‘Actor-Network Theory, Technology and Medical Sociology: An Illustrative Analysis of the Metered Dose Inhaler’. 1 AD. Sociology of Health & Illness 18: 198–219. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834&paramdict=en-UK.
Agar, Jon. 2013. Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone. Revised and Updated edition. Icon.
Allan, Stuart. 2002a. Media, Risk, and Science. Issues in cultural and Media studies. Open University Press.
Allan, Stuart. 2002b. Media, Risk, and Science. Issues in cultural and Media studies. Open University Press.
Anderson, A. 2005. ‘The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press’. Science Communication 27 (2): 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281472.
Attias, Bernardo, Anna Gavanas, and Hillegonda C. Rietveld. 2013. DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music. Bloomsbury Academic. Electronic resource. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=647332.
Attwood, Feona, Vincent Campbell, I. Q. Hunter, and Sharon Lockyer, eds. 2013. Controversial Images: Media Representations on the Edge. Palgrave Macmillan. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=425951&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
BALSAMO, A. 1995. ‘Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture’. Body & Society 1 (3–4): 215–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001003013.
Bauer, M. W. 2005. ‘Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy’. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (1): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh054.
Bell, Alice R. 2011. ‘Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication’. Science as Culture 20 (4): 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.605921.
Bell, David. 2006. Science, Technology and Culture. Issues in cultural and Media studies. Open University Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95071&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Berger, Arthur Asa. 2014. What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. Second edition. Left Coast Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1253206&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Biagioli, Mario. 1999. The Science Studies Reader. Routledge.
Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas Parke Hughes, and T. J. Pinch. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Anniversary ed. MIT Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=365530&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Bolter, J. David. 1993. Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age. Penguin.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Polity.
Bowler, Peter J., and Iwan Rhys Morus. 2005. Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey. University of Chicago Press.
Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, and Micháele Lamont. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. University of Chicago Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=325024&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Clarke, Graham. 1997. The Photograph. Oxford history of art. Oxford University Press.
Collins, H. M., and T. J. Pinch. 2002. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Canto. Cambridge University Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41445&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
‘Cosmetic Surgery and the Televisual Makeover: A Foucauldian Feminist Reading’. 2007. Feminist Media Studies 7: 17–32. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996&paramdict=en-UK.
David, Matthew. 2005. Science in Society. Palgrave Macmillan. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=86049&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Devine-Wright, Patrick. 2005. ‘Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy’. Wind Energy 8 (2): 125–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124.
Dijck, J. van. 2008. ‘Digital Photography: Communication, Identity, Memory’. Visual Communication 7 (1): 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865.
Epstein, Steven. 2008. ‘Culture and Science / Technology: Rethinking Knowledge, Power, Materiality, and Nature’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619: 165–82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Erickson, Mark. 2005. Science, Culture and Society: Understanding Science in the Twenty-First Century. Polity.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy). 2 AD. Springer; 2013 edition. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essentials-Risk-Theory-SpringerBriefs-Philosophy/dp/940075454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1443611624&sr=8-1&keywords=Essentials+of+Risk+Theory.
Garcia-Montes, J. M. 2006. ‘Changes in the Self Resulting from the Use of Mobile Phones’. Media, Culture & Society 28 (1): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059287.
Gregory, Jane, and Steve Miller. 2000. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. Persius Books.
Hackett, Edward J. and Society for Social Studies of Science. 2008. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. MIT Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=209920&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Hallman, Bonnie C., and S. Mary P. Benbow. 2007. ‘Family Leisure, Family Photography and Zoos: Exploring the Emotional Geographies of Families’. Social & Cultural Geography 8 (6): 871–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701712636.
Hand, Martin. 2011. Ubiquitous Photography. Polity. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=487274&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Hitchings, R. 2008. ‘Air Conditioning and the Material Culture of Routine Human Encasement: The Case of Young People in Contemporary Singapore’. Journal of Material Culture 13 (3): 251–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508095495.
Hjorth, Larissa, Jean Burgess, and Ingrid Richardson. 2012. Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. Routledge research in cultural and Media studies. Routledge. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=345860&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Jones, Geoffrey. 2010. Beauty Imagined: A History of the Global Beauty Industry. Oxford University Press. Electronic resource. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https:idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191573026.
Kasperson, Roger E., Ortwin Renn, Paul Slovic, et al. 1988. ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework’. Risk Analysis 8 (2): 177–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 2005. Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. Key themes in sociology. Blackwell Pub. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=202829&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Larsen, Jonas, and Mette Sandbye, eds. 2014. Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. I.B. Tauris.
Latour, B. 2004. ‘How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies’. Body & Society 10 (2–3): 205–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford University Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=90516&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Leyshon, M., S. DiGiovanna, and B. Holcomb. 2013. ‘Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor?’ Urban Studies 50 (3): 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468897.
Licoppe, C. 2011. ‘What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones’. Cultural Sociology 5 (3): 367–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510378193.
Locke, S. 2005. ‘Fantastically Reasonable: Ambivalence in the Representation of Science and        Technology in Super-Hero Comics’. Public Understanding of Science 14 (1): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048197.
Lupton, Deborah. 2013. Risk. 2nd ed. Key ideas. Routledge. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=485835&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Lupton, Deborah, and John Tulloch. 2002. ‘“Life Would Be Pretty Dull without Risk”: Voluntary Risk-Taking and Its Pleasures’. Health, Risk & Society 4 (2): 113–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015.
MacKenzie, Donald A., and Judy Wajcman. 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd ed. Open University Press.
Magaudda, P. 2014. ‘The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch’. Cultural Sociology 8 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975513484604.
‘Mapping the Field: Specialist Science News Journalism in the UK National Media’. n.d. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html.
Matthewman, Steve. 2011. Technology and Social Theory. Traditions in social theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
McQuire, S. 2013. ‘Photography’s Afterlife: Documentary Images and the Operational Archive’. Journal of Material Culture 18 (3): 223–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513489930.
McVeigh, Brian. n.d. ‘Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan’. Journal of Material Culture (London) 1 (3): 291–312. https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf.
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert. 1982. ‘Joking Apart: Some Recommendations Concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture’. Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 585–613. http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Miller, Steve. 2001. ‘Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads’. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 115–20. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308.
‘Mutton Cut up as Lamb: Mothers, Daughters and Cosmetic Surgery’. 2004. Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.) 18: 525–39. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304&paramdict=en-UK.
Peters, H. P. 1995. ‘The Interaction of Journalists and Scientific Experts: Co-Operation and Conflict between Two Professional Cultures’. Media, Culture & Society 17 (1): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001003.
Peters, H. P., D. Brossard, S. de Cheveigne, et al. 2008. ‘Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider’. Science Communication 30 (2): 266–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324809.
Pickering, Andrew. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=349593&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Pickstone, John V. 2001. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. University of Chicago Press.
Pinto, B., D. Marcal, and S. G. Vaz. 2015. ‘Communicating through Humour: A Project of Stand-up Comedy about Science’. Public Understanding of Science 24 (7): 776–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513511175.
Powell, R. C. 2007. ‘Geographies of Science: Histories, Localities, Practices, Futures’. Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 309–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077081.
Regula Valérie Burri. 2008. ‘Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology’. Social Studies of Science 38 (1): 35–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Renn, Ortwin. 1998. ‘Three Decades of Risk Research: Accomplishments and New Challenges’. Journal of Risk Research 1 (1): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377321.
Riesch, H. 2015. ‘Why Did the Proton Cross the Road? Humour and Science Communication’. Public Understanding of Science 24 (7): 768–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514546299.
Riesch, Hauke, Christian Oltra, Aleksandra Lis, Paul Upham, and Mariette Pol. 2013. ‘Internet-Based Public Debate of CCS: Lessons from Online Focus Groups in Poland and Spain’. Energy Policy 56 (May): 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.029.
Riesch, Hauke, and David J. Spiegelhalter. 2011. ‘Careless Pork Costs Lives: Risk Stories from Science to Press Release to Media’. Health, Risk & Society 13 (1): 47–64. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Schwarz, O. 2010. ‘Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens’. Visual Communication 9 (2): 151–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369982.
Silva, Elizabeth. 2000. ‘The Cook, the Cooker and the Gendering of the Kitchen’. The Sociological Review 48 (4): 612–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00235.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320473&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Stirling, Andrew. 2007. ‘Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle’. EMBO Reports 8 (4): 309–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.
Stocking, S. H., and L. W. Holstein. 2008. ‘Manufacturing Doubt: Journalists’ Roles and the Construction of Ignorance in a Scientific Controversy’. Public Understanding of Science 18 (1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079373.
Storey, John. 2012. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. 6th ed. Pearson. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=390393&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health,iIllness and Medicine. 17 AD. Palgrave MacMillan.
Thompson, Lee, and Julie Cupples. 2008. ‘Seen and Not Heard? Text Messaging and Digital Sociality’. Social & Cultural Geography 9 (1): 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701789634.
Tilley, Chris. 2006. Handbook of Material Culture. SAGE Publications. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=419419&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Turney, Jon. 1998. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. Yale University Press.
Van House, Nancy A. 2011. ‘Personal Photography, Digital Technologies and the Uses of the Visual’. Visual Studies 26 (2): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888.
Vannini, Phillip. 2009. Material Culture and Technology in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Approaches. Intersections in communications and Culture. Peter Lang.
Vialles, Noèelie. 1994. ‘A Place That Is No Place’. In Animal to Edible. Cambridge University Press. https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20VIALLES%20Place.pdf.
Vivienne, S., and J. Burgess. 2013. ‘The Remediation of the Personal Photograph and the Politics of Self-Representation in Digital Storytelling’. Journal of Material Culture 18 (3): 279–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513492080.
‘VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS)’. n.d. http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/.
Wainwright, S. P. 2004. ‘Epiphanies of Embodiment: Injury, Identity and the Balletic Body’. Qualitative Research 4 (3): 311–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047232.
Wajcman, J., M. Bittman, and J. E. Brown. 2008. ‘Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions’. Sociology 42 (4): 635–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091620.
Weingart, Peter, Claudia Muhl, and Petra Pansegrau. 2003. ‘Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film’. Public Understanding of Science 12 (3): 279–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503123006.
Wessels, Bridgette. 2010. Understanding the Internet: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
Woodward, Ian. 2007. Understanding Material Culture. Sage Publications. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255990&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
WYNNE, B. 1992. ‘Uncertainty and Environmental Learning 1, 2Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm’. Global Environmental Change 2 (2): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2.
Yearley, Steven. 2005. Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. SAGE Publications. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37093&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.