1
Linklater A. International relations: critical concepts in political science. London: : Routledge 2000.
2
Kant I. Perpetual peace. 1795. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm
3
Carr EH, Cox M. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. [2nd ed.]. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001.
4
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
5
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: : Waveland 2010.
6
Linklater A. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. London: : Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics 1982.
7
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
8
Booth K, Smith S. International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1995.
9
Brown C, Ainley K. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
10
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
11
Der Derian J. International theory: critical investigations. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1995.
12
Jackson RH, S2rensen G. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 5th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
13
MacMillan J, Linklater A. Boundaries in question: new directions in international relations. London: : Pinter Publishers 1995.
14
Nicholson M. International relations: a concise introduction. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2002.
15
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
16
Steans J, Pettiford L, Diez T, et al. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Pearson Prentice Hall 2005.
17
Sterling-Folker JA. Making sense of international relations theory. Second edition. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc 2013.
18
Weber C. International relations theory: a critical introduction. Fourth edition. London: : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2014. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=544463&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
19
Review of international studies. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=Review+of+International+Studies
20
European journal of international relations. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=cm7ly9cu9w&S=AC_T_B&C=European+Journal+of+International+Relations
21
International organisations research journal. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+organisation
22
International theory. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+theory
23
International studies quarterly. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_centric_title_equals&criteria=International%20studies%20quarterly&language=en-gb&titleType=JOURNALS
24
Ethics and international affairs. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Ethics+and+International+Affairs
25
Alternatives: global, local, political. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Alternatives%3A+global%2C+local%2C+political+
26
International security. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=international+security
27
Millennium. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?V=1.0&N=100&L=CM7LY9CU9W&S=A_T_B&C=Millennium
28
BOOTH K. Human wrongs and international relations. International Affairs 1995;71:103–26. doi:10.2307/2624012
29
Jackson RH, S2rensen G. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016. 3–29.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=75f0b456-97a2-e711-80cb-005056af4099
30
Jackson RH. Martin Wight, International Theory and the Good Life. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1990;19:261–72. doi:10.1177/03058298900190020901
31
Morgenthau HJ. Truth and power: essays of a decade, 1960-70. London: : Pall Mall P 1970.
32
Porter B, University College of Wales. The Aberystwyth papers: international politics, 1919-1969. London: : Oxford University Press (for the University College of Wales) 1972.
33
Hoffmann S. An American social science: international relations. 1977.
34
Alker HR, Biersteker TJ. The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire. International Studies Quarterly 1984;28. doi:10.2307/2600692
35
Ashley, Richard K. Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies. International studies quarterly 1AD;34.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reading dissidence/writing the discipline: crisis and the question of sovereignty in international studies&rft.jtitle=International Studies Quarterly&rft.au=Ashley, Richard K&rft.au=Walker, R.B.J&rft.date=1990-09-01&rft.pub=Wiley Subscription Services, Inc&rft.issn=0020-8833&rft.eissn=1468-2478&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=367&rft.externalDBID=BSHEE&rft.externalDocID=9675559&paramdict=en-UK
36
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:611–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
37
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1981;10:126–55. doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501
38
Boucher D. Political theories of international relations: from Thucydides to the present. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998.
39
Brown C. Sovereignty, rights and justice: international political theory today. Oxford: : Polity 2002.
40
BOOTH, KEN. Introduction: How Might We Live? Global Ethics in a New Century. Review of international studies 1AD;26.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097709?pq-origsite=summon
41
Hollis M, Smith S. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1990.
42
Wight M, Wight G, Porter BE, et al. International theory: the three traditions. London: : Continuum for the Royal Institute of International Affairs 2002.
43
Gleditsch NP. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:691–712. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x
44
Long D, Wilson P. Thinkers of The twenty years’ crisis: inter-war idealism reassessed. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995.
