1
Chandler D. An Introduction to Genre Theory.
2
Frow J. Genre. Genre. London: Routledge 2015:72–99.
3
Frow J. Genre. Second edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2015.
4
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. London: British Film Institute 1980.
5
Altman R, British Film Institute. Film/genre. London: BFI Publishing 1999.
6
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass media and society. Mass media and society. London: Edward Arnold 1991:267–84.
7
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute 2015.
8
O’Sullivan T. Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. 2nd ed. London: Routledge 1994.
9
Curti L. Genre and gender. Cultural Studies. 1988;2:152–67. doi: 10.1080/09502388800490311
10
Geraghty L, Jancovich M, editors. The shifting definitions of genre: essays on labeling films, television shows and media. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers 2008.
11
Hjarvard S. The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change | Nordicom [via the Wayback Machine]. Published Online First: 2008.
12
Hodkinson P. Media, culture and society: an introduction. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2017.
13
Lacey N. Narrative and genre: key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2000.
14
Mittell, Jason. Genre and television: from cop shows to cartoons in American culture. London: Routledge 2004.
15
Boyd-Barrett O, Newbold C. Approaches to media: a reader. London: E. Arnold 1995.
16
Seiter E. Remote control: television, audiences, and cultural power. [S.l.]: Routledge 2013.
17
Braudy L. Film: a critical introduction. Film: a critical introduction. London: Laurence King 2011:381–406.
18
Buscombe E. The Idea of Genre in the American Cinema. Screen. 1970;11:33–45. doi: 10.1093/screen/11.2.33
19
Cook P. The cinema book. The cinema book. London: British Film Institute 2007:137–234.
20
Grant BK. Film genre: from iconography to ideology. London: Wallflower 2007.
21
Grant BK. Film genre reader IV. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press 2012.
22
Hayward S. Cinema studies: the key concepts. Fifth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2018.
23
Deborah, Knight. Making sense of genre. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR2/knight.html
24
Langford B. Film genre: Hollywood and beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2005.
25
Neale S. Genre and contemporary Hollywood. London: BFI Pub 2002.
26
Williams L. Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess. ;2–13.
27
Thussu DK. News as entertainment: the rise of global infotainment. London: SAGE 2007.
28
Burton G, ProQuest (Firm). Media and society: critical perspectives. 2nd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press 2010.
29
Abercrombie N. Television and society. Cambridge: Polity Press 1996.
30
Allan S. News culture. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press 2010.
31
Allen RC. Channels of discourse, reassembled: television and contemporary criticism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge 1992.
32
Boyd-Barrett O, Rantanen T. The globalization of news. London: Sage Publications 1998.
33
Cohen S, Young J. The manufacture of news: social problems, deviance and the mass media. Rev. ed. London: Constable 1981.
34
Conboy M. Journalism: a critical history. London: Sage Publications 2004.
35
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute 2015.
36
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass media and society. 3rd ed. London: Arnold 2000.
37
Curran J, Seaton J. Power without responsibility: press, broadcasting and the internet in Britain. Eighth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2018.
38
ZCommunications » Propaganda And The BBC. https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/propaganda-and-the-bbc-by-alex-doherty/
39
Edwards D, Cromwell D. Newspeak in the 21st century. London: Pluto 2009.
40
Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. London: Vintage 1994.
41
Scannell P. Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society. 1989;11:135–66.
42
Lee J. Subversive sitcoms: Roseanne as inspiration for feminist resistance. Women’s Studies. 1992;21:87–101. doi: 10.1080/00497878.1992.9978928
43
Saha A. Citizen Smith more than Citizen Kane? Genres-in-progress and the cultural politics of difference. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11:97–102. doi: 10.1080/14746689.2013.765234
44
Abbas T. ‘Last of the dinosaurs’: Citizen Khan as institutionalisation of Pakistani stereotypes in British television comedy. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11:85–90. doi: 10.1080/14746689.2013.765221
45
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute 2015.
46
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television. London: Anthem Press 2012.
47
Corner J, Harvey S. Television times: a reader. Television times: a reader. London: Arnold 1996:111–6.
