1.
Chandler D. An Introduction to Genre Theory. Available from: http://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/HCDE510-Fall2012/Chandler_genre_theoryDFAnn.pdf
2.
Frow J. Genre. In: Genre [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 72–99. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1e847325-880d-e811-80cd-005056af4099
3.
Frow J. Genre [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. The new critical idiom. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=646973&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
4.
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. London: British Film Institute; 1980.
5.
Altman R, British Film Institute. Film/genre. London: BFI Publishing; 1999.
6.
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass media and society. In: Mass media and society [Internet]. London: Edward Arnold; 1991. p. 267–84. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d63bfce-3804-e911-80cd-005056af4099
7.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book [Internet]. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
8.
O’Sullivan T. Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. 2nd ed. Vol. Studies in culture and communication. London: Routledge; 1994.
9.
Curti L. Genre and gender. Cultural Studies. 1988 May;2(2):152–67.
10.
Geraghty L, Jancovich M, editors. The shifting definitions of genre: essays on labeling films, television shows and media [Internet]. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers; 2008. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1734104
11.
Hjarvard S. The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change | Nordicom [via the Wayback Machine]. 2008; Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20180221093605/http://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/tidskrifter/nordicom-review-22008/mediatization-society-theory-media-agents-social-and-cultural
12.
Hodkinson P. Media, culture and society: an introduction. 2nd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2017.
13.
Lacey N. Narrative and genre: key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2000.
14.
Mittell, Jason. Genre and television: from cop shows to cartoons in American culture [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=200862
15.
Boyd-Barrett O, Newbold C. Approaches to media: a reader. London: E. Arnold; 1995.
16.
Seiter E. Remote control: television, audiences, and cultural power [Internet]. [S.l.]: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1221523
17.
Braudy L. Film: a critical introduction. In: Film: a critical introduction [Internet]. 3rd ed. London: Laurence King; 2011. p. 381–406. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c7f59c0d-210c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
18.
Buscombe E. The Idea of Genre in the American Cinema. Screen [Internet]. 1970 Mar 1;11(2):33–45. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/screen/article/11/2/33/1650831
19.
Cook P. The cinema book. In: The cinema book [Internet]. 3rd ed. London: British Film Institute; 2007. p. 137–234. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a0747cc9-660a-e811-80cd-005056af4099
20.
Grant BK. Film genre: from iconography to ideology. Vol. Short cuts. London: Wallflower; 2007.
21.
Grant BK. Film genre reader IV [Internet]. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 2012. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=492853
22.
Hayward S. Cinema studies: the key concepts [Internet]. Fifth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4980918
23.
Deborah, Knight. Making sense of genre [Internet]. Available from: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR2/knight.html
24.
Langford B. Film genre: Hollywood and beyond. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2005.
25.
Neale S. Genre and contemporary Hollywood. London: BFI Pub; 2002.
26.
Williams L. Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess. 4th ed. (44):2–13. Available from: http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~jason.ward/ied240popularliterature/GENRE12pgsWilliamsBodyGenres.pdf
27.
Thussu DK. News as entertainment: the rise of global infotainment [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=319990
28.
Burton G, ProQuest (Firm). Media and society: critical perspectives [Internet]. 2nd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2010. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=771412
29.
Abercrombie N. Television and society. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996.
30.
Allan S. News culture [Internet]. 3rd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=557085
31.
Allen RC. Channels of discourse, reassembled: television and contemporary criticism [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1992. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=23657&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
32.
Boyd-Barrett O, Rantanen T. The globalization of news [Internet]. London: Sage Publications; 1998. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=537773
33.
Cohen S, Young J. The manufacture of news: social problems, deviance and the mass media. Rev. ed. Vol. 4. London: Constable; 1981.
34.
Conboy M. Journalism: a critical history [Internet]. London: Sage Publications; 2004. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=36857&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
35.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book [Internet]. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
36.
Curran J, Gurevitch M. Mass media and society. 3rd ed. London: Arnold; 2000.
37.
