1.
Chandler D. An Introduction to Genre Theory. http://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/HCDE510-Fall2012/Chandler_genre_theoryDFAnn.pdf
2.
Frow J. Genre. In: Genre. Routledge; 2015:72-99. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1e847325-880d-e811-80cd-005056af4099
3.
Frow J. Genre. Vol The new critical idiom. Second edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=646973&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
4.
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. British Film Institute; 1980.
5.
Altman R, British Film Institute. Film/Genre. BFI Publishing; 1999.
6.
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass media and society. In: Mass Media and Society. Edward Arnold; 1991:267-284. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d63bfce-3804-e911-80cd-005056af4099
7.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, eds. The Television Genre Book. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
8.
O’Sullivan T. Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies. Vol Studies in culture and communication. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1994.
9.
Curti L. Genre and gender. Cultural Studies. 1988;2(2):152-167. doi:10.1080/09502388800490311
10.
Geraghty L, Jancovich M, eds. The Shifting Definitions of Genre: Essays on Labeling Films, Television Shows and Media. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers; 2008. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1734104
11.
Hjarvard S. The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change | Nordicom [via the Wayback Machine]. Published online 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20180221093605/http://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/tidskrifter/nordicom-review-22008/mediatization-society-theory-media-agents-social-and-cultural
12.
Hodkinson P. Media, Culture and Society: An Introduction. 2nd edition. SAGE; 2017.
13.
Lacey N. Narrative and Genre: Key Concepts in Media Studies. Palgrave; 2000.
14.
Mittell, Jason. Genre and Television: From Cop Shows to Cartoons in American Culture. Routledge; 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=200862
15.
Boyd-Barrett O, Newbold C. Approaches to Media: A Reader. E. Arnold; 1995.
16.
Seiter E. Remote Control: Television, Audiences, and Cultural Power. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1221523
17.
Braudy L. Film: a critical introduction. In: Film: A Critical Introduction. 3rd ed. Laurence King; 2011:381-406. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c7f59c0d-210c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
18.
Buscombe E. The Idea of Genre in the American Cinema. Screen. 1970;11(2):33-45. doi:10.1093/screen/11.2.33
19.
Cook P. The cinema book. In: The Cinema Book. 3rd ed. British Film Institute; 2007:137-234. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a0747cc9-660a-e811-80cd-005056af4099
20.
Grant BK. Film Genre: From Iconography to Ideology. Vol Short cuts. Wallflower; 2007.
21.
Grant BK. Film Genre Reader IV. University of Texas Press; 2012. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=492853
22.
Hayward S. Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts. Fifth edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4980918
23.
Deborah, Knight. Making sense of genre. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR2/knight.html
24.
Langford B. Film Genre: Hollywood and Beyond. Edinburgh University Press; 2005.
25.
Neale S. Genre and Contemporary Hollywood. BFI Pub; 2002.
26.
Williams L. Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess. (44):2-13. http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~jason.ward/ied240popularliterature/GENRE12pgsWilliamsBodyGenres.pdf
27.
Thussu DK. News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Infotainment. SAGE; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=319990
28.
Burton G, ProQuest (Firm). Media and Society: Critical Perspectives. 2nd ed. Open University Press; 2010. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=771412
29.
Abercrombie N. Television and Society. Polity Press; 1996.
30.
Allan S. News Culture. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=557085
31.
Allen RC. Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1992. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=23657&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
32.
Boyd-Barrett O, Rantanen T. The Globalization of News. Sage Publications; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=537773
33.
Cohen S, Young J. The Manufacture of News: Social Problems, Deviance and the Mass Media. Vol 4. Rev. ed. Constable; 1981.
34.
Conboy M. Journalism: A Critical History. Sage Publications; 2004. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=36857&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
35.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, eds. The Television Genre Book. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
36.
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass Media and Society. 3rd ed. Arnold; 2000.
37.
Curran J, Seaton J. Power without Responsibility: Press, Broadcasting and the Internet in Britain. Eighth edition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=5430438
38.
ZCommunications » Propaganda And The BBC. https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/propaganda-and-the-bbc-by-alex-doherty/
39.
Edwards D, Cromwell D. Newspeak in the 21st Century. Pluto; 2009. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3386296
40.
Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Vintage; 1994.
41.
Scannell P. Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society. 1989;11(2):135-166. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016344389011002002
42.
Lee J. Subversive sitcoms: Roseanne as inspiration for feminist resistance. Women’s Studies. 1992;21(1):87-101. doi:10.1080/00497878.1992.9978928
43.
Saha A. Citizen Smith more than Citizen Kane? Genres-in-progress and the cultural politics of difference. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11(1):97-102. doi:10.1080/14746689.2013.765234
44.
