry Harris, ‘Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class’, Science & Society, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 11–54, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40403824?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[73]
D. Held and A. G. McGrew, Globalization theory: approaches and controversies, vol. Global transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
[74]
L. Sklair and L. Sklair, Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[75]
W. I. Robinson, Promoting polyarchy: globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[76]
E. L. Benner, ‘Marx and Engels on Nationalism and National Identity: A Reappraisal’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Mar. 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170010601.
[77]
‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method’, Millennium, doi: 10.1177/03058298830120020701?journalCode=mila. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/03058298830120020701?journalCode=mila
[78]
A. G. Frank, The development of underdevelopment. 1966.
[79]
W. B. Gallie, Philosophers of peace and war: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy, vol. Wiles lectures. Cambridge (etc.): Cambridge University Press, 1978.
[80]
S. Gill, ‘Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 399–423, Dec. 1995, doi: 10.1177/03058298950240030801.
[81]
S. Gill, Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[82]
F. Halliday, Rethinking international relations. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994.
[83]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[84]
J. Rosenberg, ‘The International Imagination: IR theory and "classic social analysis’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298940230010601
[85]
I. M. Wallerstein, World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004.
[86]
I. M. Wallerstein, The decline of American power: the U.S. in a chaotic world. New York: New Press, 2003.
[87]
I. M. Wallerstein, The Essential Wallerstein. New York, [USA]: New Press, 2001.
[88]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[89]
Adam Watson, ‘Systems of States’, Review of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 1990 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[90]
C. Chase-Dunn, ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, Mar. 1981, doi: 10.2307/2600209. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600209?pq-origsite=summon
[91]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland, 2010.
[92]
C. Dueck, ‘Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America’s Peculiar Path to World Power’, Security Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 195–231, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1080/09636410500232891.
[93]
S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, and J. W. Taliaferro, Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
[94]
NICHOLAS KITCHEN, ‘Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation’, Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–143, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588107?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[95]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland, 2010.
[96]
Review by: Gideon Rose, ‘Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy: The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security by Michael E. Brown’, World Politics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 144–172, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[97]
J. Donnelly, Realism and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[98]
S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, and J. W. Taliaferro, Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
[99]
J. Donnelly, Realism and international relations, vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[100]
H. J. Morgenthau, K. W. Thompson, and W. D. Clinton, Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006.
[101]
J. A. Tickner, ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 429–440, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170030801.
[102]
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson, ‘The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67–106, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[103]
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 485–507, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[104]
R. O. Keohane, Neorealism and its critics, vol. The Political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
[105]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[106]
K. Booth and S. Smith, International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995.
[107]
S. Lawson, The new agenda in international relations: from polarization to globalization in world politics. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 2002.
[108]
Justin Rosenberg, ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 285–303, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[109]
S. E. Lobell, N. M. Ripsman, and J. W. Taliaferro, Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
[110]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, Summer 1990, doi: 10.2307/2538981.
[111]
K. N. Waltz, ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’, International Security, vol. 18, no. 2, Autumn 1993, doi: 10.2307/2539097.
[112]
J. A. Sterling-Folker, Making sense of international relations theory, Second edition. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, 2013.
[113]
D. C. Copeland, The origins of major war, vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.
[114]
J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens, Eds., The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[115]
Alan James, ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[116]
Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, International Security, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 5–55, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[117]
J. J. Mearsheimer, The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.
[118]
R. L. Schweller, ‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In’, International Security, vol. 19, no. 1, Summer 1994, doi: 10.2307/2539149.
[119]
J. A. Vasquez and C. Elman, Realism and the balancing of power: a new debate, vol. Prentice Hall studies in international relations. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 2003.
[120]
J. A. Vasquez, ‘The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition’, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, no. 04, pp. 899–912, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.2307/2952172. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952172?pq-origsite=summon
[121]
S. M. Walt, The origins of alliances, vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
[122]
K. N. Waltz, Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
[123]
R. Axelrod and R. O. Keohane, ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, vol. 38, no. 01, pp. 226–254, Oct. 1985, doi: 10.2307/2010357. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010357?pq-origsite=summon
[124]
N. P. Gleditsch, ‘The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 691–712, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x. [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Liberal+Moment+Fifteen+Years+On1&rft.jtitle=International+Studies+Quarterly&rft.au=Gleditsch%2C+Nils+Petter&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=712&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2478.2008.00522.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1468_2478_2008_00522_x&paramdict=en-UK
[125]
R. O. Keohane, ‘Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism’, International Relations, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125–138, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0047117812438451.
