1
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
2
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
3
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
4
Bainbridge DI. Intellectual property. Tenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2018.
5
Torremans P. Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
6
Waelde C, Brown AEL, Kheria S, et al. Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
7
Christie A, Gare S, editors. Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property. 14th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
8
European Patents Handbook (CIPA). https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Books/CIPAEuropeanPatents?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1
9
Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. European Patents Sourcefinder. Sweet & Maxwell
10
Jones C, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. Patent Co-Operation Treaty Handbook. Sweet & Maxwell
11
Fox N. A guide to the EPC 2000: a practitioner’s guide to the new law. 4th ed. London: : Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys 2010.
12
Jewess M. Inside intellectual property: best practice in intellectual property law, management, and strategy. London: : The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys 2013.
13
Ealey D, Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (London, England). Study guide to the Patents Acts. 2014 ed. London: : CIPA 2014.
14
Visser D. The annotated European patent convention. Twenty-fifth revised edition. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: : Wolters Kluwer 15AD.
15
Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office. 2017.https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/guidelines.html
16
National law relating to the EPC. 2015.https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/national-law.html
17
Intellectual Property Office. Patents: Manual of Patent Practice - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patents-manual-of-patent-practice
18
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications for biotechnological inventions - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-biotechnological-inventions
19
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications for medical inventions - GOV.UK. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-medical-inventions
20
Intellectual Property Office. Examining patent applications relating to chemical inventions. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-relating-to-chemical-inventions
21
The PCT Applicant’s Guide. 2017.http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/appguide/
22
Adelman MJ. Global issues in patent law. St. Paul, MN: : West 2011.
23
Cornish WR. Intellectual property: omnipresent, distracting, irrelevant? Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004.
24
Dinwoodie GB, Janis MD. Trade dress and design law. New York: : Aspen Publishers 2010.
25
Drahos P, Braithwaite J. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy? London: : Earthscan 2003.
26
Fisher M. Fundamentals of patent law: interpretation and scope of protection. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2007. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781847313812
27
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Basingstoke [England]: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=219811&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
28
Helfer LR, editor. Intellectual property and human rights. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2013.
29
Jaffe AB, Lerner J. Innovation and its discontents: how our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2007. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=313338&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
30
Landes WM, Posner RA. The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
31
Luginbühl S, Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht. Centrum voor Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht. European patent law: towards a uniform interpretation. Cheltenham, UK: : Edward Elgar 2011. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302423&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
32
Terrell T. Terrell on the law of patents. Eighteenth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2016. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/tocectory?crumb-action=reset&stnew=true&crumb-label=Books&sttype=stdtemplate&ao=o.I361019C020F511E68DCBBC525B125694&ndd=2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
33
Musker DC. Community design law: principles and practice. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2002.
34
Norman HE. Intellectual property law. 2nd edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
35
Ohly A, Pila J, editors. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
36
Pila J. The requirement for invention in patent law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
37
Seville C. EU intellectual property law and policy. Second edition. Cheltenham, UK: : Edward Elgar Publishing 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4731305
38
Stone D. European Union design law: a practitioners’ guide. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2016.
39
Suthersanen U. Design law: European Union and United States of America. 2nd ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
40
European Copyright and Design Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20Copyright%20and%20Design%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
41
European Trade Mark Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=European%20Trade%20Mark%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
42
Entertainment and Media Law Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=Entertainment%20and%20Media%20Law%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
43
European Patent Office Reports. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0269-0802&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
44
Fleet Street patent law reports.
