Bibliography for LX5643 - Patent Law and Practice BETA

Adelman, Martin J. 2011. Global Issues in Patent Law. St. Paul, MN: West.

Aplin, Tanya Frances, and Jennifer Davis. 2017a. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017b. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017c. ‘Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials’. In Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third edition, 603–721. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 2017d. ‘Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials’. In Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third edition, 603–721. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 2017e. ‘Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials’. In Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third edition, 603–721. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 2017f. ‘Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials’. In Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third edition, 603–721. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 2017g. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017h. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017i. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017j. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017k. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017l. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017m. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017n. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2017o. ‘Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials’. In Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, Third edition, 603–721. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Arthur, Charles Arthur. 2014. ‘Should Apple Finally Call Time on Smartphone Patent Wars?’ Guardian, May. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/05/apple-iphone-android-wars-legal-patent-battles.

Bainbridge, David I. 2018. Intellectual Property. Tenth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson.

‘BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Gene Patenting’. 2013. 8 August 2013. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b037vb4d.

Bently, Lionel, Brad Sherman, Dev Gangjee, and Phillip Johnson. 2018a. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018b. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018c. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018d. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018e. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018f. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018g. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018h. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018i. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018j. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018k. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018l. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018m. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

———. 2018n. Intellectual Property Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bonadio, E. 2012. ‘Biotech Patents and Morality after Brussels’. European Intellectual Property Review. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4097/1/Biotech%20patents%20and%20morality%20after%20Brussels.pdf.

Bowcott, Owen. 2012. ‘Unified Patent Court Split between Paris, London and Munich’. Guardian, July. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/03/unified-patent-court-london.

Brennan, David J. 2009. ‘Biogen Sufficiency Reconsidered’. Intellectual Property Quarterly. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I42B534B0CE7911DE91DCE6753676A05A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’. n.d. http://www.bailii.org/.

Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. n.d. European Patents Sourcefinder. Sweet & Maxwell.

Christie, Andrew, and Stephen Gare, eds. 2018. Blackstone’s Statutes on Intellectual Property. 14th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Cockbain, Julian, and Sigrid Sterckx. 2011. ‘Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office Authorised to Extend the Bounds of the Patentable? The G5/83 Second Medical Indication/EISAI and G2/08 Dosage Regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY Cases’. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 42 (3). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IE5E58D00B69A11E08901C93154A11BF4&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. 2002. ‘Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy’. 2002. http://www.cipr.org.uk/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.

Cornish, W. R. 2004. Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cornish, W. R., David Llewelyn, and Tanya Frances Aplin. 2013a. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013b. ‘Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights’. In Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, Eighth edition, 1–51. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c56f2b34-9a28-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

———. 2013c. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013d. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013e. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013f. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013g. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013h. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013i. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013j. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013k. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013l. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013m. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013n. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

———. 2013o. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

‘Court of Justice of the European Union’. n.d. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_6999.

Cullet, Philippe. n.d. ‘Patents and Medicines: The Relationship between TRIPS and the Human Right to Health’. International Affairs. http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0301.pdf.

‘Difference Engine: The PC All over Again?’ 2012. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/babbage/2012/09/09/difference-engine-the-pc-all-over-again.

Dinwoodie, Graeme B. 2006. ‘*The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources’. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=749349.

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., and Mark D. Janis. 2010. Trade Dress and Design Law. New York: Aspen Publishers.

Drahos, Peter, and John Braithwaite. 2003. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? London: Earthscan.

Ealey, Doug and Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (London, England). 2014. Study Guide to the Patents Acts. 2014 ed. London: CIPA.

England, P., and S. Parker. 2012. ‘Obviousness in the New European Order’. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 7 (11): 805–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps162.

‘Entertainment and Media Law Reports’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=Entertainment%20and%20Media%20Law%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘Entertainment Law Review’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0959-3799&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘EU Law - EUROPA | European Union’. n.d. https://europa.eu/european-union/law_en.

‘European Copyright and Design Reports’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20Copyright%20and%20Design%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘European Intellectual Property Review’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20intellectual%20property%20review&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘European Patent Office (EPO)’. n.d. https://www.epo.org/index.html.

‘European Patent Office Reports’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0269-0802&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘European Patents Handbook (CIPA)’. n.d. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Books/CIPAEuropeanPatents?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1.

‘European Trade Mark Reports’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=European%20Trade%20Mark%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)’. n.d. https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/.

Evans, Gail E. n.d. ‘Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights’. https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/document.php?id=WOCO1994013&PHPSESSID=fbv506fb18nbgip10pr4a9mpl0.

Fisher, Matthew. 2005. ‘Classical Economics and Philosophy of the Patent System’. Intellectual Property Quarterly. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IBD9B2790E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

———. 2007. Fundamentals of Patent Law: Interpretation and Scope of Protection. Oxford: Hart Publishing. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781847313812.

———. 2012. ‘Extracting the Price of a Patent: Enablement and Written Description’. Intellectual Property Quarterly. https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I9AF8DA802C4211E29A4AF883571617EC&crumb-action=append&context=25.

‘Fleet Street Patent Law Reports’. n.d.

