1.
Chandler, D.: An Introduction to Genre Theory.
2.
Frow, J.: Genre. In: Genre. pp. 72–99. Routledge, London (2015).
3.
Frow, J.: Genre. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2015).
4.
Neale, S., British Film Institute: Genre. British Film Institute, London (1980).
5.
Altman, R., British Film Institute: Film/genre. BFI Publishing, London (1999).
6.
Curran, J., Gurevitch, M.: Mass media and society. In: Mass media and society. pp. 267–284. Edward Arnold, London (1991).
7.
Creeber, G., Miller, T., Tulloch, J. eds: The television genre book. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute, London, [England] (2015).
8.
O’Sullivan, T.: Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. Routledge, London (1994).
9.
Curti, L.: Genre and gender. Cultural Studies. 2, 152–167 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502388800490311.
10.
Geraghty, L., Jancovich, M. eds: The shifting definitions of genre: essays on labeling films, television shows and media. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, Jefferson, North Carolina (2008).
11.
Hjarvard, S.: The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change | Nordicom [via the Wayback Machine]. (2008).
12.
Hodkinson, P.: Media, culture and society: an introduction. SAGE, Los Angeles (2017).
13.
Lacey, N.: Narrative and genre: key concepts in media studies. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2000).
14.
Mittell, Jason: Genre and television: from cop shows to cartoons in American culture. Routledge, London (2004).
15.
Boyd-Barrett, O., Newbold, C.: Approaches to media: a reader. E. Arnold, London (1995).
16.
Seiter, E.: Remote control: television, audiences, and cultural power. Routledge, [S.l.] (2013).
17.
Braudy, L.: Film: a critical introduction. In: Film: a critical introduction. pp. 381–406. Laurence King, London (2011).
18.
Buscombe, E.: The Idea of Genre in the American Cinema. Screen. 11, 33–45 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/11.2.33.
19.
Cook, P.: The cinema book. In: The cinema book. pp. 137–234. British Film Institute, London (2007).
20.
Grant, B.K.: Film genre: from iconography to ideology. Wallflower, London (2007).
21.
Grant, B.K.: Film genre reader IV. University of Texas Press, Austin, Tex (2012).
22.
Hayward, S.: Cinema studies: the key concepts. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2018).
23.
Deborah, Knight: Making sense of genre, http://xroads.virginia.edu/~DRBR2/knight.html.
24.
Langford, B.: Film genre: Hollywood and beyond. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2005).
25.
Neale, S.: Genre and contemporary Hollywood. BFI Pub, London (2002).
26.
Williams, L.: Film Bodies: Gender, Genre and Excess. 2–13.
27.
Thussu, D.K.: News as entertainment: the rise of global infotainment. SAGE, London (2007).
28.
Burton, G., ProQuest (Firm): Media and society: critical perspectives. Open University Press, Berkshire (2010).
29.
Abercrombie, N.: Television and society. Polity Press, Cambridge (1996).
30.
Allan, S.: News culture. McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2010).
31.
Allen, R.C.: Channels of discourse, reassembled: television and contemporary criticism. Routledge, London (1992).
32.
Boyd-Barrett, O., Rantanen, T.: The globalization of news. Sage Publications, London (1998).
33.
Cohen, S., Young, J.: The manufacture of news: social problems, deviance and the mass media. Constable, London (1981).
34.
Conboy, M.: Journalism: a critical history. Sage Publications, London (2004).
35.
Creeber, G., Miller, T., Tulloch, J. eds: The television genre book. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute, London, [England] (2015).
36.
Curran, J., Gurevitch, M.: Mass media and society. Arnold, London (2000).
37.
Curran, J., Seaton, J.: Power without responsibility: press, broadcasting and the internet in Britain. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2018).
38.
ZCommunications » Propaganda And The BBC, https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/propaganda-and-the-bbc-by-alex-doherty/.
39.
Edwards, D., Cromwell, D.: Newspeak in the 21st century. Pluto, London (2009).
40.
Herman, E.S., Chomsky, N.: Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. Vintage, London (1994).
41.
Scannell, P.: Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society. 11, 135–166 (1989).
42.
Lee, J.: Subversive sitcoms: Roseanne as inspiration for feminist resistance. Women’s Studies. 21, 87–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.1992.9978928.
43.
Saha, A.: Citizen Smith more than Citizen Kane? Genres-in-progress and the cultural politics of difference. South Asian Popular Culture. 11, 97–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2013.765234.
44.
Abbas, T.: ‘Last of the dinosaurs’: Citizen Khan as institutionalisation of Pakistani stereotypes in British television comedy. South Asian Popular Culture. 11, 85–90 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2013.765221.
45.