Abbas T. ‘Last of the dinosaurs’: Citizen Khan as institutionalisation of Pakistani stereotypes in British television comedy. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11(1):85-90. doi:10.1080/14746689.2013.765221
45.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, eds. The Television Genre Book. Third edition. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
46.
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From Happy Homemaker to Desperate Housewives: Motherhood and Popular Television. Anthem Press; 2012. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3001957
47.
Corner J, Harvey S. Television times: a reader. In: Television Times: A Reader. Arnold; 1996:111-116. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f71ef1df-db02-e911-80cd-005056af4099
48.
HENRY M. ‘Don’t Ask me, I’m Just a Girl’: Feminism, Female Identity, and The Simpsons. The Journal of Popular Culture. 2007;40(2):272-303. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00379.x
49.
Howells R. ‘Is it Because I is Black?’ Race, Humour and the Polysemiology of Ali G. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 2006;26(2):155-177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01439680600691677
50.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
51.
Huq R. Situating Citizen Khan : Shifting representations of Asians onscreen and the outrage industry in the social media age. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11(1):77-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2013.765218
52.
Husband C. Humour in society: resistance and control. In: Humour in Society: Resistance and Control. Macmillan; 1988:149-178. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2e744e45-200c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
53.
Lewis J. The Ideological Octopus: An Exploration of Television and Its Audience. Routledge; 1991. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1221480
54.
Lockyer S. From toothpick legs to dropping vaginas: Gender and sexuality in Joan Rivers’ stand-up comedy performance. Comedy Studies. 2011;2(2):113-123. doi:10.1386/cost.2.2.113_1
55.
Chiaro D, Baccolini R, eds. Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives. Vol 63. Routledge; 2014. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1687469
56.
Lockyer S. Comedy matters: On the impact of comedy. HUMOR. 2016;29(2). doi:10.1515/humor-2016-5001
57.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
58.
Malik S. Representing Black Britain: A History of Black and Asian Images on British Television. SAGE Publications; 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37048&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
59.
Lockyer S. Reading Little Britain: Comedy Matters on Contemporary Television. I. B. Tauris; 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9786000042851
60.
Medhurst A. The Colour black: black images in British television. In: The Colour Black: Black Images in British Television. BFI; 1989:15-21. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=488a389f-200c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
61.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
62.
Sisson G. From humor to horror: genre and narrative purpose in abortion stories on American television. Feminist Media Studies. Published online 13 December 2017:1-18. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1414864
63.
Tyler I. "Chav Mum Chav Scum”. Feminist Media Studies. 2008;8(1):17-34. doi:10.1080/14680770701824779
64.
Ang I, Couling D. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. Routledge; 1989. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1395429
65.
Harrington CL. Soap Opera, Then and Now. Sociology Compass. 2016;10(2):109-118. doi:10.1111/soc4.12349
66.
ELAINE ASTON and IAN CLARKE. Feminist theory and the matriarchal soap: EastEnders. Critical Survey. 1994;6(2):211-217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41555822?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
67.
Madill A, Goldmeier R. EastEnders. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003;6(4):471-494. doi:10.1177/136787790364005
68.
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From Happy Homemaker to Desperate Housewives: Motherhood and Popular Television. Anthem Press; 2012. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3001957
69.
Brunsdon C. Lifestyling Britain. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003;6(1):5-23. doi:10.1177/1367877903006001001
70.
Buckingham D, British Film Institute. Public Secrets: EastEnders and Its Audience. BFI Books; 1987.
71.
Philo G. Message Received: Glasgow Media Group Research, 1993-1998. Longman; 1999. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=618256&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
72.
Henderson L. Social Issues in Television Fiction. Edinburgh University Press; 2007. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95313&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
73.
Hobson D. Soap Opera. Polity; 2003.
74.
McNicholas A. Wrenching the Machine Around: EastEnders, the BBC and Institutional Change. Media, Culture & Society. 2004;26(4):491-512. doi:10.1177/0163443704044214
75.
Meyers E. Don’t Cry because it’s Over, Smile because it Was:” American Soap Operas and Convergence Culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2015;32(5):333-346. doi:10.1080/15295036.2015.1096016
76.
Malik S. Representing Black Britain: A History of Black and Asian Images on British Television. SAGE Publications; 2002. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37048&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
77.
Scannell P. The social eye of television, I946-I955. Media, Culture & Society. 1979;1(1):97-106. doi:10.1177/016344377900100108
78.
Chapman J. Issues in Contemporary Documentary. Polity; 2009.
79.
Chapman J. Issues in contemporary documentary. In: Issues in Contemporary Documentary. Polity; 2009:28-47. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=56fc9398-3a04-e911-80cd-005056af4099
80.
Corner J. Television Form and Public Address. Edward Arnold; 1995.
81.
Hall S, University of Birmingham. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. Routledge; 1992. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=7370&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
82.