[126]
K. A. Oye, ‘Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies’, World Politics, vol. 38, no. 01, pp. 1–24, Oct. 1985, doi: 10.2307/2010349. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010349?pq-origsite=summon
[127]
Michael W. Doyle, ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–235, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[128]
J. L. Richardson, Contending liberalisms in world politics: ideology and power. Boulder, Colo: L. Rienner, 2001.
[129]
John Gerard Ruggie, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 379–415, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706527?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[130]
E. Hovden and E. Keene, The globalization of liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave in association with Millennium Journal of International Studies, 2002.
[131]
D. A. Baldwin, Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
[132]
L. M. Goodrich, ‘Political Community at the International Level. (Doubleday Short Studies in Political Science.)’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 147–148, Sep. 1954, doi: 10.1177/000271625429500118.
[133]
D. Mitrany, ‘The Functional Approach to World Organization’, International Affairs, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 350–363, Jul. 1948, doi: 10.2307/3018652. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3018652?pq-origsite=summon
[134]
Ernst B. Haas, ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing’, International Organization, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 607–646, 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706149?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[135]
D. A. Baldwin, ‘Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition’, American Political Science Review, vol. 72, no. 03, pp. 1165–1168, Sep. 1978, doi: 10.2307/1955253. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1955253?pq-origsite=summon
[136]
Oran R. Young, ‘Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes’, International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 277–297, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706523?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[137]
Friedrich Kratochwil and John Gerard Ruggie, ‘International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State’, International Organization, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 753–775, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706828?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[138]
R. O. Keohane, Closing the fairness practice gap. 1989.
[139]
R. E. Goodin, International ethics and the environmental crisis. 1990.
[140]
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 485–507, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[141]
Pevehouse, Jon, ‘Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations’, Perspectives on politics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 651–652, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. By Bruce Russett and John Oneal. New York: Norton, 2001. 393p. $22.70 paper&rft.jtitle=Perspectives on Politics&rft.au=Pevehouse, Jon&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.pub=Cambridge University Press&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=652&rft.externalDocID=S1537592703230437&paramdict=en-UK
[142]
K. W. Deutsch and Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions, Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience, vol. Publication of the Center for Research on World Political Institutions, Princeton University. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.
[143]
K. W. Deutsch and Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions, Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience, vol. Publication of the Center for Research on World Political Institutions, Princeton University. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.
[144]
D. A. Baldwin, Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
[145]
G. J. Ikenberry, Liberal order and imperial ambition: essays on American power and world politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
[146]
R. M. Axelrod, The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
[147]
M. Griffiths, International relations theory for the 21st century: an introduction. London: Routledge, 2007.
[148]
J. S. Nye, ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’, World Politics, vol. 40, no. 02, pp. 235–251, Jan. 1988, doi: 10.2307/2010363.
[149]
R. Rosecrance, The rise of the trading state: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York [USA]: Basic Books, 1986.
[150]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[151]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[152]
M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink, ‘Taking stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 391–416, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.
[153]
J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens, Eds., The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[154]
T. Hopf, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, Summer 1998, doi: 10.2307/2539267. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267?pq-origsite=summon
[155]
R. PRICE and C. REUS - SMIT, ‘Dangerous Liaisons?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 259–294, Sep. 1998, doi: 10.1177/1354066198004003001.
[156]
Ronen Palan, ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 575–598, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[157]
S. D. Krasner, ‘Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy’, in Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 3–42 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8e62b4ed-f39d-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[158]
L. Glanville, ‘The Myth of "Traditional” Sovereignty’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/isqu.12004. [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Myth+of+%22Traditional%22+Sovereignty&rft.jtitle=International+Studies+Quarterly&rft.au=Glanville%2C+Luke&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=90&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fisqu.12004&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=368625060&paramdict=en-UK
[159]
A. Linklater, Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. London: Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics, 1982.
[160]
A. Linklater, The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era, vol. Studies in international relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.
[161]
Jens Bartelson, A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[162]
John Gerard Ruggie, ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations’, International Organization, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 139–174, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706885?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[163]
TILLY, C, ‘Futures of European states’, Social research, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 705–717, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FUTURES OF EUROPEAN STATES&rft.jtitle=SOCIAL RESEARCH&rft.au=TILLY, C&rft.date=1992&rft.pub=NEW SCH SOC RES&rft.issn=0037-783X&rft.eissn=1944-768X&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=717&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=A1992LA68300003&paramdict=en-UK
[164]
Michael Mann, ‘Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?’, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 472–496, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177235?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[165]
J. A. Scholte, ‘Global capitalism and the state’, International Affairs, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 427–452, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.2307/2624266. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2624266?pq-origsite=summon
[166]
S. Hameiri, Regulating statehood: state building and the transformation of the global order, vol. Critical studies of the Asia-Pacific series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=299706&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[167]
D. WILLIAMS, ‘Development, intervention, and international order’, Review of International Studies, vol. 39, no. 05, pp. 1213–1231, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1017/S0260210513000260. [Online]. Available: https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8061
[168]
G. Harrison, The World Bank and Africa: the construction of governance states. London: Routledge, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=7716&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[169]
R. H. Jackson, Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[170]
Edward Keene, Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.
