[1]
Adelman, M.J. 2011. Global issues in patent law. West.
[2]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[3]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[4]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. 603–721.
[5]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. 603–721.
[6]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. 603–721.
[7]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. 603–721.
[8]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[14]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. 2017. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. 603–721.
[17]
Arthur, C.A. 2014. Should Apple finally call time on smartphone patent wars? Guardian. (May 2014).
[18]
Bainbridge, D.I. 2018. Intellectual property. Pearson.
[19]
BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Gene Patenting: 2013. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b037vb4d.
[20]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[21]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[22]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[23]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[25]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[26]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[27]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[31]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[33]
Bently, L. et al. 2018. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[34]
Bonadio, E. 2012. Biotech patents and morality after Brussels. European Intellectual Property Review.
[35]
Bowcott, O. 2012. Unified Patent Court split between Paris, London and Munich. Guardian. (Jul. 2012).
[36]
Brennan, D.J. 2009. Biogen sufficiency reconsidered. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2009).
[37]
British and Irish Legal Information Institute: http://www.bailii.org/.
[38]
Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys European Patents Sourcefinder. Sweet & Maxwell.
[39]
Christie, A. and Gare, S. eds. 2018. Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property. Oxford University Press.
[40]
Cockbain, J. and Sterckx, S. 2011. Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office authorised to extend the bounds of the patentable? The G5/83 Second Medical Indication/EISAI and G2/08 Dosage Regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY cases. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 42, 3 (2011).
[41]
Cornish, W.R. 2004. Intellectual property: omnipresent, distracting, irrelevant?. Oxford University Press.
[42]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[43]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters. 1–51.
[44]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[45]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[46]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[47]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[48]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[49]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[50]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[51]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[52]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[53]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[54]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[55]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[56]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[57]
Court of Justice of the European Union: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_6999.
[58]
Cullet, P. Patents and medicines: the relationship between TRIPS and the human right to health. International Affairs.
[59]
Dinwoodie, G.B. 2006. *The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review. (2006).
[60]
Dinwoodie, G.B. and Janis, M.D. 2010. Trade dress and design law. Aspen Publishers.
[61]
Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. 2003. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy?. Earthscan.
[62]
Ealey, D. and Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (London, England) 2014. Study guide to the Patents Acts. CIPA.
[63]
England, P. and Parker, S. 2012. Obviousness in the new European order. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 7, 11 (Nov. 2012), 805–815. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps162.
[64]
EU law - EUROPA | European Union: https://europa.eu/european-union/law_en.
[65]
European Patent Office (EPO): https://www.epo.org/index.html.
[66]
European Patents Handbook (CIPA): https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Books/CIPAEuropeanPatents?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1.
[67]
European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO): https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/.
[68]
Evans, G.E. Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
[69]
Fisher, M. 2005. Classical economics and philosophy of the patent system. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2005).
[70]
Fisher, M. 2012. Extracting the price of a patent: enablement and written description. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2012).
[71]
Fisher, M. 2007. Fundamentals of patent law: interpretation and scope of protection. Hart Publishing.
[72]
Floyd, C. 2010. Infringement by Repair and the Troublesome Definition of ‘Making’ the Invention: A critique of Schütz v Werit.
[73]
Floyd, C. 1996. Novelty under the Patents Act 1977: the state of the art after Merrell Dow. European Intellectual Property Review. 18, 9 (1996).
[74]
Fox, N. 2010. A guide to the EPC 2000: a practitioner’s guide to the new law. Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.
[75]
Franzosi, M. 2005. Non-Obviousness. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 6, 2 (Nov. 2005), 233–250. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00200.x.
[76]
Geiger, C. 2009. Intellectual property shall be protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: a mysterious provision with an unclear scope. European Intellectual Property Review. 31, 3 (2009).
[77]
Giles, J. 2012. The Brustle and Eli Lilly cases: Creation--God or humankind? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion. 1, 2 (Oct. 2012), 518–523. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rws009.