Curran J, Seaton J. Power without responsibility: press, broadcasting and the internet in Britain [Internet]. Eighth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=5430438
38.
ZCommunications » Propaganda And The BBC [Internet]. Available from: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/propaganda-and-the-bbc-by-alex-doherty/
39.
Edwards D, Cromwell D. Newspeak in the 21st century [Internet]. London: Pluto; 2009. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3386296
40.
Herman ES, Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. London: Vintage; 1994.
41.
Scannell P. Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society [Internet]. 1989 Apr;11(2):135–66. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016344389011002002
42.
Lee J. Subversive sitcoms: Roseanne as inspiration for feminist resistance. Women’s Studies [Internet]. 1992 Apr;21(1):87–101. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=sih&AN=9205182213&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
43.
Saha A. Citizen Smith more than Citizen Kane? Genres-in-progress and the cultural politics of difference. South Asian Popular Culture [Internet]. 2013 Apr;11(1):97–102. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14746689.2013.765234
44.
Abbas T. ‘Last of the dinosaurs’: Citizen Khan as institutionalisation of Pakistani stereotypes in British television comedy. South Asian Popular Culture [Internet]. 2013 Apr;11(1):85–90. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14746689.2013.765221
45.
Creeber G, Miller T, Tulloch J, editors. The television genre book [Internet]. Third edition. London, [England]: Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute; 2015. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4763274
46.
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television [Internet]. London: Anthem Press; 2012. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3001957
47.
Corner J, Harvey S. Television times: a reader. In: Television times: a reader [Internet]. London: Arnold; 1996. p. 111–6. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f71ef1df-db02-e911-80cd-005056af4099
48.
HENRY M. ‘Don’t Ask me, I’m Just a Girl’: Feminism, Female Identity, and The Simpsons. The Journal of Popular Culture [Internet]. 2007 Apr;40(2):272–303. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00379.x/abstract
49.
Howells R. ‘Is it Because I is Black?’ Race, Humour and the Polysemiology of Ali G. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television [Internet]. 2006 Jun;26(2):155–77. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01439680600691677
50.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
51.
Huq R. Situating Citizen Khan : Shifting representations of Asians onscreen and the outrage industry in the social media age. South Asian Popular Culture [Internet]. 2013 Apr;11(1):77–83. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14746689.2013.765218
52.
Husband C. Humour in society: resistance and control. In: Humour in society: resistance and control [Internet]. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1988. p. 149–78. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2e744e45-200c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
53.
Lewis J. The ideological octopus: an exploration of television and its audience [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 1991. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1221480
54.
Lockyer S. From toothpick legs to dropping vaginas: Gender and sexuality in Joan Rivers’ stand-up comedy performance. Comedy Studies [Internet]. 2011;2(2):113–23. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1386/cost.2.2.113_1?needAccess=true
55.
Chiaro D, Baccolini R, editors. Gender and humor: interdisciplinary and international perspectives [Internet]. Vol. 63. New York: Routledge; 2014. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1687469
56.
Lockyer S. Comedy matters: On the impact of comedy. HUMOR [Internet]. 2016;29(2). Available from: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12549
57.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
58.
Malik S. Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2002. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37048&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
59.
Lockyer S. Reading Little Britain: comedy matters on contemporary television [Internet]. London: I. B. Tauris; 2010. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9786000042851
60.
Medhurst A. The Colour black: black images in British television. In: The Colour black: black images in British television [Internet]. London: BFI; 1989. p. 15–21. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=488a389f-200c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
61.
Lockyer S, Pickering M. Beyond a joke: the limits of humour [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=317913&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
62.
Sisson G. From humor to horror: genre and narrative purpose in abortion stories on American television. Feminist Media Studies [Internet]. 2017 Dec 13;1–18. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680777.2017.1414864
63.
Tyler I. "Chav Mum Chav Scum”. Feminist Media Studies [Internet]. 2008 Mar;8(1):17–34. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680770701824779
64.
Ang I, Couling D. Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1989. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1395429
65.