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
83.
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. British Film Institute; 1980.
84.
Philo G. Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television. Routledge; 1990. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=178320
85.
Norman, Swallow. Factual Television. Focal Press
86.
Williams R. Culture and Society 1780-1950. Columbia University Press; 1983.
87.
Dines G, Humez JM, eds. Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Critical Reader. Fourth edition. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
88.
Williams R. A Lecture on Realism. 1977;18(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/18.1.61
89.
Jerslev A. Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. In: Realism and ‘Reality’ in Film and Media. Vol 2002. Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen; 2002:159-192. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7ca19bf0-4104-e911-80cd-005056af4099
90.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Routledge; 2012. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=363928&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
91.
Allen K, Mendick H. Keeping it Real? Social Class, Young People and ‘Authenticity’ in Reality TV. Sociology. 2013;47(3):460-476. doi:10.1177/0038038512448563
92.
Biressi, Anita, Nunn, Heather. Reality TV: Realism and Revelation. Wallflower; 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=574418&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
93.
Andrejevic M. Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Rowman & Littlefield; 2004. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1318905
94.
Palmer G. Exposing Lifestyle Television: The Big Reveal. Ashgate; 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=623989
95.
Wood H, Skeggs B, British Film Institute. Reality television and class. In: Reality Television and Class. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:197-209. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a6c46536-810d-e811-80cd-005056af4099
96.
Dovey J. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television. Pluto Press; 2000. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=72516
97.
Grindstaff L. Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. In: Media Scandals: Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace. Polity; 1997:164-202. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=428e3ad3-1f0c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
98.
Palmer G. Understanding reality television. In: Understanding Reality Television. Routledge; 2004:173-190. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=384bb891-630a-e811-80cd-005056af4099
99.
Jensen T. Welfare Commonsense, Poverty Porn and Doxosophy. Sociological Research Online. 2014;19(3):1-7. doi:10.5153/sro.3441
100.
K, Sender M Kraidy, ed. The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives. Routledge
101.
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. In: Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011:41-55. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=aff384c9-e002-e911-80cd-005056af4099
102.
Malik S. The Indian Family on UK Reality Television. Television & New Media. 2013;14(6):510-528. doi:10.1177/1527476412446324
103.
Murray S, Ouellette L. Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. 2nd ed. New York University Press; 2009.
104.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Routledge; 2012. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=363928&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
105.
Carter C, Steiner L, McLaughlin L, eds. The Routledge companion to media and gender. In: The Routledge Companion to Media and Gender. Routledge; 2014:269-279. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9443146d-230c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
106.
Turner G. The mass production of celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2006;9(2):153-165. doi:10.1177/1367877906064028
107.
Woods F. Classed Femininity, Performativity, and Camp in British Structured Reality Programming. Television & New Media. 2014;15(3):197-214. doi:10.1177/1527476412462246
108.
Attwood F. Sex Media. Polity Press; 2018. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=5188199
109.
S., Maddison. From porno-topia to total information awareness, or what forces really govern access to porn? | Lawrence & Wishart. 2004;52. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/lwish/nf/2004/00000052/00000052/art00004
110.
Attwood F. Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies. 2004;4(1):7-19. doi:10.1080/14680770410001674617
111.
Attwood F. Immersion: ‘extreme’ texts, animated bodies and the media. Media, Culture & Society. 2014;36(8):1186-1195. doi:10.1177/0163443714544858
112.
Attwood F. Porn.Com: Making Sense of Online Pornography. Vol v. 48. Peter Lang; 2010.
113.
Attwood F, Smith C. Porn Studies: an introduction. Porn Studies. 2014;1(1-2):1-6. doi:10.1080/23268743.2014.887308
114.
Attwood F, Walters C. Fifty Shades and the law: Regulating sex and sex media in the UK. Sexualities. 2013;16(8):974-979. doi:10.1177/1363460713508880
115.
Gill R. Media, Empowerment and the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Debates. Sex Roles. 2012;66(11-12):736-745. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1
116.
Gill R. The Sexualisation of Culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012;6(7):483-498. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00433.x
117.
Madhok S, Phillips A, Wilson K, eds. Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1161396
118.
Harvey L, Gill R. New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. In: Scharff C, ed. New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013:52-67. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8c00524a-1f0c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
119.
Paasonen S. Labors of love: netporn, Web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society. 2010;12(8):1297-1312. doi:10.1177/1461444810362853
120.
Smith C, Attwood F. Anti/pro/critical porn studies. Porn Studies. 2014;1(1-2):7-23. doi:10.1080/23268743.2014.887364
121.
Tibbals CA. Gonzo, trannys, and teens – current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies. 2014;1(1-2):127-135. doi:10.1080/23268743.2013.863659
122.
Mark, Andrejevic. The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.513.4411&rep=rep1&type=pdf
123.
