Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. 1 AD. Sociology of Health & Illness 18:198–219. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834&paramdict=en-UK.
Agar, Jon. 2013. Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone. Revised and updated edition. London: Icon.
Allan, Stuart. 2002a. Media, Risk, and Science. Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Allan, Stuart. 2002b. Media, Risk, and Science. Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Anderson, A. 2005. ‘The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press’. Science Communication 27(2):200–220. doi:10.1177/1075547005281472.
Attias, Bernardo, Anna Gavanas, and Hillegonda C. Rietveld. 2013. DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Attwood, Feona, Vincent Campbell, I. Q. Hunter, and Sharon Lockyer, eds. 2013. Controversial Images: Media Representations on the Edge. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Palgrave Macmillan.
BALSAMO, A. 1995. ‘Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture’. Body & Society 1(3–4):215–37. doi:10.1177/1357034X95001003013.
Bauer, M. W. 2005. ‘Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1):5–22. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh054.
Bell, Alice R. 2011. ‘Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication’. Science as Culture 20(4):491–512. doi:10.1080/09505431.2011.605921.
Bell, David. 2006. Science, Technology and Culture. Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
Berger, Arthur Asa. 2014. What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. Second edition. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Biagioli, Mario. 1999. The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas Parke Hughes, and T. J. Pinch. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bolter, J. David. 1993. Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age. London: Penguin.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Cambridge: Polity.
Bowler, Peter J., and Iwan Rhys Morus. 2005. Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, and Micháele Lamont. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, Graham. 1997. The Photograph. Vol. Oxford history of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, H. M., and T. J. Pinch. 2002. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Vol. Canto. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading. 2007. Feminist Media Studies 7:17–32. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996&paramdict=en-UK.
David, Matthew. 2005. Science in Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2005. ‘Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy’. Wind Energy 8(2):125–39. doi:10.1002/we.124.
van Dijck, J. 2008. ‘Digital Photography: Communication, Identity, Memory’. Visual Communication 7(1):57–76. doi:10.1177/1470357207084865.
Epstein, Steven. 2008. ‘Culture and Science / Technology: Rethinking Knowledge, Power, Materiality, and Nature’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619:165–82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Erickson, Mark. 2005. Science, Culture and Society: Understanding Science in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy). 2 AD. Springer; 2013 edition.
Garcia-Montes, J. M. 2006. ‘Changes in the Self Resulting from the Use of Mobile Phones’. Media, Culture & Society 28(1):67–82. doi:10.1177/0163443706059287.
Gregory, Jane, and Steve Miller. 2000. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: Persius Books.
Hackett, Edward J. and Society for Social Studies of Science. 2008. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Hallman, Bonnie C., and S. Mary P. Benbow. 2007. ‘Family Leisure, Family Photography and Zoos: Exploring the Emotional Geographies of Families’. Social & Cultural Geography 8(6):871–88. doi:10.1080/14649360701712636.
Hand, Martin. 2011. Ubiquitous Photography. Cambridge: Polity.
Hitchings, R. 2008. ‘Air Conditioning and the Material Culture of Routine Human Encasement: The Case of Young People in Contemporary Singapore’. Journal of Material Culture 13(3):251–65. doi:10.1177/1359183508095495.
Hjorth, Larissa, Jean Burgess, and Ingrid Richardson. 2012. Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. Vol. Routledge research in cultural and media studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jones, Geoffrey. 2010. Beauty Imagined: A History of the Global Beauty Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kasperson, Roger E., Ortwin Renn, Paul Slovic, Halina S. Brown, Jacque Emel, Robert Goble, Jeanne X. Kasperson, and Samuel Ratick. 1988. ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework’. Risk Analysis 8(2):177–87. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 2005. Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Vol. Key themes in sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Larsen, Jonas, and Mette Sandbye, eds. 2014. Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. London: I.B. Tauris.
Latour, B. 2004. ‘How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies’. Body & Society 10(2–3):205–29. doi:10.1177/1357034X04042943.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Vol. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leyshon, M., S. DiGiovanna, and B. Holcomb. 2013. ‘Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor?’ Urban Studies 50(3):587–605. doi:10.1177/0042098012468897.
Licoppe, C. 2011. ‘What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones’. Cultural Sociology 5(3):367–84. doi:10.1177/1749975510378193.
Locke, S. 2005. ‘Fantastically Reasonable: Ambivalence in the Representation of Science and        Technology in Super-Hero Comics’. Public Understanding of Science 14(1):25–46. doi:10.1177/0963662505048197.
Lupton, Deborah. 2013. Risk. Vol. Key ideas. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Lupton, Deborah, and John Tulloch. 2002. ‘“Life Would Be Pretty Dull without Risk”: Voluntary Risk-Taking and Its Pleasures’. Health, Risk & Society 4(2):113–24. doi:10.1080/13698570220137015.
MacKenzie, Donald A., and Judy Wajcman. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Magaudda, P. 2014. ‘The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch’. Cultural Sociology 8(1):63–76. doi:10.1177/1749975513484604.
Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. n.d. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html.
