[1]
S. Matthewman, Technology and social theory, vol. Traditions in social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
[2]
S. Sismondo, An introduction to science and technology studies, 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320473&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[3]
J. Storey, Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction, 6th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2012. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=390393&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[4]
I. Woodward, Understanding material culture. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2007. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255990&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[5]
B. Attias, A. Gavanas, and H. C. Rietveld, DJ culture in the mix: power, technology, and social change in electronic dance music. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=647332
[6]
D. Bell, Science, technology and culture, vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press, 2006. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95071&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[7]
A. A. Berger, What objects mean: an introduction to material culture, Second edition. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2014. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1253206&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
[8]
M. Biagioli, The science studies reader. New York: Routledge, 1999.
[9]
W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2012. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=365530&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[10]
P. J. Bowler and I. R. Morus, Making modern science: a historical survey. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[11]
C. Camic, N. Gross, and M. Lamont, Social knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=325024&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[12]
H. M. Collins and T. J. Pinch, The Golem at large: what you should know about technology, vol. Canto. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41445&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[13]
M. David, Science in society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=86049&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[14]
M. Erickson, Science, culture and society: understanding science in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.
[15]
E. J. Hackett and Society for Social Studies of Science, The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=209920&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[16]
D. L. Kleinman, Science and technology in society: from biotechnology to the Internet, vol. Key themes in sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2005. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=202829&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[17]
D. A. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman, The social shaping of technology, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999.
[18]
A. Pickering, Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=349593&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
[19]
J. V. Pickstone, Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
[20]
C. Tilley, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE Publications, 2006. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=419419&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[21]
P. Vannini, Material culture and technology in everyday life: ethnographic approaches, vol. Intersections in communications and culture. New York: Peter Lang, 2009.
[22]
B. Wessels, Understanding the Internet: a socio-cultural perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
[23]
S. Yearley, Making sense of science: understanding the social study of science. London: SAGE Publications, 2005. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37093&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[24]
S. Epstein, ‘Culture and science / technology: rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 619, pp. 165–182, 2008, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[25]
The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health,iIllness and medicine. Palgrave MacMillan, 17 AD.
[26]
R. Hitchings, ‘Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement: the case of young people in contemporary Singapore’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 251–265, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1359183508095495
[27]
P. Magaudda, ‘The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch’, Cultural Sociology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63–76, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1749975513484604
[28]
R. C. Powell, ‘Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 309–329, June 2007, doi: 10.1177/0309132507077081
[29]
E. Silva, ‘The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen’, The Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 612–628, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00235
[30]
B. McVeigh, ‘Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 291–312, Available: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf
[31]
S. Allan, Media, risk, and science, vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
[32]
A. Anderson, ‘The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press’, Science Communication, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 200–220, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1075547005281472
[33]
M. W. Bauer, ‘Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh054
[34]
J. Gregory and S. Miller, Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Persius Books, 2000.
[35]
H. P. Peters, ‘The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 31–48, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.1177/016344395017001003
[36]
H. P. Peters et al., ‘Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider’, Science Communication, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 266–276, Sept. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1075547008324809
[37]
H. Riesch and D. J. Spiegelhalter, ‘Careless pork costs lives: Risk stories from science to press release to media’, Health, Risk & Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–64, Feb. 2011, Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
[38]
S. H. Stocking and L. W. Holstein, ‘Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23–42, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0963662507079373
[39]
‘Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media’. Available: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html
[40]
A. BALSAMO, ‘Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture’, Body & Society, vol. 1, no. 3–4, pp. 215–237, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1177/1357034X95001003013
[41]
‘Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery’, Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.), vol. 18, pp. 525–539, 2004, Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304¶mdict=en-UK
[42]
‘Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading’, Feminist media studies, vol. 7, pp. 17–32, 2007, Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996¶mdict=en-UK
[43]
Regula Valérie Burri, ‘Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 35–62, 2008, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[44]
G. Jones, Beauty imagined: a history of the global beauty industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https:idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191573026
[45]
B. Latour, ‘How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies’, Body & Society, vol. 10, no. 2–3, pp. 205–229, June 2004, doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042943
[46]
J. D. Bolter, Turing’s man: western culture in the computer age. London: Penguin, 1993.
[47]
