Alcuin Blamires. 2000. ‘Chaucer the Reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales’. The Review of English Studies 51(204):523–39.
Anon. 2001. ‘Chaucer’s Pardoner on the Couch: Psyche and Clio in Medieval Literary Studies’. Speculum 76(3):638–80. doi: 10.2307/2903882.
Anon. 2011. ‘What’s Wrong with the Pardoner? Complexion Theory, the Phlegmatic Man, and Effeminacy’. The Chaucer Review 45(4). doi: 10.5325/chaucerrev.45.4.0357.
Chaucer, Geoffrey, and A. C. Cawley. 1958. Canterbury Tales. Vol. no. 307. London: Dent.
Ellis, Deborah S. 1992. ‘Chaucer’s Devilish Reeve’. The Chaucer Review 27(2).
Farrell, Thomas J. 1989. ‘Privacy and the Boundaries of Fabliau in The Miller’s Tale’. ELH 56(4). doi: 10.2307/2873159.
Howard, Jean E. 1988. ‘Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England’. Shakespeare Quarterly 39(4). doi: 10.2307/2870706.
Hunt, Maurice. 2000. ‘The Reclamation of Language in “Much Ado about Nothing”’. Studies in Philology 97(2).
Margaret Aston. 1994. ‘Corpus Christi and Corpus Regni: Heresy and the Peasants’ Revolt’. Past & Present (143):3–47.
Maurice Hunt. 2011. ‘Syncretistic Religion in Shakespeare’s Late Romances’. South Central Review 28(2):57–79.
Montrose, Louis Adrian. 1983. ‘“Shaping Fantasies”: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture’. Representations (2):61–94. doi: 10.2307/2928384.
Robert Matz. 1999. ‘Slander, Renaissance Discourses of Sodomy, and Othello’. ELH 66(2):261–76.
Shakespeare, William, and Harold F. Brooks. 1989. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. [New ed.]. [London]: Routledge.
Shakespeare, William, and Suzanne Gossett. 2004. Pericles. London: Arden Shakespeare.
Shakespeare, William, and E. A. J. Honigmann. 2002. Othello. London: Arden Shakespeare.
Stanley Cavell. 1979. ‘Epistemology and Tragedy: A Reading of Othello’. Daedalus 108(3):27–43.
