1.
Chaucer, G., Cawley, A.C.: Canterbury tales. Dent, London (1958).
2.
Shakespeare, W., Brooks, H.F.: A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Routledge, [London] (1989).
3.
Shakespeare, W., Honigmann, E.A.J.: Othello. Arden Shakespeare, London (2002).
4.
Shakespeare, W., Gossett, S.: Pericles. Arden Shakespeare, London (2004).
5.
Margaret Aston: Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt. Past & Present. 3–47 (1994).
6.
Alcuin Blamires: Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. The Review of English Studies. 51, 523–539 (2000).
7.
Farrell, T.J.: Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH. 56, (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/2873159.
8.
Ellis, D.S.: Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve. The Chaucer Review. 27, (1992).
9.
Howard, J.E.: Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England. Shakespeare Quarterly. 39, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2870706.
10.
Hunt, M.: The Reclamation of Language in ‘Much Ado about Nothing’. Studies in Philology. 97, (2000).
11.
Montrose, L.A.: ‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representations. 61–94 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2307/2928384.
12.
What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy. The Chaucer Review. 45, (2011). https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.45.4.0357.
13.
Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies. Speculum. 76, 638–680 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2903882.
14.
Robert Matz: Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello. ELH. 66, 261–276 (1999).
15.
Stanley Cavell: Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello. Daedalus. 108, 27–43 (1979).
16.
Maurice Hunt: Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances. South Central Review. 28, 57–79 (2011).
