1.
Chaucer, G. & Cawley, A. C. Canterbury tales. vol. no. 307 (Dent, 1958).
2.
Shakespeare, W. & Brooks, H. F. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. (Routledge, 1989).
3.
Shakespeare, W. & Honigmann, E. A. J. Othello. (Arden Shakespeare, 2002).
4.
Shakespeare, W. & Gossett, S. Pericles. (Arden Shakespeare, 2004).
5.
Margaret Aston. Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt. Past & Present 3–47 (1994).
6.
Alcuin Blamires. Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. The Review of English Studies 51, 523–539 (2000).
7.
Farrell, T. J. Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale. ELH 56, (1989).
8.
Ellis, D. S. Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve. The Chaucer Review 27, (1992).
9.
Howard, J. E. Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England. Shakespeare Quarterly 39, (1988).
10.
Hunt, M. The Reclamation of Language in ‘Much Ado about Nothing’. Studies in Philology 97, (2000).
11.
Montrose, L. A. ‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture. Representations 61–94 (1983) doi:10.2307/2928384.
12.
What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy. The Chaucer Review 45, (2011).
13.
Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies. Speculum 76, 638–680 (2001).
14.
Robert Matz. Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello. ELH 66, 261–276 (1999).
15.
Stanley Cavell. Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello. Daedalus 108, 27–43 (1979).
16.
Maurice Hunt. Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances. South Central Review 28, 57–79 (2011).