J. Agar, Constant touch: a global history of the mobile phone, Revised and Updated edition. London: Icon, 2013.
[48]
J. M. Garcia-Montes, ‘Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 67–82, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0163443706059287
[49]
L. Hjorth, J. Burgess, and I. Richardson, Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone, vol. Routledge research in cultural and media studies. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=345860&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[50]
B. Latour, Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
[51]
B. Latour, Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory, vol. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=90516&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[52]
M. Leyshon, S. DiGiovanna, and B. Holcomb, ‘Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor?’, Urban Studies, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 587–605, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0042098012468897
[53]
C. Licoppe, ‘What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones’, Cultural Sociology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 367–384, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1749975510378193
[54]
‘Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler’, Sociology of health & illness, vol. 18, pp. 198–219, 1 AD, Available: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834¶mdict=en-UK
[55]
L. Thompson and J. Cupples, ‘Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality’, Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 95–108, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14649360701789634
[56]
S. P. Wainwright, ‘Epiphanies of embodiment: injury, identity and the balletic body’, Qualitative Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 311–337, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1177/1468794104047232
[57]
J. Wajcman, M. Bittman, and J. E. Brown, ‘Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 635–652, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038508091620
[58]
P. Devine-Wright, ‘Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy’, Wind Energy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 125–139, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1002/we.124
[59]
R. E. Kasperson et al., ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework’, Risk Analysis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–187, June 1988, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
[60]
D. Lupton, Risk, 2nd ed., vol. Key ideas. London: Routledge, 2013. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=485835&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[61]
D. Lupton and J. Tulloch, ‘“Life would be pretty dull without risk”: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures’, Health, Risk & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–124, July 2002, doi: 10.1080/13698570220137015
[62]
O. Renn, ‘Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges’, Journal of Risk Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–71, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/136698798377321
[63]
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy). Springer; 2013 edition, 2 AD. Available: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essentials-Risk-Theory-SpringerBriefs-Philosophy/dp/940075454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1443611624&sr=8-1&keywords=Essentials+of+Risk+Theory
[64]
H. Riesch, C. Oltra, A. Lis, P. Upham, and M. Pol, ‘Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain’, Energy Policy, vol. 56, pp. 693–702, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.029
[65]
A. Stirling, ‘Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle’, EMBO reports, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 309–315, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
[66]
B. WYNNE, ‘Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–127, June 1992, doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
[67]
P. Bourdieu, Photography: a middle-brow art. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
[68]
F. Attwood, V. Campbell, I. Q. Hunter, and S. Lockyer, Eds, Controversial images: media representations on the edge. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=425951&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[69]
G. Clarke, The photograph, vol. Oxford history of art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
[70]
M. Hand, Ubiquitous photography. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=487274&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
[71]
B. C. Hallman and S. M. P. Benbow, ‘Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families’, Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 871–888, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1080/14649360701712636
[72]
J. Larsen and M. Sandbye, Eds, Digital snaps: the new face of photography. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.
[73]
S. McQuire, ‘Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 223–241, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1359183513489930
[74]
O. Schwarz, ‘Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens’, Visual Communication, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–169, May 2010, doi: 10.1177/1470357210369982
[75]
J. van Dijck, ‘Digital photography: communication, identity, memory’, Visual Communication, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–76, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1470357207084865
[76]
N. A. Van House, ‘Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual’, Visual Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125–134, June 2011, doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888
[77]
S. Vivienne and J. Burgess, ‘The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 279–298, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1359183513492080
[78]
A. R. Bell, ‘Science as âHorribleâ: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication’, Science as Culture, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 491–512, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/09505431.2011.605921
[79]
S. Miller, ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 115–120, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308
[80]
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert, ‘Joking Apart: Some Recommendations concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 585–613, 1982, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[81]
B. Pinto, D. Marcal, and S. G. Vaz, ‘Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about science’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 776–793, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0963662513511175
[82]
H. Riesch, ‘Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 768–775, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0963662514546299
[83]
S. Allan, Media, risk, and science, vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2002.
[84]
S. Locke, ‘Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and technology in super-hero comics’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 25–46, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0963662505048197
[85]
J. Turney, Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press, 1998.
[86]
P. Weingart, C. Muhl, and P. Pansegrau, ‘Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 279–287, July 2003, doi: 10.1177/0963662503123006
[87]
‘VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS)’. Available: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/
[88]
N. Vialles, ‘A place that is no place’, in Animal to edible, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 15–28. Available: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20VIALLES%20Place.pdf
