Bibliography for LX5643 - Patent Law and Practice BETA

Adelman, M.J. (2011) Global issues in patent law. St. Paul, MN: West.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017a) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017b) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017c) ‘Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials’, in Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 603–721. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017d) ‘Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials’, in Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 603–721. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017e) ‘Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials’, in Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 603–721. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017f) ‘Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials’, in Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 603–721. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017g) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017h) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017i) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017j) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017k) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017l) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017m) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017n) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Aplin, T.F. and Davis, J. (2017o) ‘Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials’, in Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, pp. 603–721. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b82d2c83-8c2b-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Arthur, C.A. (2014) ‘Should Apple finally call time on smartphone patent wars?’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/05/apple-iphone-android-wars-legal-patent-battles.

Bainbridge, D.I. (2018) Intellectual property. Tenth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson.

BBC Radio 4 - In Business, Gene Patenting (2013). Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b037vb4d.

Bently, L. et al. (2018a) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018b) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018c) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018d) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018e) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018f) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018g) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018h) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018i) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018j) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018k) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018l) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018m) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bently, L. et al. (2018n) Intellectual property law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bonadio, E. (2012) ‘Biotech patents and morality after Brussels’, European Intellectual Property Review. Available at: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4097/1/Biotech%20patents%20and%20morality%20after%20Brussels.pdf.

Bowcott, O. (2012) ‘Unified Patent Court split between Paris, London and Munich’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2012/jul/03/unified-patent-court-london.

Brennan, D.J. (2009) ‘Biogen sufficiency reconsidered’, Intellectual Property Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I42B534B0CE7911DE91DCE6753676A05A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

British and Irish Legal Information Institute (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/.

Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (no date) European Patents Sourcefinder. Sweet & Maxwell.

Christie, A. and Gare, S. (eds) (2018) Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property. 14th edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Cockbain, J. and Sterckx, S. (2011) ‘Is the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office authorised to extend the bounds of the patentable? The G5/83 Second Medical Indication/EISAI and G2/08 Dosage Regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY cases’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 42(3). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IE5E58D00B69A11E08901C93154A11BF4&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002) Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. Available at: http://www.cipr.org.uk/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.

Cornish, W.R. (2004) Intellectual property: omnipresent, distracting, irrelevant? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013a) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013b) ‘Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights’, in Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, pp. 1–51. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c56f2b34-9a28-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013c) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013d) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013e) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013f) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013g) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013h) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013i) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013j) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013k) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013l) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013m) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013n) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D. and Aplin, T.F. (2013o) Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.

Court of Justice of the European Union (no date). Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_6999.

Cullet, P. (no date) ‘Patents and medicines: the relationship between TRIPS and the human right to health’, International Affairs. Available at: http://www.ielrc.org/content/a0301.pdf.

‘Difference Engine: The PC all over again?’ (2012) The Economist [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.economist.com/babbage/2012/09/09/difference-engine-the-pc-all-over-again.

Dinwoodie, G.B. (2006) ‘*The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources’, Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review [Preprint]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=749349.

Dinwoodie, G.B. and Janis, M.D. (2010) Trade dress and design law. New York: Aspen Publishers.

Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. (2003) Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy? London: Earthscan.

Ealey, D. and Chartered Institute of Patent Agents (London, England) (2014) Study guide to the Patents Acts. 2014 ed. London: CIPA.

England, P. and Parker, S. (2012) ‘Obviousness in the new European order’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 7(11), pp. 805–815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps162.

‘Entertainment and Media Law Reports’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=Entertainment%20and%20Media%20Law%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘Entertainment Law Review’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0959-3799&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

EU law - EUROPA | European Union (no date). Available at: https://europa.eu/european-union/law_en.

‘European Copyright and Design Reports’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20Copyright%20and%20Design%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘European intellectual property review’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=European%20intellectual%20property%20review&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

European Patent Office (EPO) (no date). Available at: https://www.epo.org/index.html.

‘European Patent Office Reports’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=issn_equals&criteria=0269-0802&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

European Patents Handbook (CIPA) (no date). Available at: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Browse/Home/Books/CIPAEuropeanPatents?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&comp=pluk&bhcp=1.

‘European Trade Mark Reports’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_begins&criteria=European%20Trade%20Mark%20Reports&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (no date). Available at: https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/.

Evans, G.E. (no date) ‘Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights’. Available at: https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/document.php?id=WOCO1994013&PHPSESSID=fbv506fb18nbgip10pr4a9mpl0.

Fisher, M. (2005) ‘Classical economics and philosophy of the patent system’, Intellectual Property Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IBD9B2790E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Fisher, M. (2007) Fundamentals of patent law: interpretation and scope of protection. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Available at: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781847313812.

Fisher, M. (2012) ‘Extracting the price of a patent: enablement and written description’, Intellectual Property Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I9AF8DA802C4211E29A4AF883571617EC&crumb-action=append&context=25.

‘Fleet Street patent law reports’ (no date).

Floyd, C. (1996) ‘Novelty under the Patents Act 1977: the state of the art after Merrell Dow’, European Intellectual Property Review, 18(9). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D8B5500E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Floyd, C. (2010) ‘Infringement by Repair and the Troublesome Definition of “Making” the Invention: A critique of Schütz v Werit’. Available at: http://fordhamipconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Floyd_InfringementByRepair.pdf.

Fox, N. (2010) A guide to the EPC 2000: a practitioner’s guide to the new law. 4th ed. London: Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.

Franzosi, M. (2005) ‘Non-Obviousness’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 6(2), pp. 233–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2003.tb00200.x.

Geiger, C. (2009) ‘Intellectual property shall be protected!? Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: a mysterious provision with an unclear scope’, European Intellectual Property Review, 31(3). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IDE325F70E45111DD8BEBE47BB36F59BF&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Giles, J. (2012) ‘The Brustle and Eli Lilly cases: Creation--God or humankind?’, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 1(2), pp. 518–523. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rws009.

Gillmor, D. (2012) ‘America’s dysfunctional patent system is stifling innovation’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/30/america-dysfunctional-patent-system-innovation.

Gosseries, A., Marciano, A. and Strowel, A. (2008) Intellectual property and theories of justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=219811&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

‘Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office’ (2017). Munich: European Patent Office. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/guidelines.html.

Harmon, S.H.E., Laurie, G. and Courtney, A. (2013) ‘Dignity, plurality and patentability: the unfinished story of Brustle v Greenpeace’, European Law Review, 38(1). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I446810B274CB11E2BD04BE991BF76CB2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Harris, P. (2013) ‘Monsanto sued small famers to protect seed patents, report says’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/12/monsanto-sues-farmers-seed-patents.

Helfer, L.R. (ed.) (2013) Intellectual property and human rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research’, Science, 280(5364). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2895332?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Hilty, R. et al. (2012) ‘The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern’, SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2169254.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK (no date). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service.

Hobson, A. and Shafran, T. (2009) ‘Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Limited: pharmaceutical companies at risk of successful employee inventor compensation claim following landmark ruling’, European Intellectual Property Review, 31(10). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I1C7E77A099C911DE8BBDB40346639712&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Howell, C. (2011) ‘Extra compensation for inventive employees: is our system equitable, unbiased and motivating?’, Intellectual Property Quarterly [Preprint]. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I37DBCE500DFB11E1B928A0CFA159DA04&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Hughes, J. (1988) ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’, Georgetown Law Journal [Preprint]. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/glj77&i=309&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

‘IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law’ (no date). Available at: https://link.springer.com/journal/40319.

‘Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights’ (no date). Available at: http://www.iprcommission.org/papers/pdfs/final_report/ciprfullfinal.pdf.

Intellectual Property Institute (no date) ‘Intellectual property quarterly’. Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Intellectual%20property%20quarterly&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Intellectual Property Office (2016) ‘Examining patent applications for medical inventions - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-medical-inventions.

Intellectual Property Office (no date a) ‘Examining patent applications for biotechnological inventions - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-for-biotechnological-inventions.

Intellectual Property Office (no date b) ‘Examining patent applications relating to chemical inventions’. Cardiff. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/examining-patent-applications-relating-to-chemical-inventions.

Intellectual Property Office (no date c) ‘Patents: Manual of Patent Practice - GOV.UK’. Cardiff. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patents-manual-of-patent-practice.

Jaffe, A.B. and Lerner, J. (2007) Innovation and its discontents: how our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. [New ed.]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=313338&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Jewess, M. (2013) Inside intellectual property: best practice in intellectual property law, management, and strategy. London: The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys.

Jones, C. and Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (no date) Patent Co-Operation Treaty Handbook. Sweet & Maxwell.

‘Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Journal%20of%20Intellectual%20Property%20Law%20and%20Practice&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Keeling, D.T. (2003) Intellectual property rights in EU law: Vol.1: Free movement and competition law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitch, E.W. (1977) ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System’, The Journal of Law & Economics, 20(2). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/725193?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Kitchin, L.J. (2012) Transcript of Lord Justice Kitchin’s Speech on the Unitary Patent (2012). Available at: http://www.cipa.org.uk/pages/Congres-Dinner-2012-Lord-Justice-Kitchin.

Kur, A. and Dreier, T. (2013) ‘European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials’, in European intellectual property law: texts, cases and materials. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 39–83. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fe07e640-4f29-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

Laddie, H. (no date) ‘*Kirin Amgen — The End of Equivalents in England?1’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 40(1). Available at: https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=57VC-N3D1-DXM0-0292&csi=402200&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.

Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (2003a) The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.

Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (2003b) ‘The economic structure of intellectual property law’, in The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=282048&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.

Luginbühl, S. and Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht. Centrum voor Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht (2011) European patent law: towards a uniform interpretation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302423&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Machlup, F. and Penrose, E. (1950) ‘The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century’, The Journal of Economic History, 10(1). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2113999?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

McVeigh, K. (2013) ‘US supreme court rules human genes cannot be patented’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/jun/13/supreme-court-genes-patent-dna.