48
HENRY M. ‘Don’t Ask me, I’m Just a Girl’: Feminism, Female Identity, and The Simpsons. The Journal of Popular Culture. 2007;40:272–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00379.x
49
Howells R. ‘Is it Because I is Black?’ Race, Humour and the Polysemiology of Ali G. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 2006;26:155–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01439680600691677
50
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
51
Huq R. Situating Citizen Khan : Shifting representations of Asians onscreen and the outrage industry in the social media age. South Asian Popular Culture. 2013;11:77–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2013.765218
52
Husband C. Humour in society: resistance and control. Humour in society: resistance and control. Basingstoke: Macmillan 1988:149–78.
53
Lewis J. The ideological octopus: an exploration of television and its audience. New York: Routledge 1991.
54
Lockyer S. From toothpick legs to dropping vaginas: Gender and sexuality in Joan Rivers’ stand-up comedy performance. Comedy Studies. 2011;2:113–23. doi: 10.1386/cost.2.2.113_1
55
Chiaro D, Baccolini R, editors. Gender and humor: interdisciplinary and international perspectives. New York: Routledge 2014.
56
Lockyer S. Comedy matters: On the impact of comedy. HUMOR. 2016;29. doi: 10.1515/humor-2016-5001
57
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
58
Malik S. Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television. London: SAGE Publications 2002.
59
Lockyer S. Reading Little Britain: comedy matters on contemporary television. London: I. B. Tauris 2010.
60
Medhurst A. The Colour black: black images in British television. The Colour black: black images in British television. London: BFI 1989:15–21.
61
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2005.
62
Sisson G. From humor to horror: genre and narrative purpose in abortion stories on American television. Feminist Media Studies. 2017;1–18. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2017.1414864
63
Tyler I. "Chav Mum Chav Scum”. Feminist Media Studies. 2008;8:17–34. doi: 10.1080/14680770701824779
64
Ang I, Couling D. Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Routledge 1989.
65
Harrington CL. Soap Opera, Then and Now. Sociology Compass. 2016;10:109–18. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12349
66
ELAINE ASTON and IAN CLARKE. Feminist theory and the matriarchal soap: EastEnders. Critical Survey. 1994;6:211–7.
67
Madill A, Goldmeier R. EastEnders. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003;6:471–94. doi: 10.1177/136787790364005
68
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television. London: Anthem Press 2012.
69
Brunsdon C. Lifestyling Britain. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2003;6:5–23. doi: 10.1177/1367877903006001001
70
Buckingham D, British Film Institute. Public secrets: EastEnders and its audience. London: BFI Books 1987.
71
Philo G. Message received: Glasgow Media Group research, 1993-1998. Harlow: Longman 1999.
72
Henderson L. Social issues in television fiction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2007.
73
Hobson D. Soap opera. Cambridge: Polity 2003.
74
McNicholas A. Wrenching the Machine Around: EastEnders, the BBC and Institutional Change. Media, Culture & Society. 2004;26:491–512. doi: 10.1177/0163443704044214
75
Meyers E. Don’t Cry because it’s Over, Smile because it Was:” American Soap Operas and Convergence Culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2015;32:333–46. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2015.1096016
76
Malik S. Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television. London: SAGE Publications 2002.
77
Scannell P. The social eye of television, I946-I955. Media, Culture & Society. 1979;1:97–106. doi: 10.1177/016344377900100108
78
Chapman J. Issues in contemporary documentary. Cambridge: Polity 2009.
79
Chapman J. Issues in contemporary documentary. Issues in contemporary documentary. Cambridge: Polity 2009:28–47.
80
Corner J. Television form and public address. London: Edward Arnold 1995.
81
Hall S, University of Birmingham. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Abingdon: Routledge 1992.
82
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
83
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. London: British Film Institute 1980.
84
Philo G. Seeing and believing: the influence of television. London: Routledge 1990.
85
Norman, Swallow. Factual Television. London: Focal Press .
86
Williams R. Culture and society 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press 1983.
87
Dines G, Humez JM, editors. Gender, race, and class in media: a critical reader. Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, Califormia: SAGE Publications, Inc 2015.
88
Williams R. A Lecture on Realism. 1977;18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/18.1.61
89
Jerslev A. Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen 2002:159–92.
90
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. New York: Routledge 2012.
91
Allen K, Mendick H. Keeping it Real? Social Class, Young People and ‘Authenticity’ in Reality TV. Sociology. 2013;47:460–76. doi: 10.1177/0038038512448563
92
Biressi, Anita, Nunn, Heather. Reality TV: realism and revelation. London: Wallflower 2005.
93
Andrejevic M. Reality TV: the work of being watched. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield 2004.
94
Palmer G. Exposing lifestyle television: the big reveal. Burlington, VT: Ashgate 2008.
95
Wood H, Skeggs B, British Film Institute. Reality television and class. Reality television and class. London: Palgrave Macmillan 2011:197–209.
96
Dovey J. Freakshow: first person media and factual television. London: Pluto Press 2000.
97
Grindstaff L. Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. Cambridge: Polity 1997:164–202.
98
Palmer G. Understanding reality television. Understanding reality television. London: Routledge 2004:173–90.
99
Jensen T. Welfare Commonsense, Poverty Porn and Doxosophy. Sociological Research Online. 2014;19:1–7. doi: 10.5153/sro.3441
100
K, Sender M Kraidy, editor. The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives. Oxon: Routledge .
101
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2011:41–55.
102
Malik S. The Indian Family on UK Reality Television. Television & New Media. 2013;14:510–28. doi: 10.1177/1527476412446324
103
Murray S, Ouellette L. Reality TV: remaking television culture. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press 2009.
104
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. New York: Routledge 2012.
105
Carter C, Steiner L, McLaughlin L, editors. The Routledge companion to media and gender. The Routledge companion to media and gender. London: Routledge 2014:269–79.
106
Turner G. The mass production of celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2006;9:153–65. doi: 10.1177/1367877906064028
107
Woods F. Classed Femininity, Performativity, and Camp in British Structured Reality Programming. Television & New Media. 2014;15:197–214. doi: 10.1177/1527476412462246
108
Attwood F. Sex media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press 2018.
109
S., Maddison. From porno-topia to total information awareness, or what forces really govern access to porn? | Lawrence & Wishart. 2004;52.
110
Attwood F. Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies. 2004;4:7–19. doi: 10.1080/14680770410001674617
111
Attwood F. Immersion: ‘extreme’ texts, animated bodies and the media. Media, Culture & Society. 2014;36:1186–95. doi: 10.1177/0163443714544858
112
Attwood F. Porn.com: making sense of online pornography. New York: Peter Lang 2010.
113
Attwood F, Smith C. Porn Studies: an introduction. Porn Studies. 2014;1:1–6. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2014.887308
114
Attwood F, Walters C. Fifty Shades and the law: Regulating sex and sex media in the UK. Sexualities. 2013;16:974–9. doi: 10.1177/1363460713508880
115
Gill R. Media, Empowerment and the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Debates. Sex Roles. 2012;66:736–45. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1
116
Gill R. The Sexualisation of Culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012;6:483–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00433.x
117
Madhok S, Phillips A, Wilson K, editors. Gender, agency, and coercion. New York, New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
118
Harvey L, Gill R. New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. In: Scharff C, ed. New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2013:52–67.
119
Paasonen S. Labors of love: netporn, Web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society. 2010;12:1297–312. doi: 10.1177/1461444810362853
120
Smith C, Attwood F. Anti/pro/critical porn studies. Porn Studies. 2014;1:7–23. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2014.887364
121
Tibbals CA. Gonzo, trannys, and teens – current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies. 2014;1:127–35. doi: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863659
122
Mark, Andrejevic. The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.513.4411&rep=rep1&type=pdf
123
Duffy BE, Hund E. "Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society. 2015;1. doi: 10.1177/2056305115604337
124
Duffy BE. Gendering The Labor Of Social Media Production. Feminist Media Studies. 2015;15:710–4. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1053715
125
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 2013;18:1–11. doi: 10.5153/sro.3153
126
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 2013;18:1–11. doi: 10.5153/sro.3153
127
Arcy J. Emotion work: considering gender in digital labor. Feminist Media Studies. 2016;16:365–8. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609
128
Bell V. Performativity and Belonging. Theory, Culture & Society. 1999;16:1–10. doi: 10.1177/02632769922050511
129
Brown R, Gregg M. The pedagogy of regret: Facebook, binge drinking and young women. Continuum. 2012;26:357–69. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2012.665834
130
Buckingham D. Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2008.
131
Castells M. The rise of the network society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 2000.
132
Elias AS, Gill R. Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Published Online First: 24 June 2017. doi: 10.1177/1367549417705604
133
Fenton N. New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE 2010.
134
Hodkinson P. Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society. 2007;9:625–50. doi: 10.1177/1461444807076972
135
Jarrett K. Feminism, labour and digital media: the digital housewife. New York, New York: Routledge 2016.
136
Lewis J, West A. ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society. 2009;11:1209–29. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342058
137
Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 2008;10:393–411. doi: 10.1177/1461444808089415
138
Livingstone S, Brake DR. On the Rapid Rise of Social Networking Sites: New Findings and Policy Implications. Children & Society. 2010;24:75–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00243.x
139
Lopez LK. The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society. 2009;11:729–47. doi: 10.1177/1461444809105349
140
Luckman S. The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age: Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy. Cultural Studies Review. 2013;19. doi: 10.5130/csr.v19i1.2585
141
Luckman S. Women’s Micro-Entrepreneurial Homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies. 2015;30:146–60. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2015.1038117
142
Lüders M, Prøitz L, Rasmussen T. Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society. 2010;12:947–63. doi: 10.1177/1461444809352203
143
McNeill L. Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet. Biography. 2003;26:24–47. doi: 10.1353/bio.2003.0028
144
Dawn, Shepherd C Miller. Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172818/Miller_Blogging%20as%20Social%20Action.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
145
Murthy D. Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33:779–89. doi: 10.1177/0163443711404744
146
Negra D, Tasker Y. Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. Durham: Duke University Press 2014:136–60.
147
Z, Papcharissi. The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere.
148
St Louis B. ON ‘THE NECESSITY AND THE "IMPOSSIBILITY” OF IDENTITIES’. Cultural Studies. 2009;23:559–82. doi: 10.1080/09502380902951011
149
Adkins L, editor. The post-fordist sexual contract: working and living in contingency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2016.
150
Woodward K. Understanding identity. London: Arnold 2002.
151
Miller CR. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1984;70:151–67. doi: 10.1080/00335638409383686
152
Rian J. Music, politics and identity: from Cool Britannia to Grime4Corbyn. Soundings. 2017;50–61.
153
White J. Urban music and entrepreneurship: beats, rhymes and young people’s enterprise. London, [England]: Routledge 2017.
154
Street J. Music and politics. Music and politics. Cambridge: Polity 2012:79–97.
155
Bramwell R. UK hip-hop, grime and the city: the aesthetics and ethics of London’s rap scenes. New York, New York: Routledge 2015.
156
Chang J. Can’t stop won’t stop: a history of the hip-hop generation. London: Ebury 2007.
157
Andrews K, Palmer L, editors. Blackness in Britain. London, [England]: Routledge 2016.
158
Dedman T. Agency in UK hip-hop and grime youth subcultures – peripherals and purists. Journal of Youth Studies. 2011;14:507–22. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2010.549820
159
Gilroy P. After empire: melancholia or convivial culture? London: Routledge 2004.
160
D, Hancox. Stand Up Tall: Dizzee Rascal and the Birth of Grime. 2013.
161
Gentrification X: how an academic argument became the people’s protest | Cities | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jan/12/gentrification-argument-protest-backlash-urban-generation-displacement
162
Party politics: why grime defines the sound of protest in 2016 | Music | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/feb/18/party-politics-why-grime-defines-the-sound-of-protest-in-2016
