Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. (1 C.E.). Sociology of Health & Illness, 18, 198–219. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834&paramdict=en-UK
Agar, J. (2013). Constant touch: a global history of the mobile phone (Revised and updated edition). Icon.
Allan, S. (2002a). Media, risk, and science: Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Open University Press.
Allan, S. (2002b). Media, risk, and science: Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies. Open University Press.
Anderson, A. (2005). The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press. Science Communication, 27(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281472
Attias, B., Gavanas, A., & Rietveld, H. C. (2013). DJ culture in the mix: power, technology, and social change in electronic dance music [Electronic resource]. Bloomsbury Academic. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=647332
Attwood, F., Campbell, V., Hunter, I. Q., & Lockyer, S. (Eds). (2013). Controversial images: media representations on the edge [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=425951&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
BALSAMO, A. (1995). Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture. Body & Society, 1(3–4), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001003013
Bauer, M. W. (2005). Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh054
Bell, A. R. (2011). Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication. Science as Culture, 20(4), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2011.605921
Bell, D. (2006). Science, technology and culture: Vol. Issues in cultural and media studies [Electronic resource]. Open University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95071&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Berger, A. A. (2014). What objects mean: an introduction to material culture (Second edition). Left Coast Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1253206&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
Biagioli, M. (1999). The science studies reader. Routledge.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed) [Electronic resource]. MIT Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=365530&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Bolter, J. D. (1993). Turing’s man: western culture in the computer age. Penguin.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Photography: a middle-brow art. Polity.
Bowler, P. J., & Morus, I. R. (2005). Making modern science: a historical survey. University of Chicago Press.
Camic, C., Gross, N., & Lamont, M. (2011). Social knowledge in the making [Electronic resource]. University of Chicago Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=325024&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Clarke, G. (1997). The photograph: Vol. Oxford history of art. Oxford University Press.
Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (2002). The Golem at large: what you should know about technology: Vol. Canto [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41445&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading. (2007). Feminist Media Studies, 7, 17–32. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996&paramdict=en-UK
David, M. (2005). Science in society [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=86049&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124
Epstein, S. (2008). Culture and science / technology: rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619, 165–182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Erickson, M. (2005). Science, culture and society: understanding science in the twenty-first century. Polity.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy). (2 C.E.). Springer; 2013 edition. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essentials-Risk-Theory-SpringerBriefs-Philosophy/dp/940075454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1443611624&sr=8-1&keywords=Essentials+of+Risk+Theory
Garcia-Montes, J. M. (2006). Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059287
Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (2000). Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Persius Books.
Hackett, E. J. & Society for Social Studies of Science. (2008). The handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed) [Electronic resource]. MIT Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=209920&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Hallman, B. C., & Benbow, S. M. P. (2007). Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(6), 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701712636
Hand, M. (2011). Ubiquitous photography [Electronic resource]. Polity. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=487274&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Hitchings, R. (2008). Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement: the case of young people in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Material Culture, 13(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508095495
Hjorth, L., Burgess, J., & Richardson, I. (2012). Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone: Vol. Routledge research in cultural and media studies [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=345860&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Jones, G. (2010). Beauty imagined: a history of the global beauty industry [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https:idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191573026
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Kleinman, D. L. (2005). Science and technology in society: from biotechnology to the Internet: Vol. Key themes in sociology [Electronic resource]. Blackwell Pub. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=202829&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Larsen, J., & Sandbye, M. (Eds). (2014). Digital snaps: the new face of photography. I.B. Tauris.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2004). How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory: Vol. Clarendon lectures in management studies [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=90516&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Leyshon, M., DiGiovanna, S., & Holcomb, B. (2013). Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor? Urban Studies, 50(3), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468897
Licoppe, C. (2011). What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones. Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510378193
Locke, S. (2005). Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and        technology in super-hero comics. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048197
Lupton, D. (2013). Risk: Vol. Key ideas (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=485835&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Lupton, D., & Tulloch, J. (2002). ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570220137015
MacKenzie, D. A., & Wajcman, J. (1999). The social shaping of technology (2nd ed). Open University Press.
Magaudda, P. (2014). The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch. Cultural Sociology, 8(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975513484604
Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. (n.d.). http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html
Matthewman, S. (2011). Technology and social theory: Vol. Traditions in social theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
McQuire, S. (2013). Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive. Journal of Material Culture, 18(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513489930
McVeigh, B. (n.d.). Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan. Journal of Material Culture, 1(3), 291–312. https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert. (1982). Joking Apart: Some Recommendations concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 585–613. http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/308
Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery. (2004). Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.), 18, 525–539. http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304&paramdict=en-UK
Peters, H. P. (1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001003
Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., de Cheveigne, S., Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., & Tsuchida, S. (2008). Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider. Science Communication, 30(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324809
Pickering, A. (1992). Science as practice and culture. University of Chicago Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=349593&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
Pickstone, J. V. (2001). Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. University of Chicago Press.
Pinto, B., Marcal, D., & Vaz, S. G. (2015). Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about science. Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513511175
Powell, R. C. (2007). Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077081
Regula Valérie Burri. (2008). Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Renn, O. (1998). Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377321
Riesch, H. (2015). Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514546299
Riesch, H., Oltra, C., Lis, A., Upham, P., & Pol, M. (2013). Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain. Energy Policy, 56, 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.029
Riesch, H., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2011). Careless pork costs lives: Risk stories from science to press release to media. Health, Risk & Society, 13(1), 47–64. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
Schwarz, O. (2010). Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens. Visual Communication, 9(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210369982
Silva, E. (2000). The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen. The Sociological Review, 48(4), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00235
Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Wiley-Blackwell. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320473&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Stirling, A. (2007). Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO Reports, 8(4), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
Stocking, S. H., & Holstein, L. W. (2008). Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079373
Storey, J. (2012). Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction (6th ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=390393&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health,iIllness and medicine. (17 C.E.). Palgrave MacMillan.
Thompson, L., & Cupples, J. (2008). Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701789634
Tilley, C. (2006). Handbook of material culture [Electronic resource]. SAGE Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=419419&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
Turney, J. (1998). Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. Yale University Press.
van Dijck, J. (2008). Digital photography: communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication, 7(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207084865
Van House, N. A. (2011). Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies, 26(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888
Vannini, P. (2009). Material culture and technology in everyday life: ethnographic approaches: Vol. Intersections in communications and culture. Peter Lang.
Vialles, N. (1994). A place that is no place. In Animal to edible (pp. 15–28). Cambridge University Press. https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20VIALLES%20Place.pdf
Vivienne, S., & Burgess, J. (2013). The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling. Journal of Material Culture, 18(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183513492080
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS). (n.d.). http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/
Wainwright, S. P. (2004). Epiphanies of embodiment: injury, identity and the balletic body. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 311–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047232
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M., & Brown, J. E. (2008). Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology, 42(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508091620
Weingart, P., Muhl, C., & Pansegrau, P. (2003). Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film. Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662503123006
Wessels, B. (2010). Understanding the Internet: a socio-cultural perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
Woodward, I. (2007). Understanding material culture [Electronic resource]. Sage Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255990&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
WYNNE, B. (1992). Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
Yearley, S. (2005). Making sense of science: understanding the social study of science [Electronic resource]. SAGE Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37093&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity