1
Shimamura AP, Palmer SE. Aesthetic science: connecting minds, brains, and experience.
2
Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and social psychology review. 2004;8:364–82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
3
Zajonc RB. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1968;9:1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848
4
Jacoby LL, Kelley C, Brown J, et al. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1989;56:326–38.
5
Semir Zeki. Art and the brain. Daedalus. 1998;127:71–103.
6
Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of consciousness studies. 1999;6:15–51.
7
Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, et al. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology. 2004;95:489–508. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811
8
Cinzia DD, Vittorio G. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2009;19:682–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001
9
Jacobsen T. The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes. The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes. Elsevier 2013:159–68.
10
Zeki S, Lamb M. The neurology of kinetic art. Brain. 1994;117:607–36. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.3.607
11
Goldstein EB. Sensation and perception. 6th ed. Australia: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning 2002.
12
Berlyne DE. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing 1974.
13
Gombrich, E. H. Art and illusion: a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. 6th ed., with new preface. London: Phaidon 2002.
14
Rolf Reber, Piotr Winkielman and Norbert Schwarz. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological science. 1998;9:45–8.
15
Bornstein RF. Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological bulletin. 1989;106:265–89. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
16
Winkielman P, Halberstadt J, Fazendeiro T, et al. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological science. 2006;17:799–806. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
17
Nadal M, Capó MÀ, Rosselló J, et al. Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial vision. 2008;21:379–96. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532653
18
Rudolf Arnheim. On order, simplicity and entropy. Leonardo. 1974;7:139–41.
19
Jacobsen T, Hoefel L. Descriptive and evaluative judgement processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience. 2003;3.
20
Silvia, Paul J., Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, US, p_silvia@uncg.edu. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of general psychology.
21
R. Von Der Heydt, E. Peterhans and G. Baumgartner. Illusory Contours and Cortical Neuron Responses. Science. 1984;224:1260–2.
22
Colin Martindale, Kathleen Moore and Jonathan Borkum. Aesthetic Preference: Anomalous Findings for Berlyne’s Psychobiological Theory. The American Journal of Psychology. 1990;103:53–80.
23
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005 - ledercarbonripsas2006.pdf.
24
AugustinLederHutzlerCarbon2008.pdf.
25
Augustin MD, Defranceschi B, Fuchs HK, et al. The neural time course of art perception: An ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:2071–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.038
26
Berlyne DE. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics. 1970;8:279–86. doi: 10.3758/BF03212593
27
Checkosky SF, Whitlock D. Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of experimental psychology. 1973;100:341–8. doi: 10.1037/h0035692
28
Livingstone MS. Is it warm? Is it real? Or just low spatial frequency? Science. ;290.
29
Kawabata H, Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of neurophysiology. 2004;91:1699–705. doi: 10.1152/jn.00696.2003
30
Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport. Published Online First: 2004.
31
Zeki S, Stutters J. A brain-derived metric for preferred kinetic stimuli. Open biology. 2012;2:120001–120001. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120001
32
Bar M, Neta M. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science. 2006;17:645–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
33
Sammartino J, Palmer SE. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 2012;38:865–79.
34
Palmer S, Schloss KB, Sammartino J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual review of psychology. Published Online First: 2013.
35
Hurlbert AC, Ling Y. Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current biology. 2007;17:R623–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
36
Schloss KB, Poggesi RM, Palmer SE. Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit” on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2011;18:498–504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1
37
McManus IC. The aesthetics of simple figures. British journal of psychology. 1980;71:505–24.
38
McManus IC, Weatherby P. The golden section and the aesthetics of from and composition. Empirical studies of the arts. 1997;15:209–32.
39
Palmer S, Gardner J, Wickens T. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects. Spatial vision. 2008;21:421–49. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532662
40
Tucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 1998;24:830–46.
41
McManus IC. Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts. European review. 2005;157–80. doi: 10.1017/S1062798705000736
42
Jakesch M, Leder H, Forster M. Image ambiguity and fluency. PLoS ONE. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074084
43
Kirk U. The neural basis of object-context relationships on aesthetic judgment. PLoS ONE. 2008;3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003754
44
McManus IC, Zhou FA, l’Anson S, et al. The psychometrics of photographic cropping: The influence of colour, meaning, and expertise. Perception. Published Online First: 2011. doi: 10.1068/p6700
45
Vartanian O, Navarrete G, Chatterjee A, et al. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:10446–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301227110
46
Zeki S, Ishizu T. The "Visual Shock” of Francis Bacon: an essay in neuroesthetics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00850
47
Stefan Koelsch. Brain and music. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons 2012.
48
Koelsch S. Toward a neural basis of music perception – a review and updated model. Frontier in psychology. 2011;2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00110
49
Kornysheva K, von Cramon DY, Jacobsen T, et al. Tuning-in to the beat: aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human brain mapping. 2009;NA-NA. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20844
50
Stevens CJ. Music perception and cognition: a review of recent cross-cultural research. Topics in cognitive science. 2012;4:653–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01215.x
51
Unjung Nam. Pitch distributions in Korean court music: evidence consistent with tonal hierarchies. Music perception: an interdisciplinary journal. ;16:243–7.
52
Krumhansl CL, Shepard RN. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance. 1979;5:579–94. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.579
53
Wacongne C, Labyt E, van Wassenhove V, et al. Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108:20754–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117807108
54
Besson M, Faïta F. An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 1995;21:1278–96.
55
Kuhn G, Dienes Z. Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition. 2005;31:1417–32.
