1.
Matthewman, S. Technology and Social Theory. vol. Traditions in social theory (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2011).
2.
Sismondo, S. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K., 2010).
3.
Storey, J. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. (Pearson, Harlow, England, 2012).
4.
Woodward, I. Understanding Material Culture. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 2007).
5.
Attias, B., Gavanas, A. & Rietveld, H. C. DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and Social Change in Electronic Dance Music. (Bloomsbury Academic, New York, 2013).
6.
Bell, D. Science, Technology and Culture. vol. Issues in cultural and media studies (Open University Press, Maidenhead, England, 2006).
7.
Berger, A. A. What Objects Mean: An Introduction to Material Culture. (Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 2014).
8.
Biagioli, M. The Science Studies Reader. (Routledge, New York, 1999).
9.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. & Pinch, T. J. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2012).
10.
Bowler, P. J. & Morus, I. R. Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, 2005).
11.
Camic, C., Gross, N. & Lamont, M. Social Knowledge in the Making. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2011).
12.
Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. vol. Canto (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).
13.
David, M. Science in Society. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2005).
14.
Erickson, M. Science, Culture and Society: Understanding Science in the Twenty-First Century. (Polity, Cambridge, 2005).
15.
Hackett, E. J. & Society for Social Studies of Science. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2008).
16.
Kleinman, D. L. Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet. vol. Key themes in sociology (Blackwell Pub, Malden, MA, 2005).
17.
MacKenzie, D. A. & Wajcman, J. The Social Shaping of Technology. (Open University Press, Buckingham, 1999).
18.
Pickering, A. Science as Practice and Culture. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
19.
Pickstone, J. V. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. (University of Chicago Press, Manchester, 2001).
20.
Tilley, C. Handbook of Material Culture. (SAGE Publications, London, 2006).
21.
Vannini, P. Material Culture and Technology in Everyday Life: Ethnographic Approaches. vol. Intersections in communications and culture (Peter Lang, New York, 2009).
22.
Wessels, B. Understanding the Internet: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2010).
23.
Yearley, S. Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Study of Science. (SAGE Publications, London, 2005).
24.
Epstein, S. Culture and science / technology: rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 619, 165–182 (2008).
25.
The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health,iIllness and Medicine. (Palgrave MacMillan, 17 AD).
26.
Hitchings, R. Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement: the case of young people in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Material Culture 13, 251–265 (2008).
27.
Magaudda, P. The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch. Cultural Sociology 8, 63–76 (2014).
28.
Powell, R. C. Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography 31, 309–329 (2007).
29.
Silva, E. The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen. The Sociological Review 48, 612–628 (2000).
30.
McVeigh, B. Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan. Journal of Material Culture 1, 291–312.
31.
Allan, S. Media, Risk, and Science. vol. Issues in cultural and media studies (Open University Press, Buckingham, 2002).
32.
Anderson, A. The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press. Science Communication 27, 200–220 (2005).
33.
Bauer, M. W. Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17, 5–22 (2005).
34.
Gregory, J. & Miller, S. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. (Persius Books, Cambridge, MA, 2000).
35.
Peters, H. P. The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society 17, 31–48 (1995).
36.
Peters, H. P. et al. Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider. Science Communication 30, 266–276 (2008).
37.
Riesch, H. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. Careless pork costs lives: Risk stories from science to press release to media. Health, Risk & Society 13, 47–64 (2011).
38.
Stocking, S. H. & Holstein, L. W. Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science 18, 23–42 (2008).
39.
Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html.
40.
BALSAMO, A. Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture. Body & Society 1, 215–237 (1995).
41.
Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery. Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.) 18, 525–539 (2004).
42.
Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading. Feminist media studies 7, 17–32 (2007).
43.
Regula Valérie Burri. Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology. Social Studies of Science 38, 35–62 (2008).
44.
Jones, G. Beauty Imagined: A History of the Global Beauty Industry. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
45.
