1.
Sideways Dictionary, https://sidewaysdictionary.com/#/.
2.
boyd, danah: It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, New Haven (2014).
3.
Naughton, J.: Everything you need to know about the internet | Technology | The Observer.
4.
Ian Sample: What is the internet? 13 key questions answered. Guardian. (2018).
5.
Paul, A.: What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education, http://gator.ndm.edu/~kyoon/Web%202.0/tsw0701b.pdf.
6.
History Of The Internet, https://youtu.be/7NpczzIsnLU, (2009).
7.
o’Reily, T.: What Is Web 2.0 - O’Reilly Media, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a//web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.
8.
Galloway, A.R.: Protocol: how control exists after decentralization. MIT, Cambridge, Mass (2004).
9.
Rheingold, H.: The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).
10.
The Machine is Us/ing Us (Final Version) - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g&feature=youtu.be.
11.
Tim, O.: What Is Web 2.0?, http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a//web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.
12.
Tim, B.-L.: Frequently asked questions (The Internet & Web), https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/FAQ.html#InternetWeb.
13.
Wark, M.: A Hacker Manifesto [Version 4.0].
14.
Ellison, N., boyd, danah: Sociality through Social Network Sites. In: The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).
15.
Obar, J.A., Wildman, S.: Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy. 39, 745–750 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.
16.
boyd, danah m., Ellison, N.B.: Social Network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 13, 210–230 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
17.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12, 1143–1168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
18.
Livingstone, S.: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 10, 393–411 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415.
19.
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons. 53, 59–68 (2010).
20.
Benkler, Y.: The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven [Conn.] (2006).
21.
Erikson, T.: Social Computing - The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. (2007).
22.
Granovetter, M.S.: The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 1360–1380 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.
23.
Barabási, A.-L.: Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond. Science. 325, 412–413 (2009).
24.
van Dijck, J.: Facebook and the engineering of connectivity. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 19, 141–155 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512457548.
25.
Nancy K. Baym: Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Presented at the (2015).
26.
Dijck, J. van: The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press, New York (2013).
27.
Gillespie, T.: The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society. 12, 347–364 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738.
28.
Burkeman, O.: Forty years of the internet: how the world changed for ever | Technology | The Guardian.
29.
Gauntlett, D.: David Gauntlett: Making is Connecting, January 2010 - YouTube, (2010).
30.
Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons. 53, 59–68 (2010).
31.
Schmidt, E.: Every 2 Days We Create As Much Information As We Did Up To 2003, https://techcrunch.com/2010/08/04/schmidt-data/.
32.
Lisa Lebduska: Emoji, Emoji, What for Art Thou? Harlot: A Revealing Look at the Arts of Persuasion. 1, (2014).
33.
boyd, danah, Crawford, K.: Six Provocations for Big Data. (2011).
34.
Marwick, A., boyd, danah: I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society. 13, 114–133 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
35.
Helmond, A., Bucher, T.: The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. Presented at the (2015).
36.
Gillespie, T.: The Relevance of Algorithms. In: Media Technologies (2014).
37.
Theresa M. Senft: Selfies Introduction ~ What Does the Selfie Say? Investigating a Global Phenomenon. International Journal of Communication. 9, (2015).
38.
Khamis, S., Ang, L., Welling, R.: Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers. Celebrity Studies. 8, 191–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292.
39.
Anne Jerslev: Media Times| In The Time of the Microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication. 10, (2016).
40.
Burns, A.: Selfies self(ie)-discipline: social regulation as enacted through the discussion of photographic practice. International Journal of Communication. 9, (2015).
41.
Papacharissi, Z.: A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. Routledge, New York (2011).
42.
Marwick, A.E.: Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture. 27, 137–160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379.
43.
Murray, D.C.: Notes to self: the visual culture of selfies in the age of social media. Consumption Markets & Culture. 18, 490–516 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1052967.
44.
Rettberg, J.W.: ‘Freshly Generated for You, and Barack Obama’. European Journal of Communication. 24, 451–466 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323109345715.
45.
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., Martin, J.: Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior. 24, 1816–1836 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012.
46.
Tiidenberg, K.: Bringing sexy back: Reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 8, (2014).
47.
Senft, T.M.: Microcelebrity and the Branded Self. In: Hartley, J., Burgess, J., and Bruns, A. (eds.) A Companion to New Media Dynamics. pp. 346–354. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22.
48.
Wellman, B.: Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism. In: Tanabe, M., van den Besselaar, P., and Ishida, T. (eds.) Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches. pp. 10–25. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45636-8_2.
49.
Abidin, C.: "Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society. 2, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342.
50.
Chung, S., Cho, H.: Fostering Parasocial Relationships with Celebrities on Social Media: Implications for Celebrity Endorsement. Psychology & Marketing. 34, 481–495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001.
51.
Christine M. Kowalczyk ; Kathrynn R. Pounders: Transforming celebrities through social media: the role of authenticity and emotional attachment. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 25, (2016).
52.
Börzsei, L.K.: Makes a Meme Instead: A Concise History of Internet Memes. (2013).
53.
Burgess, J.: All Your Chocolate Rain Are Belong to Us?’ Viral Video, YouTube and the Dynamics of Participatory Culture. In: Video Vortex reader responses to YouTube. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam (2008).
54.
Jurvetson, S.: What exactly is viral marketing. (2000).
55.
Provencher Langlois, Marion: Making Sense of ‘Memes’: Where They Came From and Why We Keep Clicking Them. Inquiries Journal. 6,.
56.
Leon, S.: I Can Haz an Internet Aesthetic?!? LOLCats and the Digital Marketplace. , NEPCA Conference (2012).
57.
Shifman, L.: Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 18, 362–377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013.
58.
Shifman, L.: Memes versus virals. In: Memes in Digital Culture. MIT (2013).
59.
Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C: Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In: A New Literacies Sampler. pp. 199–227. Peter Lang, USA (2007).
60.
Nooney, L., Portwood-Stacer, L.: One Does Not Simply: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Internet Memes. Journal of Visual Culture. 13, 248–252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914551351.
61.
Rodley, C.: When Memes Go to War: Viral Propaganda in the 2014 Gaza-Israel Conflict. The Fibreculture Journal. (2016).
62.
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Thorson, K.: Good citizenship as a frame contest: Kony2012, memes, and critiques of the networked citizen. New Media & Society. 18, 1993–2011 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815575311.
63.
Zittrain, J.: Reflections on Internet Culture. Journal of Visual Culture. 13, 388–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544540.
64.
Xu, C.: A Field Guide to China’s Most Indispensible Meme - Motherboard, https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/bmvd74/china-meme-face-a-biaoqing-field-guide.
65.
Jenkins, H.: If It Doesn’t Spread, It’s Dead (Part One): Media Viruses and Memes — Henry Jenkins, http://henryjenkins.org/2009/02/if_it_doesnt_spread_its_dead_p.html.
66.
Mina, A.X.: A Tale of Two Memes: The Powerful Connection Between Trayvon Martin and Chen Guangcheng - The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/a-tale-of-two-memes-the-powerful-connection-between-trayvon-martin-and-chen-guangcheng/259604/.
67.
Milner, R.: Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz. The Fibreculture Journal. (2013).
68.
Seth Godin, Malcolm Gladwell: Unleashing the Ideavirus. Do You Zoom.
69.
Scacco, J.M., Muddiman, A.: Investigating the Influence of ‘Clickbait’ News Headlines, http://mediaengagement.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ENP-Investigating-the-Influence-of-Clickbait-News-Headlines.pdf, (2016).
70.
Lamerichs, N.: Elite male bodies: The circulation of alt-Right memes and the framing of politicians on Social Media. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception studies. 14, (2018).
71.
Milner, R.M.: The world made meme: public conversations and participatory media. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2018).
72.
Przybylski, A., Orben, A.: Why it’s too soon to classify gaming addiction as a mental disorder, https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2018/feb/14/gaming-addiction-as-a-mental-disorder-its-premature-to-pathologise-players.
73.
Harris, T.: How Technology Hijacks People’s Minds, https://www.huffingtonpost.com/tristan-harris/how-technology-hijacks-peoples-minds_b_10155754.html.
74.
Becker, R.: Why calling screen time ‘digital heroin’ is digital garbage, https://www.theverge.com/2016/8/30/12715848/new-york-post-internet-texting-addiction-irresponsible-hysteria.
75.
Ferguson, C.: Technology is Not a Drug: Debunking the Biggest Myths About ‘Technology Addiction’, https://undark.org/article/technology-addiction-myths/.
76.
Kardaras, N.: It’s ‘digital heroin’: How screens turn kids into psychotic junkies | New York Post, https://nypost.com/2016/08/27/its-digital-heroin-how-screens-turn-kids-into-psychotic-junkies/.
77.
Paasonen, S.: Fickle focus: Distraction, affect and the production of value in social media. First Monday. 21, (2016).
78.
Turkle, S.: The inner history of devices. The MIT Press.
79.
Shakya, H., Christakis, N.: Association of Facebook Use With Compromised Well-Being: A Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Epidemiology. (2017).
80.