45
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Reports%20of%20Patent,%20Design%20and%20Trade%20Mark%20Cases&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
46
European intellectual property review. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20intellectual%20property%20review&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
47
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Intellectual%20property%20quarterly&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
48
Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Journal%20of%20Intellectual%20Property%20Law%20and%20Practice&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
49
The journal of world intellectual property. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=journal%20of%20world%20intellectual%20property&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
50
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. https://link.springer.com/journal/40319
51
Entertainment Law Review. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0959-3799&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb
52
The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office
53
European Patent Office (EPO). https://www.epo.org/index.html
54
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/
55
HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service
56
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. http://www.bailii.org/
57
EU law - EUROPA | European Union. https://europa.eu/european-union/law_en
58
Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_6999
59
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html
60
World Trade Organization (WTO). https://www.wto.org/
61
The IPKat. http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
62
The 1709 Blog. http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/
63
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
64
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
65
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017. 603–721.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
66
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. In: Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013. 1–51.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c56f2b34-9a28-e911-80cd-005056af4099
67
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
68
Fisher M. Classical economics and philosophy of the patent system. Intellectual Property Quarterly Published Online First: 2005.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IBD9B2790E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
69
Geiger C. Intellectual property shall be protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: a mysterious provision with an unclear scope. European Intellectual Property Review 2009;31.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IDE325F70E45111DD8BEBE47BB36F59BF&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
70
Hughes, J. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal Published Online First: 1988.https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj77&i=309&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
71
Kitch EW. The Nature and Function of the Patent System. The Journal of Law & Economics 1977;20.https://www.jstor.org/stable/725193?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
72
Landes WM, Posner RA. The economic structure of intellectual property law. In: The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
73
Machlup F, Penrose E. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century. The Journal of Economic History 1950;10.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2113999?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
74
Merges RP, Nelson RR. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope. Columbia Law Review 1990;90. doi:10.2307/1122920
75
Prizes, Not Patents by Joseph E. Stiglitz - Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/prizes--not-patents?barrier=accesspaylog
76
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. 2002.http://www.cipr.org.uk/graphic/documents/final_report.htm
77
Arthur CA. Should Apple finally call time on smartphone patent wars? Guardian Published Online First: 5 May 2014.https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/05/apple-iphone-android-wars-legal-patent-battles
78
Gillmor D. America’s dysfunctional patent system is stifling innovation. Guardian Published Online First: 30 November 2012.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/30/america-dysfunctional-patent-system-innovation
79
Difference Engine: The PC all over again? The Economist Published Online First: 2012.https://www.economist.com/babbage/2012/09/09/difference-engine-the-pc-all-over-again
80
Bowcott O. Unified Patent Court split between Paris, London and Munich. Guardian Published Online First: 3 July 2012.https://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/03/unified-patent-court-london
81
Plomer A. EU ban on stem cell patents is a threat both to science and the rule of law | Aurora Plomer. Guardian Published Online First: 12 December 2011.https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/dec/12/eu-ban-stem-cell-patents
82
McVeigh K. US supreme court rules human genes cannot be patented. Guardian Published Online First: 13 June 2013.https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jun/13/supreme-court-genes-patent-dna
83
BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Gene Patenting. 2013.https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b037vb4d
84
Southgate T. Can you patent an experience? The Guardian Published Online First: 17 April 2013.https://web.archive.org/web/20140831204301/http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/partner-zone-brand-union/patent-brand-experience
85
Smedley T. Patent wars: has India taken on Big Pharma and won? Guardian Published Online First: 14 May 2013.https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/patent-wars-india-takes-on-big-pharma
86
Harris P. Monsanto sued small famers to protect seed patents, report says. Guardian Published Online First: 12 February 2013.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto-sues-farmers-seed-patents
87
Patently Absurd! - Weird & wacky patents. http://www.patentlyabsurd.org.uk/
88
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
89
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017. 603–721.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
90
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
91
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf
92
Cullet P. Patents and medicines: the relationship between TRIPS and the human right to health. International Affairs. http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0301.pdf
93
Dinwoodie GB. *The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Published Online First: 2006.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=749349
94
Evans GE. Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/document.php?id=WOCO1994013&PHPSESSID=fbv506fb18nbgip10pr4a9mpl0
95
Keeling DT. Intellectual property rights in EU law: Vol.1: Free movement and competition law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
96
Kur A, Dreier T. European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. In: European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 2013. 39–83.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fe07e640-4f29-e911-80cd-005056af4099
97
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
98
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017. 603–721.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
99
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
100
Struve, F. W. Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-Net Grace Period as an International Best Practice. William Mitchell Law Review Published Online First: 2013.https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wmitch39&i=1424&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
101
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
102
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017. 603–721.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
103
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
104
Bonadio E. Biotech patents and morality after Brussels. European Intellectual Property Review. 2012.http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4097/1/Biotech%20patents%20and%20morality%20after%20Brussels.pdf
