1.
Chaucer G, Cawley AC. Canterbury Tales. Vol no. 307. Dent; 1958.
2.
Shakespeare W, Brooks HF. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. [New ed.]. Routledge; 1989. https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/books/a-midsummer-nights-dream-iid-115610/do-9781408188095-div-00000001
3.
Shakespeare W, Honigmann EAJ. Othello. Arden Shakespeare; 2002. https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/search?q=othello
4.
Shakespeare W, Gossett S. Pericles. Arden Shakespeare; 2004. https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/playtext-detail?docid=do-9781408160213&tocid=do-9781408160213-div-00000037&actid=do-9781408160213-div-00000041
5.
Margaret Aston. Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt. Past & Present. 1994;(143):3-47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/651160
6.
Alcuin Blamires. Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. The Review of English Studies. 2000;51(204):523-539. http://www.jstor.org/stable/519254
7.
Farrell TJ. Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH. 1989;56(4). doi:10.2307/2873159
8.
Ellis DS. Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve. The Chaucer Review. 1992;27(2). https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/25095794?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
9.
Howard JE. Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England. Shakespeare Quarterly. 1988;39(4). doi:10.2307/2870706
10.
Hunt M. The Reclamation of Language in ‘Much Ado about Nothing’. Studies in Philology. 2000;97(2). https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4174665?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
11.
Montrose LA. ‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representations. 1983;(2):61-94. doi:10.2307/2928384
12.
What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy. The Chaucer Review. 2011;45(4). doi:10.5325/chaucerrev.45.4.0357
13.
Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies. Speculum. 2001;76(3):638-680. doi:10.2307/2903882
14.
Robert Matz. Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello. ELH. 1999;66(2):261-276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032073
15.
Stanley Cavell. Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello. Daedalus. 1979;108(3):27-43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024619
16.
Maurice Hunt. Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances. South Central Review. 2011;28(2):57-79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261489
