1.
Shimamura, A. P. & Palmer, S. E. Aesthetic science: connecting minds, brains, and experience.
2.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and social psychology review 8, 364–382 (2004).
3.
Zajonc, R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology 9, 1–27 (1968).
4.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J. & Jasechko, J. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of personality and social psychology 56, 326–338 (1989).
5.
Semir Zeki. Art and the brain. Daedalus 127, 71–103 (1998).
6.
Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of consciousness studies 6, 15–51 (1999).
7.
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A. & Augustin, D. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology 95, 489–508 (2004).
8.
Cinzia, D. D. & Vittorio, G. Neuroaesthetics: a review. Current opinion in neurobiology 19, 682–687 (2009).
9.
Jacobsen, T. The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes. in The Fine Arts, Neurology, and Neuroscience - New Discoveries and Changing Landscapes vol. 204 159–168 (Elsevier, 2013).
10.
Zeki, S. & Lamb, M. The neurology of kinetic art. Brain 117, 607–636 (1994).
11.
Goldstein, E. B. Sensation and perception. (Wadsworth-Thomson Learning, 2002).
12.
Berlyne, D. E. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. (Hemisphere Publishing, 1974).
13.
Gombrich, E. H. Art and illusion: a study in the psychology of pictorial representation. (Phaidon, 2002).
14.
Rolf Reber, Piotr Winkielman and Norbert Schwarz. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological science 9, 45–48 (1998).
15.
Bornstein, R. F. Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological bulletin 106, 265–289 (1989).
16.
Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T. & Catty, S. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological science 17, 799–806 (2006).
17.
Nadal, M., Capó, M. À., Rosselló, J., Munar, E. & Cela-Conde, C. J. Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial vision 21, 379–396 (2008).
18.
Rudolf Arnheim. On order, simplicity and entropy. Leonardo 7, 139–141 (1974).
19.
Jacobsen, T. & Hoefel, L. Descriptive and evaluative judgement processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics. Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience 3, (2003).
20.
Silvia, Paul J., Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC, US, p_silvia@uncg.edu. Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of general psychology.
21.
R. Von Der Heydt, E. Peterhans and G. Baumgartner. Illusory Contours and Cortical Neuron Responses. Science 224, 1260–1262 (1984).
22.
Colin Martindale, Kathleen Moore and Jonathan Borkum. Aesthetic Preference: Anomalous Findings for Berlyne’s Psychobiological Theory. The American Journal of Psychology 103, 53–80 (1990).
23.
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005 - ledercarbonripsas2006.pdf.
24.
AugustinLederHutzlerCarbon2008.pdf.
25.
Augustin, M. D., Defranceschi, B., Fuchs, H. K., Carbon, C.-C. & Hutzler, F. The neural time course of art perception: An ERP study on the processing of style versus content in art. Neuropsychologia 49, 2071–2081 (2011).
26.
Berlyne, D. E. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 279–286 (1970).
27.
Checkosky, S. F. & Whitlock, D. Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of experimental psychology 100, 341–348 (1973).
28.
Livingstone, M. S. Is it warm? Is it real? Or just low spatial frequency? Science 290,.
29.
Kawabata, H. & Zeki, S. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of neurophysiology 91, 1699–1705 (2004).
30.
Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport (2004).
31.
Zeki, S. & Stutters, J. A brain-derived metric for preferred kinetic stimuli. Open biology 2, 120001–120001 (2012).
32.
Bar, M. & Neta, M. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science 17, 645–648 (2006).
33.
Sammartino, J. & Palmer, S. E. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 38, 865–879 (2012).
34.
Palmer, S., Schloss, K. B. & Sammartino, J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual review of psychology (2013).
35.
Hurlbert, A. C. & Ling, Y. Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Current biology 17, R623–R625 (2007).
36.
Schloss, K. B., Poggesi, R. M. & Palmer, S. E. Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit” on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford. Psychonomic bulletin & review 18, 498–504 (2011).
37.
McManus, I. C. The aesthetics of simple figures. British journal of psychology 71, 505–524 (1980).
38.
McManus, I. C. & Weatherby, P. The golden section and the aesthetics of from and composition. Empirical studies of the arts 15, 209–232 (1997).
39.
Palmer, S., Gardner, J. & Wickens, T. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: effects of position and direction on framing single objects. Spatial vision 21, 421–449 (2008).
40.
Tucker, M. & Ellis, R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 24, 830–846 (1998).
41.
McManus, I. C. Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts. European review 157–180 (2005) doi:10.1017/S1062798705000736.
42.
Jakesch, M., Leder, H. & Forster, M. Image ambiguity and fluency. PLoS ONE 8, (2013).
43.
Kirk, U. The neural basis of object-context relationships on aesthetic judgment. PLoS ONE 3, (2008).
44.
McManus, I. C. et al. The psychometrics of photographic cropping: The influence of colour, meaning, and expertise. Perception (2011) doi:10.1068/p6700.
45.
Vartanian, O. et al. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 10446–10453 (2013).
46.
Zeki, S. & Ishizu, T. The "Visual Shock” of Francis Bacon: an essay in neuroesthetics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, (2013).
47.
Stefan Koelsch. Brain and music. (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).
48.
Koelsch, S. Toward a neural basis of music perception – a review and updated model. Frontier in psychology 2, (2011).
49.
Kornysheva, K., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T. & Schubotz, R. I. Tuning-in to the beat: aesthetic appreciation of musical rhythms correlates with a premotor activity boost. Human brain mapping NA-NA (2009) doi:10.1002/hbm.20844.
50.
Stevens, C. J. Music perception and cognition: a review of recent cross-cultural research. Topics in cognitive science 4, 653–667 (2012).
51.
Unjung Nam. Pitch distributions in Korean court music: evidence consistent with tonal hierarchies. Music perception: an interdisciplinary journal 16, 243–247.
52.
Krumhansl, C. L. & Shepard, R. N. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance 5, 579–594 (1979).
53.
Wacongne, C. et al. Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 20754–20759 (2011).
54.
Besson, M. & Faïta, F. An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 21, 1278–1296 (1995).
55.
Kuhn, G. & Dienes, Z. Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition 31, 1417–1432 (2005).
56.
Orgs, G., Lange, K., Dombrowski, J.-H. & Heil, M. Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: an ERP study. Brain and cognition 62, 267–272 (2006).
57.
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I. & Mouraux, A. Selective Neuronal Entrainment to the Beat and Meter Embedded in a Musical Rhythm. Journal of Neuroscience 32, 17572–17581 (2012).
58.
Calvo-Merino, B., Urgesi, C., Orgs, G., Aglioti, S. M. & Haggard, P. Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Experimental brain research 204, 447–456 (2010).
59.
Rhodes, G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual review of psychology 57, 199–266 (2006).
60.
Peelen, Marius V.1Downing, Paul E.1 p.downing@bangor.ac.uk. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature reviews neuroscience 8, 636–648.
61.
Minnebusch, D. A. & Daum, I. Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception. Neuroscience & biobehavioral reviews 33, 1133–1144 (2009).
62.
Di Dio, C., Macaluso, E. & Rizzolatti, G. The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE 2, (2007).
63.
Lambrou, C., Veale, D. & Wilson, G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology 120, 443–453 (2011).
64.
Mele, S., Cazzato, V. & Urgesi, C. The importance of perceptual experience in the esthetic appreciation of the body. PLoS ONE 8, (2013).
65.
Lambrou, C., Veale, D. & Wilson, G. The role of aesthetic sensitivity in body dysmorphic disorder. Journal of abnormal psychology 120, 443–453 (2011).
66.
Winkler, C. & Rhodes, G. Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. British journal of psychology 96, 141–154 (2005).
67.
Aviezer, H., Trope, Y. & Todorov, A. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science 338, 1225–1229 (2012).
68.
de Gelder, B. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature reviews neuroscience 7, 242–249 (2006).
69.
Urgesi, C., Calvo-Merino, B., Haggard, P. & Aglioti, S. M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. Journal of neuroscience 27, 8023–8030 (2007).
70.
Daprati, E., Iosa, M. & Haggard, P. A dance to the music of time: aesthetically-relevant changes in body posture in performing art. PLoS ONE 4, (2009).
71.
Scott, I. M. et al. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2014) doi:10.1073/pnas.1409643111.
72.
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D. E. & Haggard, P. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and cognition 17, 911–922 (2008).
73.
Dalziell, A. H. et al. Dance choreography is coordinated with song repertoire in a complex avian display. Current biology 23, 1132–1135 (2013).