45
Andreas Osiander. Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited. International Studies Quarterly 1998;42:409–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600745?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
46
Herz JH. Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics 1950;2:157–80. doi:10.2307/2009187
47
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review 1952;46:961–88. doi:10.2307/1952108
48
Wolfers A. The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference. World Politics 1951;4:39–63. doi:10.2307/2008900
49
Ruggie JG. Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis. World Politics 1983;35:261–85. doi:10.2307/2010273
50
Peter Wilson. The Myth of the ‘First Great Debate’. Review of International Studies 1998;24:1–15.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
51
Fukuyama FF. The End of History. National Interest 1989;18.https://ps321.community.uaf.edu/files/2012/10/Fukuyama-End-of-history-article.pdf
52
Kegley CW. The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities: ISA Presidential Address March 27, 1993 Acapulco, Mexico. International Studies Quarterly 1993;37. doi:10.2307/2600765
53
Brown C, Ainley K. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
54
Ashworth LM. Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? a Revisionist History. International Relations 2002;16:33–51. doi:10.1177/0047117802016001004
55
Walters FP. Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. International Affairs 1956;32:481–481. doi:10.2307/2606306
56
Peter Gellman. Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism. Review of International Studies 1988;14:247–66.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097151?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
57
Howard M. War and the liberal conscience. [New ed.]. London: : Hurst 2008.
58
Gilbert M. Encyclopedia of international relations and global politics. London: : Routledge 2005.
59
D. J. Markwell. Sir Alfred Zimmern Revisited: Fifty Years On. Review of International Studies 1986;12:279–92.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097090?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60
Miller JDB. Norman Angell and the futility of war: peace and the public mind. London: : Macmillan 1986.
61
Navari C. The great illusion revisited: the international theory of Norman Angell. 1989.
62
Schmidt BC. Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism. International Relations 2002;16:9–31. doi:10.1177/0047117802016001003
63
Peter Stirk. John H. Herz: Realism and the Fragility of the International Order. Review of International Studies 2005;31:285–306.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072097?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64
Casper Sylvest. Continuity and Change in British Liberal Internationalism, c. 1900-1930. Review of International Studies 2005;31:263–83.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40072096?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65
Angell N. The great illusion. Cheap ed. London: : Heinemann 1933.
66
Waltz, Kenneth N. The emerging structure of international politics. International security 1AD;18.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The emerging structure of international politics&rft.jtitle=International Security&rft.au=Waltz, Kenneth N&rft.date=1993-10-01&rft.pub=MIT Press Journals&rft.issn=0162-2889&rft.eissn=1531-4804&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=44&rft.externalDocID=6183986&paramdict=en-UK
67
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 1990;15. doi:10.2307/2538981
68
Rachman, Gideon. Clash of civilisations prediction revisited. The Australian financial review Published Online First: 18AD.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clash of civilisations prediction revisited&rft.jtitle=The Australian Financial Review&rft.au=Gideon Rachman&rft.date=2015-11-18&rft.pub=Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited&rft.issn=0404-2018&rft.eissn=0404-2018&rft.externalDocID=3868070261&paramdict=en-UK
69
Gleditsch NP. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:691–712. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x
70
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 2009;7:71–87.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
71
The End of History? - Francis Fukuyama. http://www.wesjones.com/eoh.htm
72
William I. Robinson and Jerry Harris. Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science & Society 2000;64:11–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40403824?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
73
Held D, McGrew AG. Globalization theory: approaches and controversies. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2007.
74
Sklair L, Sklair L. Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
75
Robinson WI. Promoting polyarchy: globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
76
Benner EL. Marx and Engels on Nationalism and National Identity: A Reappraisal. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1988;17:1–23. doi:10.1177/03058298880170010601
77
Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method. Millennium doi:10.1177/03058298830120020701?journalCode=mila
78
Frank AG. The development of underdevelopment. 1966.
79
Gallie WB. Philosophers of peace and war: Kant, Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Tolstoy. Cambridge (etc.): : Cambridge University Press 1978.
80
Gill S. Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1995;24:399–423. doi:10.1177/03058298950240030801
81
Gill S. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
82
Halliday F. Rethinking international relations. Vancouver: : UBC Press 1994.
83
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
84
Rosenberg J. The International Imagination: IR theory and "classic social analysis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1994;23.http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03058298940230010601
85
Wallerstein IM. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2004.
