1.
Shimamura AP, Palmer SE. Aesthetic Science: Connecting Minds, Brains, and Experience. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=342328&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
2.
Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and social psychology review. 2004;8(4):364-382. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
3.
Zajonc RB. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1968;9(2, Pt.2):1-27. doi:10.1037/h0025848
4.
Jacoby LL, Kelley C, Brown J, Jasechko J. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1989;56(3):326-338. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/viewarticle?data=dGJyMPPp44rp2%2fdV0%2bnjisfk5Ie46a9JsKmuTLek63nn5Kx95uXxjL6nsEevrq1KrqexOK%2bnuEu0sK9OnrfLPvLo34bx1%2bGM5%2bXsgeKzr1Czq65Ir6mvS6Ti34bls%2bOGpNrgVe7a5j7y1%2bVVv8Skeeyzr1G2r6tJta6yUKumrkmk3O2K69fyVeTr6oTy2%2faM&hid=125
5.
Semir Zeki. Art and the brain. Daedalus. 1998;127(2):71-103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027491
6.
Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of consciousness studies. 1999;6(6-7):15-51. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/1999/00000006/F0020006/949
7.
Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology. 2004;95(4):489-508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811
8.
Cinzia DD, Vittorio G. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2009;19(6):682-687. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001
9.
Jacobsen T. The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes. In: The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes. Vol 204. Elsevier; 2013:159-168.
10.
Zeki S, Lamb M. The neurology of kinetic art. Brain. 1994;117(3):607-636. doi:10.1093/brain/117.3.607
11.
Goldstein EB. Sensation and Perception. 6th ed. Wadsworth-Thomson Learning; 2002.
12.
Berlyne DE. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Hemisphere Publishing; 1974.
13.
Gombrich, E. H. Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. 6th ed., with new preface. Phaidon; 2002.
14.
Rolf Reber, Piotr Winkielman and Norbert Schwarz. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological science. 1998;9(1):45-48.
15.
Bornstein RF. Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological bulletin. 1989;106(2):265-289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
16.
Winkielman P, Halberstadt J, Fazendeiro T, Catty S. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological science. 2006;17(9):799-806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
17.
Nadal M, Capó MÀ, Rosselló J, Munar E, Cela-Conde CJ. Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial vision. 2008;21(3):379-396. doi:10.1163/156856808784532653
18.
Rudolf Arnheim. On order, simplicity and entropy. Leonardo. 1974;7(2):139-141. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1572794
19.
Jacobsen T, Hoefel L. Descriptive and evaluative judgement processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience. 2003;3(4). http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FCABN.3.4.289#page-1
20.
Silvia, Paul J., Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, US, p_silvia@uncg.edu. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of general psychology. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2006-01036-003&site=ehost-live
21.
R. Von Der Heydt, E. Peterhans and G. Baumgartner. Illusory Contours and Cortical Neuron Responses. Science. 1984;224(4654):1260-1262. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/1692068
22.
Colin Martindale, Kathleen Moore and Jonathan Borkum. Aesthetic Preference: Anomalous Findings for Berlyne’s Psychobiological Theory. The American Journal of Psychology. 1990;103(1):53-80. http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/1423259
23.
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005 - ledercarbonripsas2006.pdf. http://www.experimental-psychology.de/ccc/docs/pubs/ledercarbonripsas2006.pdf
24.
AugustinLederHutzlerCarbon2008.pdf. http://www.experimental-psychology.org/ccc/docs/pubs/AugustinLederHutzlerCarbon2008.pdf
25.
Augustin MD, Defranceschi B, Fuchs HK, Carbon CC, Hutzler F. The neural time course of art perception: An ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(7):2071-2081. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.038
26.
Berlyne DE. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics. 1970;8(5):279-286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
27.
Checkosky SF, Whitlock D. Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of experimental psychology. 1973;100(2):341-348. doi:10.1037/h0035692
28.
Livingstone MS. Is it warm? Is it real? Or just low spatial frequency? Science. 290(5495). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078215
29.
Kawabata H, Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of neurophysiology. 2004;91(4):1699-1705. doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003
30.
Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport. Published online 2004. http://www.yorku.ca/vgoel/reprints/Vartanian_Goel_art.pdf
31.
Zeki S, Stutters J. A brain-derived metric for preferred kinetic stimuli. Open biology. 2012;2(2):120001-120001. doi:10.1098/rsob.120001
32.
Bar M, Neta M. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science. 2006;17(8):645-648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
33.
Sammartino J, Palmer SE. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 2012;38(4):865-879. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=d5251d3c-e066-483c-819c-82080369407f%40sessionmgr4003&hid=4109&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=2012-06754-001
34.
Palmer S, Schloss KB, Sammartino J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual review of psychology. Published online 2013. http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~plab/pdf/PalmerSchlossSammartino(2013)AR.pdf
35.
Hurlbert AC, Ling Y. Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current biology. 2007;17(16):R623-R625. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022
36.
Schloss KB, Poggesi RM, Palmer SE. Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit” on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2011;18(3):498-504. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1
37.
McManus IC. The aesthetics of simple figures. British journal of psychology. 1980;71:505-524. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293705404?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:summon&accountid=14494
38.
McManus IC, Weatherby P. The golden section and the aesthetics of from and composition. Empirical studies of the arts. 1997;15(2):209-232. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-education/reprints/1997EmpiricalStudiesArts-GoldenSection.PDF
39.
Palmer S, Gardner J, Wickens T. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects. Spatial vision. 2008;21(3):421-449. doi:10.1163/156856808784532662
40.
Tucker M, Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 1998;24(3):830-846. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=ad395592-8f4e-44f9-8ce0-42eabf61c6b4%40sessionmgr115&vid=4&hid=120&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=1998-02354-011
41.
McManus IC. Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts. European review. 2005;(Suppl. S2):157-180. doi:10.1017/S1062798705000736
42.
Jakesch M, Leder H, Forster M. Image ambiguity and fluency. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074084
43.
Kirk U. The neural basis of object-context relationships on aesthetic judgment. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003754
44.
McManus IC, Zhou FA, l’Anson S, Waterfield L, Stöver K, Cook R. The psychometrics of photographic cropping: The influence of colour, meaning, and expertise. Perception. Published online 2011. doi:10.1068/p6700
45.
Vartanian O, Navarrete G, Chatterjee A, et al. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(Supplement_2):10446-10453. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301227110
46.
Zeki S, Ishizu T. The "Visual Shock” of Francis Bacon: an essay in neuroesthetics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00850
47.
Stefan Koelsch. Brain and Music. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
48.
Koelsch S. Toward a neural basis of music perception – a review and updated model. Frontier in psychology. 2011;2. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00110
49.
Kornysheva K, von Cramon DY, Jacobsen T, Schubotz RI. Tuning-in to the beat: aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human brain mapping. Published online 2009:NA-NA. doi:10.1002/hbm.20844
50.
Stevens CJ. Music perception and cognition: a review of recent cross-cultural research. Topics in cognitive science. 2012;4(4):653-667. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01215.x
51.
Unjung Nam. Pitch distributions in Korean court music: evidence consistent with tonal hierarchies. Music perception: an interdisciplinary journal. 16(2):243-247. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40285789
52.
Krumhansl CL, Shepard RN. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance. 1979;5(4):579-594. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.579
53.
Wacongne C, Labyt E, van Wassenhove V, Bekinschtein T, Naccache L, Dehaene S. Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(51):20754-20759. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117807108
54.
Besson M, Faïta F. An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 1995;21(6):1278-1296. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=a7648c3a-40e6-45b2-968f-b5892491674d%40sessionmgr4005&vid=4&hid=4212&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=1996-16299-001
55.
Kuhn G, Dienes Z. Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition. 2005;31(6):1417-1432. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=ce7eb9dd-4212-4b81-8707-d91549eba95e%40sessionmgr4003&vid=5&hid=4109
56.
Orgs G, Lange K, Dombrowski JH, Heil M. Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: an ERP study. Brain and cognition. 2006;62(3):267-272. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.05.003
57.
Nozaradan S, Peretz I, Mouraux A. Selective Neuronal Entrainment to the Beat and Meter Embedded in a Musical Rhythm. Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32(49):17572-17581. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3203-12.2012
58.
Calvo-Merino B, Urgesi C, Orgs G, Aglioti SM, Haggard P. Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Experimental brain research. 2010;204(3):447-456. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2283-6
59.
Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual review of psychology. 2006;57:199-266. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
60.
Peelen, Marius V.1Downing, Paul E.1 p.downing@bangor.ac.uk. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature reviews neuroscience. 8(8):636-648. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=25811795&site=ehost-live
61.
Minnebusch DA, Daum I. Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews. 2009;33(7):1133-1144. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.05.008
62.
Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G. The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001201
63.
Lambrou C, Veale D, Wilson G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2011;120(2):443-453. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=219f1169-7335-4067-bd03-59f7ac841777%40sessionmgr112&vid=4&hid=113&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=2011-01601-001
64.
Mele S, Cazzato V, Urgesi C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081378
65.
Lambrou C, Veale D, Wilson G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2011;120(2):443-453. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=a5eee4ae-b9e0-48d0-9c11-f89eb504af6b%40sessionmgr111&vid=5&hid=122&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=2011-01601-001
66.
Winkler C, Rhodes G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. British journal of psychology. 2005;96(2):141-154. doi:10.1348/000712605X36343
67.
Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science. 2012;338(6111):1225-1229. doi:10.1126/science.1224313
68.
de Gelder B. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2006;7(3):242-249. doi:10.1038/nrn1872
69.
Urgesi C, Calvo-Merino B, Haggard P, Aglioti SM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of neuroscience. 2007;27(30):8023-8030. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0789-07.2007
70.