Creeber, G., Miller, T., Tulloch, J. eds: The television genre book. Palgrave Macmillan on behalf of the British Film Institute, London, [England] (2015).
46.
Feasey, R., ProQuest (Firm): From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television. Anthem Press, London (2012).
47.
Corner, J., Harvey, S.: Television times: a reader. In: Television times: a reader. pp. 111–116. Arnold, London (1996).
48.
HENRY, M.: ‘Don’t Ask me, I’m Just a Girl’: Feminism, Female Identity, and The Simpsons. The Journal of Popular Culture. 40, 272–303 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00379.x.
49.
Howells, R.: ‘Is it Because I is Black?’ Race, Humour and the Polysemiology of Ali G. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television. 26, 155–177 (2006). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01439680600691677.
50.
Lockyer, S., Pickering, M.: Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005).
51.
Huq, R.: Situating Citizen Khan : Shifting representations of Asians onscreen  and the outrage industry in the social media age. South Asian Popular Culture. 11, 77–83 (2013). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14746689.2013.765218.
52.
Husband, C.: Humour in society: resistance and control. In: Humour in society: resistance and control. pp. 149–178. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1988).
53.
Lewis, J.: The ideological octopus: an exploration of television and its audience. Routledge, New York (1991).
54.
Lockyer, S.: From toothpick legs to dropping vaginas: Gender and sexuality in Joan Rivers’ stand-up comedy performance. Comedy Studies. 2, 113–123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1386/cost.2.2.113_1.
55.
Chiaro, D., Baccolini, R. eds: Gender and humor: interdisciplinary and international perspectives. Routledge, New York (2014).
56.
Lockyer, S.: Comedy matters: On the impact of comedy. HUMOR. 29, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-5001.
57.
Lockyer, S., Pickering, M.: Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005).
58.
Malik, S.: Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television. SAGE Publications, London (2002).
59.
Lockyer, S.: Reading Little Britain: comedy matters on contemporary television. I. B. Tauris, London (2010).
60.
Medhurst, A.: The Colour black: black images in British television. In: The Colour black: black images in British television. pp. 15–21. BFI, London (1989).
61.
Lockyer, S., Pickering, M.: Beyond a joke: the limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2005).
62.
Sisson, G.: From humor to horror: genre and narrative purpose in abortion stories on American television. Feminist Media Studies. 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1414864.
63.
Tyler, I.: "Chav Mum Chav Scum”. Feminist Media Studies. 8, 17–34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770701824779.
64.
Ang, I., Couling, D.: Watching Dallas: soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. Routledge, London (1989).
65.
Harrington, C.L.: Soap Opera, Then and Now. Sociology Compass. 10, 109–118 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12349.
66.
ELAINE ASTON and IAN CLARKE: Feminist theory and the matriarchal soap: EastEnders. Critical Survey. 6, 211–217 (1994).
67.
Madill, A., Goldmeier, R.: EastEnders. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 6, 471–494 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790364005.
68.
Feasey, R., ProQuest (Firm): From happy homemaker to desperate housewives: motherhood and popular television. Anthem Press, London (2012).
69.
Brunsdon, C.: Lifestyling Britain. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 6, 5–23 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877903006001001.
70.
Buckingham, D., British Film Institute: Public secrets: EastEnders and its audience. BFI Books, London (1987).
71.
Philo, G.: Message received: Glasgow Media Group research, 1993-1998. Longman, Harlow (1999).
72.
Henderson, L.: Social issues in television fiction. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2007).
73.
Hobson, D.: Soap opera. Polity, Cambridge (2003).
74.
McNicholas, A.: Wrenching the Machine Around: EastEnders, the BBC and Institutional Change. Media, Culture & Society. 26, 491–512 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443704044214.
75.
Meyers, E.: Don’t Cry because it’s Over, Smile because it Was:” American Soap Operas and Convergence Culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication. 32, 333–346 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1096016.
76.
Malik, S.: Representing black Britain: a history of black and Asian images on British television. SAGE Publications, London (2002).
77.
Scannell, P.: The social eye of television, I946-I955. Media, Culture & Society. 1, 97–106 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1177/016344377900100108.
78.
Chapman, J.: Issues in contemporary documentary. Polity, Cambridge (2009).
79.
Chapman, J.: Issues in contemporary documentary. In: Issues in contemporary documentary. pp. 28–47. Polity, Cambridge (2009).
80.
Corner, J.: Television form and public address. Edward Arnold, London (1995).
81.
Hall, S., University of Birmingham. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies: Culture, media, language: working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Routledge, Abingdon (1992).
82.
Brunt, R., Cere, R.: Postcolonial media culture in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
83.
Neale, S., British Film Institute: Genre. British Film Institute, London (1980).