Floyd, C. 2010. ‘Infringement by Repair and the Troublesome Definition of “Making” the Invention: A Critique of Schütz v Werit’. http://fordhamipconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Floyd_InfringementByRepair.pdf.

Floyd, Christopher. 1996. ‘Novelty under the Patents Act 1977: The State of the Art after Merrell Dow’. European Intellectual Property Review 18 (9). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D8B5500E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Fox, Nick. 2010. A Guide to the EPC 2000: A Practitioner’s Guide to the New Law. 4th ed. London: Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.

Franzosi, Mario. 2005. ‘Non-Obviousness’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 6 (2): 233–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00200.x.

Geiger, Christophe. 2009. ‘Intellectual Property Shall Be Protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Mysterious Provision with an Unclear Scope’. European Intellectual Property Review 31 (3). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IDE325F70E45111DD8BEBE47BB36F59BF&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Giles, J. 2012. ‘The Brustle and Eli Lilly Cases: Creation--God or Humankind?’ Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 1 (2): 518–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rws009.

Gillmor, Dan. 2012. ‘America’s Dysfunctional Patent System Is Stifling Innovation’. Guardian, November. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/30/america-dysfunctional-patent-system-innovation.

Gosseries, Axel, Alain Marciano, and Alain Strowel. 2008. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=219811&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

‘Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office’. 2017. Munich: European Patent Office. https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/guidelines.html.

Harmon, Shawn H.E., Graeme Laurie, and Aidan Courtney. 2013. ‘Dignity, Plurality and Patentability: The Unfinished Story of Brustle v Greenpeace’. European Law Review 38 (1). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I446810B274CB11E2BD04BE991BF76CB2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Harris, Paul. 2013. ‘Monsanto Sued Small Famers to Protect Seed Patents, Report Says’. Guardian, February. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto-sues-farmers-seed-patents.

Helfer, Laurence R., ed. 2013. Intellectual Property and Human Rights. Vol. 7. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Heller, Michael A., and Rebecca S. Eisenberg. 1998. ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research’. Science 280 (5364). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2895332?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Hilty, Reto, Thomas Jaeger, Matthias Lamping, and Hanns Ullrich. 2012. ‘The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2169254.

‘HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK’. n.d. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service.

Hobson, Andrew, and Tamar Shafran. 2009. ‘Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited: Pharmaceutical Companies at Risk of Successful Employee Inventor Compensation Claim Following Landmark Ruling’. European Intellectual Property Review 31 (10). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1C7E77A099C911DE8BBDB40346639712&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Howell, Claire. 2011. ‘Extra Compensation for Inventive Employees: Is Our System Equitable, Unbiased and Motivating?’ Intellectual Property Quarterly. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I37DBCE500DFB11E1B928A0CFA159DA04&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Hughes, J. 1988. ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’. Georgetown Law Journal. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj77&i=309&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

‘IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law’. n.d. https://link.springer.com/journal/40319.

‘Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights’. n.d. http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf.

Intellectual Property Institute. n.d. ‘Intellectual Property Quarterly’. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Intellectual%20property%20quarterly&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Intellectual Property Office. 2016. ‘Examining Patent Applications for Medical Inventions - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-medical-inventions.

———. n.d. ‘Examining Patent Applications for Biotechnological Inventions - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-biotechnological-inventions.

———. n.d. ‘Examining Patent Applications Relating to Chemical Inventions’. Cardiff. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-relating-to-chemical-inventions.

———. n.d. ‘Patents: Manual of Patent Practice - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patents-manual-of-patent-practice.

Jaffe, Adam B., and Joshua Lerner. 2007. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do about It. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=313338&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Jewess, Michael. 2013. Inside Intellectual Property: Best Practice in Intellectual Property Law, Management, and Strategy. London: The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.

Jones, Colin and Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys. n.d. Patent Co-Operation Treaty Handbook. Sweet & Maxwell.

‘Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Journal%20of%20Intellectual%20Property%20Law%20and%20Practice&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Keeling, David T. 2003. Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law: Vol.1: Free Movement and Competition Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitch, Edmund W. 1977. ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System’. The Journal of Law & Economics 20 (2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/725193?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Kitchin, Lord Justice. 2012. ‘Transcript of Lord Justice Kitchin’s Speech on the Unitary Patent (2012)’. 2012. http://www.cipa.org.uk/pages/Congres-Dinner-2012-Lord-Justice-Kitchin.

Kur, Annette, and Thomas Dreier. 2013. ‘European Intellectual Property Law: Texts, Cases and Materials’. In European Intellectual Property Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, 39–83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fe07e640-4f29-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Laddie, Hugh. n.d. ‘*Kirin Amgen — The End of Equivalents in England?1’. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 40 (1). https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57VC-N3D1-DXM0-0292&csi=402200&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 2003a. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.

———. 2003b. ‘The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law’. In The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.

Luginbühl, Stefan and Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht. Centrum voor Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht. 2011. European Patent Law: Towards a Uniform Interpretation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302423&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Machlup, Fritz, and Edith Penrose. 1950. ‘The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century’. The Journal of Economic History 10 (1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2113999?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

McVeigh, Karen. 2013. ‘US Supreme Court Rules Human Genes Cannot Be Patented’. Guardian, June. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jun/13/supreme-court-genes-patent-dna.