[78]
Gillmor, D. 2012. America’s dysfunctional patent system is stifling innovation. Guardian. (Nov. 2012).
[79]
Gosseries, A. et al. 2008. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[80]
Harmon, S.H.E. et al. 2013. Dignity, plurality and patentability: the unfinished story of Brustle v Greenpeace. European Law Review. 38, 1 (2013).
[81]
Harris, P. 2013. Monsanto sued small famers to protect seed patents, report says. Guardian. (Feb. 2013).
[82]
Helfer, L.R. ed. 2013. Intellectual property and human rights. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
[83]
Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. 1998. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research. Science. 280, 5364 (1998).
[84]
Hilty, R. et al. 2012. The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2169254.
[85]
HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service.
[86]
Hobson, A. and Shafran, T. 2009. Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited: pharmaceutical companies at risk of successful employee inventor compensation claim following landmark ruling. European Intellectual Property Review. 31, 10 (2009).
[87]
Howell, C. 2011. Extra compensation for inventive employees: is our system equitable, unbiased and motivating? Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2011).
[88]
Hughes, J. 1988. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal. (1988).
[89]
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: 2002. http://www.cipr.org.uk/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.
[90]
Intellectual Property Institute Intellectual property quarterly.
[91]
Intellectual Property Office Examining patent applications for biotechnological inventions - GOV.UK.
[92]
Intellectual Property Office 2016. Examining patent applications for medical inventions - GOV.UK.
[93]
Intellectual Property Office Examining patent applications relating to chemical inventions.
[94]
Intellectual Property Office Patents: Manual of Patent Practice - GOV.UK.
[95]
Jaffe, A.B. and Lerner, J. 2007. Innovation and its discontents: how our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
[96]
Jewess, M. 2013. Inside intellectual property: best practice in intellectual property law, management, and strategy. The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.
[97]
Jones, C. and Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys Patent Co-Operation Treaty Handbook. Sweet & Maxwell.
[98]
Keeling, D.T. 2003. Intellectual property rights in EU law: Vol.1: Free movement and competition law. Oxford University Press.
[99]
Kitch, E.W. 1977. The Nature and Function of the Patent System. The Journal of Law & Economics. 20, 2 (1977).
[100]
Kur, A. and Dreier, T. 2013. European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. Edward Elgar. 39–83.
[101]
Laddie, H. *Kirin Amgen — The End of Equivalents in England?1. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 40, 1.
[102]
Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. 2003. The economic structure of intellectual property law. Harvard University Press.
[103]
Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. 2003. The economic structure of intellectual property law. The economic structure of intellectual property law. Harvard University Press.
[104]
Luginbühl, S. and Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht. Centrum voor Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht 2011. European patent law: towards a uniform interpretation. Edward Elgar.
[105]
Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. 1950. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century. The Journal of Economic History. 10, 1 (1950).
[106]
McVeigh, K. 2013. US supreme court rules human genes cannot be patented. Guardian. (Jun. 2013).
[107]
Merges, R.P. 1999. The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. (1999).
[108]
Merges, R.P. and Nelson, R.R. 1990. On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope. Columbia Law Review. 90, 4 (May 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1122920.
[109]
Musker, D.C. 2002. Community design law: principles and practice. Sweet & Maxwell.
[110]
Norman, H.E. 2014. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[111]
Ohly, A. and Pila, J. eds. 2013. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford University Press.
[112]
Ohly, A. and Pila, J. eds. 2013. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford University Press. 199–216.
[113]
Patently Absurd! - Weird & wacky patents: http://www.patentlyabsurd.org.uk/.
[114]
Pehlivan, C.N. 2012. The creation of a single European patent system: from dream to (almost) reality. European Intellectual Property Review. 34, 7 (2012).