56
Orgs G, Lange K, Dombrowski J-H, et al. Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: an ERP study. Brain and cognition. 2006;62:267–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.05.003
57
Nozaradan S, Peretz I, Mouraux A. Selective Neuronal Entrainment to the Beat and Meter Embedded in a Musical Rhythm. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32:17572–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3203-12.2012
58
Calvo-Merino B, Urgesi C, Orgs G, et al. Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Experimental brain research. 2010;204:447–56. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2283-6
59
Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual review of psychology. 2006;57:199–266.
60
Peelen, Marius V.1Downing, Paul E.1 p.downing@bangor.ac.uk. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature reviews neuroscience. ;8:636–48.
61
Minnebusch DA, Daum I. Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews. 2009;33:1133–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.05.008
62
Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G. The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE. 2007;2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001201
63
Lambrou C, Veale D, Wilson G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2011;120:443–53.
64
Mele S, Cazzato V, Urgesi C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS ONE. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081378
65
Lambrou C, Veale D, Wilson G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2011;120:443–53.
66
Winkler C, Rhodes G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. British journal of psychology. 2005;96:141–54. doi: 10.1348/000712605X36343
67
Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science. 2012;338:1225–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1224313
68
de Gelder B. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2006;7:242–9. doi: 10.1038/nrn1872
69
Urgesi C, Calvo-Merino B, Haggard P, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of neuroscience. 2007;27:8023–30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0789-07.2007
70
Daprati E, Iosa M, Haggard P. A dance to the music of time: aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS ONE. 2009;4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005023
71
Scott IM, Clark AP, Josephson SC, et al. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published Online First: 22 September 2014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409643111
72
Calvo-Merino B, Jola C, Glaser DE, et al. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and cognition. 2008;17:911–22. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003
73
Dalziell AH, Peters RA, Cockburn A, et al. Dance choreography is coordinated with song repertoire in a complex avian display. Current biology. 2013;23:1132–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.018
74
Orgs G, Hagura N, Haggard P. Learning to like it: aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Consciousness and cognition. 2013;22:603–12. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010
75
Orgs G, Dombrowski J-H, Heil M, et al. Expertise in dance modulates alphabeta event-related desynchronization during action observation. European journal of neuroscience. 2008;27:3380–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06271.x
76
McCarty K, Hönekopp J, Neave N, et al. Male body movements as possible cues to physical strength: a biomechanical analysis. American journal of human biology. 2013;25:307–12. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22360
77
Cross E. The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2011;5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
78
Sian L. Beilock and Lauren E. Holt. Embodied preference judgments: can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological science. 2007;18:51–7. doi: 10.2307/40064577
79
Topolinski S. Moving the eye of the beholder: motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological science. 2010;21:1220–4. doi: 10.1177/0956797610378308
80
Saygin AP. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of neuroscience. 2004;24:6181–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-04.2004
81
Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, et al. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current biology. 2006;16:1905–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065
82
Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2010;11:264–74. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805
83
Opacic T, Stevens C, Tillmann B. Unspoken knowledge: Implicit learning of structured human dance movement. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition. 2009;35:1570–7.
84
Reddish P, Fischer R, Bulbulia J. Let’s dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071182
85
Shankar MU, Levitan CA, Spence C. Grape expectations: The role of cognitive influences in color–flavor interactions. Consciousness and Cognition. 2010;19:380–90. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.008
86
Auvray M, Spence C. The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008;17:1016–31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005
87
Loeken et al. LS. Coding of pleasant touch. Nature neuroscience. 2009;12:547–8.
88
Ackerley R, Saar K, McGlone F, et al. Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2014;8.
89
Djordjevic J, Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Experimental brain research. 2004;159:405–8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2103-y
90
Rudenga K, Green B, Nachtigal D, et al. Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula. Chemical senses. 2010;35:693–703. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq068
91
Birch L. Development of food preferences. Annual review of nutrition. 1999;19:41–62.
92
Evans M, Jamal A, Foxall, G. R. Consumer behaviour. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley 2009.
93
Haugtvedt CP, Herr P, Kardes, Frank R. Handbook of consumer psychology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum 2008.
94
Carbon C-C. The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica. 2010;134:233–44. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.004
95
Karremans JC, Stroebe W, Claus J. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of experimental social psychology. 2006;42:792–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002
96
Piech RM, Lewis J, Parkinson CH, et al. Neural correlates of affective influence on choice. Brain and cognition. 2010;72:282–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.012
97
Hannon EE, Soley G, Ullal S. Familiarity overrides complexity in rhythm perception: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Turkish listeners. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 2012;38:543–8.
98
Chrea C. Semantic, typicality and odor representation: a cross-cultural study. Chemical senses. 2005;30:37–49. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh255
99
Royet J-P, Plailly J, Saive A-L, et al. The impact of expertise in olfaction. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00928
100
Kirsch LP, Drommelschmidt KA, Cross ES. The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013;7. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521
101
Delon-Martin C, Plailly J, Fonlupt P, et al. Perfumers’ expertise induces structural reorganization in olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage. 2013;68:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.044
102
Castriota-Scanderberg A. The appreciation of wine by sommeliers: a functional magnetic resonance study of sensory integration. NeuroImage. 2005;25:570–8.
103
Calvo-Merino B. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex. 2004;15:1243–9.
104
T.F. M, E. A, L. J. The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity : Article : Nature Reviews Neuroscience. http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v3/n6/full/nrn843.html