84.
Philo, G.: Seeing and believing: the influence of television. Routledge, London (1990).
85.
Norman, Swallow: Factual Television. Focal Press, London.
86.
Williams, R.: Culture and society 1780-1950. Columbia University Press, New York (1983).
87.
Dines, G., Humez, J.M. eds: Gender, race, and class in media: a critical reader. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, Califormia (2015).
88.
Williams, R.: A Lecture on Realism. 18, (1977). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/18.1.61.
89.
Jerslev, A.: Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. In: Realism and ‘reality’ in film and media. pp. 159–192. Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (2002).
90.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. Routledge, New York (2012).
91.
Allen, K., Mendick, H.: Keeping it Real? Social Class, Young People and ‘Authenticity’ in Reality TV. Sociology. 47, 460–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512448563.
92.
Biressi, Anita, Nunn, Heather: Reality TV: realism and revelation. Wallflower, London (2005).
93.
Andrejevic, M.: Reality TV: the work of being watched. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2004).
94.
Palmer, G.: Exposing lifestyle television: the big reveal. Ashgate, Burlington, VT (2008).
95.
Wood, H., Skeggs, B., British Film Institute: Reality television and class. In: Reality television and class. pp. 197–209. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011).
96.
Dovey, J.: Freakshow: first person media and factual television. Pluto Press, London (2000).
97.
Grindstaff, L.: Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. In: Media scandals: morality and desire in the popular culture marketplace. pp. 164–202. Polity, Cambridge (1997).
98.
Palmer, G.: Understanding reality television. In: Understanding reality television. pp. 173–190. Routledge, London (2004).
99.
Jensen, T.: Welfare Commonsense, Poverty Porn and Doxosophy. Sociological Research Online. 19, 1–7 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3441.
100.
K, Sender, M., Kraidy ed: The Politics of Reality Television: Global Perspectives. Routledge, Oxon.
101.
Brunt, R., Cere, R.: Postcolonial media culture in Britain. In: Postcolonial media culture in Britain. pp. 41–55. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
102.
Malik, S.: The Indian Family on UK Reality Television. Television & New Media. 14, 510–528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412446324.
103.
Murray, S., Ouellette, L.: Reality TV: remaking television culture. New York University Press, New York (2009).
104.
Skeggs, B., Wood, H.: Reacting to reality television: performance, audience and value. Routledge, New York (2012).
105.
Carter, C., Steiner, L., McLaughlin, L. eds: The Routledge companion to media and gender. In: The Routledge companion to media and gender. pp. 269–279. Routledge, London (2014).
106.
Turner, G.: The mass production of celebrity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 9, 153–165 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877906064028.
107.
Woods, F.: Classed Femininity, Performativity, and Camp in British Structured Reality Programming. Television & New Media. 15, 197–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412462246.
108.
Attwood, F.: Sex media. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2018).
109.
S., Maddison: From porno-topia to total information awareness, or what forces really govern access to porn? | Lawrence & Wishart. 52, (2004).
110.
Attwood, F.: Pornography and objectification. Feminist Media Studies. 4, 7–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770410001674617.
111.
Attwood, F.: Immersion: ‘extreme’ texts, animated bodies and the media. Media, Culture & Society. 36, 1186–1195 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714544858.
112.
Attwood, F.: Porn.com: making sense of online pornography. Peter Lang, New York (2010).
113.
Attwood, F., Smith, C.: Porn Studies: an introduction. Porn Studies. 1, 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2014.887308.
114.
Attwood, F., Walters, C.: Fifty Shades and the law: Regulating sex and sex media in the UK. Sexualities. 16, 974–979 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713508880.
115.
Gill, R.: Media, Empowerment and the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ Debates. Sex Roles. 66, 736–745 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1.
116.
Gill, R.: The Sexualisation of Culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 6, 483–498 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00433.x.
117.
Madhok, S., Phillips, A., Wilson, K. eds: Gender, agency, and coercion. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, New York (2013).
118.
Harvey, L., Gill, R.: New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. In: Scharff, C. (ed.) New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. pp. 52–67. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2013).
119.
Paasonen, S.: Labors of love: netporn, Web 2.0 and the meanings of amateurism. New Media & Society. 12, 1297–1312 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810362853.
120.
Smith, C., Attwood, F.: Anti/pro/critical porn studies. Porn Studies. 1, 7–23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2014.887364.
121.
Tibbals, C.A.: Gonzo, trannys, and teens – current trends in US adult content production, distribution, and consumption. Porn Studies. 1, 127–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2013.863659.
122.
Mark, Andrejevic: The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.513.4411&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
123.
Duffy, B.E., Hund, E.: "Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society. 1, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337.
124.
Duffy, B.E.: Gendering The Labor Of Social Media Production. Feminist Media Studies. 15, 710–714 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1053715.
125.
Harvey, L., Ringrose, J., Gill, R.: Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 18, 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3153.
126.
Harvey, L., Ringrose, J., Gill, R.: Swagger, Ratings and Masculinity: Theorising the Circulation of Social and Cultural Value in Teenage Boys’ Digital Peer Networks. Sociological Research Online. 18, 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3153.
127.
Arcy, J.: Emotion work: considering gender in digital labor. Feminist Media Studies. 16, 365–368 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609.
128.
Bell, V.: Performativity and Belonging. Theory, Culture & Society. 16, 1–10 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632769922050511.
129.
Brown, R., Gregg, M.: The pedagogy of regret: Facebook, binge drinking and young women. Continuum. 26, 357–369 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665834.
130.
Buckingham, D.: Youth, identity, and digital media. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2008).
131.
Castells, M.: The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (2000).
132.
Elias, A.S., Gill, R.: Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705604.
133.
Fenton, N.: New media, old news: journalism & democracy in the digital age. SAGE, Los Angeles, [Calif.] (2010).
134.
Hodkinson, P.: Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society. 9, 625–650 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807076972.
135.
Jarrett, K.: Feminism, labour and digital media: the digital housewife. Routledge, New York, New York (2016).
136.
Lewis, J., West, A.: ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media & Society. 11, 1209–1229 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342058.
137.
Livingstone, S.: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society. 10, 393–411 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415.
138.
Livingstone, S., Brake, D.R.: On the Rapid Rise of Social Networking Sites: New Findings and Policy Implications. Children & Society. 24, 75–83 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00243.x.
139.
Lopez, L.K.: The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society. 11, 729–747 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809105349.
140.
Luckman, S.: The Aura of the Analogue in a Digital Age: Women’s Crafts, Creative Markets and Home-Based Labour After Etsy. Cultural Studies Review. 19, (2013). https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v19i1.2585.
141.
Luckman, S.: Women’s Micro-Entrepreneurial Homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies. 30, 146–160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1038117.
142.
Lüders, M., Prøitz, L., Rasmussen, T.: Emerging personal media genres. New Media & Society. 12, 947–963 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809352203.
143.
McNeill, L.: Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet. Biography. 26, 24–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1353/bio.2003.0028.
144.
Dawn, Shepherd, C., Miller: Blogging as Social Action: A Genre Analysis of the Weblog, https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172818/Miller_Blogging%20as%20Social%20Action.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
145.
Murthy, D.: Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture & Society. 33, 779–789 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711404744.
146.
Negra, D., Tasker, Y.: Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. In: Gendering the recession: media and culture in an age of austerity. pp. 136–160. Duke University Press, Durham (2014).
147.
Z, Papcharissi: The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as Public Sphere.
148.
St Louis, B.: ON ‘THE NECESSITY AND THE "IMPOSSIBILITY” OF IDENTITIES’. Cultural Studies. 23, 559–582 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380902951011.
149.
Adkins, L. ed: The post-fordist sexual contract: working and living in contingency. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2016).
150.
Woodward, K.: Understanding identity. Arnold, London (2002).
151.
Miller, C.R.: Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 70, 151–167 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686.
152.
Rian, J.: Music, politics and identity: from Cool Britannia to Grime4Corbyn. Soundings. 50–61 (2017).
153.
White, J.: Urban music and entrepreneurship: beats, rhymes and young people’s enterprise. Routledge, London, [England] (2017).
154.
Street, J.: Music and politics. In: Music and politics. pp. 79–97. Polity, Cambridge (2012).
155.
Bramwell, R.: UK hip-hop, grime and the city: the aesthetics and ethics of London’s rap scenes. Routledge, New York, New York (2015).
156.
Chang, J.: Can’t stop won’t stop: a history of the hip-hop generation. Ebury, London (2007).
157.
Andrews, K., Palmer, L. eds: Blackness in Britain. Routledge, London, [England] (2016).
158.
Dedman, T.: Agency in UK hip-hop and grime youth subcultures – peripherals and purists. Journal of Youth Studies. 14, 507–522 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2010.549820.
159.
Gilroy, P.: After empire: melancholia or convivial culture? Routledge, London (2004).
160.
D, Hancox: Stand Up Tall: Dizzee Rascal and the Birth of Grime. (2013).
161.
Gentrification X: how an academic argument became the people’s protest | Cities | The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jan/12/gentrification-argument-protest-backlash-urban-generation-displacement.
162.
Party politics: why grime defines the sound of protest in 2016 | Music | The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/feb/18/party-politics-why-grime-defines-the-sound-of-protest-in-2016.