86
Wallerstein IM. The decline of American power: the U.S. in a chaotic world. New York: : New Press 2003.
87
Wallerstein IM. The Essential Wallerstein. New York, [USA]: : New Press 2001.
88
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
89
Adam Watson. Systems of States. Review of International Studies 1990;16:99–109.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097214?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
90
Chase-Dunn C. Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two? International Studies Quarterly 1981;25. doi:10.2307/2600209
91
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: : Waveland 2010.
92
Dueck C. Realism, Culture and Grand Strategy: Explaining America’s Peculiar Path to World Power. Security Studies 2005;14:195–231. doi:10.1080/09636410500232891
93
Lobell SE, Ripsman NM, Taliaferro JW. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
94
NICHOLAS KITCHEN. Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: a neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies 2010;36:117–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40588107?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
95
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. Long Grove, Ill: : Waveland 2010.
96
Review by: Gideon Rose. Review: Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy: The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security by Michael E. Brown. World Politics 1998;51:144–72.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
97
Donnelly J. Realism and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
98
Lobell SE, Ripsman NM, Taliaferro JW. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
99
Donnelly J. Realism and international relations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=43213&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
100
Morgenthau HJ, Thompson KW, Clinton WD. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. 7th ed. Boston: : McGraw-Hill Higher Education 2006.
101
Tickner JA. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1988;17:429–40. doi:10.1177/03058298880170030801
102
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson. The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 1991;16:67–106.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
103
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 1988;42:485–507.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
104
Keohane RO. Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia University Press 1986.
105
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
106
Booth K, Smith S. International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1995.
107
Lawson S. The new agenda in international relations: from polarization to globalization in world politics. Cambridge: : Blackwell Publishers 2002.
108
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies 1990;16:285–303.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109
Lobell SE, Ripsman NM, Taliaferro JW. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511811869
110
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 1990;15. doi:10.2307/2538981
111
Waltz KN. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security 1993;18. doi:10.2307/2539097
112
Sterling-Folker JA. Making sense of international relations theory. Second edition. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc 2013.
113
Copeland DC. The origins of major war. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2001.
114
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2014.
115
Alan James. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies 1989;15:215–29.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097183?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
116
Jeffrey W. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 1999;24:5–55.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
117
Mearsheimer JJ. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: : W.W. Norton 2001.
118
Schweller RL. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security 1994;19. doi:10.2307/2539149
119
Vasquez JA, Elman C. Realism and the balancing of power: a new debate. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: : Prentice Hall 2003.
120
Vasquez JA. The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. American Political Science Review 1997;91:899–912. doi:10.2307/2952172
121
Walt SM. The origins of alliances. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1987.
122
Waltz KN. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: : Columbia University Press 2001.
123
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 1985;38:226–54. doi:10.2307/2010357
124
Gleditsch NP. The Liberal Moment Fifteen Years On. International Studies Quarterly 2008;52:691–712. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00522.x
125
Keohane RO. Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations 2012;26:125–38. doi:10.1177/0047117812438451
126
Oye KA. Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 1985;38:1–24. doi:10.2307/2010349
127
Michael W. Doyle. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1983;12:205–35.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
128
Richardson JL. Contending liberalisms in world politics: ideology and power. Boulder, Colo: : L. Rienner 2001.
129
John Gerard Ruggie. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 1982;36:379–415.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706527?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
130
Hovden E, Keene E. The globalization of liberalism. Basingstoke: : Palgrave in association with Millennium Journal of International Studies 2002.
131
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: : Columbia University Press 1993.
132
Goodrich LM. Political Community at the International Level. (Doubleday Short Studies in Political Science.). The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1954;295:147–8. doi:10.1177/000271625429500118
133
Mitrany D. The Functional Approach to World Organization. International Affairs 1948;24:350–63. doi:10.2307/3018652
134
Ernst B. Haas. The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing. International Organization 1970;24:607–46.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706149?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135
Baldwin DA. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. American Political Science Review 1978;72:1165–8. doi:10.2307/1955253
136
Oran R. Young. Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes. International Organization 1982;36:277–97.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706523?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
137
Friedrich Kratochwil and John Gerard Ruggie. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 1986;40:753–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706828?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
138
Keohane RO. Closing the fairness practice gap. 1989.
139
Goodin RE. International ethics and the environmental crisis. 1990.
140
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 1988;42:485–507.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
141
Pevehouse, Jon. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. Perspectives on politics 1AD;1:651–2.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. By Bruce Russett and John Oneal. New York: Norton, 2001. 393p. $22.70 paper&rft.jtitle=Perspectives on Politics&rft.au=Pevehouse, Jon&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.pub=Cambridge University Press&rft.issn=1537-5927&rft.eissn=1541-0986&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=652&rft.externalDocID=S1537592703230437&paramdict=en-UK
142
Deutsch KW, Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions. Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1957.
143
Deutsch KW, Princeton University. Center for research on world political institutions. Political community and the North Atlantic Area: international organisation in the light of historical experience. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1957.
144
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: : Columbia University Press 1993.
145
Ikenberry GJ. Liberal order and imperial ambition: essays on American power and world politics. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2006.
146
Axelrod RM. The evolution of cooperation. New York: : Basic Books 1984.
147
Griffiths M. International relations theory for the 21st century: an introduction. London: : Routledge 2007.
148
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics 1988;40:235–51. doi:10.2307/2010363
149
Rosecrance R. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York [USA]: : Basic Books 1986.
150
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 1992;46:391–425.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
151
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
152
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2001;4:391–416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
153
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2014.
154
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 1998;23. doi:10.2307/2539267
155
PRICE R, REUS - SMIT C. Dangerous Liaisons? European Journal of International Relations 1998;4:259–94. doi:10.1177/1354066198004003001
156
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies 2000;26:575–98.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
157
Krasner SD. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. In: Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999. 3–42.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8e62b4ed-f39d-e711-80cb-005056af4099
158
Glanville L. The Myth of "Traditional” Sovereignty. International Studies Quarterly 2013;57:79–90. doi:10.1111/isqu.12004
159
Linklater A. Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. London: : Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics 1982.
160
Linklater A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. Columbia: : University of South Carolina Press 1998.
161
Jens Bartelson. A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.
162
John Gerard Ruggie. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organization 1993;47:139–74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706885?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
163
TILLY, C. Futures of European states. Social research 1992;59:705–17.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FUTURES OF EUROPEAN STATES&rft.jtitle=SOCIAL RESEARCH&rft.au=TILLY, C&rft.date=1992&rft.pub=NEW SCH SOC RES&rft.issn=0037-783X&rft.eissn=1944-768X&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=717&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=A1992LA68300003&paramdict=en-UK
164
Michael Mann. Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State? Review of International Political Economy 1997;4:472–96.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177235?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
165
Scholte JA. Global capitalism and the state. International Affairs 1997;73:427–52. doi:10.2307/2624266
166
Hameiri S. Regulating statehood: state building and the transformation of the global order. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=299706&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
167
WILLIAMS D. Development, intervention, and international order. Review of International Studies 2013;39:1213–31. doi:10.1017/S0260210513000260
168
Harrison G. The World Bank and Africa: the construction of governance states. London: : Routledge 2004. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=7716&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
169
Jackson RH. Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
170
Edward Keene. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press
171
Koskenniemi M. The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
172
Anghie A. Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
173
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui. Sovereigns, quasi sovereigns, and Africans. Minneapolis, Minn: : University of Minnesota Press 1996.
174
Wallerstein IM. The modern world-system: 2: Mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600-1750. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2011.
175
Wallerstein IM. The modern world-system: 3: Second era of great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730-1840s. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2011.
176
Clark, Ian. The hierarchy of states. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
177
David A. Lake. Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics. International Security 2007;32:47–79.http://www.jstor.org/stable/30129801?pq-origsite=summon
178
Ahsan I. Butt. Anarchy and Hierarchy in International Relations: Examining South America’s War-Prone Decade, 1932-41. International Organization 2013;67:575–607.http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282077?pq-origsite=summon
179
Donnelly J. Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society. European Journal of International Relations 2006;12:139–70. doi:10.1177/1354066106064505
180
Donnelly J. Rethinking political structures: from ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond. International Theory 2009;1. doi:10.1017/S1752971909000037
181
Hobson JM, Sharman JC. The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change. European Journal of International Relations 2005;11:63–98. doi:10.1177/1354066105050137
182
Helen Milner. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique. Review of International Studies 1991;17:67–85.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097244?pq-origsite=summon
183
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. In: The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012. 51–73.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2bcd36d9-059e-e711-80cb-005056af4099
184
Barry Buzan. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. CAMBRIDGE: : CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=0521541212
185
Hurrell A. On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052512
186
Diplomatic Investigations. Harvard University Press
187
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.
188
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
189
Bull H, Watson A. The Expansion of international society. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984.
190
Richard Little. The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language? Review of International Studies 2003;29:443–60.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097865?pq-origsite=summon
191
ReusSmit, Christian. Imagining society: constructivism and the English School. British journal of politics & international relations 1AD;4:487–509.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imagining society: constructivism and the English School&rft.jtitle=British Journal of Politics and International Relations&rft.au=ReusSmit, Christian&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing&rft.issn=1369-1481&rft.eissn=1467-856X&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00091&rft.externalDBID=n/a&rft.externalDocID=n/a&paramdict=en-UK
192
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740
193
Dunne T, Wheeler NJ. Human rights in global politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.
194
Bull H. Intervention in world politics. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984.
195
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
196
Jackson RH, S2rensen G. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
197
Vincent RJ. Nonintervention and international order. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press
198
Miller JDB, Vincent RJ. Order and violence: Hedley Bull and international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1990.
199
Bull H, Kingsbury B, Roberts A. Hugo Grotius and international relations. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1990.
200
Forbes I, Hoffman M. Political theory, international relations, and the ethics of intervention. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1993.
201
Suganami H. The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations. International Relations 1983;7:2363–81. doi:10.1177/004711788300700508
202
WATSON, ADAM. Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies. Review of international studies 1AD;13.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies&rft.jtitle=Review of International Studies&rft.au=WATSON, ADAM&rft.date=1987-04-01&rft.pub=Butterworths&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&paramdict=en-UK
203
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. 6th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2014.
204
Arrighi G. The long twentieth century: money, power and the origins of our times. London: : Verso 1994.
205
George Modelski. The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State. Comparative Studies in Society and History 1978;20:214–35.http://www.jstor.org/stable/178047?pq-origsite=summon
206
Rosecrance R. Long cycle theory and international relations. International Organization 1987;41. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027478
207
Chase-Dunn C, Inoue H. Accelerating democratic global state formation. Cooperation and Conflict 2012;47:157–75. doi:10.1177/0010836712443168
208
Wendt A. Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International Relations 2003;9:491–542. doi:10.1177/135406610394001
209
Cabrera L. World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges. European Journal of International Relations 2010;16:511–30. doi:10.1177/1354066109346888
210
Bull H, Watson A. The Expansion of international society. Oxford: : Clarendon 1984.
211
Buzan B, Little R. International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
212
Clark I. Globalization and fragmentation: international relations in the twentieth century. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1997.
213
Geyer M, Bright C. World History in a Global Age. The American Historical Review 1995;100. doi:10.2307/2168200
214
Polanyi K. The great transformation. New York: : Octagon Books 1975.
215
Buhari-Gulmez D. Stanford School on Sociological Institutionalism: A Global Cultural Approach1. International Political Sociology 2010;4:253–70. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00104.x
216
Duffield MR. Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: : Polity 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1179717
217
Edward Keene. Beyond the Anarchical Society. Cambridge University Press
218
Koskenniemi M. The gentle civilizer of nations: the rise and fall of international law, 1870-1960. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.
219
Anghie A. Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
220
Siba N’Zatioula Grovogui. Sovereigns, Quasi sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination. University of Minnesota Press 1996. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/32421
221
Brown C. International relations theory: new normative approaches. New York: : Columbia University Press 1992.
