1.
Matthewman S. Technology and social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
2.
Sismondo S. An introduction to science and technology studies [Internet]. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=320473&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
3.
Storey J. Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction [Internet]. 6th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=390393&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
4.
Woodward I. Understanding material culture [Internet]. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2007. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255990&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
5.
Attias B, Gavanas A, Rietveld HC. DJ culture in the mix: power, technology, and social change in electronic dance music [Internet]. New York: Bloomsbury Academic; 2013. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s1123049&direct=true&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&site=ehost-live&scope=site&AN=647332
6.
Bell D. Science, technology and culture [Internet]. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press; 2006. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=95071&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
7.
Berger AA. What objects mean: an introduction to material culture [Internet]. Second edition. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2014. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1253206&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
8.
Biagioli M. The science studies reader. New York: Routledge; 1999.
9.
Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology [Internet]. Anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=365530&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
10.
Bowler PJ, Morus IR. Making modern science: a historical survey. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
11.
Camic C, Gross N, Lamont M. Social knowledge in the making [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=325024&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
12.
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. The Golem at large: what you should know about technology [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41445&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
13.
David M. Science in society [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=86049&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
14.
Erickson M. Science, culture and society: understanding science in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity; 2005.
15.
Hackett EJ, Society for Social Studies of Science. The handbook of science and technology studies [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2008. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=209920&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
16.
Kleinman DL. Science and technology in society: from biotechnology to the Internet [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=202829&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
17.
MacKenzie DA, Wajcman J. The social shaping of technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
18.
Pickering A. Science as practice and culture [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=349593&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
19.
Pickstone JV. Ways of knowing: a new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester: University of Chicago Press; 2001.
20.
Tilley C. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2006. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=419419&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
21.
Vannini P. Material culture and technology in everyday life: ethnographic approaches. New York: Peter Lang; 2009.
22.
Wessels B. Understanding the Internet: a socio-cultural perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
23.
Yearley S. Making sense of science: understanding the social study of science [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=37093&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
24.
Epstein S. Culture and science / technology: rethinking knowledge, power, materiality, and nature. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science [Internet]. 2008;619:165–182. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40375801?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
25.
The Palgrave handbook of social theory in health,iIllness and medicine. Palgrave MacMillan; 17 AD.
26.
Hitchings R. Air conditioning and the material culture of routine human encasement: the case of young people in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Material Culture. 2008 Nov 1;13(3):251–265.
27.
Magaudda P. The Broken Boundaries between Science and Technology Studies and Cultural Sociology: Introduction to an Interview with Trevor Pinch. Cultural Sociology. 2014 Mar 1;8(1):63–76.
28.
Powell RC. Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography. 2007 June 1;31(3):309–329.
29.
Silva E. The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen. The Sociological Review. 2000 Nov;48(4):612–628.
30.
McVeigh B. Commodifying Affection, Authority and Gender in the Everyday Objects of Japan. Journal of Material Culture [Internet]. London: Sage; 1(3):291–312. Available from: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20MCVEIGH%20Commodifying.pdf
31.
Allan S. Media, risk, and science. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.
32.
Anderson A. The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press. Science Communication. 2005 Dec 1;27(2):200–220.
33.
Bauer MW. Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2005 Mar 1;17(1):5–22.
34.
Gregory J, Miller S. Science in public: communication, culture, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Persius Books; 2000.
35.
Peters HP. The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society. 1995 Jan 1;17(1):31–48.
36.
Peters HP, Brossard D, de Cheveigne S, Dunwoody S, Kallfass M, Miller S, Tsuchida S. Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider. Science Communication. 2008 Sept 12;30(2):266–276.
37.
Riesch H, Spiegelhalter DJ. Careless pork costs lives: Risk stories from science to press release to media. Health, Risk & Society [Internet]. 2011 Feb;13(1):47–64. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=a9h&AN=58145021&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s1123049
38.
Stocking SH, Holstein LW. Manufacturing doubt: journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science. 2008 Aug 6;18(1):23–42.
39.
Mapping the Field: Specialist science news journalism in the UK national media [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/riskscienceandhealth/fundedprojects/mappingscience.html
40.
BALSAMO A. Forms of Technological Embodiment: Reading the Body in Contemporary Culture. Body & Society. 1995 Nov 1;1(3–4):215–237.
41.
Mutton cut up as lamb: Mothers, daughters and cosmetic surgery. Continuum (Mount Lawley, WA) [Internet]. 2004;18:525–539. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutton+cut+up+as+lamb%3A+Mothers%2C+daughters+and+cosmetic+surgery&rft.jtitle=Continuum%3A+Journal+of+Media+and+Cultural+Studies&rft.au=Jones%2C+M&rft.date=2004&rft.eissn=1469-3666&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=539&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0280040001304&paramdict=en-UK
42.
Cosmetic surgery and the televisual makeover: A Foucauldian feminist reading. Feminist media studies [Internet]. 2007;7:17–32. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmetic+surgery+and+the+televisual+makeover%3A+A+Foucauldian+feminist+reading&rft.jtitle=Feminist+Media+Studies&rft.au=Heyes%2C+C+J&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=CAX0300060001996&paramdict=en-UK
43.
Regula Valérie Burri. Doing Distinctions: Boundary Work and Symbolic Capital in Radiology. Social Studies of Science [Internet]. 2008;38(1):35–62. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474564?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
44.
Jones G. Beauty imagined: a history of the global beauty industry [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https:idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191573026
45.
Latour B. How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society. 2004 June 1;10(2–3):205–229.
46.
Bolter JD. Turing’s man: western culture in the computer age. London: Penguin; 1993.
47.
Agar J. Constant touch: a global history of the mobile phone. Revised and updated edition. London: Icon; 2013.
48.
Garcia-Montes JM. Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media, Culture & Society. 2006 Jan 1;28(1):67–82.
49.
Hjorth L, Burgess J, Richardson I. Studying mobile media: cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone [Internet]. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=345860&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
50.
Latour B. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1987.
51.
Latour B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=90516&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
52.
Leyshon M, DiGiovanna S, Holcomb B. Mobile Technologies and Youthful Exploration: Stimulus or Inhibitor? Urban Studies. 2013 Feb 1;50(3):587–605.
53.
Licoppe C. What Does Answering the Phone Mean? A Sociology of the Phone Ring and Musical Ringtones. Cultural Sociology. 2011 Sept 1;5(3):367–384.
54.
Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of health & illness [Internet]. 1 AD;18:198–219. Available from: http://cm7ly9cu9w.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor-network+theory%2C+technology+and+medical+sociology%3A+An+illustrative+analysis+of+the+metered+dose+inhaler&rft.jtitle=Sociology+of+Health+and+Illness&rft.au=Prout%2C+Alan&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=219&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=126332834&paramdict=en-UK
55.
Thompson L, Cupples J. Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality. Social & Cultural Geography. 2008 Feb;9(1):95–108.
56.
Wainwright SP. Epiphanies of embodiment: injury, identity and the balletic body. Qualitative Research. 2004 Dec 1;4(3):311–337.
57.
Wajcman J, Bittman M, Brown JE. Families without Borders: Mobile Phones, Connectedness and Work-Home Divisions. Sociology. 2008 Aug 1;42(4):635–652.
58.
Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy. 2005 Apr;8(2):125–139.
59.
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis. 1988 June;8(2):177–187.
60.
Lupton D. Risk [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=485835&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
61.
Lupton D, Tulloch J. ‘Life would be pretty dull without risk’: Voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk & Society. 2002 July;4(2):113–124.
62.
Renn O. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research. 1998 Jan;1(1):49–71.
63.
Essentials of Risk Theory (SpringerBriefs in Philosophy) [Internet]. Springer; 2013 edition; 2 AD. Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Essentials-Risk-Theory-SpringerBriefs-Philosophy/dp/940075454X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1443611624&sr=8-1&keywords=Essentials+of+Risk+Theory
64.
Riesch H, Oltra C, Lis A, Upham P, Pol M. Internet-based public debate of CCS: Lessons from online focus groups in Poland and Spain. Energy Policy. 2013 May;56:693–702.
65.
Stirling A. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. Talking point on the precautionary principle. EMBO reports. 2007 Apr;8(4):309–315.
66.
WYNNE B. Uncertainty and environmental learning 1, 2Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change. 1992 June;2(2):111–127.
67.
Bourdieu P. Photography: a middle-brow art. Cambridge: Polity; 1990.
68.
Attwood F, Campbell V, Hunter IQ, Lockyer S, editors. Controversial images: media representations on the edge [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=425951&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
69.
Clarke G. The photograph. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
70.
Hand M. Ubiquitous photography [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity; 2011. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=487274&entityid=https://idp.brunel.ac.uk/entity
71.
Hallman BC, Benbow SMP. Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families. Social & Cultural Geography. 2007 Dec;8(6):871–888.
72.
Larsen J, Sandbye M, editors. Digital snaps: the new face of photography. London: I.B. Tauris; 2014.
73.
McQuire S. Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive. Journal of Material Culture. 2013 Sept 1;18(3):223–241.
74.
Schwarz O. Negotiating Romance in Front of the Lens. Visual Communication. 2010 May 1;9(2):151–169.
75.
van Dijck J. Digital photography: communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication. 2008 Feb 1;7(1):57–76.
76.
Van House NA. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies. 2011 June;26(2):125–134.
77.
Vivienne S, Burgess J. The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling. Journal of Material Culture. 2013 Sept 1;18(3):279–298.
78.
Bell AR. Science as ‘Horrible’: Irreverent Deference in Science Communication. Science as Culture. 2011 Dec;20(4):491–512.
79.
Miller S. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science. 2001 Jan;10(1):115–120.
80.
Michael Mulkay and G. Nigel Gilbert. Joking Apart: Some Recommendations concerning the Analysis of Scientific Culture. Social Studies of Science [Internet]. 1982;12(4):585–613. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/284829?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
81.
Pinto B, Marcal D, Vaz SG. Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about science. Public Understanding of Science. 2015 Oct 1;24(7):776–793.
82.
Riesch H. Why did the proton cross the road? Humour and science communication. Public Understanding of Science. 2015 Oct 1;24(7):768–775.
83.
Allan S. Media, risk, and science. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2002.
84.
Locke S. Fantastically reasonable: ambivalence in the representation of science and        technology in super-hero comics. Public Understanding of Science. 2005 Jan 1;14(1):25–46.
85.
Turney J. Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 1998.
86.
Weingart P, Muhl C, Pansegrau P. Of Power Maniacs and Unethical Geniuses: Science and Scientists in Fiction Film. Public Understanding of Science. 2003 July 1;12(3):279–287.
87.
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1 (2012) | Institute for Critical Animal Studies (ICAS) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-10-issue-1-2012/
88.
Vialles N. A place that is no place. Animal to edible [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994. p. 15–28. Available from: https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/Library/Digital%20Readings/SO2603%20VIALLES%20Place.pdf