1.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
2.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
3.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
4.
Bainbridge DI. Intellectual Property. Tenth edition. Pearson; 2018.
5.
Torremans P. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
6.
Waelde C, Brown AEL, Kheria S, Cornwell J. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
7.
Christie A, Gare S, eds. Blackstone’s Statutes on Intellectual Property. 14th edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
8.
European Patents Handbook (CIPA). https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Books/CIPAEuropeanPatents?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1
9.
Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. European Patents Sourcefinder. Sweet & Maxwell
10.
Jones C, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. Patent Co-Operation Treaty Handbook. Sweet & Maxwell
11.
Fox N. A Guide to the EPC 2000: A Practitioner’s Guide to the New Law. 4th ed. Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys; 2010.
12.
Jewess M. Inside Intellectual Property: Best Practice in Intellectual Property Law, Management, and Strategy. The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys; 2013.
13.
Ealey D, Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (London, England). Study Guide to the Patents Acts. 2014 ed. CIPA; 2014.
14.
Visser D. The Annotated European Patent Convention. Twenty-fifth revised edition. Wolters Kluwer; 15AD.
15.
Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office. Published online 2017. https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/guidelines.html
16.
National law relating to the EPC. Published online 2015. https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/national-law.html
17.
Intellectual Property Office. Patents: Manual of Patent Practice - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patents-manual-of-patent-practice
18.
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications for biotechnological inventions - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-biotechnological-inventions
19.
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications for medical inventions - GOV.UK. Published online 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-medical-inventions
20.
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications relating to chemical inventions. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-relating-to-chemical-inventions
21.
The PCT Applicant’s Guide. Published online 2017. http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/appguide/
22.
Adelman MJ. Global Issues in Patent Law. West; 2011.
23.
Cornish WR. Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? Oxford University Press; 2004.
24.
Dinwoodie GB, Janis MD. Trade Dress and Design Law. Aspen Publishers; 2010.
25.
Drahos P, Braithwaite J. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Earthscan; 2003.
26.
Fisher M. Fundamentals of Patent Law: Interpretation and Scope of Protection. Hart Publishing; 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781847313812
27.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=219811&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
28.
Helfer LR, ed. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Vol 7. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; 2013.
29.
Jaffe AB, Lerner J. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It. [New ed.]. Princeton University Press; 2007. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=313338&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
30.
Landes WM, Posner RA. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press; 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
31.
Luginbühl S, Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht. Centrum voor Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht. European Patent Law: Towards a Uniform Interpretation. Edward Elgar; 2011. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302423&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
32.
Terrell T. Terrell on the Law of Patents. Eighteenth edition. (Birss C, Austen T, eds.). Sweet & Maxwell; 2016. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/tocectory?crumb-action=reset&stnew=true&crumb-label=Books&sttype=stdtemplate&ao=o.I361019C020F511E68DCBBC525B125694&ndd=2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
33.
Musker DC. Community Design Law: Principles and Practice. Sweet & Maxwell; 2002.
34.
Norman HE. Intellectual Property Law. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press; 2014.
35.
Ohly A, Pila J, eds. The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology. Oxford University Press; 2013.
36.
Pila J. The Requirement for Invention in Patent Law. Oxford University Press; 2010.
37.
Seville C. EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy. Second edition. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4731305
38.
Stone D. European Union Design Law: A Practitioners’ Guide. Second edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
39.
Suthersanen U. Design Law: European Union and United States of America. 2nd ed. Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
40.
European Copyright and Design Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20Copyright%20and%20Design%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
41.
European Trade Mark Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=European%20Trade%20Mark%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
42.
Entertainment and Media Law Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=Entertainment%20and%20Media%20Law%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
43.
European Patent Office Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0269-0802&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
44.
Fleet Street patent law reports.
45.
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Reports%20of%20Patent,%20Design%20and%20Trade%20Mark%20Cases&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
46.
European intellectual property review. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20intellectual%20property%20review&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
47.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Intellectual%20property%20quarterly&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
48.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Journal%20of%20Intellectual%20Property%20Law%20and%20Practice&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
49.
The journal of world intellectual property. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=journal%20of%20world%20intellectual%20property&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
50.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. https://link.springer.com/journal/40319
51.
Entertainment Law Review. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0959-3799&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
52.
The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office
53.
European Patent Office (EPO). https://www.epo.org/index.html
54.
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/
55.
HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service
56.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. http://www.bailii.org/
57.
EU law - EUROPA | European Union. https://europa.eu/european-union/law_en
58.
Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_6999
59.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html
60.
World Trade Organization (WTO). https://www.wto.org/
61.
The IPKat. http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
62.
The 1709 Blog. http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/
63.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
64.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
65.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:603-721. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
66.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. In: Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013:1-51. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c56f2b34-9a28-e911-80cd-005056af4099
67.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
68.
Fisher M. Classical economics and philosophy of the patent system. Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2005. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IBD9B2790E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
69.
Geiger C. Intellectual property shall be protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: a mysterious provision with an unclear scope. European Intellectual Property Review. 2009;31(3). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IDE325F70E45111DD8BEBE47BB36F59BF&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
70.
Hughes, J. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal. Published online 1988. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj77&i=309&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
71.
Kitch EW. The Nature and Function of the Patent System. The Journal of Law & Economics. 1977;20(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/725193?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
72.
Landes WM, Posner RA. The economic structure of intellectual property law. In: The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press; 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
73.
Machlup F, Penrose E. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century. The Journal of Economic History. 1950;10(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2113999?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
74.
Merges RP, Nelson RR. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope. Columbia Law Review. 1990;90(4). doi:10.2307/1122920
75.
Prizes, Not Patents by Joseph E. Stiglitz - Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/prizes--not-patents?barrier=accesspaylog
76.
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. Published 2002. http://www.cipr.org.uk/graphic/documents/final_report.htm
77.
Arthur CA. Should Apple finally call time on smartphone patent wars? Guardian. Published online 5 May 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/05/apple-iphone-android-wars-legal-patent-battles
78.
Gillmor D. America’s dysfunctional patent system is stifling innovation. Guardian. Published online 30 November 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/30/america-dysfunctional-patent-system-innovation
79.
Difference Engine: The PC all over again? The Economist. Published online 2012. https://www.economist.com/babbage/2012/09/09/difference-engine-the-pc-all-over-again
80.
Bowcott O. Unified Patent Court split between Paris, London and Munich. Guardian. Published online 3 July 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/03/unified-patent-court-london
81.
Plomer A. EU ban on stem cell patents is a threat both to science and the rule of law | Aurora Plomer. Guardian. Published online 12 December 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/dec/12/eu-ban-stem-cell-patents
82.
McVeigh K. US supreme court rules human genes cannot be patented. Guardian. Published online 13 June 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jun/13/supreme-court-genes-patent-dna
83.
BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Gene Patenting. Published 8 August 2013. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b037vb4d
84.
Southgate T. Can you patent an experience? The Guardian. Published online 17 April 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140831204301/http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/partner-zone-brand-union/patent-brand-experience
85.
Smedley T. Patent wars: has India taken on Big Pharma and won? Guardian. Published online 14 May 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/patent-wars-india-takes-on-big-pharma
86.
Harris P. Monsanto sued small famers to protect seed patents, report says. Guardian. Published online 12 February 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto-sues-farmers-seed-patents
87.
Patently Absurd! - Weird & wacky patents. http://www.patentlyabsurd.org.uk/
88.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
89.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:603-721. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
90.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
91.
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf
92.
Cullet P. Patents and medicines: the relationship between TRIPS and the human right to health. International Affairs. http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0301.pdf
93.
Dinwoodie GB. *The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review. Published online 2006. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=749349
94.
Evans GE. Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/document.php?id=WOCO1994013&PHPSESSID=fbv506fb18nbgip10pr4a9mpl0
95.
Keeling DT. Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law: Vol.1: Free Movement and Competition Law. Oxford University Press; 2003.
96.
Kur A, Dreier T. European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. In: European Intellectual Property Law: Texts, Cases and Materials. Edward Elgar; 2013:39-83. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fe07e640-4f29-e911-80cd-005056af4099
97.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
98.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:603-721. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
99.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
100.
Struve, F. W. Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-Net Grace Period as an International Best Practice. William Mitchell Law Review. 2013;(4). https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wmitch39&i=1424&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
101.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
102.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:603-721. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
103.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
104.
Bonadio E. Biotech patents and morality after Brussels. European Intellectual Property Review. Published online 2012. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4097/1/Biotech%20patents%20and%20morality%20after%20Brussels.pdf
105.
’Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions’ (COM(2002) 92 final — 2002/0047(COD)). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:061:0154:0163:EN:PDF
106.
The Ethics of Patenting DNA - Nuffield Bioethics. Published online 2002. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/patenting-dna
107.