Latour, B. How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society 10, 205–229 (2004).
46.
Bolter, J. D. Turing’s Man: Western Culture in the Computer Age. (Penguin, London, 1993).
47.
Agar, J. Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone. (Icon, London, 2013).
48.
Garcia-Montes, J. M. Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media, Culture & Society 28, 67–82 (2006).
49.
Hjorth, L., Burgess, J. & Richardson, I. Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. vol. Routledge research in cultural and media studies (Routledge, New York, NY, 2012).
50.
Latour, B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1987).
51.
Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. vol. Clarendon lectures in management studies (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005).
52.
Leyshon, M., DiGiovanna, S. & Holcomb, B. Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor? Urban Studies 50, 587–605 (2013).
53.
Licoppe, C. What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones. Cultural Sociology 5, 367–384 (2011).
54.
Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of health & illness 18, 198–219 (1 AD).
55.
Thompson, L. & Cupples, J. Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality. Social & Cultural Geography 9, 95–108 (2008).
56.
Wainwright, S. P. Epiphanies of embodiment: injury, identity and the balletic body. Qualitative Research 4, 311–337 (2004).
57.
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M. & Brown, J. E. Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology 42, 635–652 (2008).
58.
Devine-Wright, P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 8, 125–139 (2005).
59.
Kasperson, R. E. et al. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis 8, 177–187 (1988).
60.
Lupton, D. Risk. vol. Key ideas (Routledge, London, 2013).
61.
Lupton, D. & Tulloch, J. ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society 4, 113–124 (2002).
62.
Renn, O. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research 1, 49–71 (1998).
63.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy). (Springer; 2013 edition, 2 AD).
64.
Riesch, H., Oltra, C., Lis, A., Upham, P. & Pol, M. Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain. Energy Policy 56, 693–702 (2013).
65.
Stirling, A. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports 8, 309–315 (2007).
66.
WYNNE, B. Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change 2, 111–127 (1992).
67.
Bourdieu, P. Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. (Polity, Cambridge, 1990).
68.
Controversial Images: Media Representations on the Edge. (Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire [England], 2013).
69.
Clarke, G. The Photograph. vol. Oxford history of art (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).
70.
Hand, M. Ubiquitous Photography. (Polity, Cambridge, 2011).
71.
Hallman, B. C. & Benbow, S. M. P. Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families. Social & Cultural Geography 8, 871–888 (2007).
72.
Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. (I.B. Tauris, London, 2014).
73.
McQuire, S. Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive. Journal of Material Culture 18, 223–241 (2013).
74.
Schwarz, O. Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens. Visual Communication 9, 151–169 (2010).
75.
van Dijck, J. Digital photography: communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication 7, 57–76 (2008).
76.
Van House, N. A. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies 26, 125–134 (2011).
77.
Vivienne, S. & Burgess, J. The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling. Journal of Material Culture 18, 279–298 (2013).
78.
Bell, A. R. Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication. Science as Culture 20, 491–512 (2011).
79.
Miller, S. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science 10, 115–120 (2001).
80.
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert. Joking Apart: Some Recommendations concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture. Social Studies of Science 12, 585–613 (1982).
81.
Pinto, B., Marcal, D. & Vaz, S. G. Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about science. Public Understanding of Science 24, 776–793 (2015).
82.
Riesch, H. Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication. Public Understanding of Science 24, 768–775 (2015).
83.
Allan, S. Media, Risk, and Science. vol. Issues in cultural and media studies (Open University Press, Buckingham, 2002).
84.
Locke, S. Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and        technology in super-hero comics. Public Understanding of Science 14, 25–46 (2005).
85.
Turney, J. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. (Yale University Press, New Haven, [Conn.], 1998).
86.
Weingart, P., Muhl, C. & Pansegrau, P. Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film. Public Understanding of Science 12, 279–287 (2003).
87.
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS). http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/.
88.
Vialles, N. A place that is no place. in Animal to edible 15–28 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).