Dredge, S.: Mobile phone addiction? It’s time to take back control | Technology | The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/27/mobile-phone-addiction-apps-break-the-habit-take-back-control?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Add_to_Evernote.
81.
Gilroy-Ware, M.: Laughing and crying online, https://newint.org/features/2018/01/01/social-media-mental-health.
82.
Bosker, B.: Addicted to Your iPhone? You’re Not Alone, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/11/the-binge-breaker/501122/.
83.
Hearn, A.: ‘Never get high on your own supply’ – why social media bosses don’t use social media, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/23/never-get-high-on-your-own-supply-why-social-media-bosses-dont-use-social-media?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Add_to_Evernote.
84.
Read, J.: Distracted by Attention, https://thenewinquiry.com/distracted-by-attention/.
85.
Tania, B.: A Technicity of Attention: How Software ‘Makes Sense’. Culture Machine. 13, (2012).
86.
Andrejevic, M.: Infoglut: how too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge, New York (2013).
87.
Lewis, P.: ‘Our minds can be hijacked’: the tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia.
88.
Ganesh, M.: The Center for Humane Technology Doesn’t Want Your Attention, https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2018/02/09/the-center-for-humane-technology-doesnt-want-your-attention/.
89.
MacKay, J.: Why you’re not "addicted” to technology (and it’s dangerous to say so): An interview with behavioral designer Nir Eyal, https://blog.rescuetime.com/nir-eyal-digital-distraction/.
90.
Simon, P.: Has dopamine got us hooked on tech?, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/04/has-dopamine-got-us-hooked-on-tech-facebook-apps-addiction.
91.
Oscar Schwartz: Why beating your phone addiction may come at a cost. Guardian. (2019).
92.
Senior, J.: Review: ‘The Attention Merchants’ Dissects the Battle for Clicks and Eyeballs, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/03/books/review-attention-merchants-tim-wu.html.
93.
Mark Andrejevic, Gates, K.: Big Data Surveillance: Introduction. Surveillance & Society. 12, 185–196 (2014).
94.
boyd, danah: Debating Privacy in a Networked World for the WSJ. (2011).
95.
Angwin, J.: How Much Should People Worry About the Loss of Online Privacy? (2011).
96.
Shoshana Zuboff: Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. 30 (1), 75–89 (2015).
97.
Nick Couldry: The price of connection: ‘surveillance capitalism’. The Conversation. (2016).
98.
Christl, Wolfie: Corporate Surveillance In Everyday Life. How Companies Collect, Combine, Analyze, Trade, and Use Personal Data on Billions. (2017).
99.
Anders Albrechtslund: Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. 13, (2008).
100.
Andrejevic, M.: The work of being watched: interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 19, 230–248 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180216561.
101.
boyd, danah boyd, Hargattai, E.: Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday. 15, (2010).
102.
boyd, danah, Marwick, A.: Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens’ Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies, http://www.danah.org/papers/2011/SocialPrivacyPLSC-Draft.pdf, (2011).
103.
Goldcare, B.: Datamining for terrorists would be lovely if it worked – Bad Science, http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/datamining-would-be-lovely-if-it-worked/.
104.
Solove, Daniel J.: ‘I’ve Got Nothing to Hide’ and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy. 44, (2007).
105.
David Lyon: Surveillance Studies: understanding visibility, mobility and the phenetic fix. Surveillance & Society. 1, 1–7 (2002).
106.
Sharma, S., Nijjar, J.: The racialized surveillant assemblage: Islam and the fear of terrorism. 16 (1), 72–85 (2018).
107.
Naughton, J.: Why we are resigned to giving our data to corporate spies | Opinion | The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/28/why-we-give-our-data-to-corporate-spies-surveillance.
108.
van Dijck, J.: Datafication, dataism and dataveillance by prof. José van Dijck - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOt2-HRWaYU, (2014).
109.
Mineo, L.: When it comes to internet privacy, be very afraid, analyst suggests – Harvard Gazette, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/08/when-it-comes-to-internet-privacy-be-very-afraid-analyst-suggests/.
110.
Hargittai, E.H., Marwick, A.: "What Can I Really Do?” Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy. International Journal of Communication. 10, (2016).
111.
Shepherd, T., Harvey, A., Jordan, T., Srauy, S., Miltner, K.: Histories of Hating. Social Media + Society. 1, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603997.
112.
Daniels, J.: Race and racism in Internet Studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society. 15, 695–719 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462849.
113.
Gagliardone, I.: Countering online hate speech, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284157227_Countering_Online_Hate_Speech_-_UNESCO, (2015).
114.