Harrington CL. Soap Opera, Then and Now. Sociology Compass [Internet]. 2016 Feb;10(2):109–18. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/soc4.12349/abstract;jsessionid=0214C60C84783E50F152789624226993.f01t03
66.
ELAINE ASTON and IAN CLARKE. Feminist theory and the matriarchal soap: EastEnders. Critical Survey [Internet]. 1994;6(2):211–7. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41555822?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
67.
Madill A, Goldmeier R. EastEnders. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2003 Dec;6(4):471–94. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/136787790364005
68.
Feasey R, ProQuest (Firm). From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television [Internet]. London: Anthem Press; 2012. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=3001957
69.
Brunsdon C. Lifestyling Britain. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2003 Mar;6(1):5–23. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1367877903006001001
70.
Buckingham D, British Film Institute. Public secrets: EastEnders and its audience. London: BFI Books; 1987.
71.
Philo G. Message received: Glasgow Media Group research, 1993-1998 [Internet]. Harlow: Longman; 1999. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=618256&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
72.
Henderson L. Social issues in television fiction [Internet]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2007. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95313&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
73.
Hobson D. Soap opera. Cambridge: Polity; 2003.
74.
McNicholas A. Wrenching the Machine Around: EastEnders, the BBC and Institutional Change. Media, Culture & Society [Internet]. 2004 Jul;26(4):491–512. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163443704044214
75.
Meyers E. Don’t Cry because it’s Over, Smile because it Was:” American Soap Operas and Convergence Culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication [Internet]. 2015 Oct 20;32(5):333–46. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15295036.2015.1096016
76.
Malik S. Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2002. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37048&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
77.
Scannell P. The social eye of television, I946-I955. Media, Culture & Society [Internet]. 1979 Jan;1(1):97–106. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016344377900100108
78.
Chapman J. Issues in contemporary documentary. Cambridge: Polity; 2009.
79.
Chapman J. Issues in contemporary documentary. In: Issues in contemporary documentary [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2009. p. 28–47. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=56fc9398-3a04-e911-80cd-005056af4099
80.
Corner J. Television form and public address. London: Edward Arnold; 1995.
81.
Hall S, University of Birmingham. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79 [Internet]. Abingdon: Routledge; 1992. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=7370&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
82.
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
83.
Neale S, British Film Institute. Genre. London: British Film Institute; 1980.
84.
Philo G. Seeing and believing: the influence of television [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1990. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=178320
85.
Norman, Swallow. Factual Television. London: Focal Press;
86.
Williams R. Culture and society 1780-1950. New York: Columbia University Press; 1983.
87.
Dines G, Humez JM, editors. Gender, race, and class in media: a critical reader. Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, Califormia: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
88.
Williams R. A Lecture on Realism. 1977;18(1). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/screen/article/18/1/61/1704480
89.
Jerslev A. Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. In: Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media [Internet]. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen; 2002. p. 159–92. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7ca19bf0-4104-e911-80cd-005056af4099
90.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=363928&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
91.
Allen K, Mendick H. Keeping it Real? Social Class, Young People and ‘Authenticity’ in Reality TV. Sociology [Internet]. 2013 Jun;47(3):460–76. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0038038512448563
92.
Biressi, Anita, Nunn, Heather. Reality TV: realism and revelation [Internet]. London: Wallflower; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=574418&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
93.
Andrejevic M. Reality TV: the work of being watched [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1318905
94.
Palmer G. Exposing lifestyle television: the big reveal [Internet]. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=623989
95.
Wood H, Skeggs B, British Film Institute. Reality television and class. In: Reality television and class [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. p. 197–209. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a6c46536-810d-e811-80cd-005056af4099
96.
Dovey J. Freakshow: first person media and factual television [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2000. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=72516
97.
Grindstaff L. Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. In: Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 1997. p. 164–202. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=428e3ad3-1f0c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
98.
Palmer G. Understanding reality television. In: Understanding reality television [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2004. p. 173–90. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=384bb891-630a-e811-80cd-005056af4099
99.
Jensen T. Welfare Commonsense, Poverty Porn and Doxosophy. Sociological Research Online [Internet]. 2014 Sep;19(3):1–7. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/19/3/3.html
100.