Matthewman, Steve. 2011. Technology and Social Theory. Vol. Traditions in social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McQuire, S. 2013. ‘Photography’s Afterlife: Documentary Images and the Operational Archive’. Journal of Material Culture 18(3):223–41. doi:10.1177/1359183513489930.
McVeigh, Brian. n.d. ‘Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan’. Journal of Material Culture 1(3):291–312. https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf.
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert. 1982. ‘Joking Apart: Some Recommendations Concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture’. Social Studies of Science 12(4):585–613. http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Miller, Steve. 2001. ‘Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads’. Public Understanding of Science 10(1):115–20. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308.
Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery. 2004. Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.) 18:525–39. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304&paramdict=en-UK.
Peters, H. P. 1995. ‘The Interaction of Journalists and Scientific Experts: Co-Operation and Conflict between Two Professional Cultures’. Media, Culture & Society 17(1):31–48. doi:10.1177/016344395017001003.
Peters, H. P., D. Brossard, S. de Cheveigne, S. Dunwoody, M. Kallfass, S. Miller, and S. Tsuchida. 2008. ‘Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider’. Science Communication 30(2):266–76. doi:10.1177/1075547008324809.
Pickering, Andrew. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickstone, John V. 2001. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: University of Chicago Press.
Pinto, B., D. Marcal, and S. G. Vaz. 2015. ‘Communicating through Humour: A Project of Stand-up Comedy about Science’. Public Understanding of Science 24(7):776–93. doi:10.1177/0963662513511175.
Powell, R. C. 2007. ‘Geographies of Science: Histories, Localities, Practices, Futures’. Progress in Human Geography 31(3):309–29. doi:10.1177/0309132507077081.
Regula Valérie Burri. 2008. ‘Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology’. Social Studies of Science 38(1):35–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Renn, Ortwin. 1998. ‘Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges’. Journal of Risk Research 1(1):49–71. doi:10.1080/136698798377321.
Riesch, H. 2015. ‘Why Did the Proton Cross the Road? Humour and Science Communication’. Public Understanding of Science 24(7):768–75. doi:10.1177/0963662514546299.
Riesch, Hauke, Christian Oltra, Aleksandra Lis, Paul Upham, and Mariette Pol. 2013. ‘Internet-Based Public Debate of CCS: Lessons from Online Focus Groups in Poland and Spain’. Energy Policy 56:693–702. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.029.
Riesch, Hauke, and David J. Spiegelhalter. 2011. ‘Careless Pork Costs Lives: Risk Stories from Science to Press Release to Media’. Health, Risk & Society 13(1):47–64. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Schwarz, O. 2010. ‘Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens’. Visual Communication 9(2):151–69. doi:10.1177/1470357210369982.
Silva, Elizabeth. 2000. ‘The Cook, the Cooker and the Gendering of the Kitchen’. The Sociological Review 48(4):612–28. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00235.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stirling, Andrew. 2007. ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’. EMBO Reports 8(4):309–15. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.
Stocking, S. H., and L. W. Holstein. 2008. ‘Manufacturing Doubt: Journalists’ Roles and the Construction of Ignorance in a Scientific Controversy’. Public Understanding of Science 18(1):23–42. doi:10.1177/0963662507079373.
Storey, John. 2012. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. 6th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson.
The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health,iIllness and medicine. 17 AD. Palgrave MacMillan.
Thompson, Lee, and Julie Cupples. 2008. ‘Seen and Not Heard? Text Messaging and Digital Sociality’. Social & Cultural Geography 9(1):95–108. doi:10.1080/14649360701789634.
Tilley, Chris. 2006. Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE Publications.
Turney, Jon. 1998. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Van House, Nancy A. 2011. ‘Personal Photography, Digital Technologies and the Uses of the Visual’. Visual Studies 26(2):125–34. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888.
Vannini, Phillip. 2009. Material Culture and Technology in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Approaches. Vol. Intersections in communications and culture. New York: Peter Lang.
Vialles, Noèelie. 1994. ‘A Place That Is No Place’. Pp. 15–28 in Animal to edible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vivienne, S., and J. Burgess. 2013. ‘The Remediation of the Personal Photograph and the Politics of Self-Representation in Digital Storytelling’. Journal of Material Culture 18(3):279–98. doi:10.1177/1359183513492080.
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS). n.d. http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/.
Wainwright, S. P. 2004. ‘Epiphanies of Embodiment: Injury, Identity and the Balletic Body’. Qualitative Research 4(3):311–37. doi:10.1177/1468794104047232.
Wajcman, J., M. Bittman, and J. E. Brown. 2008. ‘Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions’. Sociology 42(4):635–52. doi:10.1177/0038038508091620.
Weingart, Peter, Claudia Muhl, and Petra Pansegrau. 2003. ‘Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film’. Public Understanding of Science 12(3):279–87. doi:10.1177/0963662503123006.
Wessels, Bridgette. 2010. Understanding the Internet: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Woodward, Ian. 2007. Understanding Material Culture. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
WYNNE, B. 1992. ‘Uncertainty and Environmental Learning 1, 2Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm’. Global Environmental Change 2(2):111–27. doi:10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2.
Yearley, Steven. 2005. Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE Publications.