Sharma, S., Brooker, P., Sanjay, S., Sanjay, S.: #notracist: In: Daniels, J., Gregory, K., and Cottom, T.M. (eds.) Digital sociologies. pp. 463–486. Bristol University Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89cfr.35.
115.
Sanjay, S.: Black Twitter? Racial Hashtags, Networks and Contagion | Lawrence & Wishart. 78, 46–64 (2013).
116.
Schonfield, E.: Jump Into The Stream | TechCrunch, https://techcrunch.com/2009/05/17/jump-into-the-stream/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_us=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_cs=BPGTQYORhpfpvVzNGFJPpQ.
117.
Marche, S.: There Are No Saints Online - Stephen Marche on Internet Hate, https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a22310/no-saints-online-0513/.
118.
Safiya Umoja Noble: Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism - Safiya Umoja Noble - Google Books. NYU Press, 2018.
119.
Nakamura, L.: Glitch Racism: Networks as Actors within Vernacular Internet Theory, http://culturedigitally.org/2013/12/glitch-racism-networks-as-actors-within-vernacular-internet-theory/.
120.
Murthy, D., Sharma, S.: Visualizing YouTube’s comment space: online hostility as a networked phenomena. New Media & Society. 21, 191–213 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792393.
121.
Stephen Marche: Swallowing the Red Pill: a journey to the heart of modern misogyny. Guardian. (2016).
122.
Demos: Anti-social media: 10,000 racial slurs a day on Twitter, https://www.demos.co.uk/files/DEMOS_Anti-social_Media.pdf?1391774638, (2014).
123.
Jeong, S.: The Internet of Garbage. The Verge (2018).
124.
Brandwatch and KickItOut Expose Online Football Abuse, https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/brandwatch-and-kickitout-team-up-to-expose-online-football-abuse/.
125.
Lisa Nakamura, Chow-White, P.: Race after the Internet. Routledge, New York (2011).
126.
Online Harassment: What Americans Consider Crossing the Line, http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/01/04/crossing-the-line-what-counts-as-online-harassment/.
127.
Massanari, A.: #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society. 19, 329–346 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807.
128.
Zeynap, T.: Mark Zuckerberg Is in Denial, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/opinion/mark-zuckerberg-is-in-denial.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fzeynep-tufekci&action=click&contentCollection=opinion&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=collection.
129.
Mihailidis, P., Viotty, S.: Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in "Post-Fact” Society. American Behavioral Scientist. 61, 441–454 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217701217.
130.
Berghel, H.: Lies, Damn Lies, and Fake News. Computer. 50, 80–85 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.56.
131.
Tandoc, E.C., Lim, Z.W., Ling, R.: Defining "Fake News”. Digital Journalism. 6, 137–153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143.
132.
Maheshwari, S.: How Fake News Goes Viral: A Case Study, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/business/media/how-fake-news-spreads.html.
133.
Jeong, S.: The Internet of Garbage. The Verge (2018).
134.
New America: LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5F5Wi1exhI&feature=youtu.be, (2018).
135.
danah boyd: re:publica 2018 – danah boyd: Opening Keynote: How an Algorithmic World Can Be Undermined - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTl0yyPqf3E, (2018).
136.
Read, M.: How Much of the Internet Is Fake?, http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/how-much-of-the-internet-is-fake.html.
137.
Szalai, J.: Why Fighting Fake News With the Facts Might Not Be Enough - The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/books/review-misinformation-age-cailin-oconnor-james-owen-weatherall-down-to-earth-bruno-latour.html.
138.
Xiao Mina, A.: Learning the Politics of ‘Digital Dissensus’, https://civichall.org/civicist/learning-the-politics-of-digital-dissensus/.
139.
Phillips, W.: Our information systems aren’t broken — they’re working as intended, http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/12/our-information-systems-arent-broken-theyre-working-as-intended/.
140.
Marwick, A., Lewis, R.: Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online, https://datasociety.net/output/media-manipulation-and-disinfo-online/, (2017).
141.
Lazer, D.M.J., Baum, M.A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A.J., Greenhill, K.M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M.J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S.A., Sunstein, C.R., Thorson, E.A., Watts, D.J., Zittrain, J.L.: The science of fake news. Science. 359, 1094–1096 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998.
142.
Newman, Nic: Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017.
143.
Kucharski, A.: Study epidemiology of fake news | Nature. (2016).
144.
How is Fake News Spread? Bots, People like You, Trolls, and Microtargeting | Center for Information Technology and Society - UC Santa Barbara, http://www.cits.ucsb.edu/fake-news/spread.
145.
Bakir, V., McStay, A.: Fake News and The Economy of Emotions. Digital Journalism. 6, 154–175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645.