K, Sender M Kraidy, editor. The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives. Oxon: Routledge;
101.
Brunt R, Cere R. Postcolonial media culture in Britain. In: Postcolonial media culture in Britain [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. p. 41–55. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=aff384c9-e002-e911-80cd-005056af4099
102.
Malik S. The Indian Family on UK Reality Television. Television & New Media [Internet]. 2013 Nov;14(6):510–28. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527476412446324
103.
Murray S, Ouellette L. Reality TV: remaking television culture. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press; 2009.
104.
Skeggs B, Wood H. Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=363928&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
105.
Carter C, Steiner L, McLaughlin L, editors. The Routledge companion to media and gender. In: The Routledge companion to media and gender [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 269–79. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9443146d-230c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
106.
Turner G. The mass production of celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2006 Jun;9(2):153–65. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1367877906064028
107.
Woods F. Classed Femininity, Performativity, and Camp in British Structured Reality Programming. Television & New Media [Internet]. 2014 Mar;15(3):197–214. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1527476412462246
108.
Attwood F. Sex media [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 2018. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=5188199
109.
S., Maddison. From porno-topia to total information awareness, or what forces really govern access to porn? | Lawrence & Wishart. 2004;52. Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/lwish/nf/2004/00000052/00000052/art00004
110.
Attwood F. Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies. 2004 Mar;4(1):7–19.
111.
Attwood F. Immersion: ‘extreme’ texts, animated bodies and the media. Media, Culture & Society. 2014 Nov;36(8):1186–95.
112.
Attwood F. Porn.com: making sense of online pornography. Vol. v. 48. New York: Peter Lang; 2010.
113.
Attwood F, Smith C. Porn Studies: an introduction. Porn Studies. 2014 Jan 2;1(1–2):1–6.
114.
Attwood F, Walters C. Fifty Shades and the law: Regulating sex and sex media in the UK. Sexualities. 2013 Dec;16(8):974–9.
115.
Gill R. Media, Empowerment and the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Debates. Sex Roles. 2012 Jun;66(11–12):736–45.
116.
Gill R. The Sexualisation of Culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2012 Jul;6(7):483–98.
117.
Madhok S, Phillips A, Wilson K, editors. Gender, agency, and coercion [Internet]. New York, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=1161396
118.
Harvey L, Gill R. New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. In: Scharff C, editor. New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. p. 52–67. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8c00524a-1f0c-e811-80cd-005056af4099
119.
Paasonen S. Labors of love: netporn, Web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society. 2010 Dec;12(8):1297–312.
120.
Smith C, Attwood F. Anti/pro/critical porn studies. Porn Studies. 2014 Jan 2;1(1–2):7–23.
121.
Tibbals CA. Gonzo, trannys, and teens – current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies. 2014 Jan 2;1(1–2):127–35.
122.
Mark, Andrejevic. The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure [Internet]. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.513.4411&rep=rep1&type=pdf
123.
Duffy BE, Hund E. "Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society [Internet]. 2015 Sep 22;1(2). Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305115604337
124.
Duffy BE. Gendering The Labor Of Social Media Production. Feminist Media Studies [Internet]. 2015 Jul 4;15(4):710–4. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58b37319ff7c508925e2d112/t/5a1c0c4d53450a9c54757316/1511787597430/DuffyGenderingLaborSocialMediaProduction2015.pdf
125.
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online [Internet]. 2013 Nov;18(4):1–11. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/18/4/9.html
126.
Harvey L, Ringrose J, Gill R. Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online [Internet]. 2013 Nov;18(4):1–11. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/18/4/9.html
127.
Arcy J. Emotion work: considering gender in digital labor. Feminist Media Studies. 2016 Mar 3;16(2):365–8.
128.
Bell V. Performativity and Belonging. Theory, Culture & Society. 1999 Apr;16(2):1–10.
129.
Brown R, Gregg M. The pedagogy of regret: Facebook, binge drinking and young women. Continuum. 2012 Jun;26(3):357–69.