222
BROWN C. Theories of International Justice. British Journal of Political Science 1997;27:273–97. doi:10.1017/S0007123497000148
223
Booth K, Cox M, Dunne T. How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
224
Nardin T, Mapel D. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
225
Booth K, Cox M, Dunne T. How might we live?: global ethics in the new century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
226
Commission on Global Governance. Our global neighbourhood: the report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1995.
227
Falk RA. On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1995.
228
Linklater A. Men and citizens in international relations. 1981.
229
Pogge T. Global justice. [New ed.]. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 2007.
230
Rorty R. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
231
Walzer M. Spheres of justice: a defence of pluralism and equality. [New York]: : Basic Books 1983.
232
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3052740
233
Holzgrefe JL, Keohane RO. Humanitarian intervention: ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
234
BELLAMY AJ. The responsibilities of victory: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War. Review of International Studies 2008;34. doi:10.1017/S026021050800819X
235
Evans M. Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of. Ethics & International Affairs 2009;23:147–64. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00204.x
236
Rawls J, Rawls J. The law of peoples: with, ‘The idea of public reason revisited’. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
237
Pogge T. Global justice. [New ed.]. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishing 2007.
238
Peter Singer. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1972;1:229–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265052?pq-origsite=summon
239
Caney, Simon. International distributive justice. Political studies 1AD;49.http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International distributive justice&rft.jtitle=Political Studies&rft.au=Simon Caney&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.pub=Blackwell Publishing Ltd&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=974&rft.externalDocID=98490332&paramdict=en-UK
240
Brown C. ‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1994;23:213–36. doi:10.1177/03058298940230020901
241
Andrew Linklater. Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process. Review of International Studies 2005;31:141–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40072076?pq-origsite=summon
242
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1981;10:126–55. doi:10.1177/03058298810100020501
243
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 1984;38:225–86.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440?pq-origsite=summon
244
Linklater A. The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1992;21:77–98. doi:10.1177/03058298920210010601
245
Tickner JA. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1988;17:429–40. doi:10.1177/03058298880170030801
246
Devetak R. The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1995;24:27–51. doi:10.1177/03058298950240010401
247
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
248
Burchill S, Linklater A, Devetak R. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
249
Falk RA. On humane governance: toward a new global politics : the World Order Models Report of the Global Civilization Initiative. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1995.
250
Hoffman M. Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1987;16:231–50. doi:10.1177/03058298870160022801
251
Jahn B. One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1998;27:613–41. doi:10.1177/03058298980270030201
252
Katzenstein PJ, Social Science Research Council (U.S.). Committee on International Peace & Security. The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. New York: : Columbia University Press 1996.
253
Keck ME, Sikkink K. Activists beyond borders: advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1998.
254
Linklater A. The transformation of political community: ethical foundations of the Post-Westphalian era. Columbia: : University of South Carolina Press 1998.
255
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
256
Nicholson M. International relations: a concise introduction. In: International relations: a concise introduction. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2002. 114–27.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3ddbb1ec-f3a1-e711-80cb-005056af4099
257
Kathryn Sikkink. Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America. International Organization 1993;47:411–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706982?pq-origsite=summon
258
Walker RBJ. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
259
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2004;33:1–32. doi:10.1177/03058298040330010101
260
Nandy A. The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Delhi: : Oxford University Press 1988.
261
Ahluwalia DPS. Politics and post-colonial theory: African inflections. London: : Routledge 2001.
262
Darby P. At the edge of international relations: postcolonialism, gender and dependency. London: : Cassell 2000.
263
Tickner JA. What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions. International Studies Quarterly 2005;49:1–22. doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x
264
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
265
Steans J. Gender and international relations: an introduction. London: : Polity Press 1998.
266
Booth K, Smith S. International relations theory today. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1995.
267
Tickner JA. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-Cold War era. New York: : Columbia University Press 2001.
268
Whitworth S. Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: a gendered analysis. Boulder, Colo: : Lynne Rienner Pub 2004.
269
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
270
Robert O. Keohane. Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory. International Studies Quarterly 1998;42:193–7.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600824?pq-origsite=summon
271
Anne Sisson Runyan and V. Spike Peterson. The Radical Future of Realism: Feminist Subversions of IR Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 1991;16:67–106.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644702?pq-origsite=summon