[115]
Pila, J. 2009. Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After. King’s Law Journal. 20, 3 (Oct. 2009), 489–526. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2009.11423685.
[116]
Pila, J. 2005. Dispute over the meaning of ‘invention’ in Art.52(2) EPC - the patentability of computer-implemented inventions in Europe. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 36, 2 (2005).
[117]
Pila, J. 2012. ‘Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute’: Employee Inventions and the Employment Context. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 32, 2 (2012).
[118]
Pila, J. 2013. *THE EUROPEAN PATENT: AN OLD AND VEXING PROBLEM. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 62, 04 (Oct. 2013), 917–940. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589313000304.
[119]
Pila, J. 2010. The requirement for invention in patent law. Oxford University Press.
[120]
Plomer, A. 2011. EU ban on stem cell patents is a threat both to science and the rule of law | Aurora Plomer. Guardian. (Dec. 2011).
[121]
Prizes, Not Patents by Joseph E. Stiglitz - Project Syndicate: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/prizes--not-patents?barrier=accesspaylog.
[122]
Pumfrey, N. The Doctrine of Equivalents in Various Patent Regimes: Does Anybody Have It Right?
[123]
Seville, C. 2016. EU intellectual property law and policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[124]
Sharples, A. 2012. Industrial applicability, patents and the Supreme Court: Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Co. European Intellectual Property Review. 34, 4 (2012).
[125]
Sharples, A. and Curley, D. 2006. Experimental novelty: Synthon v SmithKline Beecham. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 5 (2006).
[126]
Smedley, T. 2013. Patent wars: has India taken on Big Pharma and won? Guardian. (May 2013).
[127]
Southgate, T. 2013. Can you patent an experience? The Guardian. (Apr. 2013).
[128]
Stone, D. 2016. European Union design law: a practitioners’ guide. Oxford University Press.
[129]
Struve, F. W. 2013. Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-Net Grace Period as an International Best Practice. William Mitchell Law Review. 4 (2013).
[130]
Suthersanen, U. 2010. Design law: European Union and United States of America. Sweet & Maxwell.
[131]
Terrell, T. 2016. Terrell on the law of patents. Sweet & Maxwell.
[132]
The 1709 Blog: http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/.
[133]
The IPKat: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/.
[134]
The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO): https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office.
[135]
Torremans, P. 2016. Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[136]
Transcript of Lord Justice Kitchin’s Speech on the Unitary Patent (2012): 2012. http://www.cipa.org.uk/pages/Congres-Dinner-2012-Lord-Justice-Kitchin.
[137]
Unitary patent – ratification progress: http://unitarypatent.com/ratification-process/.
[138]
Visser, D. 15AD. The annotated European patent convention. Wolters Kluwer.
[139]
Waelde, C. et al. 2016. Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. Oxford University Press.
[140]
Whitehead, B. 2006. Patent construction after Amgen: are patent claims construed more widely or narrowly than previously? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 1, 5 (Mar. 2006), 332–337. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl019.
[141]
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.
[142]
World Trade Organization (WTO): https://www.wto.org/.
[143]
2012. Difference Engine: The PC all over again? The Economist. (2012).
[144]
Entertainment and Media Law Reports.
[145]
Entertainment Law Review.
[146]
European Copyright and Design Reports.
[147]
European intellectual property review.
[148]
European Patent Office Reports.
[149]
European Trade Mark Reports.
[150]
Fleet Street patent law reports.
[151]
2017. Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office. European Patent Office.
[152]
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law.
[153]
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights.
[154]
Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice.
[155]
2015. National law relating to the EPC. European Patent Office.
[156]
’Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions’ (COM(2002) 92 final — 2002/0047(COD)). Official Journal of the European Union.
[157]
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases.
[158]
2002. The Ethics of Patenting DNA - Nuffield Bioethics. Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
[159]
The journal of world intellectual property.
[160]
2017. The PCT Applicant’s Guide. World Intellectual Property Organization.