1.
Chaucer G, Cawley AC. Canterbury tales. London: Dent; 1958.
2.
Shakespeare W, Brooks HF. A Midsummer Night’s Dream [Internet]. [New ed.]. [London]: Routledge; 1989. Available from: https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/books/a-midsummer-nights-dream-iid-115610/do-9781408188095-div-00000001
3.
Shakespeare W, Honigmann EAJ. Othello [Internet]. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2002. Available from: https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/search?q=othello
4.
Shakespeare W, Gossett S. Pericles [Internet]. London: Arden Shakespeare; 2004. Available from: https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/playtext-detail?docid=do-9781408160213&tocid=do-9781408160213-div-00000037&actid=do-9781408160213-div-00000041
5.
Margaret Aston. Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt. Past & Present [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1994;(143):3–47. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/651160
6.
Alcuin Blamires. Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. The Review of English Studies [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2000;51(204):523–539. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/519254
7.
Farrell TJ. Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH [Internet]. 1989 Winter;56(4). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2873159
8.
Ellis DS. Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve. The Chaucer Review [Internet]. Penn State University Press; 1992;27(2). Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/25095794?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
9.
Howard JE. Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England. Shakespeare Quarterly. 1988 Winter;39(4).
10.
Hunt M. The Reclamation of Language in ‘Much Ado about Nothing’. Studies in Philology [Internet]. University of North Carolina Press; 2000;97(2). Available from: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4174665?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
11.
Montrose LA. ‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representations. 1983 Apr;(2):61–94.
12.
What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy. The Chaucer Review. 2011;45(4).
13.
Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies. Speculum. 2001 Jul;76(3):638–680.
14.
Robert Matz. Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello. ELH [Internet]. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999;66(2):261–276. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032073
15.
Stanley Cavell. Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello. Daedalus [Internet]. The MIT Press; 1979;108(3):27–43. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024619
16.
Maurice Hunt. Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances. South Central Review [Internet]. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2011;28(2):57–79. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261489