74.
Orgs, G., Hagura, N. & Haggard, P. Learning to like it: aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure. Consciousness and cognition 22, 603–612 (2013).
75.
Orgs, G., Dombrowski, J.-H., Heil, M. & Jansen-Osmann, P. Expertise in dance modulates alphabeta event-related desynchronization during action observation. European journal of neuroscience 27, 3380–3384 (2008).
76.
McCarty, K., Hönekopp, J., Neave, N., Caplan, N. & Fink, B. Male body movements as possible cues to physical strength: a biomechanical analysis. American journal of human biology 25, 307–312 (2013).
77.
Cross, E. The impact of aesthetic evaluation and physical ability on dance perception. Frontiers in human neuroscience 5, (2011).
78.
Sian L. Beilock and Lauren E. Holt. Embodied preference judgments: can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological science 18, 51–57 (2007).
79.
Topolinski, S. Moving the eye of the beholder: motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological science 21, 1220–1224 (2010).
80.
Saygin, A. P. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of neuroscience 24, 6181–6188 (2004).
81.
Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E. & Haggard, P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current biology 16, 1905–1910 (2006).
82.
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature reviews neuroscience 11, 264–274 (2010).
83.
Opacic, T., Stevens, C. & Tillmann, B. Unspoken knowledge: Implicit learning of structured human dance movement. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition 35, 1570–1577 (2009).
84.
Reddish, P., Fischer, R. & Bulbulia, J. Let’s dance together: synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS ONE 8, (2013).
85.
Shankar, M. U., Levitan, C. A. & Spence, C. Grape expectations: The role of cognitive influences in color–flavor interactions. Consciousness and Cognition 19, 380–390 (2010).
86.
Auvray, M. & Spence, C. The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition 17, 1016–1031 (2008).
87.
Loeken et al., L. S. Coding of pleasant touch. Nature neuroscience 12, 547–548 (2009).
88.
Ackerley, R., Saar, K., McGlone, F. & Backlund Wasling, H. Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience 8, (2014).
89.
Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R. J. & Jones-Gotman, M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Experimental brain research 159, 405–408 (2004).
90.
Rudenga, K., Green, B., Nachtigal, D. & Small, D. M. Evidence for an integrated oral sensory module in the human anterior ventral insula. Chemical senses 35, 693–703 (2010).
91.
Birch, L. Development of food preferences. Annual review of nutrition 19, 41–62 (1999).
92.
Evans, M., Jamal, A., & Foxall, G. R. Consumer behaviour. (Wiley, 2009).
93.
Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P., & Kardes, Frank R. Handbook of consumer psychology. vol. Marketing and consumer psychology series (Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008).
94.
Carbon, C.-C. The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica 134, 233–244 (2010).
95.
Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W. & Claus, J. Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of experimental social psychology 42, 792–798 (2006).
96.
Piech, R. M. et al. Neural correlates of affective influence on choice. Brain and cognition 72, 282–288 (2010).
97.
Hannon, E. E., Soley, G. & Ullal, S. Familiarity overrides complexity in rhythm perception: A cross-cultural comparison of American and Turkish listeners. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance 38, 543–548 (2012).
98.
Chrea, C. Semantic, typicality and odor representation: a cross-cultural study. Chemical senses 30, 37–49 (2005).
99.
Royet, J.-P., Plailly, J., Saive, A.-L., Veyrac, A. & Delon-Martin, C. The impact of expertise in olfaction. Frontiers in psychology 4, (2013).
100.
Kirsch, L. P., Drommelschmidt, K. A. & Cross, E. S. The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance. Frontiers in human neuroscience 7, (2013).
101.
Delon-Martin, C., Plailly, J., Fonlupt, P., Veyrac, A. & Royet, J.-P. Perfumers’ expertise induces structural reorganization in olfactory brain regions. NeuroImage 68, 55–62 (2013).
102.
Castriota-Scanderberg, A. The appreciation of wine by sommeliers: a functional magnetic resonance study of sensory integration. NeuroImage 25, 570–578 (2005).
103.
Calvo-Merino, B. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral cortex 15, 1243–1249 (2004).
104.
T.F., M., E., A. & L., J. The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity : Article : Nature Reviews Neuroscience. http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v3/n6/full/nrn843.html doi:doi:10.1038/nrn843.