130.
Buckingham D. Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2008.
131.
Castells M. The rise of the network society [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. v. 1. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; 2000. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320466&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
132.
Elias AS, Gill R. Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2017 Jun 24;
133.
Fenton N. New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age [Internet]. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2010. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Brunel&isbn=9781849204415
134.
Hodkinson P. Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society. 2007 Aug;9(4):625–50.
135.
Jarrett K. Feminism, labour and digital media: the digital housewife [Internet]. Vol. 33. New York, New York: Routledge; 2016. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4098217
136.
Lewis J, West A. ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society. 2009 Nov;11(7):1209–29.
137.
Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 2008 Jun;10(3):393–411.
138.
Livingstone S, Brake DR. On the Rapid Rise of Social Networking Sites: New Findings and Policy Implications. Children & Society. 2010 Jan;24(1):75–83.
139.
Lopez LK. The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society. 2009 Aug;11(5):729–47.
140.
Luckman S. The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age: Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy. Cultural Studies Review. 2013 Feb 6;19(1).
141.
Luckman S. Women’s Micro-Entrepreneurial Homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies. 2015 Apr 3;30(84):146–60.
142.
Lüders M, Prøitz L, Rasmussen T. Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society. 2010 Sep;12(6):947–63.
143.
McNeill L. Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet. Biography. 2003;26(1):24–47.
144.
Dawn, Shepherd C Miller. Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog [Internet]. Available from: https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172818/Miller_Blogging%20as%20Social%20Action.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
145.
Murthy D. Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture & Society. 2011 Jul;33(5):779–89.
146.
Negra D, Tasker Y. Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. In: Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2014. p. 136–60. Available from: https://login.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822376538
147.
Z, Papcharissi. The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere. Available from: http://zizi.people.uic.edu/Site/Research_files/VirtualSphere.pdf
148.
St Louis B. ON ‘THE NECESSITY AND THE "IMPOSSIBILITY” OF IDENTITIES’. Cultural Studies. 2009 Jul;23(4):559–82.
149.
Adkins L, editor. The post-fordist sexual contract: working and living in contingency [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4096846
150.
Woodward K. Understanding identity. London: Arnold; 2002.
151.
Miller CR. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech [Internet]. 1984 May;70(2):151–67. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d1a2560-f2fe-e811-80cd-005056af4099
152.
Rian J. Music, politics and identity: from Cool Britannia to Grime4Corbyn. Soundings [Internet]. 2017;(67):50–61. Available from: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/lwish/sou/2017/00000067/00000067/art00004
153.
White J. Urban music and entrepreneurship: beats, rhymes and young people’s enterprise [Internet]. Vol. 193. London, [England]: Routledge; 2017. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4732759
154.
Street J. Music and politics. In: Music and politics [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2012. p. 79–97. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c8a19d67-8503-e911-80cd-005056af4099
155.
Bramwell R. UK hip-hop, grime and the city: the aesthetics and ethics of London’s rap scenes [Internet]. Vol. 14. New York, New York: Routledge; 2015. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=2058039
156.
Chang J. Can’t stop won’t stop: a history of the hip-hop generation. London: Ebury; 2007.
157.
Andrews K, Palmer L, editors. Blackness in Britain [Internet]. Vol. 15. London, [England]: Routledge; 2016. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/brunelu/detail.action?docID=4516767
158.
Dedman T. Agency in UK hip-hop and grime youth subcultures – peripherals and purists. Journal of Youth Studies. 2011 Aug;14(5):507–22.
159.
Gilroy P. After empire: melancholia or convivial culture? London: Routledge; 2004.
160.
D, Hancox. Stand Up Tall: Dizzee Rascal and the Birth of Grime. 2013.
161.
Gentrification X: how an academic argument became the people’s protest | Cities | The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jan/12/gentrification-argument-protest-backlash-urban-generation-displacement
162.
Party politics: why grime defines the sound of protest in 2016 | Music | The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/feb/18/party-politics-why-grime-defines-the-sound-of-protest-in-2016