Merges, R. P. 1999. ‘The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions’. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hjlt13&i=7&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

Merges, Robert P., and Richard R. Nelson. 1990. ‘On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’. Columbia Law Review 90 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/1122920.

Musker, David C. 2002. Community Design Law: Principles and Practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

‘National Law Relating to the EPC’. 2015. Munich: European Patent Office. https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/national-law.html.

Norman, Helen E. 2014. Intellectual Property Law. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ohly, Ansgar, and Justine Pila, eds. 2013a. The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2013b. ‘The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology’. In The Europeanization of Intellectual Property Law: Towards a European Legal Methodology, 199–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74535763-8228-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

‘’Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions’ (COM(2002) 92 Final — 2002/0047(COD))’. n.d. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:061:0154:0163:EN:PDF.

‘Patently Absurd! - Weird & Wacky Patents’. n.d. http://www.patentlyabsurd.org.uk/.

Pehlivan, Ceyhun Necati. 2012. ‘The Creation of a Single European Patent System: From Dream to (Almost) Reality’. European Intellectual Property Review 34 (7). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I527E01A0B9BE11E1AAED857176AF78A8&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Pila, Justine. 2005. ‘Dispute over the Meaning of “Invention” in Art.52(2) EPC - the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions in Europe’. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 36 (2). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IF3AE89208C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

———. 2009. ‘Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After’. King’s Law Journal 20 (3): 489–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2009.11423685.

———. 2010. The Requirement for Invention in Patent Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2012. ‘“Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute”: Employee Inventions and the Employment Context’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41682779?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

———. 2013. ‘*THE EUROPEAN PATENT: AN OLD AND VEXING PROBLEM’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62 (04): 917–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589313000304.

Plomer, Aurora. 2011. ‘EU Ban on Stem Cell Patents Is a Threat Both to Science and the Rule of Law | Aurora Plomer’. Guardian, December. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/dec/12/eu-ban-stem-cell-patents.

‘Prizes, Not Patents by Joseph E. Stiglitz - Project Syndicate’. n.d. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/prizes--not-patents?barrier=accesspaylog.

Pumfrey, Nicholas. n.d. ‘The Doctrine of Equivalents in Various Patent Regimes: Does Anybody Have It Right?’ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2224188.

‘Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Reports%20of%20Patent,%20Design%20and%20Trade%20Mark%20Cases&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Seville, Catherine. 2016. EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy. Second edition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4731305.

Sharples, Andrew. 2012. ‘Industrial Applicability, Patents and the Supreme Court: Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Co’. European Intellectual Property Review 34 (4). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I09DDC441647711E1AAB4EE4A0ACB9543&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Sharples, Andrew, and Duncan Curley. 2006. ‘Experimental Novelty: Synthon v SmithKline Beecham’. European Intellectual Property Review 28 (5). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D89A751E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Smedley, Tim. 2013. ‘Patent Wars: Has India Taken on Big Pharma and Won?’ Guardian, May. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/patent-wars-india-takes-on-big-pharma.

Southgate, T. 2013. ‘Can You Patent an Experience?’ The Guardian, April. https://web.archive.org/web/20140831204301/http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/partner-zone-brand-union/patent-brand-experience.

Stone, David. 2016. European Union Design Law: A Practitioners’ Guide. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Struve, F. W. 2013. ‘Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-Net Grace Period as an International Best Practice’. William Mitchell Law Review, no. 4. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wmitch39&i=1424&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

Suthersanen, Uma. 2010. Design Law: European Union and United States of America. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Terrell, Thomas. 2016. Terrell on the Law of Patents. Edited by Colin Birss and Tim Austen. Eighteenth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/tocectory?crumb-action=reset&stnew=true&crumb-label=Books&sttype=stdtemplate&ao=o.I361019C020F511E68DCBBC525B125694&ndd=2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

‘The 1709 Blog’. n.d. http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/.

‘The Ethics of Patenting DNA - Nuffield Bioethics’. 2002. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/patenting-dna.

‘The IPKat’. n.d. http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/.

‘The Journal of World Intellectual Property’. n.d. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=journal%20of%20world%20intellectual%20property&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘The PCT Applicant’s Guide’. 2017. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/appguide/.

‘The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO)’. n.d. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office.

Torremans, Paul. 2016. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

‘Unitary Patent – Ratification Progress’. n.d. http://unitarypatent.com/ratification-process/.

Visser, Derk. 15AD. The Annotated European Patent Convention. Twenty-Fifth revised edition. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.

Waelde, Charlotte, Abbe E. L. Brown, Smita Kheria, and Jane Cornwell. 2016. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead, B. 2006. ‘Patent Construction after Amgen: Are Patent Claims Construed More Widely or Narrowly than Previously?’ Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 1 (5): 332–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl019.

‘World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)’. n.d. http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.

‘World Trade Organization (WTO)’. n.d. https://www.wto.org/.