Harmon SHE, Laurie G, Courtney A. Dignity, plurality and patentability: the unfinished story of Brustle v Greenpeace. European Law Review. 2013;38(1). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I446810B274CB11E2BD04BE991BF76CB2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
108.
Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science. 1998;280(5364). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2895332?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
109.
Pila J. Dispute over the meaning of ‘invention’ in Art.52(2) EPC - the patentability of computer-implemented inventions in Europe. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2005;36(2). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IF3AE89208C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
110.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
111.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
112.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
113.
Cockbain J, Sterckx S. Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office authorised to extend the bounds of the patentable? The G5/83 Second Medical Indication/EISAI and G2/08 Dosage Regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY cases. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2011;42(3). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IE5E58D00B69A11E08901C93154A11BF4&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
114.
Floyd C. Novelty under the Patents Act 1977: the state of the art after Merrell Dow. European Intellectual Property Review. 1996;18(9). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D8B5500E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
115.
Sharples A, Curley D. Experimental novelty: Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;28(5). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D89A751E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
116.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
117.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
118.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
119.
England P, Parker S. Obviousness in the new European order. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2012;7(11):805-815. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jps162
120.
Franzosi M. Non-Obviousness. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2005;6(2):233-250. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00200.x
121.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
122.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
123.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
124.
Giles J. The Brustle and Eli Lilly cases: Creation--God or humankind? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 2012;1(2):518-523. doi:10.1093/ojlr/rws009
125.
Sharples A. Industrial applicability, patents and the Supreme Court: Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Co. European Intellectual Property Review. 2012;34(4). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I09DDC441647711E1AAB4EE4A0ACB9543&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
126.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
127.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
128.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
129.
Brennan DJ. Biogen sufficiency reconsidered. Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2009. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I42B534B0CE7911DE91DCE6753676A05A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
130.
Fisher M. Extracting the price of a patent: enablement and written description. Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2012. https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I9AF8DA802C4211E29A4AF883571617EC&crumb-action=append&context=25
131.
Pila J. Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After. King’s Law Journal. 2009;20(3):489-526. doi:10.1080/09615768.2009.11423685
132.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
133.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
134.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
135.
Laddie H. *Kirin Amgen — The End of Equivalents in England?1. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 40(1). https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57VC-N3D1-DXM0-0292&csi=402200&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
136.
Pumfrey N. The Doctrine of Equivalents in Various Patent Regimes: Does Anybody Have It Right? https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2224188
137.
Whitehead B. Patent construction after Amgen: are patent claims construed more widely or narrowly than previously? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2006;1(5):332-337. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl019
138.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
139.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
140.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
141.
Floyd C. Infringement by Repair and the Troublesome Definition of ‘Making’ the Invention: A critique of Schütz v Werit. Published online 2010. http://fordhamipconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Floyd_InfringementByRepair.pdf
142.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
143.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
144.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
145.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
146.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017.
147.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
148.
Hobson A, Shafran T. Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited: pharmaceutical companies at risk of successful employee inventor compensation claim following landmark ruling. European Intellectual Property Review. 2009;31(10). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1C7E77A099C911DE8BBDB40346639712&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
149.
Howell C. Extra compensation for inventive employees: is our system equitable, unbiased and motivating? Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2011. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I37DBCE500DFB11E1B928A0CFA159DA04&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
150.
Merges RP. The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Published online 1999. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hjlt13&i=7&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
151.
Pila J. ‘Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute’: Employee Inventions and the Employment Context. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2012;32(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41682779?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
152.
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, Johnson P. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
153.
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2017:603-721. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
154.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
155.
Unitary patent – ratification progress. http://unitarypatent.com/ratification-process/
156.
Pehlivan CN. The creation of a single European patent system: from dream to (almost) reality. European Intellectual Property Review. 2012;34(7). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I527E01A0B9BE11E1AAED857176AF78A8&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
157.
Pila J. *THE EUROPEAN PATENT: AN OLD AND VEXING PROBLEM. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2013;62(04):917-940. doi:10.1017/S0020589313000304
158.
Hilty R, Jaeger T, Lamping M, Ullrich H. The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2169254
159.
Kitchin LJ. Transcript of Lord Justice Kitchin’s Speech on the Unitary Patent (2012). Published 2012. http://www.cipa.org.uk/pages/Congres-Dinner-2012-Lord-Justice-Kitchin
160.
Ohly A, Pila J, eds. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. In: The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology. Oxford University Press; 2013:199-216. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74535763-8228-e911-80cd-005056af4099