Merges, R.P. (1999) ‘The Law and Economics of Employee Inventions’, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology [Preprint]. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hjlt13&i=7&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

Merges, R.P. and Nelson, R.R. (1990) ‘On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, 90(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1122920.

Musker, D.C. (2002) Community design law: principles and practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

‘National law relating to the EPC’ (2015). Munich: European Patent Office. Available at: https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/national-law.html.

Norman, H.E. (2014) Intellectual property law. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ohly, A. and Pila, J. (eds) (2013a) The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ohly, A. and Pila, J. (eds) (2013b) ‘The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology’, in The Europeanization of intellectual property law: towards a European legal methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–216. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=74535763-8228-e911-80cd-005056af4099.

‘’Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions’ (COM(2002) 92 final — 2002/0047(COD))’ (no date) Official Journal of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2003:061:0154:0163:EN:PDF.

Patently Absurd! - Weird & wacky patents (no date). Available at: http://www.patentlyabsurd.org.uk/.

Pehlivan, C.N. (2012) ‘The creation of a single European patent system: from dream to (almost) reality’, European Intellectual Property Review, 34(7). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I527E01A0B9BE11E1AAED857176AF78A8&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Pila, J. (2005) ‘Dispute over the meaning of “invention” in Art.52(2) EPC - the patentability of computer-implemented inventions in Europe’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 36(2). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IF3AE89208C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Pila, J. (2009) ‘Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After’, King’s Law Journal, 20(3), pp. 489–526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2009.11423685.

Pila, J. (2010) The requirement for invention in patent law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pila, J. (2012) ‘“Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute”: Employee Inventions and the Employment Context’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32(2). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41682779?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Pila, J. (2013) ‘*THE EUROPEAN PATENT: AN OLD AND VEXING PROBLEM’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 62(04), pp. 917–940. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589313000304.

Plomer, A. (2011) ‘EU ban on stem cell patents is a threat both to science and the rule of law | Aurora Plomer’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/dec/12/eu-ban-stem-cell-patents.

Prizes, Not Patents by Joseph E. Stiglitz - Project Syndicate (no date). Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/prizes--not-patents?barrier=accesspaylog.

Pumfrey, N. (no date) ‘The Doctrine of Equivalents in Various Patent Regimes: Does Anybody Have It Right?’ Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2224188.

‘Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=Reports%20of%20Patent,%20Design%20and%20Trade%20Mark%20Cases&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

Seville, C. (2016) EU intellectual property law and policy. Second edition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4731305.

Sharples, A. (2012) ‘Industrial applicability, patents and the Supreme Court: Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Co’, European Intellectual Property Review, 34(4). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I09DDC441647711E1AAB4EE4A0ACB9543&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Sharples, A. and Curley, D. (2006) ‘Experimental novelty: Synthon v SmithKline Beecham’, European Intellectual Property Review, 28(5). Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7D89A751E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

Smedley, T. (2013) ‘Patent wars: has India taken on Big Pharma and won?’, Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/patent-wars-india-takes-on-big-pharma.

Southgate, T. (2013) ‘Can you patent an experience?’, The Guardian [Preprint]. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20140831204301/http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/partner-zone-brand-union/patent-brand-experience.

Stone, D. (2016) European Union design law: a practitioners’ guide. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Struve, F. W. (2013) ‘Ending Unnecessary Novelty Destruction: Why Europe Should Adopt the Safety-Net Grace Period as an International Best Practice’, William Mitchell Law Review [Preprint], (4). Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/wmitch39&i=1424&a=YnJ1bmVsLmVkdQ.

Suthersanen, U. (2010) Design law: European Union and United States of America. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Terrell, T. (2016) Terrell on the law of patents. Eighteenth edition. Edited by C. Birss and T. Austen. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/tocectory?crumb-action=reset&stnew=true&crumb-label=Books&sttype=stdtemplate&ao=o.I361019C020F511E68DCBBC525B125694&ndd=2&entityID=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.

The 1709 Blog (no date). Available at: http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/.

‘The Ethics of Patenting DNA - Nuffield Bioethics’ (2002). Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Available at: http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/patenting-dna.

The IPKat (no date). Available at: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/.

‘The journal of world intellectual property’ (no date). Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/ejp/?libHash=CM7LY9CU9W#/search/?searchControl=title&searchType=alternate_title_equals&criteria=journal%20of%20world%20intellectual%20property&titleType=JOURNALS&filterBy=All&beginPage=0&language=en-gb.

‘The PCT Applicant’s Guide’ (2017). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/appguide/.

The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) (no date). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/intellectual-property-office.

Torremans, P. (2016) Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Unitary patent – ratification progress (no date). Available at: http://unitarypatent.com/ratification-process/.

Visser, D. (15AD) The annotated European patent convention. Twenty-fifth revised edition. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer.

Waelde, C. et al. (2016) Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. Fourth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Whitehead, B. (2006) ‘Patent construction after Amgen: are patent claims construed more widely or narrowly than previously?’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 1(5), pp. 332–337. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl019.

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (no date). Available at: http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.

World Trade Organization (WTO) (no date). Available at: https://www.wto.org/.