[1]
Alcuin Blamires 2000. Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. The Review of English Studies. 51, 204 (2000), 523–539.
[2]
Chaucer, G. and Cawley, A.C. 1958. Canterbury tales. Dent.
[3]
Ellis, D.S. 1992. Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve. The Chaucer Review. 27, 2 (1992).
[4]
Farrell, T.J. 1989. Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH. 56, 4 (Winter 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2873159.
[5]
Howard, J.E. 1988. Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England. Shakespeare Quarterly. 39, 4 (Winter 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2870706.
[6]
Hunt, M. 2000. The Reclamation of Language in ‘Much Ado about Nothing’. Studies in Philology. 97, 2 (2000).
[7]
Margaret Aston 1994. Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt. Past & Present. 143 (1994), 3–47.
[8]
Maurice Hunt 2011. Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances. South Central Review. 28, 2 (2011), 57–79.
[9]
Montrose, L.A. 1983. ‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representations. 2 (Apr. 1983), 61–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2928384.
[10]
Robert Matz 1999. Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello. ELH. 66, 2 (1999), 261–276.
[11]
Shakespeare, W. and Brooks, H.F. 1989. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Routledge.
[12]
Shakespeare, W. and Gossett, S. 2004. Pericles. Arden Shakespeare.
[13]
Shakespeare, W. and Honigmann, E.A.J. 2002. Othello. Arden Shakespeare.
[14]
Stanley Cavell 1979. Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello. Daedalus. 108, 3 (1979), 27–43.
[15]
2001. Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies. Speculum. 76, 3 (Jul. 2001), 638–680. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2903882.
[16]
2011. What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy. The Chaucer Review. 45, 4 (2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.45.4.0357.