Daprati E, Iosa M, Haggard P. A dance to the music of time: aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005023
71.
Scott IM, Clark AP, Josephson SC, et al. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online 22 September 2014. doi:10.1073/pnas.1409643111
72.
Calvo-Merino B, Jola C, Glaser DE, Haggard P. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and cognition. 2008;17(3):911-922. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.11.003
73.
Dalziell AH, Peters RA, Cockburn A, Dorland AD, Maisey AC, Magrath RD. Dance choreography is coordinated with song repertoire in a complex avian display. Current biology. 2013;23(12):1132-1135. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.018
74.
Orgs G, Hagura N, Haggard P. Learning to like it: aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Consciousness and cognition. 2013;22(2):603-612. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.010
75.
Orgs G, Dombrowski JH, Heil M, Jansen-Osmann P. Expertise in dance modulates alphabeta event-related desynchronization during action observation. European journal of neuroscience. 2008;27(12):3380-3384. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06271.x
76.
McCarty K, Hönekopp J, Neave N, Caplan N, Fink B. Male body movements as possible cues to physical strength: a biomechanical analysis. American journal of human biology. 2013;25(3):307-312. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22360
77.
Cross E. The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2011;5. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00102
78.
Sian L. Beilock and Lauren E. Holt. Embodied preference judgments: can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological science. 2007;18(1):51-57. doi:10.2307/40064577
79.
Topolinski S. Moving the eye of the beholder: motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological science. 2010;21(9):1220-1224. doi:10.1177/0956797610378308
80.
Saygin AP. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of neuroscience. 2004;24(27):6181-6188. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-04.2004
81.
Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current biology. 2006;16(19):1905-1910. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065
82.
Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2010;11(4):264-274. doi:10.1038/nrn2805
83.
Opacic T, Stevens C, Tillmann B. Unspoken knowledge: Implicit learning of structured human dance movement. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition. 2009;35(6):1570-1577. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=pdh&AN=2009-19590-017&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
84.
Reddish P, Fischer R, Bulbulia J. Let’s dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071182
85.
Shankar MU, Levitan CA, Spence C. Grape expectations: The role of cognitive influences in color–flavor interactions. Consciousness and Cognition. 2010;19(1):380-390. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.008
86.
Auvray M, Spence C. The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008;17(3):1016-1031. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005
87.
Loeken et al. LS. Coding of pleasant touch. Nature neuroscience. 2009;12(5):547-548. http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v12/n5/pdf/nn.2312.pdf
88.
Ackerley R, Saar K, McGlone F, Backlund Wasling H. Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2014;8. http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034/full
89.
Djordjevic J, Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Experimental brain research. 2004;159(3):405-408. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2103-y
90.
Rudenga K, Green B, Nachtigal D, Small DM. Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula. Chemical senses. 2010;35(8):693-703. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjq068
91.
Birch L. Development of food preferences. Annual review of nutrition. 1999;19(1):41-62. http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41
92.
Evans M, Jamal A, Foxall, G. R. Consumer Behaviour. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2009.
93.
Haugtvedt CP, Herr P, Kardes, Frank R. Handbook of Consumer Psychology. Vol Marketing and consumer psychology series. Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=137224&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
94.
Carbon CC. The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica. 2010;134(2):233-244. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.004
95.
Karremans JC, Stroebe W, Claus J. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of experimental social psychology. 2006;42(6):792-798. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.002
96.
Piech RM, Lewis J, Parkinson CH, et al. Neural correlates of affective influence on choice. Brain and cognition. 2010;72(2):282-288. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.012
97.
Hannon EE, Soley G, Ullal S. Familiarity overrides complexity in rhythm perception: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Turkish listeners. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance. 2012;38(3):543-548. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=a9d58374-6742-462f-8ce4-416425400521%40sessionmgr113&hid=120&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=pdh&AN=2012-04374-001
98.
Chrea C. Semantic, typicality and odor representation: a cross-cultural study. Chemical senses. 2005;30(1):37-49. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjh255
99.
Royet JP, Plailly J, Saive AL, Veyrac A, Delon-Martin C. The impact of expertise in olfaction. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00928
100.
Kirsch LP, Drommelschmidt KA, Cross ES. The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013;7. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00521
101.
Delon-Martin C, Plailly J, Fonlupt P, Veyrac A, Royet JP. Perfumers’ expertise induces structural reorganization in olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage. 2013;68:55-62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.044
102.
Castriota-Scanderberg A. The appreciation of wine by sommeliers: a functional magnetic resonance study of sensory integration. NeuroImage. 2005;25(2):570-578. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811904007062
103.
Calvo-Merino B. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex. 2004;15(8):1243-1249. https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/8/1243.full
104.
T.F. M, E. A, L. J. The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity : Article : Nature Reviews Neuroscience. doi:doi:10.1038/nrn843