105
’Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions’ (COM(2002) 92 final — 2002/0047(COD)). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:061:0154:0163:EN:PDF
106
The Ethics of Patenting DNA - Nuffield Bioethics. 2002.http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/patenting-dna
107
Harmon SHE, Laurie G, Courtney A. Dignity, plurality and patentability: the unfinished story of Brustle v Greenpeace. European Law Review 2013;38.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I446810B274CB11E2BD04BE991BF76CB2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
108
Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science 1998;280.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2895332?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
109
Pila J. Dispute over the meaning of ‘invention’ in Art.52(2) EPC - the patentability of computer-implemented inventions in Europe. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2005;36.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IF3AE89208C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
110
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
111
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
112
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
113
Cockbain J, Sterckx S. Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office authorised to extend the bounds of the patentable? The G5/83 Second Medical Indication/EISAI and G2/08 Dosage Regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY cases. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2011;42.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IE5E58D00B69A11E08901C93154A11BF4&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
114
Floyd C. Novelty under the Patents Act 1977: the state of the art after Merrell Dow. European Intellectual Property Review 1996;18.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D8B5500E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
115
Sharples A, Curley D. Experimental novelty: Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. European Intellectual Property Review 2006;28.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D89A751E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
116
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
117
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
118
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
119
England P, Parker S. Obviousness in the new European order. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2012;7:805–15. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jps162
120
Franzosi M. Non-Obviousness. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 2005;6:233–50. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00200.x
121
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
122
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
123
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
124
Giles J. The Brustle and Eli Lilly cases: Creation--God or humankind? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 2012;1:518–23. doi:10.1093/ojlr/rws009
125
Sharples A. Industrial applicability, patents and the Supreme Court: Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Co. European Intellectual Property Review 2012;34.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I09DDC441647711E1AAB4EE4A0ACB9543&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
126
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
127
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
128
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
129
Brennan DJ. Biogen sufficiency reconsidered. Intellectual Property Quarterly Published Online First: 2009.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I42B534B0CE7911DE91DCE6753676A05A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
130
Fisher M. Extracting the price of a patent: enablement and written description. Intellectual Property Quarterly Published Online First: 2012.https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I9AF8DA802C4211E29A4AF883571617EC&crumb-action=append&context=25
131
Pila J. Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After. King’s Law Journal 2009;20:489–526. doi:10.1080/09615768.2009.11423685
132
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
133
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
134
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
135
Laddie H. *Kirin Amgen — The End of Equivalents in England?1. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law;40.https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57VC-N3D1-DXM0-0292&csi=402200&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
136
Pumfrey N. The Doctrine of Equivalents in Various Patent Regimes: Does Anybody Have It Right? https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2224188
137
Whitehead B. Patent construction after Amgen: are patent claims construed more widely or narrowly than previously? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2006;1:332–7. doi:10.1093/jiplp/jpl019
138
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
139
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
140
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
141
Floyd C. Infringement by Repair and the Troublesome Definition of ‘Making’ the Invention: A critique of Schütz v Werit. 2010.http://fordhamipconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Floyd_InfringementByRepair.pdf
142
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
143
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
144
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
145
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
146
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
147
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
148
Hobson A, Shafran T. Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited: pharmaceutical companies at risk of successful employee inventor compensation claim following landmark ruling. European Intellectual Property Review 2009;31.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1C7E77A099C911DE8BBDB40346639712&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
149
Howell C. Extra compensation for inventive employees: is our system equitable, unbiased and motivating? Intellectual Property Quarterly Published Online First: 2011.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I37DBCE500DFB11E1B928A0CFA159DA04&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
150
Merges RP. The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology Published Online First: 1999.https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hjlt13&i=7&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ
151
Pila J. ‘Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute’: Employee Inventions and the Employment Context. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2012;32.https://www.jstor.org/stable/41682779?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
152
Bently L, Sherman B, Gangjee D, et al. Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2018.
153
Aplin TF, Davis J. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. In: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017. 603–721.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099
154
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: : Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters 2013.
155
Unitary patent – ratification progress. http://unitarypatent.com/ratification-process/
156
Pehlivan CN. The creation of a single European patent system: from dream to (almost) reality. European Intellectual Property Review 2012;34.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I527E01A0B9BE11E1AAED857176AF78A8&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
157
Pila J. *THE EUROPEAN PATENT: AN OLD AND VEXING PROBLEM. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2013;62:917–40. doi:10.1017/S0020589313000304
158
Hilty R, Jaeger T, Lamping M, et al. The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2169254
159
Kitchin LJ. Transcript of Lord Justice Kitchin’s Speech on the Unitary Patent (2012). 2012.http://www.cipa.org.uk/pages/Congres-Dinner-2012-Lord-Justice-Kitchin
160
Ohly A, Pila J, editors. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. In: The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. 199–216.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74535763-8228-e911-80cd-005056af4099