Duffy BE, Hund E. "Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society. 2015;1(2). doi:10.1177/2056305115604337
124.
Duffy BE. Gendering The Labor Of Social Media Production. Feminist Media Studies. 2015;15(4):710-714. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1053715
125.
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 2013;18(4):1-11. doi:10.5153/sro.3153
126.
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 2013;18(4):1-11. doi:10.5153/sro.3153
127.
Arcy J. Emotion work: considering gender in digital labor. Feminist Media Studies. 2016;16(2):365-368. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609
128.
Bell V. Performativity and Belonging. Theory, Culture & Society. 1999;16(2):1-10. doi:10.1177/02632769922050511
129.
Brown R, Gregg M. The pedagogy of regret: Facebook, binge drinking and young women. Continuum. 2012;26(3):357-369. doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.665834
130.
Buckingham D. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. MIT Press; 2008.
131.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Vol v. 1. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishers; 2000. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320466&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
132.
Elias AS, Gill R. Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Published online 24 June 2017. doi:10.1177/1367549417705604
133.
Fenton N. New Media, Old News: Journalism & Democracy in the Digital Age. SAGE; 2010. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781849204415
134.
Hodkinson P. Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society. 2007;9(4):625-650. doi:10.1177/1461444807076972
135.
Jarrett K. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. Vol 33. Routledge; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4098217
136.
Lewis J, West A. ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society. 2009;11(7):1209-1229. doi:10.1177/1461444809342058
137.
Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 2008;10(3):393-411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
138.
Livingstone S, Brake DR. On the Rapid Rise of Social Networking Sites: New Findings and Policy Implications. Children & Society. 2010;24(1):75-83. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00243.x
139.
Lopez LK. The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society. 2009;11(5):729-747. doi:10.1177/1461444809105349
140.
Luckman S. The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age: Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy. Cultural Studies Review. 2013;19(1). doi:10.5130/csr.v19i1.2585
141.
Luckman S. Women’s Micro-Entrepreneurial Homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies. 2015;30(84):146-160. doi:10.1080/08164649.2015.1038117
142.
Lüders M, Prøitz L, Rasmussen T. Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society. 2010;12(6):947-963. doi:10.1177/1461444809352203
143.
McNeill L. Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet. Biography. 2003;26(1):24-47. doi:10.1353/bio.2003.0028
144.
Dawn, Shepherd C Miller. Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172818/Miller_Blogging%20as%20Social%20Action.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
145.
Murthy D. Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33(5):779-789. doi:10.1177/0163443711404744
146.
Negra D, Tasker Y. Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. In: Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity. Duke University Press; 2014:136-160. https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822376538
147.
Z, Papcharissi. The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere. http://zizi.people.uic.edu/Site/Research_files/VirtualSphere.pdf
148.
St Louis B. ON ‘THE NECESSITY AND THE "IMPOSSIBILITY” OF IDENTITIES’. Cultural Studies. 2009;23(4):559-582. doi:10.1080/09502380902951011
149.
Adkins L, ed. The Post-Fordist Sexual Contract: Working and Living in Contingency. Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4096846
150.
Woodward K. Understanding Identity. Arnold; 2002.
151.
Miller CR. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1984;70(2):151-167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
152.
Rian J. Music, politics and identity: from Cool Britannia to Grime4Corbyn. Soundings. 2017;(67):50-61. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/lwish/sou/2017/00000067/00000067/art00004
153.
White J. Urban Music and Entrepreneurship: Beats, Rhymes and Young People’s Enterprise. Vol 193. Routledge; 2017. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4732759
154.
Street J. Music and politics. In: Music and Politics. Polity; 2012:79-97. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c8a19d67-8503-e911-80cd-005056af4099
155.
Bramwell R. UK Hip-Hop, Grime and the City: The Aesthetics and Ethics of London’s Rap Scenes. Vol 14. Routledge; 2015. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=2058039
156.
Chang J. Can’t Stop Won’t Stop: A History of the Hip-Hop Generation. Ebury; 2007.
157.
Andrews K, Palmer L, eds. Blackness in Britain. Vol 15. Routledge; 2016. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4516767
158.
Dedman T. Agency in UK hip-hop and grime youth subcultures – peripherals and purists. Journal of Youth Studies. 2011;14(5):507-522. doi:10.1080/13676261.2010.549820
159.
Gilroy P. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture? Routledge; 2004.
160.
D, Hancox. Stand Up Tall: Dizzee Rascal and the Birth of Grime.; 2013.
161.
Gentrification X: how an academic argument became the people’s protest | Cities | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jan/12/gentrification-argument-protest-backlash-urban-generation-displacement
162.
Party politics: why grime defines the sound of protest in 2016 | Music | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/feb/18/party-politics-why-grime-defines-the-sound-of-protest-in-2016
