[1]
G. Chaucer and A. C. Cawley, Canterbury tales, vol. no. 307. London: Dent, 1958.
[2]
W. Shakespeare and H. F. Brooks, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, [New ed.]. [London]: Routledge, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/books/a-midsummer-nights-dream-iid-115610/do-9781408188095-div-00000001
[3]
W. Shakespeare and E. A. J. Honigmann, Othello. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/search?q=othello
[4]
W. Shakespeare and S. Gossett, Pericles. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/playtext-detail?docid=do-9781408160213&tocid=do-9781408160213-div-00000037&actid=do-9781408160213-div-00000041
[5]
Margaret Aston, ‘Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt’, Past & Present, no. 143, pp. 3–47, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/651160
[6]
Alcuin Blamires, ‘Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales’, The Review of English Studies, vol. 51, no. 204, pp. 523–539, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/519254
[7]
T. J. Farrell, ‘Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale’, ELH, vol. 56, no. 4, Winter 1989, doi: 10.2307/2873159. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2873159
[8]
D. S. Ellis, ‘Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve’, The Chaucer Review, vol. 27, no. 2, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/25095794?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[9]
J. E. Howard, ‘Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England’, Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, Winter 1988, doi: 10.2307/2870706.
[10]
M. Hunt, ‘The Reclamation of Language in “Much Ado about Nothing”’, Studies in Philology, vol. 97, no. 2, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/stable/4174665?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[11]
L. A. Montrose, ‘“Shaping Fantasies”: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture’, Representations, no. 2, pp. 61–94, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.2307/2928384.
[12]
‘What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy’, The Chaucer Review, vol. 45, no. 4, 2011, doi: 10.5325/chaucerrev.45.4.0357.
[13]
‘Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies’, Speculum, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 638–680, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.2307/2903882.
[14]
Robert Matz, ‘Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello’, ELH, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 261–276, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30032073
[15]
Stanley Cavell, ‘Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello’, Daedalus, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 27–43, 1979 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024619
[16]
Maurice Hunt, ‘Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances’, South Central Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 57–79, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261489