[171]
M. Koskenniemi, The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[172]
A. Anghie, Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law, vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[173]
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui, Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
[174]
I. M. Wallerstein, The modern world-system: 2: Mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600-1750, vol. Modern world-system. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2011.
[175]
I. M. Wallerstein, The modern world-system: 3: Second era of great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730-1840s, vol. Studies in social discontinuity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
[176]
Clark, Ian, The hierarchy of states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[177]
David A. Lake, ‘Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics’, International Security, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–79, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30129801?pq-origsite=summon
[178]
Ahsan I. Butt, ‘Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America’s War-Prone Decade, 1932-41’, International Organization, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 575–607, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282077?pq-origsite=summon
[179]
J. Donnelly, ‘Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–170, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1354066106064505.
[180]
J. Donnelly, ‘Rethinking political structures: from “ordering principles” to “vertical differentiation” – and beyond’, International Theory, vol. 1, no. 01, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1752971909000037.
[181]
J. M. Hobson and J. C. Sharman, ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 63–98, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1354066105050137.
[182]
Helen Milner, ‘The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique’, Review of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097244?pq-origsite=summon
[183]
H. Bull, ‘The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics’, in The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics, 4th ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 51–73 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2bcd36d9-059e-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[184]
Barry Buzan, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=0521541212
[185]
A. Hurrell, On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052512
[186]
Diplomatic Investigations. Harvard University Press.
[187]
A. Linklater and H. Suganami, The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[188]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[189]
H. Bull and A. Watson, The Expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
[190]
Richard Little, ‘The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 443–460, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097865?pq-origsite=summon
[191]
ReusSmit, Christian, ‘Imagining society: constructivism and the English School’, British journal of politics & international relations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 487–509, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imagining society: constructivism and the English School&rft.jtitle=British Journal of Politics and International Relations&rft.au=ReusSmit, Christian&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing&rft.issn=1369-1481&rft.eissn=1467-856X&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00091&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=n/a&paramdict=en-UK
[192]
N. J. Wheeler, Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740
[193]
T. Dunne and N. J. Wheeler, Human rights in global politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[194]
H. Bull, Intervention in world politics. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
[195]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[196]
R. H. Jackson and G. S2rensen, Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[197]
R. J. Vincent, Nonintervention and international order. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
[198]
J. D. B. Miller and R. J. Vincent, Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
[199]
H. Bull, B. Kingsbury, and A. Roberts, Hugo Grotius and international relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
[200]
I. Forbes and M. Hoffman, Political theory, international relations, and the ethics of intervention, vol. Southampton studies in international policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.
[201]
H. Suganami, ‘The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations’, International Relations, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2363–2381, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.1177/004711788300700508.
[202]
WATSON, ADAM, ‘Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies’, Review of international studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies&rft.jtitle=Review of International Studies&rft.au=WATSON, ADAM&rft.date=1987-04-01&rft.pub=Butterworths&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&paramdict=en-UK
[203]
J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens, Eds., The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[204]
G. Arrighi, The long twentieth century: money, power and the origins of our times. London: Verso, 1994.
[205]
George Modelski, ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 214–235, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178047?pq-origsite=summon
[206]
R. Rosecrance, ‘Long cycle theory and international relations’, International Organization, vol. 41, no. 02, Mar. 1987, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300027478.
[207]
C. Chase-Dunn and H. Inoue, ‘Accelerating democratic global state formation’, Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 157–175, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0010836712443168.
[208]
A. Wendt, ‘Why a World State is Inevitable’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 491–542, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1177/135406610394001.
[209]
L. Cabrera, ‘World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 511–530, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1354066109346888.
[210]
H. Bull and A. Watson, The Expansion of international society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
[211]
B. Buzan and R. Little, International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[212]
I. Clark, Globalization and fragmentation: international relations in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[213]
M. Geyer and C. Bright, ‘World History in a Global Age’, The American Historical Review, vol. 100, no. 4, Oct. 1995, doi: 10.2307/2168200.
[214]
K. Polanyi, The great transformation. New York: Octagon Books, 1975.
[215]
D. Buhari-Gulmez, ‘Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach1’, International Political Sociology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 253–270, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00104.x.
[216]
M. R. Duffield, Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1179717
[217]
Edward Keene, Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press.
[218]
M. Koskenniemi, The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[219]
A. Anghie, Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law, vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[220]
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui, Sovereigns, Quasi sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination. University of Minnesota Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/32421
[221]
C. Brown, International relations theory: new normative approaches. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
[222]
C. BROWN, ‘Theories of International Justice’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 273–297, Apr. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0007123497000148.
[223]
K. Booth, M. Cox, and T. Dunne, How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[224]
T. Nardin and D. Mapel, Traditions of international ethics, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[225]
K. Booth, M. Cox, and T. Dunne, How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[226]
Commission on Global Governance, Our global neighbourhood: the report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[227]
R. A. Falk, On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
[228]
A. Linklater, Men and citizens in international relations. 1981.
[229]
T. Pogge, Global justice, [New ed.]., vol. Metaphilosophy series in philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
[230]
R. Rorty, Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[231]
M. Walzer, Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. [New York]: Basic Books, 1983.
[232]
N. J. Wheeler, Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740
[233]
J. L. Holzgrefe and R. O. Keohane, Humanitarian intervention: ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[234]
A. J. BELLAMY, ‘The responsibilities of victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War’, Review of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 04, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1017/S026021050800819X.
[235]
M. Evans, ‘Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 147–164, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00204.x.
[236]
J. Rawls and J. Rawls, The law of peoples: with, ‘The idea of public reason revisited’. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[237]
T. Pogge, Global justice, [New ed.]., vol. Metaphilosophy series in philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
[238]
Peter Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 229–243, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265052?pq-origsite=summon
[239]
Caney, Simon, ‘International distributive justice’, Political studies, vol. 49, no. 5, 1AD [Online]. Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International distributive justice&rft.jtitle=Political Studies&rft.au=Simon Caney&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing Ltd&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=974&rft.externalDocID=98490332&paramdict=en-UK
[240]
C. Brown, ‘“Turtles All the Way Down”: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 213–236, Jun. 1994, doi: 10.1177/03058298940230020901.
[241]
Andrew Linklater, ‘Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process’, Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 141–154, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072076?pq-origsite=summon
[242]
R. W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–155, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1177/03058298810100020501.
[243]
Richard K. Ashley, ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 225–286, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?pq-origsite=summon
[244]
A. Linklater, ‘The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 77–98, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1177/03058298920210010601.
[245]
J. A. Tickner, ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 429–440, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170030801.
[246]
R. Devetak, ‘The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 27–51, Mar. 1995, doi: 10.1177/03058298950240010401.
[247]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[248]
S. Burchill, A. Linklater, and R. Devetak, Theories of international relations, Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[249]
R. A. Falk, On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
[250]
M. Hoffman, ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 231–250, Jun. 1987, doi: 10.1177/03058298870160022801.
[251]
B. Jahn, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 613–641, Sep. 1998, doi: 10.1177/03058298980270030201.
[252]
P. J. Katzenstein and Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on International Peace & Security, The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
[253]
M. E. Keck and K. Sikkink, Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998.
[254]
A. Linklater, The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era, vol. Studies in international relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998.
[255]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[256]
M. Nicholson, ‘International relations: a concise introduction’, in International relations: a concise introduction, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, pp. 114–127 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ddbb1ec-f3a1-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[257]
Kathryn Sikkink, ‘Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America’, International Organization, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 411–441, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706982?pq-origsite=summon
[258]
R. B. J. Walker, Inside/outside: international relations as political theory, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
[259]
P. Darby, ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1177/03058298040330010101.
[260]
A. Nandy, The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1988.
[261]
D. P. S. Ahluwalia, Politics and post-colonial theory: African inflections. London: Routledge, 2001.
[262]
P. Darby, At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. London: Cassell, 2000.
[263]
J. A. Tickner, ‘What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3693622
[264]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[265]
J. Steans, Gender and international relations: an introduction. London: Polity Press, 1998.
[266]
K. Booth and S. Smith, International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995.
[267]
J. A. Tickner, Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
[268]
S. Whitworth, Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: a gendered analysis, vol. Critical security studies. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Pub, 2004.
[269]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[270]
Robert O. Keohane, ‘Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 193–197, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600824?pq-origsite=summon
[271]
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson, ‘The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67–106, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon
