‘Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler’ (1 AD) Sociology of health & illness, 18, pp. 198–219. Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834&paramdict=en-UK.
Agar, J. (2013) Constant touch: a global history of the mobile phone. Revised and updated edition. London: Icon.
Allan, S. (2002a) Media, risk, and science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Allan, S. (2002b) Media, risk, and science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Anderson, A. (2005) ‘The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press’, Science Communication, 27(2), pp. 200–220. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281472.
Attias, B., Gavanas, A. and Rietveld, H.C. (2013) DJ culture in the mix: power, technology, and social change in electronic dance music [electronic resource]. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=647332.
Attwood, F. et al. (eds) (2013) Controversial images: media representations on the edge [electronic resource]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=425951&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
BALSAMO, A. (1995) ‘Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture’, Body & Society, 1(3–4), pp. 215–237. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001003013.
Bauer, M.W. (2005) ‘Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), pp. 5–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh054.
Bell, A.R. (2011) ‘Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication’, Science as Culture, 20(4), pp. 491–512. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.605921.
Bell, D. (2006) Science, technology and culture [electronic resource]. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95071&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Berger, A.A. (2014) What objects mean: an introduction to material culture. Second edition. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1253206&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Biagioli, M. (1999) The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.
Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T.J. (2012) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology [electronic resource]. Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=365530&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Bolter, J.D. (1993) Turing’s man: western culture in the computer age. London: Penguin.
Bourdieu, P. (1990) Photography: a middle-brow art. Cambridge: Polity.
Bowler, P.J. and Morus, I.R. (2005) Making modern science: a historical survey. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Camic, C., Gross, N. and Lamont, M. (2011) Social knowledge in the making [electronic resource]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=325024&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Clarke, G. (1997) The photograph. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, H.M. and Pinch, T.J. (2002) The Golem at large: what you should know about technology [electronic resource]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41445&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
‘Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading’ (2007) Feminist media studies, 7, pp. 17–32. Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996&paramdict=en-UK.
David, M. (2005) Science in society [electronic resource]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=86049&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Devine-Wright, P. (2005) ‘Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy’, Wind Energy, 8(2), pp. 125–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124.
van Dijck, J. (2008) ‘Digital photography: communication, identity, memory’, Visual Communication, 7(1), pp. 57–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865.
Epstein, S. (2008) ‘Culture and science / technology: rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, pp. 165–182. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Erickson, M. (2005) Science, culture and society: understanding science in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy) (2 AD). Springer; 2013 edition. Available at: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essentials-Risk-Theory-SpringerBriefs-Philosophy/dp/940075454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1443611624&sr=8-1&keywords=Essentials+of+Risk+Theory.
Garcia-Montes, J.M. (2006) ‘Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones’, Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), pp. 67–82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059287.
Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (2000) Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Persius Books.
Hackett, E.J. and Society for Social Studies of Science (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies [electronic resource]. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=209920&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Hallman, B.C. and Benbow, S.M.P. (2007) ‘Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families’, Social & Cultural Geography, 8(6), pp. 871–888. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701712636.
Hand, M. (2011) Ubiquitous photography [electronic resource]. Cambridge: Polity. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=487274&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Hitchings, R. (2008) ‘Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement: the case of young people in contemporary Singapore’, Journal of Material Culture, 13(3), pp. 251–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508095495.
Hjorth, L., Burgess, J. and Richardson, I. (2012) Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone [electronic resource]. New York, NY: Routledge. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=345860&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Jones, G. (2010) Beauty imagined: a history of the global beauty industry [electronic resource]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https:idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191573026.
Kasperson, R.E. et al. (1988) ‘The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework’, Risk Analysis, 8(2), pp. 177–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
Kleinman, D.L. (2005) Science and technology in society: from biotechnology to the Internet [electronic resource]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=202829&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Larsen, J. and Sandbye, M. (eds) (2014) Digital snaps: the new face of photography. London: I.B. Tauris.
Latour, B. (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004) ‘How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies’, Body & Society, 10(2–3), pp. 205–229. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.
Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory [electronic resource]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=90516&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Leyshon, M., DiGiovanna, S. and Holcomb, B. (2013) ‘Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor?’, Urban Studies, 50(3), pp. 587–605. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468897.
Licoppe, C. (2011) ‘What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones’, Cultural Sociology, 5(3), pp. 367–384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510378193.
Locke, S. (2005) ‘Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and        technology in super-hero comics’, Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), pp. 25–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048197.
Lupton, D. (2013) Risk [electronic resource]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=485835&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Lupton, D. and Tulloch, J. (2002) ‘“Life would be pretty dull without risk”: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures’, Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), pp. 113–124. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015.
MacKenzie, D.A. and Wajcman, J. (1999) The social shaping of technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Magaudda, P. (2014) ‘The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch’, Cultural Sociology, 8(1), pp. 63–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975513484604.
Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media (no date). Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html.
Matthewman, S. (2011) Technology and social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McQuire, S. (2013) ‘Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive’, Journal of Material Culture, 18(3), pp. 223–241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513489930.
McVeigh, B. (no date) ‘Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan’, Journal of Material Culture, 1(3), pp. 291–312. Available at: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf.
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert (1982) ‘Joking Apart: Some Recommendations concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture’, Social Studies of Science, 12(4), pp. 585–613. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Miller, S. (2001) ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads’, Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), pp. 115–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308.
‘Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery’ (2004) Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.), 18, pp. 525–539. Available at: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304&paramdict=en-UK.
Peters, H.P. (1995) ‘The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures’, Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), pp. 31–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001003.
Peters, H.P. et al. (2008) ‘Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider’, Science Communication, 30(2), pp. 266–276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324809.
Pickering, A. (1992) Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=349593&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Pickstone, J.V. (2001) Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester: University of Chicago Press.
Pinto, B., Marcal, D. and Vaz, S.G. (2015) ‘Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about science’, Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), pp. 776–793. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513511175.
Powell, R.C. (2007) ‘Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures’, Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), pp. 309–329. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077081.
Regula Valérie Burri (2008) ‘Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology’, Social Studies of Science, 38(1), pp. 35–62. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Renn, O. (1998) ‘Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges’, Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), pp. 49–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377321.
Riesch, H. et al. (2013) ‘Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain’, Energy Policy, 56, pp. 693–702. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.029.
Riesch, H. (2015) ‘Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication’, Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), pp. 768–775. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514546299.
Riesch, H. and Spiegelhalter, D.J. (2011) ‘Careless pork costs lives: Risk stories from science to press release to media’, Health, Risk & Society, 13(1), pp. 47–64. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049.
Schwarz, O. (2010) ‘Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens’, Visual Communication, 9(2), pp. 151–169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369982.
Silva, E. (2000) ‘The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen’, The Sociological Review, 48(4), pp. 612–628. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00235.
Sismondo, S. (2010) An introduction to science and technology studies [electronic resource]. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320473&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Stirling, A. (2007) ‘Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle’, EMBO reports, 8(4), pp. 309–315. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400953.
Stocking, S.H. and Holstein, L.W. (2008) ‘Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy’, Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), pp. 23–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079373.
Storey, J. (2012) Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction [electronic resource]. 6th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=390393&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health,iIllness and medicine (17 AD). Palgrave MacMillan.
Thompson, L. and Cupples, J. (2008) ‘Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality’, Social & Cultural Geography, 9(1), pp. 95–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701789634.
Tilley, C. (2006) Handbook of material culture [electronic resource]. London: SAGE Publications. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=419419&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
Turney, J. (1998) Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press.
Van House, N.A. (2011) ‘Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual’, Visual Studies, 26(2), pp. 125–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888.
Vannini, P. (2009) Material culture and technology in everyday life: ethnographic approaches. New York: Peter Lang.
Vialles, N. (1994) ‘A place that is no place’, in Animal to edible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–28. Available at: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20VIALLES%20Place.pdf.
Vivienne, S. and Burgess, J. (2013) ‘The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling’, Journal of Material Culture, 18(3), pp. 279–298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513492080.
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS) (no date). Available at: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/.
Wainwright, S.P. (2004) ‘Epiphanies of embodiment: injury, identity and the balletic body’, Qualitative Research, 4(3), pp. 311–337. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047232.
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M. and Brown, J.E. (2008) ‘Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions’, Sociology, 42(4), pp. 635–652. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091620.
Weingart, P., Muhl, C. and Pansegrau, P. (2003) ‘Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film’, Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 279–287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503123006.
Wessels, B. (2010) Understanding the Internet: a socio-cultural perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Woodward, I. (2007) Understanding material culture [electronic resource]. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255990&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.
WYNNE, B. (1992) ‘Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm’, Global Environmental Change, 2(2), pp. 111–127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2.
Yearley, S. (2005) Making sense of science: understanding the social study of science [electronic resource]. London: SAGE Publications. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37093&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity.